Ethiopian Roads Authority I RP1 36 Volume 5 FINAL REPORT RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN PACKAGE 'A' ROAD PROJECTS NAZARETH - ASSELA DODOLA AND SHASEMENE GOBA March 2003 ;SULT Pan African Consultants Plc. In association with AFRO-CONSULT J , Ethiopiant Roads Aruthoerty PAA'AF and AFRO Consult Nazarelh - Assela - Dodola and Shiashiemene - Goba Road Upgtading Project TABLE OF CONTENTS I EXECUTIVE SUIMMARY .................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION ............ .......... 2 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION........... .2......................... ............... . . 2 1 3 DESCRIPTIONOFTHEPROJECTAREA. ............. ............ 3 1 4 LEGAL FRAMEWORK ...... .... . . .. ............... .3 1 5 POTENTIAL SOCIAL IMPACIS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ........ ........... ....... 3 1.6 IMPLEMENTATION OF RAP AND MONITORING PLAN....... ..... 5 2 INTRODUCTION ............. 7 2.1 BACKGROUND ......... . ..7 2.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE RAP ..... ..............7....... . ................ .7 2.3 METHODOLOGY.. ...... ..... .7... . . . 7 2 4 REPORT STRUCTURE ... .... ....... .... - . g 2 5 THE TEAM COMPOSITION FOR THE PREPARATION OF RAP .................9. ............... ............... 9 3 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PROJECT ROADS. I 3 1 BACKGROUND .... .... ............... .. .............................. ..... .11 3 2 NAZARETH-ASSELA SECTION ................ . ....... - . . ......... ...... 12 3.3 ASSELA -DODOLA SECTION .................. .......... ......... .. ... ... 12 3.4 SHASHEMENE- DODOLA SECTION ......CTION......... ... . 13 3 5 DODOLA- GOBA SECTION ......... . .. .............13 ..... . .......... ........ . 13 4 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK .14 4 1 POLICY FRAMEWORK ....................1.....4.................... ... ..... 14 4.1.1 The Constitution of FDRE /4 4.1.2 Environmentalpolicy of Ethiopia.. /6 4.2 REVIEW OF RELEVANT LAWS AND REGULATIONS AT THE FEDERAL AND REGIONAL LEVEIS . 18 4.2.1 The Rural Lands Administration and Utilization Proclamation 18 4.2.2 Oromiya R'ural Land Use And Administration Proclamation (Draft) 18 4 3 LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE EXPROPRIATION AND COMPENSATION OF PROP ERTY..... 1 9 4.3.1 Expropriation 20 4.3.2 Right of Way 21 4.3.3 Property to be Compensated 22 4.3.4 Compensation and Valuation Procedures and Methods 22 4.4 INSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK . . . . 25 4.4.1 Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and Administration Regions 25 4.4.2 Tje Environmental Protection Authority 25 4.4.3 Ethiopian Roads Autlority 26 4.4.4 Regional Governments 27 4.4.5 Oromiya Office of Environmental Protection .. 28 5 POTENTIAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ......................................... 29 5.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT SoCIo-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ... . . . 29 5.1.1 Family Size of the Project Affected Person 29 5.1.2 Gender and Age Structure of the Project Affected Person 29 5.1.3 Livelihood of the ProjectAffected Person 29 5.1.4 Etniicity, Religion and Language of thle Project Affected Person 30 5.1.5 Educational Background of the Project Affected Person 31 5.1.6 Historical, Cultural, and Religious Resouirces 31 5.1.7 Social Acceptability of the Project Road 31 5.2 SoCIo-ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE PROJECT . ... . 32 5.2.1 Social Impacts in Urban Areas 32 Reseldeemen Action Plans - Final i Febnrary. 2003 Ethiopaian Roads At/thot Ity PANAF and AlFRO Consult Nazaretel - Assela - Dodola and Shashemtneiie - Goba Road Upgrading Pt oject 5.2.2 Impacts of tie Project in Rural Areas 35 5 3 SOCIAL SERVICES TO BE INTERRUP T ED ..... .......... .................. . 35 5 4 DISRUPTION TO SERVICES ....................... .................3.6. . ............ ... . 36 5.5 IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH ANCILLARY WORKS .............. ......... 37 5 6 IMPACT ON VULNERABLE GROUPS ................... 38 6 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ............................................. 40 7 METHODS OF VALUING AFFECTED ASSETS ............................................. 41 7.1 COMPENSATION FOR LosS OF HOUSES AND BUSINESS ............................................. 41 7.1.1 Metitods Of Valuing Replacement Costfor the Affected Houses . . . 41 7.1.2 Compensation for Loss of Houses . . 43 7.1.3 Compensation for Butsiness 45 7.1.4 Compensation for Renters of Kebele Houtses 46 7 2 COMPENSATION FOR LOSS OF FARMLANDS ................... ................... 46 7.2.1 Methtod of Valuing Replacement Costfor Loss of Strips of Farmland 46 7.2.2 Compensation for Permanent Loss of Farmland 49 7.2.3 Compensation for Temporary Loss of Farmland 50 7.3 COMPENSATION FIOR EUCALYPTUS TREES .................................... . ... 50 7 4 COMPENSATION FOR AFFECTED SERVICES..,..... .51 7.5 ASSISTANCE FOR VULNERABLE GROUPS .....5.2... .......... . ..... ....... . ....... . ...52 8 ORGANIZATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR DELIVERY OF ENTITLEMENTS .53 9 IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS FOR THE RAP .54 9.1 IMPLEMENTING COMMITTEE . .. . .54 9.2 SCHEDULING AND TIMING .........5. ...............9......... . 9 3 BUDGET REQUIREMENT FOR THE IMPLEMENTING COMMITTEE ....... ...... .59 10 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ... 62 11 RAP IMPLEMENTATION COST ... 65 12 CONSULTATION WITH PAP ... 66 13 MONITORING PLAN ... 67 Resettlettient Action Plans - Final ii Febnrary. 2003 Ethiopiani Roads Aithority PANAF and AFRO Consu/lt Nazateth - Assela - Dodola and Slhasheemene - Goba Road Upgradimg Project LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CSA Central Statistics Authority CSE Conservation Strategy of Ethiopia EC Ethiopian Calendar EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMSB Environmental Management and Safety Branch EPA Environmental Protection Authonty EPC Environmental Protection Council EPE Environmental Policy of Ethiopia EEPCO Ethiopian Electric and Power Corporation ERA Ethiopian Roads Authority FDRE Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia FV Future Value GCRC Gross Current Replacement Cost GPS Global Positioning System HH Household IC Implementing Committee MoA Ministry of Agriculture NGO Non-Governmental Organizations NPV Net Present Value OGA Other Governmental Agencies PAA Project Affected Area PAP Project Affected Person PV Present Value PVF Present Value Factor RAP Resettlement Action Plan RAP-IC Resettlement Action Plan - Implementing Committee ROW Right-of-Way RSDP Road Sector Development Programme TOR Terms of Reference WB World Bank WSS Water Supply Service Resettlement Action Plaits - Final ili Febrtuary 2003 Ethiopian Roads Autthority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazateth - Assela - Dodola and Shiasheiene - Goba Road Upgrading Project Figure 1 Location Map of the Project Road [Khartoum ;E ER I T R EM A S A HEL @7 ,s E N S mr H E L ,G R I T RASanaa, Y E i E N Wad Medan~i Aljuadh Ad Duwayrn !, Gedairi' e. _ -I. , 7 $1 ,EI ObeidKusbr i , -' ) ~~~~~Gonder ~ __ DANAR Ci NUBMI! JIBALAN D * EPRhI Bed1 7, N S U B A'~ Nt - Dese C6I1 1' ',, ~~~ 0DebrerlnrNc. 0Malakil EfIIOPIANPLATEAI - Hbr?v ,;. B.rra. Or1 IF Addis Ababa.0 - - Harer DOOXO Dembi Dolo Nazret -.NU;.tULED C,Gore *Asel , / | " ° G Asela >,,0 ', A D F N °- (ZJima ~ N '. AArba Mnch'fE TH I 9,0 'R I A * Juba 9 <2b S E'eh- t.f* -f;ij c p.e' * / Kme, '-, 7- i.4 K ~~~~~Kinyet,'.j;77tr < jr^S LodwarO K E *e N y --Garbahaarf- S O .1 A L I A 6Ut A N D A Marsabd Parder ° *ajTlisfiri" Reset.leent A c tioi Ptins - 1 JFEa I:JfIicrc r eriW r EI ; ueiblayr _1 r i0. Resettlement Action? Plans - Pnral jV Febrnary, 2003 Ethiopiani Roads Aithot uy PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashiemnene - Goba Road Upgrading Project Figure 2 Layout of the Project Road N R e o Fa / _ Resettlement Action Plamis -Final i Febti ua, 2003 Ethiopian Road1s Aut/hority PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashiemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction The Nazareth-Assela-Dodola and Shashemene-Goba road upgrading project is one of the components of the Road Sector Development Programme 1997-2007 (ERA 1996), which was formulated to improve and expand the country's road network, and which has been accorded high prionty by the Government of Ethiopia in order to stimulate growth of the economy and for the long term development of the country. The entire project is sub divided into the following four different road sections and accordingly each will be a separate construction contracts (lots). Section 1: Nazareth- Assela (length 72.9 km) Section 2: Assela- Dodola (length 116.5 km) Section 3: Shashemene -Dodola (length 69.3 km) Section 4: Dodola - Goba (length 130 km) The project comprises upgrading works to approximately 388.7 km of existing roads in south eastern Ethiopia. This Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) was carried out for these proposed road-upgrading projects. 1.2 Project Description and Justification The road network, which is crucial to the connection between rural communities and urban centers, has deteriorated markedly as a result of lack of investment, and is constraining development of the economy. The present project, through providing upgraded and asphalted road communications between Nazareth- Assela-Dodola and Shashemene- Gob a is expected to make a significant contribution to removing some of the constraints on agricultural and livestock resources development in the project area. The project comprises upgrading works to approximately 388.7km of existing road between Nazareth-Assela-Dodola and Shashemene-Goba. The surfacing, which will be 6.7m wide, is proposed as a Double Bituminous surface treatment. The location map and layout of the project road are given in Fig I and 2 respectively. Resettlement AIciion Plans - Final 2 Februtary, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Autthority PANAF and AFRO Consult Naza, eth - Assela - Dodola and Slhasheinene - Goba Road Upg,ading Project 1.3 Description of the Project Area The project road traverses entirely within the Oromiya Region. The population and economy of the region traversed by the project road is almost totally dependent upon agriculture and livestock. The sector employs more than 90% of the economically active population in the Region. Apart from agriculture and livestock and general commerce in the major towns along the route, there appear to be few other economic activities in the project area at the present time. Industrial development in the project area is embryonic. The contribution of manufacturing industries to the generation of income and employment in the project area is exceptionally low when compared to agriculture. 