RP586 EMERGENCYTSUNAMI RECONSTRUCTIONPROEJCT Resettlement Action Plan for AIR Land (k Okkium Thoraipakkam Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board I3XECUTIVEI SUNIMAIIY Table of Contents Topic Project Description Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) Census and Socio - Economic Survey Baseline Socio - Economic Characteristics Profile of vulnerable Population Profile of Structure Affected Resettlement Training Implementation f RAP Monitoring and Evaluation Entitlements Matrix List of Families Enumerated at AIR List of Hut dwellers (PAF) at Okkium Thoraipakkam Topo Sketch of AIR Scheme List of Tables 13M13IICENCY TSUNANII ItECONSTRUCTION EDROEJCT Resettlement Action Plan for Project Affected families at AIR Land & Okkium Thoraipakkam TAMIL NADU SLUM CLEARANCE BOARD The Pro-jectDescription 'l'ali~ilNadu Slu~llClearance Board (TNSCB) has taken a major initiative for construction of 3616 multi storied tenements at All India Radio (A.I.R.) Land 'Thiruvottiyur and 2064 families at Okkium Thoraipakkam for the Tsunami affected slum dwellers under the World Bank Assistance. MoEF clearance and CRZ clearance from Government of India have been obtained. Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) Environnlent and Social Assessment for the Construction of Tenements at All lndia Radio Land, Thiruvottiyur and Okkium Thoraipakkam was completed .There is a nced tor assesslnent and evaluation of environlnental and social issues related to the project and provide an Environmental Management Plan for adequate mitigation. Hence as pcr the directions of the World Bank it is felt important for the need of the Resettle~~~entAction Plan (RAP) for the additional 103 project affected families (103 families and one Pothu Nala Sangam - 104 structures) living on the approach road to be resettled at AIR Land and Okkium Thoraipakkam along with the Tsunami affected Resettlement project. 'The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for Project Affected Families of the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board contains the magnitude of resettlement issues and the mitigation of impacts. This report also includes the baseline socio economic characteristics of project affected peopie, the R& R policy provisions, the entitlements, outconies of the public consultation held with community, implementation and monitoring mechanisms and the budget for implementing the R&R Provisions. Based on the outcome of the Environniental and Social Assessment report sub~nittedby tlie Ecosniart consultants and tlie baseline survey carried out by tlie cotnmilnity developnicnt wing ol'Fl'aniilnadi~Slum Clearance Board, the draft RAP report has becli prepared by the 'I'amilnatiu Sltlm clearance board with the aim of filling up the gal's ant1 additional in1hrni;ttion uIlcrc\ cr rccluircd. Stages in Resettle~iientAction Plan (RAP) 'l'he Resettlement Planning involves the following elements: Screening ant1 social inipact assessment Preparation ol'resettlement and rehabilitation entitlements Census survey of tlie I'rqject affected Families Public Consultations and Preparation of' KAI' Objectives of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) 'The objective of the RAP is to improve tlie overall living standards of the persons to be resettled to AIR site. This will be achieved by adopting the following measures: '1.0 provide compensation to project affected for loss of assets 'I'o prepare an action plan for delivery of compensation and assistance prior to resettlement To establish i~lipletnentation procedures including monitoring and evaluation to track the timely progress of implementation. Magnitude of Impact 103 households are being affected due to tlie Relocation and Resettlement of Tsunami affected slum dwellers at the AIR and Okkium Thoraipakkam sites. All the 103 households will be resettled from the two settlements to the respective site. Impact Category /AIR OT I Loss of Houses 72 29 Loss of Commercial Structures 0 0 I Residential& Commercial 1 0 3 / 0 / 1 Loss of Livelihood I 0 3 I O I Magnitude of Impact on Common Properties Resources: 'The Project does not affect any of tlic com~nunityproperties. 1 2.0 C:ENSUS AND SOClO -ECONOMIC SURVEY - A fill1 census survey has been carried out in All India Radio Nagar road side slum and the Okkium Thoraipakkam S~LIIII.Aroilnd 104 Stri~ctureshave been enumerated as the affected structures. 