E476 Vol. 1 Female Secondary School Assistance Project-1I (P044876) Environmental Analysis I. Project Description: The project development objective is to improve quality of, and girls access to, secondary education in rural areas of Bangladesh. The proposed project is a sequel to the IDA financed Female Secondary School Assistance Project (FSSAP) (1993-2001), and responds to the Government request for IDA assistance to build upon the success of that project. The FSSAP II project sustains improved gender equity, and adds activities and incentives to increase the quality of education in participating schools and to improve both the management capacity of the Ministry of Education and monitoring and accountably mechanisms at the community level. The project will address institutions in 119 Upazillas throughout Bangladesh distributed as follows: 12 Upazillas in Barisal Division; 15 Upazillas in Chittagong Division; 32 Upazillas in Dhaka Division; 19 Upazillas in Khulna Division; 32 Upazillas in Rajshahi Division and 8 Upazillas in Sylhet Division II. Key Environmental Issues: The principal environmental concerns regarding FSSAP II relate to the need to ensure the provision of safe drinking water, and the provision and maintenance of adequate sanitation. 1. Ensuring the Provision of Safe Drinking Water After contamination of tubewells with naturally occurring arsenic was identified as a national problem, testing was initiated of tubewells installed under FSSAP I. To date, approximately 60% of the tubewells installed under FSSAP I have been tested, of which some 14% have been found contaminated with arsenic at concentrations above the national standard for drinking water. Actions have been designed under FSSAP II to address the following aspects of this environmnental challenge: * Provision of safe drinking water at schools without tubewells; * Testing of tubewells for arsenic contamination; and, * Provision of alternative safe drinking water at schools with arsenic contaminated tubewells. 2. Provision and Maintenance of Sanitation The provision of safe sanitation is a first step towards creating a healthy physical learning environment. Experience demonstrates, however, that to derive the full health benefits, FLE COPY latrines must be appropriately designed, in a good functional state, used by all students and teaching staff, and the users need to practice adequate hygiene behavior. Guidelines for the Improvement of School Sanitation have been developed, and should inform the design, maintenance and use of latrines under FSSAP II. III. Proposed Mitigation Plans: Ensuring the Provision of Safe Drinking Water 1. Provision of safe drinking water at schools without tubewells Nationally, it is estimated that approximately 30% of Shallow Tubewells (STWs) are arsenic contaminated, compared with only 1-2% of Deep Tubewells (DTWs). To minimize the risk of arsenic contamination, FSSAP II will not support the installation of any further STWs, but will provide DTWs for schools that do not have any safe drinking water. DTWs will be installed by the Local Government Engineering Department (LGED), following the guidelines for installation of DTWs to be developed by the Local Government Division (LGD) as part of the national arsenic mitigation program. In all cases, newly installed DTWs will be tested for arsenic contamination as indicated below. 2. Testing of tubewells for arsenic contamination All tubewells (STW or DTW) installed under FSSAP I and II must be tested for arsenic contamination on installation, and given that groundwater conditions may change, they should be retested six months later, and annually thereafter. If required, FSSAP II will provide retroactive funding to complete the initial testing of tubewells installed under FSSAP I. This testing will be conducted at either private or Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE) laboratories. These services will be selected on a competitive basis from among those laboratories that performed satisfactorily in the Inter-Laboratory Comparison conducted in 2001 by IAEA and WHO. The Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education (DSHE) will be responsible for contracting these services, and Upazila Project Officers (UPOs) will be responsible for coordinating the collection of samples, recording results and informing School Management Committees (SMCs). SMCs will ensure that all arsenic contaminated tubewells are painted red, following national practice, and will instruct pupils and staff not to use water from these tubewells for drinking or cooking. Installation of new DTWs under FSSAP II will only be approved if arsenic testing immediately on installation can be guaranteed. SMCs, with the assistance of UPOs, may either contract this testing from a laboratory approved by the DSHE, or may seek the commitment of the ward-level arsenic mitigation committee, to be established under the national arsenic mitigation program, to test their DTW using field test kits. SMCs will also be responsible for ensuring that the ward-level arsenic mitigation committee conducts follow-up testing of FSSAP I and II tubewells, six months after installation and annually thereafter. The UPO will maintain records of tubewell testing and status, which will be compiled nationally by DPHE. 3. Provision of alternative safe drinking water at schools with arsenic contaminated tubewells In cases where FSSAP I or II tubewells are found to be arsenic-contaminated, FSSAP II will support the provision of alternative safe drinking water. In cases where STWs are found to be contaminated, LGED will be contracted to install a DTW, following the national guidelines to be developed by LGD, and provided that according to these guidelines, local conditions are considered appropriate. In the few