1.4 Legal Framework The Constitution (Art. 44.2) provides that state programs that result in the displacement of people or adversely affect the livelihood of the local population shall give the right to commensurate monetary or other means of compensation including relocation (resettlement) with adequate State assistance. The World Bank OP 4.12 under the title of "Involuntary Resettlement policy" has addressed the need for the treatment of the project impacts, which cannot be avoided. Many other manuals, policies, laws & regulations of the country also addressed the involuntary resettlement issue. The EIA Proclamation states that no proponent shall commence implementation of a project without conducting proper environmental and social impact assessment and authorization from the Authority or from the Relevant Regional Agency, as appropriate. The Terms of Reference (TOR) for this project requires the preparation of a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for Nazareth-Assela-Dodola and Shashemene- Goba road upgrading projects. Therefore, as per the requirements of the TOR and the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and World Bank (WB) guidelines, the consultant has camed out this RAP for this proposed road Upgrading project. 1.5 Potential Social Impacts and Mitigation Measures The pnncipal potentially adverse impact is the land and property expropriation associated with realignments and road section widening. In urban areas, the major impact of the project will be on households that are going to be affected and resettled to a new locations and for some decrease on their land size, reduced compound and on others loss of their current business or reduced income due to relocation. A summary of the main findings is presented in the table below. Resettlement Action Plans - Final 3 Febmary, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shrashtemlene - Goba Road Upgra(ding Project Main Findings Region Oromiya Zone Arsi and Bale Road Length (kin) 388.7 Status Existing Road upgrading project Road Functional Classification Trunk road Proposed Surfacing type From gravel to asphalt Affected People in Urban areas Total number of affected people 396 (from 52 HH) Total number of partially affected people 330 (from 36 HH) Total number of fully affected people 66 (from 16 HH) Affected People in Rural Areas Total number of affected people 3,359 (from 442 HH) Total number of partially affected people 3,359 (from 442 HH) Total number of fully affected people nil Total Number of Affected People (urban & rural) 3,755 (from 494 HH) Size of affected farmland (ha) 112 Number of affected eucalyptus trees 2,000 Total number of affected Government Offices 2 Note * Affected farmland for contractors camp, detours and access roads, materials site and spoil dumping sites Social Impacts in Urban Areas Based on this assessment, a total of 52 households (HH) with an estimated 396 people in 9 different towns will be affected. This comprises 11 residential houses, 35 business and 7 multi-functional (business and residence) will be affected. In addition to these, two government buildings (a service cooperative office and a grain store) will be affected. Out of the above indicated 52 households 16 will be fully affected and will need to be re-housed on a new plot but in the same localities, whereas the remaining 36 will be partially affected leaving a smaller but still viable building and/or land. Therefore, they will be relocated in own land. Social Impacts in Rural Areas The impact of the project in rural areas would be temporary occupation of strips of land along the road alignment, occupation of land for the establishment of construction camp sites, detour, operation of borrow and quarry sites and spoil dumping sites. The land to be used for the above activities includes crop land, grazing land and perennial trees. This would have substantial effect and impact on the income and livelihood of some households. In rural section of the project road, an estimated 112 ha of strips of farmland belonging to 442 HH or 3,35 9 people will be partially affected. Resettleniient Action Plans - Final 4 Febrtary, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Autthor-ty PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashe,nene - Goba Road Upgradi,ig Project Impacts on Public Services The project, in addition to its impact on the urban settlement and economy it will also have impact on telephone and electric power lines as well as on water supply systems found in the major towns along the project road. Compensation Estimates A valuation compensation approach is developed for households that would be affected by the project both in rural and urban centers. The methods adopted for valuing the affected assets and resources is based on a replacement cost and also by considering the compensation value estimate. The compensation for the forgone benefits from affected farmlands will be paid on the basis of the unit rates established in this RAP. A replacement costs for affected services is estimated and included in the total RAP cost. The following table summarizes the overall compensation requirement of the Resettlement Action Plan. Resettlement / Rehabilitation Budget (in millions Birr) Item Description Compensation Estimate Compensation for loss of houses 1.71 Compensation Value 1.71 Compensation for Loss of Business 1.63 Compensation for loss of crops and land * 1.40 Compensation for loss of trees (only eucalyptus trees will be lost) 0.62 Compensation for water pipes 0.12 Monitoring 0.07 Sub-Total 7.26 Contingency (20%) 1.45 Grand Total 8.71 Note * Land loss for contractors camp, materials site, detours and spoil dumping sites 1.6 Implementation of RAP and Monitoring Plan ERAs Right-of-Way Branch together with the local authorities will be responsible for the implementation and management of the RAP activities. The RAP has included a monitoring plan and ERA's Environmental Management and Safety Branch and ROW-A will be responsible to monitor and evaluate the process involved in implementing this RAP by adopting the following indicators; * Compensation to be made * Restoration and restitution of PAP * Appropriateness of relocation sites Resettlement Action Planzs - inial 5 Febnrary. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Atuthority PANAF and AFRO Conszult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shlashemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project * Appropriateness of the time schedule for RAP * Public infrastructures and social services re established * Support and assistance made to vulnerable groups and women * Appropriateness of grievance redress mechanisms ERA's through the EMSB will assign qualified social scientist to conduct individual evaluations of PAPs re-establishment socio-economic progress. The evaluation will be done quarterly for two years and annually for the next two years. Socio-economic evaluation will be based on a number of key indices for selected households, in combination with the special observation by the social scientist. The monitoring report by EMB staff together with RAP-Implementing Committee will be prepared. The monthly, quarterly and annual progress report during supervision of the construction project and the World Bank supervision mission reports will include information about each PAP and these reports will be submitted to all concerned stakeholders and partners. The estimated budget for RAP monitoring and evaluation is estimated to be Birr 0.07 million and will be financed from the RAP budget. Resettlement Action Plauis - Final 6 Febrlagy 2003 Ethiopiat Roads A tnthorary PANAF and AFRO Consil;t Nazarelh - Assela - Dodola and Shaslhe,nene - Goba Road Upgraditng Project 2 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Background The Ethiopian Roads Authority has assigned Panafrican Consultants Plc in association with Afro Consult and Trading Plc. of Ethiopia, to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the proposed Nazareth-Assela-Dodola and Shashemene-Goba road-upgrading projects. This report presents the RAP prepared for these road upgrading projects. 2.2 Objectives of the RAP The central objective of the consulting services is to prepare Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the three roads. The RAP assesses the adverse social impacts of the construction and operations of the project roads and suggests mitigation measures including budget, to address the issues at stake. 2.3 Methodology Road projects will create a range of direct and indirect impacts on the human environment and understanding the socio-economic settings and issues and constraints along the project road is essential for the design of road projects. The TOR requires undertaking a RAP for the proposed road projects. The Environmental Assessment (EA) guidelines prepared by Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) and the World Bank requires development projects to reduce adverse effects on the physical, biological, and socio-economic environments. The consultant has therefore (in response to both the requirements of the TOR and the EPA and World Bank guidelines), carried out this RAP for the projects under consideration in accordance with the Country and World Bank guidelines. The methodology adopted for the preparation of this RAP is sumnarized below. Collection of Available Data: The consultant collected and reviewed project specific background documents and published regulations, guidelines, national policy papers, CSA's census reports and documents (see References in Annex l). The national legislative and institutional framework, policies, procedures, guidelines etc. has also been reviewed. Field Visits: Detailed field visit were carried out in all the project areas in order to gain first-hand knowledge and information of existing socio-economic environmental conditions and also to put the proposed designs and construction Resettlement Acteon Planis - Ftinfa 7 Febmnray. 