71'l~ecensus survey covered 100% of the affected population within the Project affected area, their assets, and sources of livelihood. The surveys registered the extent of the area affected and document the socio -economic details of the entire affected population. -*- Structured formats were prepared on which the data of the households were - *-- recorde&'"mlformation includes the asset details, ownership details, extent of loss, household information such as religion, age, sex, education, income and other demographic details. During the survey, each structure affected was evaluated for the physical condition, size of the structure, type of roof and value of the structure. 3.0 BASELINE SOCIO - ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS The report presents the socio - economic features of the Project affected slum dwellers in AIR Land and Okkiuln Thoraipakkam. The survey was conducted among all the 103 families affected i.e., 74 families in the AIR Land and 29 families in the Okkium 'I'lioraipakkani. One structure at AIR Land was a common property which belongs to "k'othu Nala Sangam" (Local Welfare Association). Hence, the total number of structures affected are 104 nos. The report was classified into following major components: Social Factor 0:. Economic Factor 0:. Type of loss 0:. *:*Vulnerable Status 3.1 SOCIAL FACTORS I he Social tiictors include the following: Sex 0 3 Religion 0:. Education 0:. Age 0:. *:*Social Category Marital Status 0:. *:*Household Size 3.1.1 SEX AIR OT I Total S. No Head of the Family Nos I % INos 1 O/o I Nos I % 1 IMale 1 63 185 125 1 86 1 88 1 85 1 2 1Female I I I I IS 1 4 1 14 ( 1 5 1 15 Total 1 74 1100 129 1100 1103 1100 ] Gender analysis of the AIR Land slum reveals that 85% of the population are from Male headed households and 15% of them are Felnale headed households. The analysis of the Kannagi nagar slum reveals that 86% of the households are Male headed and 14% of them women headed. 011 the whole 85% of the households are headed by Male me~nbersand 15% of them are Women headed Families. 3.1.2 EDUCATION Tr~bleNo 3.2 Erlrrcrrtiorr 1 Total 'The education status of the affected population reveals that only 49% of them are literates. The above table portrays that 51% of the slun~dwellers are illiterate, followed by 19% educated up to elementary level, 16% of them educated up to 5thprimary level, 12% of them educated up to SSLC level. One of the affected persons was a graduate and none of them have a diploma degree. 3.1.3 RELIGION Table No 3.3 Religiort / / AIR OT 1 TOTAL S.No Religion Nos I I Nos I % 1 Nos 1 % I Hindu 66 89 29 100 95 92 2 Christian I I 0 0 I 1 3 Muslim 7 9 0 0 7 7 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 74 100 29 100 103 100 Data on the religious groups highlights, 92% of the affected population belongs to Hindu religion, followed by 7% Muslims and only one percent belongs to Christian community. 3.1.4. AGE 7irhleNo 3.4 Age AIR / OT I TOTAL Nos 1 1 1 1 1 O/O NOS % NOS % 'fhe table on the age classilicatioli clescribes that 5% in the age group are below 25 years. 23% of the at'l'ected peoplc bciong to the age group of 25 to 35 years, followed by 32"" belonging to the age group of 35 to 45 years and 2 1% of the male are between 45 to 55 years of age. 'l'hc elderly and dependent population, above 55 years constitute 18%. 3.1.4 SOCIAL STRATIFICATION 1 / / / Social AIR OT TOTAL Stratification NOS I I I O/" Nos % Nos % 1 2 MBC / 7 1 9 1 1 3 . 5 1 8 1 8 3 SC 35 47 1 3.5 36 35 Total 74 100 29 100 103 100 L I'he Social category reflects that, 57% of the population belongs to the backward class category followed by 43% of the affected people belonging to the scheduled caste and 8% to most backward class. The data related to the social category highlights the vital role of the PIU in identifyingthe vi~lnerablegroups based on the indigenous characteristics.There is a high ratio of SC popi~lationin AIR land rather than tlie OT site. 3.1.5. MARITAL STATUS Ilirhle No 3.6 ilfnrifrrl Stnt~~s I I S. No Marital Status - AIR OT TOTAL Nos 1 I NOSI I NOSI O h % % 62 84 25 86 87 84 1 1 15 4 14 15 15 . - Unmarriccl I 1 0 0 1 1 Total 74 100 29 100 103 100 -- 'T'he Marital status of the head oi' the households depicts, 84% of them married, fbllowed by 15% of the lamilies as Women I-Ieaded families i.e. widowed. One affected person is unmarried. The data expressed the need for identifying the women headed fan~ilies,since the factor is also included in iinalizing the vulnerability of the family. 