cases that DTWs are not considered appropriate, or are found to be arsenic contaminated, alternative options will be considered by the SMC in consultation with the ward-level arsenic mitigation committee. The options to be considered should be those validated by the Government under the national arsenic mitigation program, and may include arsenic removal technologies, or alternative sources such as rain-water harvesting, dug-wells or pond-sand filters. Provision and Maintenance of Sanitation The Guidelines for Improvement of School Sanitation, deVeloped in June 2001 by the International Training Network at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, together with the International Water and Sanitation Centre, should be used to help guide the design, maintenance and use of latrines supported by FSSAP II. The Guidelines are attached as Annex 1. The Guidelines, and accompanying fact sheets which describe different types of latrines, will help SMCs to determine what improvements in school sanitation are needed, and which technical options will be most suitable considering local environmental and social conditions, and the capacity of the school to operate and maintain them. Dissemination of these guidelines will be built into the training to be provided to the UPOs and SMCs. IV. Institutional Arrangements The project will be implemented over a five year period (2001-2006) in 119 rural Upazillas. The DSHE will be the lead agency for the project. As under the current FSSAP, an Inter-Ministerial Steering Committee, chaired by the Secretary MoE, will facilitate project implementation, and provide policy and decision making guidance. Implementation of the current FSSAP is managed by a PIU and the local Upazilla Project Offices (UPO) with Steering Committee Oversight provided by MoE/DSHE. The responsibility of implementation for FSSAP II has been shifted to the Program Management Unit (PMU) which is to be established within the MoE/ DSHE. With the guidance of UPOs, SMCs will be responsible for ensuring that school tubewells are tested for arsenic. SMCs may either contract this testing from a laboratory approved by the DSHE, or may obtain testing using field test kits from the ward-level arsenic mitigation committee, to be established under the national arsenic mitigation program. SMCs will also be responsible for ensuring that the ward-level arsenic mitigation committee conducts follow-up testing of tubewells, six months after installation and annually thereafter. The UPO will maintain records of tubewell testing and status, which will be compiled nationally by DPHE. DSHE will ensure that the Guidelines for Improvement of School Sanitation are disseminated through the UPOs to the SMCs. The design and maintenance of latrines, and requirements for arsenic testing of tubewells, will be incorporated into the training to be provided to UPOs and SMCs. Selection of latrine design, as well as construction and maintenance will be the responsibility of SMCs, with clearance to be provided by UPOs. V. Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring and Evaluation activities for FSSAP II will be built into the current DSHE program, with the goal of ensuring accountability and monitoring of development objectives. On the basis of reports submitted by SMCs, UPOs will be responsible for recording the installation of tubewells, the dates and outcomes of arsenic testing, the construction of latrines, and their operating and hygienic condition. UPO records will be compiled by DSHE, who will also contract annual audits of arsenic testing by an independent institution, which will retest a representative sample of the tubewells installed under FSSAP I and II. The records compiled by DSHE and the independent verification of arsenic testing will be submitted for review by IDA during supervision missions. With the guidance of UPOs, SMCs will be responsible for ensuring that school tubewells are tested for arsenic. SMCs may either contract this testing from a laboratory approved by the DSHE, or may obtain testing using field test kits from the ward-level arsenic mitigation committee, to be established under the national arsenic mitigation program. SMCs will also be responsible for ensuring that the ward-level arsenic mitigation committee conducts follow-up testing of tubewells, six months after installation and annually thereafter. The UPO will maintain records of tubewell testing and status, which will be compiled nationally by DPHE. DSHE will ensure that the Guidelines for Improvement of School Sanitation are disseminated through the UPOs to the SMCs. The design and maintenance of latrines, and requirements for arsenic testing of tubewells, will be incorporated into the training to be provided to UPOs and SMCs. Selection of latrine design, as well as construction and maintenance will be the responsibility of SMCs, with clearance to be provided by UPOs. V. Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring and Evaluation activities for FSSAP II will be built into the current DSHE program, with the goal of ensuring accountability and monitoring of development objectives. On the basis of reports submitted by SMCs, UPOs will be responsible for recording the installation of tubewells, the dates and outcomes of arsenic testing, the construction of latrines, and their operating and hygienic condition. UPO records will be compiled by DSHE, who will also contract annual audits of arsenic testing by an independent institution, which will retest a representative sample of the tubewells installed under FSSAP I and II. The records compiled by DSHE and the independent verification of arsenic testing will be submitted for review by IDA during supervision missions. Annex 1 Guidelines for Improvement of School Sanitation (will be included)