2003 Ethlopian Roa(ds Autthor-ity PANAFand AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Smasheinene - Goba Road Upgt ading Project works into context. The project team has carried out the field visit in order to facilitate joint review of potential problems and possible solutions. During the trip, information on socio-economic aspects, cultural and other values in the project area had been collected through designed questionnaire survey, GPS, etc. Public Consultation: The field visits also included interviews and discussion with Project Affected Person (PAP), local authorities and various stakeholders along all sections of the roads, in order to obtain supplementary information on socio-economic and socio-cultural conditions, and views on various aspects of the project. The consultation was also to obtain background information relevant to socio-economic impact assessment and in particular, to identify any areas of specific concern which needed to be addressed. During the survey, 3 households were not consulted and we got information from neighbors. Organizations and individuals consulted are listed in Annex 2. Characteristics of the projects: A review of the project designs has been camed out, with particular reference to establishing the form and scope of the works and construction materials in order to identify potential sources of impact of the project on the socio-economic environment. Description of the Project Area: baseline data on the socio-economic environment of the project area has been collected and evaluated. Direct information was obtained by visiting the project area. The Project Area comprises the area which will be under direct influence (i.e., where the impacts of the land- take requirement and construction activity can be felt) of the project and includes the road section and its influence area, quarry and borrow areas, etc. Identification of socio-economic Impacts: Key potentially adverse impacts on the socio-economic environment associated with implementation of the proposed project have been identified. Description of Compensatory Measures: The compensation principles from Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) and the WB OP 4.12 were adopted. Based on these principles, a feasible and acceptable resettlement and compensation package for various Project Affected Persons and groups is prepared and presented in this RAP. Monitoring Plan: A monitoring plan has been developed and recommended to be fttlly integrated with implementation process of the proposed RAP. 2.4 Report Structure This report provides the Resettlement Action Plan for the proposed road upgrading project and follows the following flows: Revetilement Action Plans - Finel 8 Februaty. 2003 rmniopian Koaa( s Iiiuinotiy ,rlvir ana iiriu aLoiZiW Nazareth - Asvela - Dodola and Shtasheizteine - Goba Road Upgrading Project * Following the Executive Summary and the Introduction, Chapter 3 provides a brief description of the project and components for which land acquisition and resettlement is required. * Chapter 4 presents the existing and evolving policy, legal and institutional framework. The chapter also presents the assessment results of the legal framework reviewing the fit between the borrower laws and regulations and Bank policy requirements and measures proposed to bridge any gaps between them; * In Chapter 5 existing socio-economic conditions of the Project Affected Person (PAP) and Project Affected Area (PAA) is discussed in brief. In this chapter, affected population is estimated and to the extent possible, the likely categories of affected persons is presented. * Chapter 6 identifies and describes the eligibility crnteria for defining various categories of affected persons * The methods of valuing affected assets and the actual compensation and resettlement package is discussed in Chapter 7 * Organizational procedures for delivery of entitlement is discussed in Chapters 8 * Description of the implementation process, linking resettlement implementation to civil works is presented in chapter 9. * Chapter 10 describes the grievance redress mechanism and Chapter 11 presents the arrangements of funding resettlement, including the preparation and review of cost estimates, the flow of funds and contingency arrangements; * The mechanism for consultation with, and participation of affected persons in planning, implementation and monitoring is presented in Chapter 12 and * Chapter 13 presents the arrangement for monitoring by the implementing agency. 2.5. The Team Composition for the Preparation of RAP Sociologist/Team Leader: ASSEFA ADDISU, Bachelor Degree in Sociology and Althropology in 1980 attended several updating courses in rural development, management, and organization strengthening, rural reconstruction. He has 20 years of experience working for government organizations, NGO's and private firms. He has extensive experience on social projects monitoring and evaluation, the development of policy and strategy for rural development schemes. Economist: YUSUF AHMED, B.A. in Economics with minor in management, MSc. Transportation Science and a wide range of training in planning, statistics, finance, projects, and information. He has over 25 years of extensive work Resettlement Action Plans - Fitnal 9 Febnrary. 2003 Ethiopian Roatis Auithoritty PANAF and AFRO Consrult Nazat etih - Assela - Dodola and Sliaslhenzene - Goba Road Upgi ading Project experience and services at various responsible positions. He has also extensive experience in conducting feasibility studies, regional analysis, land use and traffic studies, etc. Socio-Economist: MULUGETA SERGAWI, has more than 15 years of work experience in conducting economic and financial analysis, resettlement action plans, Tariff Study, Institution Study, Sector Development Programme Study, Project Follow-up and monitoring activities, budget preparation, socio-economic analysis. Civil Engineer: TESFAYE ASFAW, A civil Engineer and long years of experience in the planning, design, construction and maintenance of all types of transport infrastructures while working for ERA, TCDE and PANAF Consult. He has also been involved in the management of planning, study and implementation of a highly integrated development programmes during his service to the Ministry of Coffee and Tea Development holding Chief Engineer and General Manager. Environmentalist: DEJENE WOLDEMARIAM, Master of Technology in Civil Engineering in addition to several short term workshops on EIA. He has 14 years experience as environmentalist and conducted a number of EIA for Road projects in Ethiopia. Legal Expert: IMIRU TAMIRAT, has more than 15 years experience providing advice and expertise on policy, legal and institutional matters with respect to both national and international resources development and management issues. He has been providing advice and expertise on policy, legal and institutional matters with respect to national and international natural resources and environmental management issues, international trade law matters linked with agriculture and intellectual property rights. Resettlenment Action Planis - Final 10 February. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authlority PANAF and AFRO Consult Naza/eth/ - Assela - Dodola and Shlashemcne - Goba Road Upgradilng Pt oject 3 DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PROJECT ROADS 3.1 Background Recognizing the relative importance of the transport in supporting social and economic growth and meeting the poverty alleviation objectives, the Federal Government of Ethiopia has placed increased emphasis on improving the quality and quantity of the road infrastructure as part of its economic development program and poverty alleviation strategy. To address the constraints in the road sector (related to restricted road network coverage and low standards), the Federal Government of Ethiopia formulated a 10-year Road Sector Development Program (RSDP). The RSDP was officially launched in September 1997, and since then, both the Government and donor-funded projects has been under implementation. Under this project, it is planned to upgrade the existing roads from Nazareth - Assela - Dodola (195km) and Shashemene -Goba (199.2km). This project has got a total length of 388.7 km and is found entirely with in the Oromiya regional state in the southern part of Ethiopia. The project is sub divided into the following four different fully engineered road sections: Section 1: Nazareth- Assela (length 72.9 km) Section 2: Assela- Dodola (length 116.5 km) Section 3: Shashemene -Dodola (length 69.3 km) Section 4: Dodola - Goba (length 130 km) The location map and layout of the project roads is given in Fig I and 2 and brief descnption for each of the project is presented in the following sections. Table 3.1 Information on the Proposed Road Upgrading Projects Road Sections Location Region Oromiya Zone Arsi and Bale Road Length (km) 388.7 Status Existing Road upgrading project Road Functional Classification Trunk road Proposed Surfacing type From gravel to asphalt Alignment No major realignment Resettlemzent Actioni Plans - Final 1 February. 2003 Etilopiati Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consuslt Nazareth - Asseia - Dod/oa nand Shash/einene - Goba Road Upgraiding Project 3.2 Nazareth-Assela Section This section of the road starts at the junction of the Nazareth-Assela and Addis- Harar roads and ends after 72.9 km at the end of Assela town. The riding surface of this section is paved and from fair to poor condition. The area is fairly flat terrain and features gentle curves up to Sodere Junction at Melkasa located at 16.8 km. Besides featuring sharp curves between 17.8 and 20.9, the remaining part of the section passes through rolling and flat terrain until 67.2 at klumsa town. Along the indicated road section, there are a total of 7 project impact towns as well as campsites and detour areas, which need compensation. In this section, there is no any realignment that will lead to any displacement issue. During implementation of this section of the road, a total number of 27 households (HH) (with an estimated 183 people) in urban areas and 83 households (RH) (with an estimated 705 people) in rural areas will be affected. Of these, only 10 HH will be fully affected and will be re-housed on a new plot but in the same neighborhood. 