3.1.5 HOUSEHOLD SIZE Tnhle No 3.7 Hortselrokl Sizes AIR OT 1 , TOTAL S. No Household Size Nos ( % Nos I % I Nos 1% t Total 1 74 1 100 1 29 1100 1 103 1100 1 The data on the household size of the affected families describes that 30% of the families consist of 3 members in the family, followed by 27% with 4 members, 21% with two members, 16% with 5 members, 2% with single member and 4% with more than 5 members in the family. The average household size calculated reveals that there are 3.5 members per family. 3.2 ECONOMIC FACTORS 'I'lle Econonlic factors include the following *:* Occupation pattern *:* Monthly inconie f* Nuniber of earning members 3.2.1 OCCUPATION Trrhle No 3.8 0cclrl)afiort The Occupation pattern reflects that 17% of the head of the household are engaged as Helpers, followed by15% as construction workers, 3% as Coolis, 5% as street vendors, 60/0as painters and 7 % as drivers and 2% as farmers and 5% are masons, 11% in small business activities and the rest 8% of the affected persons are not engaged in any occupatioi~. 3.2.2 MONTHLY INCOME Table No 3.9 Morttlr!l~Iriconres AIR OT I TOTAL S. No Monthly income Nos I % I NOS 'YOI I NOS I% Total 17-1 1 100 1 29 ( 100 1 103 1100 1 An analysis 011the monthly inconie of the household reflects that 32% of the affected people earn below Rs.1500 per month, l'ollowed by 38% with income range of Ks. 1500-2500 and 15% of the respondents earning Rs.2500-3500 and 7% earn Rs.3500 - 4500 per month. Only 8% of the total households earn more than Rs.4500 per month. 1!40 of the affected families do not have any income. The monthly income is one of the variables to decide the vulnerability status of affected people falling under the BPL category. 33% of the affected people fall under the BPL category. 'I'he average monthly income is calculated at Rs.23 19per month. 3.2.3 EARNING MEMBERS TrrbleNo 3.10 E~rrrrirrgnretirbers irr tlrefanrily The occupational profile of the affected persons was analyzed to assess the number of earning members in the family. The study on the earning members reflects that 58% of the families have a single earning member, followed by 36% of the families having two earning members in the family. Only 4% of the families have three earning members and 1% has more than 3 earning members. An analysis on the average number 01'earning members reflects the average numbel. of earning members as 1.5 members / fiiniilq. 4.0 PROFILE OF VULNERABLE POPULATlON A \t~lncrabilitycriterion of the allkcted population is mentioned as people who Ihll ulicler one of the three ciitcgorics slio~vnbelow: *:+ Below I'overty 1,inc *:* SC IS'I' Women I Ieaded I louseholds 6:. 4.1 VULNERABLE STATUS Trrhle No 4.1 VrrltiernhilityStnrrrs AIR OT TOTAL S. No Vulnerability Nos 1 % Nos 1 % Nos I% I I I I INon Vulnerable 118 1 24 1 17 1 59 135 134 I I I I I I I 2 IVulnerable 56 76 12 41 68 66 Total 74 100 29 100 103 100 Based on the survey findings and physical survey, it is described that 66% of the affected population are vulnerable and 34% of them are non- vulnerable. The vulnerability classiiication is the major focus area for any Resettlement Action Plan, since the entitlements framework will be based on the vulnerable status of the people. .The unit of entitlement for the vulnerable people is the household in general. 4.2 VULNERABLE CATEGORYWISE TnbleNo 4.2 Vrrltrernhility Category wise Among the vulnerable people, 44% of them living below poverty line, 32% of the all'ected masses were Scheduled caste people and 12 % of the families are Women fleaded Families. It is also noted that some of the affected population fall in two or all the thsce category. 5.0 PROFILE OF STRUCTURES AFFECTED 'I'he type of loss of the affected people was broadly classified as structure loss, homestead land loss and livelihood loss. The survey focuses more on the study on the stsucturcs based on their ownership, tenure, type and extent of loss. 5.1 OWNERSHIP OF THE STRUCTURE T(1hleNo 5.1 O~vrrersltipof tlte Strrrctrrre 'I'he ownership of the structure reveals that 65% residents in the area are owner occupants, followed by 35% occupiers (tenants) and hence are also owner occupants. 5.2 PERIOD OF RESIDING IN RENTAL STRUCTURES Table Nu 5.2 Reritnl Strrrctures - Period of Residing Among the rented structures, the tenancy period for 58% is less than 5 years, followed by 25% of the tenants residing for 5 to 10 years, 11% of the tenants for 10 to 15 years and a 6% of then1 residing for more than 15 years. The tenancy period highlights the vital role of the policy makers to decide entitlenient framework for the tenants. 5.3 RENTAL STRUCTURES - RENTAL AMOUNT -- - ltcntetl / I,e;~sed Ilouse - A I R OT TOTAI, Itental , \ n i o ~ ~ ~ i t NOS %S NOS "/a NOS ?4n - ---. . 