3.3 Assela -Dodola Section The Assela - Dodola Junction section starts at the outskirt of the Assela town and ends at junction of the Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Dodola. The total length of this road is 116.5 km. Between kmO.0 and km88.0 and remaining portion of this road section is surfaced with highly plastic and poorly graded natural gravel, which needs regular maintenance. The road section is gravel road with a shoulder - to - shoulder width of 8m. The first 15 km of the section traverses through mountainous terrain of the Assela - Bekoji plateau and then runs through rolling and flat terrain until it reaches the Webe plains. About 20% of the alignment passes through mountainous, 30% through rolling, and 50% through plains. The total realignment length is approximately km 8.0 in nine stretches. During implementation of this section of the road, a total number of 6 HH (with an estimated 47 people) in urban areas and 133 households (HH) (with an estimated 1129 people) in rural areas will be affected. Of these, none will be fully affected. Resettlement Action Plans - Fitral 12 Febnrtary. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Atahotity PANAF and AFRO Consaikt Nazareth - Asseln - Dodola and Slhaslherinene - Goba Road Upgra(ling Ptoyeca 3.4 Shashemene - Dodola Section The over all length of this section amounts to 69.3km and has a gravel surface, with a width of 8m from shoulder to shoulder. The road section between and Kofele (27Km) has well consolidated gravel surface. The road section betveen km43.0 and km59.0 features red cinder surface while between km 69.0 and km 69.3, the area has no surfacing material and is with a lot of potholes. The first 19.0 km of the road runs through rolling terrain between 19.0 km and km 35.0. From km 35.0 to end of realignment length is approximately km 1.2 in one stretch. During implementation of this section of the road, a total of 6 households (HH) (with an estimated 53 people) in urban areas and 78 households (HH) (with an estimated 666 people) in rural areas will be affected. Of these, only 2 TH will be fully affected and will be re-housed on a new plot but in the same neighborhood. 3.5 Dodola - Goba Section The Dodola - Goba section of the road has got a total length of 130 km. The road section has gravel and earthen road throughout the stretch. The road section is gravel road with a shoulder - to - shoulder width of 8m. The initial stretch of the road up to 107 traverses generally through flat terrain and thereafter till km 147 from Shashemene is through mountainous terrain. The road between km 147.0 and km 199.25 features gentle curves and runs through flat terrain. The total length of the proposed realignment is approximately 4.0 km in six stretches. During implementation of this section of the road, a total number of 13 households (HH) (with an estimated 113 people) in urban areas and 148 households (HH) (with an estimated 1255 people) in rural areas will be affected. Of these, only 4 HH will be fully affected and will be re-housed on a new plot but in the same neighborhood. Resetlementi Action Plans - Final 13 Febniray, 2003 Ethiopiapn Road/s Atilhority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shasheemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project 4 POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 4.1 Policy Framework 4.1.1 The Constitution of FDRE As the supreme law of Ethiopia, all national policies, laws and regulations as well as the institutional frameworks of the country must comply with the Constitutional provisions. The Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Proclamation 1/1995, has several provisions which have direct policy, legal and institutional relevance for the appropriate implementation of the resettlement action plans which are being prepared by the Ethiopian Roads Authority in order to mitigate the impact on people who might be affected by the Road Sector Development Program under way. The current land tenure system is, in essence, not different from that adopted by the previous regime although there are certain elements that may be considered to give the user of the land more security than in the past. The Constitution itself addresses this issue to some extent when it guarantees Ethiopian peasants and pastoralists the right to have access to land as well as the protection against eviction from their possession (Art. 40.4 and 40.5). The detailed implementation of this provision is to be specified by subsequent laws. Art. 40.3 of the Constitution provides for the public ownership of both rural and urban land as well as all natural resources. It further states that land is the common property of the Ethiopian people and cannot be subject to sale or to other means of exchange. In other words, private ownership of land and other natural resources is excluded in that one very essential element of private ownership- that of alienating land by sale, mortgage or any form of transfer with respect to land- is expressly prohibited by the Constitution. Moreover, ownership of land is vested in the State (and the people of Ethiopia) while rural and urban dwellers have only usufruct rights over land. A usufruct right gives the user of the land, the right to use the land and the nght to benefit from the fruits of her/his labor which may be crops, trees etc found on the land or any permanent works such as buildings etc. The rights regarding the latter may be considered private property and any interference on the usufruct right such as expropriation shall entail compensation. This is clearly provided in Art. 40.7 of the Constitution which says that ' Every Ethiopian shall have the full nght to the immovable property he builds and to the permanent improvements he brings about on the land by his labor or capital'. It further states, among other things, that the owner of such rights is entitled to compensation and that the particulars shall Resettment Action Plans - Final 14 February. 2003 Ethiopian Roads At tihoritu PANAF and AFRO Consiult Nazareth - As%ela - Dodoln and Sliashemene - Cobn Road Upgradinig Project be determined by law. Art. 40.8 in turn strengthens this by providing for expropriation of private property by the government for public purposes subject to the payment in advance of compensation commensurate to the value of the [expropriated] property. The detailed implementation of this provision is also left to be determined by subsequent law. More importantly, and specifically, Art. 44.2 of the Constitution provides that state programs that result in the displacement of people or adversely affect the livelihood of the local population shall give the right to commensurate monetary or other means of compensation including relocation (resettlement) with adequate State assistance. This is an important provision to the resettlement action plan that ERA undertakes with respect to the road projects in the sense that the Government has obliged itself not only to compensate for the works on land created by the labor and capital of any Ethiopian citizen but also to compensate for the lost land through resettling those affected by State programs with adequate assistance. Although in strict legal terms, an individual landholder does not have full ownership rights over the land he/she uses because of the fact that the landholder cannot alienate the land through sale, mortgage or any other form of transfer of ownership, the Constitution endows the land holder rights akin to ownership in the sense that it gives the landholder the right to continued access to the land and the right to be compensated for lost land. The State has also obliged itself to relocate/resettle the landholder. In this sense, the landholder has the right to be relocated to land similar to that lost through expropriation or involuntary resettlement. One issue that may arise is what if the landholder is not willing to resettle in another area and claims monetary compensation or if land is not readily available? As we shall see later in some detail, it is submitted that the landholder should be compensated for the lost land in an alternative form which may include the cost of alternative means of livelihood, relocation cost etc. The land itself has no market value for the land user because he/she cannot alienate the land in the form of sale or mortgage. This is why it may be difficult to adequately assess the amount of compensation. The right of the public and the community to full consultations and participation as well as to the expression of their views in the planning and implementation of environmental policies and development projects that affect them is enshrined in the Constitution (Arts. 92.3 and 43.2). The rights of women to full consultations in the formulation of national development policies and in designing and execution of projects especially when such projects are likely to affect their interests is also stipulated in the Constitution (Art. 35.6). Thus, in the course of the preparation of resettlement action plans, all affected stakeholders need to be appropriately consulted in order to identify their needs and interests including determination of the amount of compensation required. Resettlement Aciion Plans - Final 15 Febrsary, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Autthority PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola anmd Slhasheiene - Goba Road Upgrading Project In relation to the environment, the Constitution also stipulates that the Government should endeavor to ensure a clean and healthy environment as a basic right of the Ethiopian people (Arts. 44.1 and 92.1). It also provides that the design and implementation of development programs and projects should not damage or destroy the environment (Art. 92.2). This indicates a recognition that development programs and projects should pass through an Environmental Impact Assessment process. In sum, as discussed in this section, the Constitution has laid down the policy and legal basis regarding land tenure policy, the need for appropriate compensation and consultations regarding those affected by development projects and State programs as well as the recognition of the need to conduct an environmental impact assessment of development projects. Subsequent policies, legislations and institutions are designed to meet these Constitutional provisions. 