1 x 5 s than- K1.500 34 04 0 34 94 . -. - . -0 - - - -- ---- --- 500- 1000 0 0 6 - 6- -- . - - - --. -- - - ~~ 1000-I 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- - -- ---- - - 1500-2000-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -- 'l-ot;ll 36 IOU 0 0 36 100 -- Aniong the rented structures. the rental a~noi~nttowards the rented structures depicls 94'K ot' the tenants arc paying less than Rs.500 per month and 6% of them are paying sental amount of Ks.500 to 1000 per month. 'I'he tenants will be the target group to be focused while planning for Resettlement. 5.4 REASONS FOR RESIDING IN THE AREA Tirble No 5.4 Rensorisfor Kesirlirig irt /lie nren / I Reason for Residing A I R I OT I TOTAL S. No in the ~ r e a Nos 1 O/o INOSI INos 1% i-i I Near to workplace 66 89 0 0 66 64 2 To Save Rent 0 0 8 2 8 8 8 Friends and Relatives Staying near by 3 4 1 3 4 4 L I ~vailabilit~of Land 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 5 1 3 5 5 5 1 Others 1 1 19 66 20 19 Total 74 100 29 100 103 100 The Survey focuses on the interest of the people, the reasons for residing in the area, which reveals that 64% of the people are residing in the area since it is at close proximity near by to the work place, 8% to save the rent, 4% reported the reason as friends and relatives staying nearby and 5% are residing due to availability of land and 19 percent reported various other reasons. 5.5. TYPE OF STRUCTURE TableNo 5.5 Typeof Strudures In order to ascertain the loss of structure, the survey focused on the type of structure in which the affected people were living. It is observed that 74% of the affected people are li(ring in Kutcha type roofed houses, followed by 16% in Pucca structures and 9% in Semi - pucca structures. The housing condition of the affected people is one main variable to ascertain the living condition of the people. Since the data reveals more than 74% as residing in thatched roof houses which needs special attention of the policy makers to frame the entitlements matrix. 5.6 TYPE OF LOSS TableNo 5.6 Typeof Loss The survey findings depicts that 97% structures affected were residential structures and 3% of them are both residential and commercial. No homestead land is affected. 5.7 EXTENT OF STRUCTURAL LOSS TableNo 5.7 Extent of StructuralLoss 5 1Above40 10 14 0 0 10 10 Total 7-1 100 29 100 103 100 An analysis was attempted to describe the extent of the loss for the affected structures, which state that 42% of the structures with loss of 10 to 20 sq.mts., followed by 28% with loss of 20-30 sq.mts, 13% living in houses less than 10 Sq.mt. 8 % of them in house size ranging from 30-40Sq.mt. and 10% of them losing more than 40 sq.mts house. All the commercial structures are below 10Sq.mts. The average area lost by the affected people account for 20.30 sq.mts. 5.8DETAILS OF STRUCTURAL LOSS In All India Radio Land Project ,out of 75 Project affected families(PAF) ,39 are owner occupied and 35 are tenants and one belongs the welfare association. As all of them are residing in the project affected area, they are eligible for allotment of one tenement. Among the 39 owners, 23 owners have erected 35 additional temporary structures and let it out on rent. Only 7 owners are living in permanent structures and the value of their structures have been ascertained.( see annexure). The compensation is to be paid only for 4 owners as the value of their houses exceeds Rs.2.50 Lakh which is the cost of one tenement proposed to be constructed by Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board at AIR Land. The compensations have been calculated based on PWD Circular Memo No. HDO(A) 4851812003 dated 07.05.2007. However, at the time of shifting, the compensation would be revised, if necessary, based on the then prevailing rates as per PWD norms. In Okkium Thoraipakkarn and All India Radio Land Project the valuation of the affected structures reveals 31% of the structures at Rs.40,000 and above, 35% of the affected structures valued at RslOOOO -20000, followed by 19% valued at Rs.20000- 30000, 8% of the structures valued at Rs.30000 -40000 and 7% less than Rs.10000 respectively. Among the commercial structures, one structure cost is valued at Rs.10000- 20000, another valued at Rs. 20000 - Rs.30000 and third one was valued at Rs. 30000- 40000 respect~vely.(ReferTable 5.8 B -Annexure ) .UI& 5.9 COMPENSATION The Project Affected Families will be rehabilitated at new site which belongs to Government and will be eligible for compensationfor structural loss only. The owner occupants will be given an assistance which will be the difference between the value of their own structure affected and cost of the unit to be given by TNSCB. As per table 5.8 A, four owner families are to be assisted with Rs.5,05,388/-. The occupants (tenants) in the Project Affected Area will be given only the housing units. The owners of the structures, tenants, squatters and encroachers who are eligible for housing units at the new site will be paid a shifting allowance of Rs.1,0001- per family. 5.10 LIVELIHOOD LOSS Tab12No 5.9 Livelikood loss Liveliboh Loss1 AIR I OT I TOTAL S1No month in Rs 1 1 I Below 1000 5 (Above4000 I O I O I 0 I O I O I O Total 1 2 11001 0 ( 0 1 2 1100 The data on the livelihood loss highlights that 2 of the affected population lost the~rlivelihood due to resettlement. Hence this connotes that the PIU should focus on income restoration mechanism for the people losing their livelihood. 5.11 EXTENT OF LIVELIHOOD LOSS Tab&No 5.10 Extent of I.ivrlihood loss Livelihood Loss 1 The data on the livelihood loss highlights the extent of the livelihood lost, with 50% of the people who have lost their livelihood in the income range of Rs.1000 - 2000 and 50% their income of Rs.1000-2000. 6. RESETTLEMENT 6.1 OPTION FOR RESETTLEMENT The household survey also covered the consent of the people to move to new site, which shows that 100% of the affected families were ready for relocation. TableNo 6.1 Optionfor Resdtlement S.No Opted forResettlement No ?A 1 Yes 103 100 2 No 0 0 Total 103 100 6.2 DISTANCES FROM RESETTLEMENT SITE The household survey focused on the awareness level among the affected people about the identified resettlement site. 72% of the people were aware of the site and opined that the site is within 0.5 Krn distance from the present area.28% of people living in Okkium Thoraipakkam opined that the site is more than 1 Krn from their original site. TrrbleNo 6.2 Distrrrtcefront the settlerneritto tire ResettlenretttSite S. No Distance to Site No % 1 Withiti 0.5 km 74 72 2 0.5-1.0Klll 0 0 3 ' More 'l'lian IKin 29 28 .l'otal 103 100 7.0 TRAINING 'I'l1e l~ousel~oldsurvey tindings were not only limited to analyze the socio - economic factors, but also attempted to find out potential population eligible for Skill Training programme after resettlement. It is noted that the eligibility criteria has been fixed as I8 years to 35 years with minimum of 8"' standard qualification. This table depicts the eligible number of'niale and female to whom the training shall be focused. Tr~bleNo 7.1 Eligible rrtentbersfor Trniriirtg The eligibility table describes that out of the eligible members, 45% of them are Males and 55% of them are Females. Public consultation: Public consultation meeting were held for the better understanding of the perceptions, concerns and responses of the project affected. The outcomes of these meetings held during the preparation of Environment and Social Impact Assessment helped the TNSCB in formulating the strategies for the affected people. The consultation was held in the following ways. individual consultation by 'rNSCB during Socio Economic Survey Meeting held with the local communities by ECOSMART and the Community development wing. Ilistrict lcvel Public Meeting Stake I-loldersConsultation Meeting held involving the Project Affected I'coplcs. Consultalits. NtiO's and lead (jovcrnmcnt Agencies Livelihood Losses in the Project: 12ivelihoodloss in the project includes the no11 -land based economic activities. Apart li.om the loss of the structirres for a household, the project involves the loss of livelihood ol' an individual by losing employn~entdue to closure of business and change of'place. Income Restoration Schemes: 'To compensate the loss of livelihood, assistance shall be given to reestablish his /her livelihood and income, as per the provisions in the entitlement matrix. The in~plementationof the Income restoration programme shall be carried out as follows: * Identification of suitable income generating enterprises. * Sustainable economic generation options to be discussed with the affected people through consultation process * Establishing links between skill training, credit availability and marketing * Feasible studies for each business options to be made * Field level monitoring on the income generation programmes and facilitation by the PIU Database Management: J'he details collected from the census survey and enlistment survey will be compiled. An external database