4.1.2 Environmental policy of Ethiopia The Environmental Policy of Ethiopia, which includes social policy, was approved by the Council of Ministers in 1997. The policy contains ten sectoral and ten cross-sectoral policies including provisions required for the appropriate implementation of the policy. Although there are some relevant elements in the sectoral policies incorporated in the document, the cross-sectoral policies are of much more relevance to the resettlement action plans that ERA is undertaking particularly regarding community participation and environmental impact assessment. The policy elements on community participation are progressive and relevant in the context of preparing the resettlement action plans. The relevant ones are: * To ensure that all phases of environmental and resource development and management, from project conception to planning and implementation to monitoring and evaluation are undertaken based on the decisions of resource users and managers; * To develop effective methods of popular participation in the planning and implementation of environmental and resource use and management projects and programmes; Of more importance in the context of the resettlement action plan are the policy provisions on Environmental Impact Assessment which provide the basic policy framework in the area and form the basis for subsequent issuance of laws, regulations and guidelines in the area. The policy elements are as follows: Resettleient Action Plans - Final 1 6 Februari' 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAFand AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shasliemene - Goba Road Upgrading P-oject * To ensure that environmental impact assessments consider not only physical and biological impacts but also address social, socio-economic, political and cultural conditions; * To ensure that public and private sector development programmes and projects recognize any environmental impacts early and incorporate their containment into the development design process; * To recognize that public consultation is an integral part of EIA and ensure that EIA procedures make provision for both an independent review and public comment before consideration of decision makers; * To ensure that and environmental impact statement always includes mitigation plans for environmental management problems and contingency plans in case of accidents; * To ensure that, at specified intervals during the project implementation, environmental audits regarding monitoring, inspection and record keeping take place for activities where these have been required by the Environmental Impact Statement; * To ensure that preliminary and full EIAs are undertaken by the relevant sectoral ministries or departments, if in the public sector, and by the developer, if in the private sector. * To create by law an EIA process which require appropriate environmental impact statements and environmental audits for private and state development projects; * To establish the necessary institutional framework and determine the linkages of its parts for undertaking, coordinating and approving EIAs and the subsequent system of environmental audits required to ensure compliance with conditionalities; * To develop detailed sectoral technical guidelines in ETAs and environmental audits; * To ensure that social, socio-economic, political and cultural conditions are considered in environmental impact assessment procedures and included in sectoral guidelines; and * To develop ETA and environmental audit capacity and capability in the Environmental Protection Authority, sectoral ministries and agencies as well as in regions. The above environmental policy provisions which include social assessment reveal that much has been covered, at least at the policy level, regarding the measures that need to be taken and procedures to be followed when conducting an environmental impact assessment of development projects from the planning level up to the implementation and post-implementation level. As the resettlement action plan that is prepared by ERA is part of the Environmental Impact Assessment process, particularly taken to mitigate the socio-economic and cultural impacts of the road projects, the policy provisions should be considered to serve as guidelines for more specific sectoral policies, laws and institutional set ups that are required to translate such policy provisions. The following sections will attempt to address such issues. Resettlenient Action Plans - Final 1 7 February. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Autihority PANAF and AFRO Consiult Nazat ethi - Assela - Dodolan and Shiasheniene - Goba Road Upgrading P'roject 4.2 Review of Relevant Laws and Regulations at the Federal and Regional Levels 4.2.1 The Rural Lands Administration and Utilization Proclamatioln The Constitution leaves the detailed implementation of the provisions concerning tenure rights over rural land to be determined by subsequent specific laws to be issued at both the federal and regional levels. Accordingly, at the federal level, the Rural Lands Administration and Utilization Proclamation was enacted in 1997 to further determine the land use system and use rights in the country. The Proclamation provides that land administration laws to be enacted by Regions should be based on the provisions provided therein and specifies the basic principles of rural land distribution and utilization including the scope of land use right which Regional laws should grant. Similar to the Constitution, the Proclamation provides that peasants and nomads (pastoralists) shall have the right to get rural land holding the size of which shall be determined based upon the particular conditions of the locality and free of charge. 4.2.2 Oromiya Rural Land Use And Administration Proclamation (Draft) Based on the Federal Land Administration and Utilization Proclamation No.89/1997, regions have commenced enacting their own land administration and utilization laws. For our purposes, since all the three roads subject to the resettlement action plans are within the Oromiya Region, a brief examination of the relevant provisions of the Draft Oromiya Land Use and Administration Proclamation will be made here. The Proclamation provides for the right of access to rural land free of charge for those whose lives depend on agriculture and who are aged 18 years or above (Art.5.1). The holder of the land is guaranteed a life long nght of use of the land for agricultural purposes or lease the land to a third party or bequeath it to his/her heirs. Full property rights is also given to the right holder over any property produced or built on the land including the right to alienate it in any manner (Art. 6.1). However, the latter right of alienation does not extend to the land itself (Art. 6.2) which is consistent with the federal Constitution discussed before (Art. 6.2). However, the use right of the individual land user is subject to termination when the land is required for public uses and when this is decided with the participation of the community [affected] (Art. 6.4). When the right of the landholder is terminated for reasons of public use, the right of the landholder to get compensation for the assets on the land or tree crops cultivated on the land is provided in Art. 6.5 of the draft Proclamation including the right to be Resettlement Action Plans - Final 18 February, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO ConsiiIi Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shmasheniene - Goba Road Upgrading Project compensated for similar land. The responsible organ which is designated in the Proclamation itself, as " the Land Administration and Natural Resources Authority" (Art.24) will also issue a life long certificate of holding right to the land user (Art. 15). In case conflict arises regarding the rights of the landholder, the draft Proclamation provides for an initial appeal to the local social court (Gaanda). A party aggrieved by the decision of the social court has the right to appeal to the first instance ordinary court (Aanaa court). Where the Aanaa court confirms the decision of the social court the decision of the first instance court will be final. However, if the decision of the first instance court rescinds the decision of the social court, then a final appeal may be made to the higher court. However, it also provides for the resolution of disputes by other means upon agreement by the parties concerned. Although the Oromiya Rural Land Use and Administration Proclamation is still in a draft forn, it contains very relevant provisions regarding the right of a rural landholder where his rights of use is affected through eviction or expropriation of land for public use as for instance for the purpose of road construction, rehabilitation or upgrading. It clearly provides for relocation of the landholder to a similar land and for compensation of lost assets and tree crops on the land and the manner for dispute resolution. It also requires that the communities affected by such development projects need to be consulted. One important provision is the issuance of certificate of use right to the landholder which makes it easier to identify the right holder of a given land where resettlement action plan is prepared by ERA in the future. The above two sections have shown the general policy and legal framework at the macro-level regarding the land tenure and environmental policies and general provisions pertaining to resettlement/relocation of land users (usufructuaries) as well as the principles and general requirements for the right to be compensated for property lost on work made on land and the need for public consultations in case of eviction or expropriation of property. The next section will be a discussion of legal and administrative requirements more specifically dealing with the requirements of the resettlement action plans that ERA is undertaking. 