management specialist shall be appointed for establishing the database. The external consultant shall train the PIU for updating and retrieval of the database. The key tasks for the database establishment involve: *3 Establishing the input formats *3 Designing outputs for periodical reports *:* 'Training the PIU staff on DBMS lmplemeritation Agency: A well-deiined institutional arrangement and implementation mechanism is very important tor timely and successful implementation of any plan. The success or failure of a Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R&R) progranime predominantly depends on the ot'licers responsible for its implementation. Therefore it is appropriate to define the type of' institutional arrangement and impleilientation mechanism proposed for the R&R programme. ln~plementationAuthority The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (TNSCB) which is responsible for the implenlentation of this project, 'Tenements for Tsunami affected at All India Radio Site in Thiruvottiyur' and the Okkium Thoraipakkan , and other related components will be responsible for the implelilentation of the Resettlement Plan (RP).The TNSCB will constitute Project Implenienting Unit (PIU) which will be under the direction of the Executive Engineer, Division I and FAP, TNSCB, who are responsible for coordination of all components of resettlement. The PIU will be staffed with an Officer - Resettlement and Rehabilitation of the rank of Assistant Executive Engineer (AEE-RR) fro111 the same Divisional Office. The AEE-RR will be supported by one Community Development Officer and Community Officer with experience in consultation and relocation activities, for a period of three months (intermittently) or till the end of the implementation of the RI'. RAP facilitation Since this project involves allotment of tenements in the proposed project as resettlement measure for 103 PAFs and providing livelihood assistance to 2 PAFs, there is no need for a separate NGO to facilitate the RP implementation and the same can be undertaken by the Community Development Officer of TNSCB who will be involved in thc implementation of this KI'. 'l'hc designated Commiinity Llevelop~nentOftice (CDO) of TNSCB will be responsible li)r tl~eli)llowing tasks: Ilevelop rapport with I'AI:s issire ol'photo identity cartls to each ol'the I'A1:s after completing the verification Vcriljl the genuineness of' the 1'AI:s who were not identitied at the time of baseline socioeconomic survey 1'0 create awareness about the resettlement and rehabilitation measures Explain and counsel why some PAl:s are beneficiaries and why some are not (as absentee owners will not be entitled for alternate house) Assist the PAFs in allotting dwelling units in the proposed tenements Assist the PAFs in the transition Disbursement of funds Ensure that the PAFs obtain the assistance that is allocated to them Accompany and represent the PAFs at the grievance redressal committee meetings, and Carry out any other responsibilities as required and identified to facilitate and provide alternative livelihoods for the rehabilitated Project Supervision In order to oversee the timely implementation of the programme and take appropriate decisions from time to time, the Project Management Unit (PMU) constituted at CRA will meet periodically to discuss the progress made in the RP implementation and take timely decisions to overcome any operational difticulties. lnlplementation of RAP 'The entire programme will be implemented over a period of 3 months (intermittent). Each entitled unit (family/persons) will be issued an identity card that will list the support mechanisms and amount of assistance to be given. The PIU will be established exclusively for the purpose of implementing the RP in order to complete the implementation in twelve weeks. I-Iowever if there is any delay in implementation due to unforeseen circumstances, the period of PIU will be extended accordingly. The in~pletnentationof the RAI' involves the following activities: * FinalizationofCut-offdate * Notification forclearanceofencroachmentsandSquattersforresettlement * EnlistmentoftheStructuresof-thelJrojectaff'ected * Estimationoftheimpactof1,oss oftheprojectaffected * IssueofIDCards * PreparationofPA1;sforresettlement * DisbursemelitofR&RcashAssistancefortheaffectedpeople * RelocationandresettlementofPAFs. Community Participation for Implementation of RAP During the implementation of the RAP, as a follow up action for the consultations held continuous participation of community has been envisaged through three levels: *:* At the first level disseminating the information on the finalized entitlements package and options for each category. +:* Second level participation will be ensured through reaching agreements on the compensation and assistance and finalizing the project affected through issue of ID Cards *:* The third round involves the disbursement of compensation and assistance amounts when the actual resettlement process began after obtaining the approval of the PIU. Gender issues in the Project Realizing the need for gender issues, the R&R policy includes the Women Headed Households as the vulnerable groups. These households will be entitled for all assistances under vulnerable category. The impact assessment will focus on the women gender in specific. The concerns and the responses of the women during the consultation meetings will be addressed. Plan for Continuous Participation 1;ollow-up consultution will be held prior to the resettlement. The stake holders' \\orhshops are to be conductcd, wherein the PAI:s shall be csplaincd as to how the issues raised during the earlier corisul~atiotishave been or not been addressed in the linal design. Co-ordination with civil works 'l'he I'IU will be responsible for coordination of civil works and the RP for timely relocation of the I'AFs. The I'IU will be responsible for the overall co-ordination of RP ~inciwill ensure that construction of tene~nentsare complete and all related amenities are in placc before advising the PAFs to relocate to the tenements allotted to them. Further, it will be the responsibility of the PIU to ensure that the widening of the approach road in the Western side is not taken up for construction until all PAFs occupy their respective tenements. By ensuring this the shifting of PAFs temporarily does not arise and the PAFs can continue to live in the same place until the tenements are ready for occupation. The PIIJ will also ensure that the western side of the site is adequately safeguarded during construction operation. Training and Development of Staff To strengthen the PIU, a couple of training activities will be planned for the duration of the project. These training programmes will cover subjects such as policy framework, identification and verification of beneficiaries, public consultations, resettlement action plan, compliance, and coordination with civil work. Resettlement site Based on the feedback obtained during the socio-economic survey, wherein all PAFs had opted for a house in the AIR site being developed to house Tsunami affected, there is no need for identifying, selecting and developing a separate resettlement site. Steps in Implementation The main steps in irnplelnentation of the programme include: Establishment of the I'IU Imparting training to the staff to be involved in implementation Issuing identity cards to I'A1:s Ilisburselnent of RP assistance Consultation and allotn~entof dwelling units Delively of completed dwelling units fit for occupation and Impact evaluation Grievances Redressal Mechanism Any aggrieved PAFs will be directed to approach the Executive Engineer, TNSCB and forwarded to the Chief Engineer (TNSCB) subsequently at the first level. Further if the PAFs are not satisfied, they may approach Assistant Commissioner / DMR and DRO 1 K&R of Project Management Unit Office at Ezhilagam. Petitions received will be acknowledged within 7 days from the date of receiving the petition. The action taken on the grievance will be communicated to the aggrieved PAF through registered letter within 30 days Sronl the date of receipt of the petition. The project affected person can go through these two levels of grievance redressal forum available to the PAF and if not satisfied can appeal in the Court of Law. Step-by-step process for registering and redressing of grievances, response time, comn~unicationmodes, mechanism for appeal and the provisions to approach civil courts in case of other provision fail will be disseminated. These will be prepared in the local language and distributed to all the PAFs at the time of issuing identity cards. Monitoring and Evaluation 'Though sizeable number of PAFs are involved, the impact to the PAFs is one and the same and hence TNSCB itself can do the concurrent monitoring. A consultant will be appointed who would undertake an impact evaluation, six months after the implementation of the RP. 'I'NSCB will monitor the R&R activities and prepare monthly 23 progress reports in terms of physical and financial indicators and submit the same to the Special Ot'ficer, ETRPITEAI'. 