4.3 Legal Framework for the Expropriation and Compensation of Property The expansion of road construction has got a paramount importance for the efforts of the development activities of the country. Any development activity is directly linked to the presence of road infrastructure and recognizing this, the Government of Ethiopia is currently undertaking the upgrading of the existing roads as well as the construction of new roads. Like many other projects, the construction of roads could result in major negative ill effects upon the environment in general and the people in particular unless an appropriate measure to encounter the negative Resettlement Action Plans - Final 1 9 Februatr. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Auithority PANAF and AFRO Consuzlt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Slaslhemene - Goba Road Upgradirng Project impacts is taken. People whose subsistence is dependent on the same occupy almost all of the urban and the rural areas through which the road passes. It is a fact that the people are expecting the commencement of the road construction to begin soon. They are also expecting to become compensated for any losses that may arise as a result of the construction of the project. The identification and the implementation of compensation are required to be effected prior to the construction of the road. The need for the preparation of the mitigation measure is presented in operational manual of the World Bank. The World Bank OP 4.12 under the title of "Involuntary Resettlement policy" has addressed the need for the treatment of the project impacts, which cannot be avoided. Many other manuals, policies, laws & regulations of the country also addressed the involuntary resettlement issue. The main objective of this study is to identify the socio economic impacts of the project to the extent feasible and propose mitigative measures, which need to be implemented prior to the construction of the road. 4.3.1 Expropriation The 1960 Civil Code of Ethiopia contains relevant provisions regarding expropriation of property for public purposes considered to be in the public domain (Arts.1444-1488). Art. 1445 provides that any property belonging to the State or other administrative bodies shall be deemed to formn part of the public domain. It also stipulates that properties which form part of the public domain are those placed at the disposal of the public or destined to a public service. More relevant for our purpose, Art. 1446 provides that roads, streets.. .etc. if owned by the State or other administrative bodies form part of the public domain. It further stipulates that the competent authorities may, by way of expropriation proceedings, obtain the land necessary for the creation of roads and streets and may; by alignment proceedings widen or straighten existing roads or streets (Art. 1450). In case the alignment land shows unbuilt land within public ways such land shall be incorporated to such public ways and where the alignment plan shows built land such land shall be charged with a servitude to draw back (Arts. 1451 and 1452). Servitude is a form of property right provided in the Civil Code (Arts. 1359-1385) which gives the right of way to someone over the property of another. In other words, in case of road construction (rehabilitation/upgrading etc), the government body which does the work is given the right of way over another's property or holder of the land. In this sense, it creates a restriction on the right of the holder of the land. In both instances, the expropriation for building roads gives the person the right to claim compensation in accordance with Arts 1470-1477 of the Civil Code (Art. 1453). The compensation provisions of the Civil Code will be discussed in a later part of this section. ResettlementAction Plais - Final 20 Febnrary, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Aiithot ity PANAF and AFRO Consult Naza,teil - Assela - Dodola and ShaFhslcinenze - Goba Road Upgrading Project The provisions on expropriation proceedings and procedures on compensation are provided under Arts. 1460-1488 of the Civil Code. Some of the relevant provisions regarding expropriation proceedings stipulate that: * That the competent authority has the right to compel the owner to surrender the ownership (in our case the use right of the landholder) of an immovable property for public purposes (Art.1460); * The project which makes expropriation necessary shall be declared by notice to be in the public interest (Art. 1463). * Where public inquiry is necessary, the declaration of public utility will not be made until the public interest has been consulted (Art.1465). * Once the project is declared to be in the public interest, determination of which immovable need to be expropriated for carrying out the project will be made and the persons having property rights over the immovable will be notified to this effect. The persons to be affected by the expropriation shall express their views on the necessity of the expropriation within a reasonable time (Art. 1466). In a similar vein, the Ethiopian Roads Authority Re-establishment Proclamation No 80/1997 gives era the power to " use, free of charge, land and such other resources and quarry substances required for the purpose of construction and maintenance of highways and other required services; provided, however, that it shall pay compensation in accordance with the law of properties on the land it uses" (Art. 6.18). The right of expropriation given to ERA under its reestablishment Proclanmation and in previous proclamations is in essence similar with the provisions of the Civil Code because the road works conducted by ERA is in the public domain. 4.3.2 Right of Way ERA has been exercising what it calls a right of way of adjacent land to roads it constructs which is 30 mts in extent. This right of way that ERA exercises seems to have been established in practice through specifications and not by any form of legislation which gave ERA, by law, to exercise such right. In practice, the right of way concept within ERA has been and is flexible, especially in urban areas. In this sense, therefore, it might be difficult to assert that it would not give compensation to persons who have encroached on land deemed to be a right of way unless this is enforceable by law. It seems that it is in recognition of this that Art. 6.17 of Proclamation No. 80/1997 re-establishing ERA gives the power to ERA to "determine the extent of land required for its activities, in the adjacency as well as surrounding of highways, and the conditions of use of such land by others". From the discussions we have had with ERA, it is now conducting a study as to how to determine the right of way and the conditions of its use by third parties. The practice to date is that ERA pays compensation to affected persons regarding land deemed to be a right of way. This is a correct position in light of the fact that the right of way ERA is cle facto and not de jure (emanating from Resettlement Action Plans - Final 21 Febriary, 2003 Ethiopian Roaris Auithority PANAFaand AFRO Consult Nazat etili - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgradting Pi oject law) and therefore cannot be legally enforceable. However, it is proposed that in the future ERA's nght of way should be determined by law which can then be enforceable on persons encroaching in such right of way. If the right of way forms part of the public domain, it may not be occupied by a private person except with the authorization of the competent authority as provided in Art. 1457 of the Civil Code. In such cases, the Civil Code empowers the competent authorities (in this case ERA) to order at any time the destruction of any work or the cessation of any activity which impairs the existence or purpose of the property forming part of the public domain (Art. 1459(1)). In other words, once ERA establishes by law a right of way, this may be considered a public domain and it can enforce its rights by means of ordering a cessation of any activity that violates such rights or even order the destruction of any works done in such right of way. Moreover, if any administration grants a concession or authorization on such public domain this may be revoked (Art. 1459 (2) and in such cases the person affected by such revocation can claim compensation from the administrative authority which gave the concession or authorization (Art. 1459 (3)). 