111addition, the monitoring process will also look into the com~nunicationand reactions of PAFs, use of grievance procedures and intormation to 1'AI.s oli benefits, options and i~npleme~ltationtimetable. 'The progress report will be revieweti by the PMU. 1"orthe impact evaluation tlie consultant would collect primary data from the PAFs cu~dcompare tlie salne with the BSS data collectetl. Some of the key socio-economic indicators that would be used to assess the success of the project are listed below: 'l'ype ol'dwelling unit Size of dwelling unit Access and quality of basic amenities such as water, electricity, toilet, separate kitchen, and Income levels Entitlements Matrix ENTITLEMENTS - I ELIGIBILITY Entitlements Category Compensation for No Such Cases Ni1 Land Compensation for Owners of the All the Families residing in Structures Structures,Occupants, Government Land, will be Squattersand provided with Built House Encroachers approximately of 270 Sq.mt. without any cost in the proposed site. For the structures whose value exceeds the unit cost of alternate built house the balance will be given as assistance. * Unit cost of the alternate built house is Rs.2,50,000/- ShiRing:Assistance Owners of the for theioss of Structures,Tenants, Rs.1000/-will be provided Complete structures Squattersand as shiftingassistance. Encroachers Owners of the Those who have lost their Structures,Tenants, livelihood. Alternate Shops Loss of Livelihood and will be provided in the I Encroachers I proposed site. Costs and Budget S1. No Items Amount (Rs.) 1 R&R Cash Assistance - 5,05,388 Compensation for the Structures 2 Shiftingallowanceto 103families 1,03,000 @, Rs. 10001-per family Grand Total 6,08,388 Chief Community Development Officer VALUE OF STRUCTURAL LOSS TableNo: 5.8 A- Valueof Cornpensotionto bepaid for the 0WNERoccupiedpermanent structura at AIR londprojec~ Door Nn. Value of Structure Value of PI-oposed Compensation to SI. No: as per PWD * Tenement by TNSCB be paid 1 3 1,71,171 2,50,000 N11 2 8 3 24,790 2,50,000 74,790 - -- - -.- -----. .- ------ - ---- 3 12 2,49,660 2,50,000 N I ~ 4 17 4,18,950 2,50,000 1,68,950 - - - --- --- 5 21 495,743 2,50,000 2,45,743 6 53 1,71,851 2,50,000 N11 7 58 2,65,905 2,50,000 15,905 20,!M,070 17JOpOO 545J88 ~--- Total..- * F w ~TMNOI-DO48518??65?i,da&i (A) 07 05 2007 TableNo 5.8 B- Valueof StructumlLoss at OTP &AIR h d sites. 5 I Above 40000 32 43 0 0 32 31 Total 74 100 29 100 103 100 List of families enumerated at AIR Nagar / SI. Door If. Tenant Name Name Owner Tenant L o No of the Owner 1 Muthu / Kandasan~y Owner --- --- 2 Durga I Natarajan --- Tenant Kandasamy Mohamed Ayisha / Naina 3 Owner --- --- Mohatned I I Naina --- Tenant ri Mohammed j -- 5 1Ilhana I Shanmugam / owner I --- --- L- 6 Pawnarilma 1Ganesan --- I Tenant Dhana 1 7 7 Sasikala 1Abimanvu Owner I --- --- Ti L-8 ~utharnmal1~uniHndi I owner 1 --- --- 1 -- Kannammal Munniammal --- Tenant Muniandi (Daughter) --- i 10 8B Yella~~~malI Sankar Tenant Muniandi - - 11 9 Sabira / Mahaboo Basha Owner --- --- 12 10 SakirabeeIRahman Basha --- Tenant Narayanan 13 1 1 PushpaIMari --- Tenant Narayanan 14 11A Saratha / Narayanan Owner --- --- 15 12 Vengadasangaml Owner --- --- Santhanakrishnan 6 13 Neela iKattan Owner --- --- 17 14 Gandimathi / Remesh Owner --- --- 18 15 Shanthil Eruchappan Owner --- --- 19 16 Saina / Anbu --- Tenant Eruchappan 20 17 Gani 1Selvaraj Owner --- --- 21 18 MaryIRaji --- Tenant Selvaraj 22 19 Malli~a/Kuonusaniv --- Tenant Selvarai 31 25A Malliga / Pakkiri --- Tenant Manonmani 32 25B Phiolomina / Kumar --- Tenant Manonmani 33 26 Rose1Krishnamoorthy Owner --- --- 34 26A Jeyanthi I Ravi --- Tenant Krishnamoorthy 35 27 Menaga / OmGanesh --- Tenant Krishnarnoorthy Annexure -3 List of owner occupied Project Affected Families at Okkium Thoraipakkam S.No Name of the beneficiary 1 Shyamma / Baskar 2 Chandra / Venugopal 3 Raji 1Durai kannu 4 Ammu I Mohan 5 Manikandan / Meenakshi 6 Kala / Murali 7 Ravi I Anjalai 8 Unnamalai / Murugan 9 Shanthi / Munusamy 10 Sarasu 1Annamalai 11 Elumalai 1Muthamma 12 Krishnamurthi 1Sarasu 13 Usha / Annamalai 14 Adh Lakshmi IJagadeesan 15 Saroja / Balu 16 Radha 1Subramani 17 Babu I Peirasamy 18 Babi I Sasi 19 Selvi / Mani 20 Renuka / Shankar 21 Vani / Elumalai 22 Jayalakshmi 1Karupaiah 23 Mekala I Karunakaran 24 Manjula 1Nagarajan I S.No Name of the beneficiary 25 Lakshmi 1Muthiah 26 Dhanalakshmi 1Kumar 27 Nandhini 1Selvaraj 28 Raju 1Selvakani 29 Selvi 1 Balakrishnan 171, J-L ----- z; LIT