4.3.3 Property to be Compensated As discussed in Section 4.1.1, the Constitution lays down the basis for the property to be compensated in case of expropriation as a result of State programs or projects in both rural and urban areas. Art. 44.2 clearly states that " All persons who have been affected or whose livelihoods have been adversely affected as a result of state programs have the right to a commensurate monetary or alternative means of compensation, including relocation with adequate state assistance." Thus, persons who have lost their land as a result of acquisition of such land for the purpose of road works are entitled to be compensated to a similar land plus the related costs arising from relocation; assets such as buildings, crops or fruit trees that are part of the land etc. The Resettlement/Rehabilitation Policy Framework prepared by ERA also expressly and appropriately recognizes that Art. 44.2 of the Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia provides the basis for the compensation procedures and the legal framework for its resettlement and rehabilitation policy (ERA, 2002, p.13) 4.3.4 Compensation and Valuationi Procedures and Methods The 1960 Civil Code of Ethiopia contains some provisions pertaining to compensation procedures. Art. 1470 provides that an owner, bare owner or usufructuary of an expropriated immovable and any person who benefits by a servitude (e.g. customary rights of way to a religious site or national parks etc) shall inform the competent authorities of the amount of compensation they claim within one month after notification that their rights would be affected by the expropriation. Where there is disagreement on the amount of compensation claimed by the affected persons and the competent authority, Art. 1471 provides Resettlemneni Action Plnais - Final 22 Febragy, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgraling Project for the establishment of an arbitration appraisal committee to decide on the amount of compensation. However, there is no provision regarding who should be members of such arbitral committees. It is provided that the principle in determining the amount of compensation is the amount of compensation or the value of the land that may be given to replace the expropriated land shall be equal to the amount of actual damage caused by expropriation" (Art. 1474 (1)). As regards elements to be taken into account when determining the amount compensation, the statement made by the contending parties (the persons to be affected by the expropriation and the administrative authorities e.g. ERA) regarding the value of the property or the rights expropnated is to be taken into account as well as the increase in value arising from the construction of the public works (Art. 1475). However, any building or improvement made after the service (notification) of the expropriation order for the purpose of obtaining a greater amount of compensation shall not be taken into account in determining the amount of compensation (Art. 1476). Although the principle is set out with respect to valuation of land and other assets expropriated as discussed above, the details to be followed regarding valuation methods are not provided for in the Civil Code. This is left to the bodies established to determine the details of the valuation procedure presumably because it is a technical matter. The Resettlement/Rehabilitation Policy Framework prepared by ERA (ERA, February 2002) contains various elements that ERA should follow regarding compensation procedures; Methods of valuation; consultation and participation process, grievance procedures as well as the institutional framework in the preparation of the resettlement action plans. Regarding compensation procedures, ERA has provided for a three-step approach to be followed. First, the establishment of compensation committees in each local government (Woreda) affected by the expropriation comprising of representatives from local governments, representatives from project affect persons (PAPs) and the ERA right of way agent. Second, is the assessment of replacement values of identified assets and the third step is to establish compensation rates for all assets to be expropriated. The compensation committees have the function of conducting the registration of affected properties and the number of PAPs per households and determining the compensation rates taking into account the World Bank requirements. It is also provided in the policy framework that all compensation will be effected ahead of the civil works (p27). This is in line with Art. 1478 of the Civil Code which provides that the competent authonties may not take possession of an expropriated immovable until they have paid the amount of compensation fixed. Although the criteria of eligibility is not expressly articulated in the resettlement/rehabilitation framework prepared by ERA, the identification of the eligible persons for compensation is presumably done during the course of Resettlemnen7t Action Plans - Final 23 Febnrary, 2003 Ethiopian Road.s Auithlority PANAFand AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Sliasheniene- Goba Road Upgradinig Ptoject registration of affected properties and the census made of project affected persons. Moreover, ERA has committed itself to take into account World Bank requirements for determining compensation. Thus, the eligibility criteria contained in OP 4.12 of the World Bank's operational manual on involuntary resettlement will be the one that ERA follows when determining eligible persons for compensation. The criteria for eligibility for affected persons contained in OP 4.12 are: a) those who have formal legal to land (including customary and traditional rights recognized by law of the country); b) those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a claim to such lands or assets- provided that such claims are recognized under the laws of the country or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan and c) those who have no recognizable legal right or claim to the land they are occupying (see p. 6 of OP 4.12). These are important factors because they also determine the compensation rates to be provided to PAPs. The eligibility criteria set by the World Bank is basically in line with the national legal requirements. In regard to legal rights over land, the eligibility with respect to land rights can be easily determined in most cases because land is owned by the Government in both rural and urban areas and there are authorities such as peasant associations in rural areas and municipalities, woredas and Kebeles in urban areas who allocate the land or give legal recognition to such land to the person using such land affected by expropriation. Legal documents such as certificates of registration may be difficult to obtain in rural areas but in cases of urban areas where municipalities exist there affected persons may have such legal documents. In practice, however, such legal documents may be difficult to find even in urban areas and most residents may claim such rights due to many years of possession or occupation of the land which in most cases is recognized by the urban authorities. Moreover, the Civil Code also recognizes that a possessor of an immovable shall become an owner of such an immovable if he/she has paid taxes for fifteen consecutive years (Art. 1168). With the exception of the land which is owned by the Government, this would apply to buildings, residential houses etc. One other important factor contained in the World Bank's OP 4.12 is the non- entitlement of persons who encroach on the area subject to expropriation after a 'cut-off date'. The cut-off date is presumably after the period a census is made to determine eligible persons at the initial stage the compensation committee undertakes this activity. Such persons will not be eligible to compensation or any other form of resettlement assistance. For Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba road, the 'cut-off date' is 20'i' January 2003. The procedures followed for identifying PAPS; the Consultations and Participation Process of Various Stakeholders and the deterrnination of compensation rates and valuation procedures are discussed at length in ERA's Resettlement/Rehabilitation framework. It is not the purpose of this section to discuss these further. What can be said generally is that they provide adequate procedures and methods of valuation and are in line with World Bank's Resettlement Action Plans5 - Final 24 Februan'. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Au(thority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazat eih - Assela - Dodola and Sliasheieiene - Coba Road Upgrading Pt oject requirements and the national policies, laws and regulations. What needs to be seen is how in practice these requirements are adhered to. ERA's policy framework provides sufficient guidelines for monitorng and evaluation and it is believed that this would really be a learning process for improvement of future resettlement action plans. One issue that might arise in the future is the lack of adequate land to relocate persons affected by expropnation within the vicinity these persons have been affected or to find suitable land to this effect. In this case, non-land based options providing opportunities for employment or self- employment is the preferred option as provided in the World Bank OP 4.12. Sustainability of this option in terns of providing the right opportunities for alternative employment or self-employment equal to that of the value of the property to sustain the livelihood of the affected persons is an issue that may require constant improvement and thought. 4.4 Institutional and Administrative Framework 4.4.1 Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and Administration Regions The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) was formally established on August 21, 1995. The FDRE comprises of the Federal states with nine Regional State members. The new government structure takes power from the center to regions and localities. The relative roles of government at the different levels (Federal, Regional and Local) in tenrns of power and duties, including on fiscal matters, have been defined by the Constitution, Proclamations Nos. 33 of 1992, 41 of 1993, and 4 of 1995. Under these proclamations, duties and responsibilities of Regional States include planning, directing and developing social and economic programs, as well as the administration, development and protection of resources of their respective regions. 4.4.2 The Environmental Protection Authority The Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) was established in August 1995, under Proclamation 9/1995, and is an autonomous government body reporting directly to the Council of Ministers. It has a broad mandate covering environmental matters at federal level. The Proclamation sets out the main responsibilities and broad organizational structure of the EPA and these include to establish a system for EIA of projects, policies, strategies, laws and programs and to enforce implementation of this EIA process (i.e. Review EIA reports) and the recommendations which result from it for projects that are subject to Federal licensing, execution or supervision. EPA is also responsible to provide advice and technical support to the regions on environmental matters Resettleient Action PlanIs - Finial 25 Febrary. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Aulthtority PANAF and AFRO Considlt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola anid Sliashernene - Goba Road Upgrading Ptoject In view of the multi-sectoral nature of the EPE and the number of government agencies involved in various aspects of environmental management, overall co- ordination and policy review and direction is the responsibility of an Environmental Protection Council (EPC) within EPA, whose members represent the key agencies concerned with policy implementation. With these powers, EPA has the mandate to involve itself with all environmental issues and projects that have a federal, inter-regional (involving more than one Region) and international scope. 4.4.3 Ethiiopian Roads Authlority The Ethiopian Roads Authority (ERA) is the Government body responsible for the administration of the RSDP. ERA is a legally autonomous agency in charge of the development and management of the country's road network: planning, construction and maintenance of trunk and major link roads, while responsibility of rural roads has been decentralized to regional Rural Road Authorities (RRAs). ERA's Legal Division and Right-of-Way (ROW) Branch ERA's legal division, and in particular its right of way protection branch is responsible for implementation of all resettlement action plans. It negotiates with regional government bodies, rural and urban kebele administrations to secure right of way for highway maintenance and construction purpose as well as for the establishment of quarry and camp sites. ROW negotiates with property owners, rural and urban dwellers associations (or kebele administration) in establishing compensation for any building, crop, vegetation and other property through judicial methods. ROW investigates claims and disputes arising from land acquisition; recommends acceptance or rejection of compensatory claims and ensures that payments are effected as agreed with claimants or as decided by the competent authority; secures receipts and land transfers for road construction. ROW organizes property valuation committee from appropriate Regional officials, community elders and introduce the committee with the authority's standard methodology and procedures of valuation of properties on the land. The ROW Branch, where appropriate, establishes arbitration appraisal committee for conducting negotiations with property owners or their representatives, ensures that accepted appraisal methods and techniques are followed in the valuation of property. Resettlenent Action Ploais - Final 26 Februanry 2003 Ethiopiant Roads A uthority PANAF an(d AFRO Consullt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashiemene - Goba Road Upgrading Pt oject ERA's Environmental Monitoring and Safety Branch The Environmental Monitoring and Safety Branch (EMSB) was established in January 1998 as Environmental Management Branch (EMB). It is established within the Planning and Programming Division of the Engineering and Regulatory Department to address environmental matters arising from the road development programme. The main responsibilities of the Branch include: * Advising senior management and assisting in the decision-making process on all road sector environmental and social issues; * Advising senior management and assisting in the decision-making process on all road sector environmental and social issues; * Ensuring that environmental and social issues related to environmental and social management and monitoring are adequately addressed in connection with the road project design, construction and operation and maintenance and other activities of all ERA departments and divisions; * Supervising and monitoring for road sector projects. 4.4.4 Regional Governments The project road falls within Oromiya Regional State. Under the Regional Governments are have zonal administrations. Zones are in their turn divided into Woredas. The basic administration unit is the Woreda and each Woreda is sub- divided into the grassroot administration level of Kebele in Urban areas and farmers associations in rural areas. Each administrative unit has its own local government elected by the people. Based on the powers and responsibilities of the regional governments, the Regional Governments have established Sectoral Bureaus, Commissions and Authorities. In accordance with the principles of decentralization set out in the Ethiopian constitution, Regional states shall establish their own independent Regional environmental agencies or designate existing agencies that shall be responsible for environmental monitoring, protection and regulation within their respective jurisdictions. These are expected to reflect the environmental management requirements at local level. The Regional Government Environmental Agencies shall: * based on the CSE, coordinate the fornmulation, implementation, review or revision of regional conservation strategies. * facilitate the establishment of lower level environmental coordinating bodies at the zonal, woreda and community levels ResettlemientA ctioui Plauis - Fiiial 27 Febi-iaiy. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - As5ela - Dodol aond Shiashenmene - Goba Road Upgrading Project * ensure the implementation of federal environmental standards or, as appropriate, issue and implement their own no less stringent standards. * prepare reports on the state of the environment and sustainable development of their respective states and submit them to the Authority. 4.4.5 Oromiya Office of Environmental Protection In accordance with the principles of government decentralization set out in the Ethiopian constitution, Regional states shall establish their own independent Regional environmental agencies or designate existing agencies that shall be responsible for environmental monitoring, protection and regulation within their respective junsdictions. These are expected to reflect the environmental management requirements at local level. Many of the responsibilities related to environment within the Oromiya Regional Government Bureaus are only now being formulated and additionally the original bureau structure is being reorganized whereby the environmental activities which used to be part of the bureau of agriculture, is now included in the newly established Office of Environmental Protection. The Regional Government's Office of Environmental Protection shall: * based on the CSE, coordinate the formulation, implementation, review or revision of regional conservation strategies. * facilitate the establishment of lower level environmental coordinating bodies at the zonal, woreda and community levels * ensure the implementation of federal environmental standards or, as appropriate, issue and implement their own no less stringent standards. * prepare reports on the state of the environment and sustainable development of their respective states and submit them to the Authority. Resettleizient Action Ploais - Finral 28 February, 2003 Ethiopian Roadis Auiihority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola anid Shashineene - Goba Road Upgrading Pt oject 5 POTENTIAL SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT 5.1 Description of the Project Socio-Economic Environment 5.1.1 Family Size of the Project Affected Person The total Project Affected (fully or partially) population is estimated at 3,755. Of this total population, 396 will be in urban areas and the remaining 3,359 are located in rural areas and will loss strips of farm land. Of the 3,755 people that will be affected, only 66 (or 16 HH) will be fully affected. These people will be relocated in a new plot but in the same locality. Partially Affected Fully Affected Total HH Population HH Population HH Population Urban Areas 36 330 16 66 52 396 Rural Areas 442 3,359 nil nil 442 3,359 TOTAL 478 3,689 16 66 494 3,755 The family size of the PAP range from 21 persons in Dodola town to 3 in Awash Melkasa and Dodola towns. The average family size is 7.6 for the whole of the PAPs. The family size of each of the affected household is presented in Annex 3. 5.1.2 Gender and Age Structure of the Project Affected Person In both the urban and rural areas, there are both female and male headed households that would be affected by implementation of the project road. Out of the 52 total affected household heads, 12 (23-1%) are female and the rest 40 (76.9%) are male. The age structure of the family heads ranges between 27 to 80 and the average age of the affected HH heads is 46.5. The gender and age structure of the Project Affected Family Heads is attached in Annex 3. 5.1.3 Livelihood of the Project Affected Person The project affected populations residing in the area are engaged in different types of livelihood activities. The livelihood activities where the majority of the population engaged in are trade and farming. In addition to these, there are also some people that are working in government institutions. ResettlenientAction Plans - Final 29 February 2003 Etihiopiain Roais Autihority PANAFan(dAFRO Consuslt Nazareth - Assela - Dodolat and Slhasheciene - Goba Road Upgi ading Project Due to its locational advantage, the households that live along the project road use their houses for different types of business activities. These houses in which they live in serve as a major and regular sources of income. Some of the business activities they are engaged in are hotel, restaurant and bars, shops, selling of local drinks (Tella, Tej, Areke), for storage of goods, pharmacies, barberry, etc. There are also significant number of people that use their houses (rented or privately owned) for business activities as well as for residence (multifunctional). Table 5.1 Affected Household Who Lose Houses No. Occupation No of HH 1 Pensioned 7 2 Guard I 3 Health Workers 2 4 Fanner 3 5 Business 26 6 Driver 1 7 Laborer 1 8 Unspecified 11 TOTAL 52 Although the majority of the PAP were not able to exactly estimate their daily or monthly income levels, an indicative information on income level and standard of living of the PAP were assessed during the socio- economic field survey (see Annex 3). 5.1.4 Ethnticity, Religion and Langutage of the Project Affected Person The different ethnic groups that reside in the area include Oromos, Amharas, Gurages, Silte and Tigrawi. No new access will be created to previously undeveloped areas, and there are no tribal people in the project area whose traditional lifestyles could become compromised through road development. Table 5.2 Ethnicity & Language of the Project Affected Person Ethnicity Percentage Amhara 42.3 Eritrean 1.9 Gurage 15.5 Oromo 25.0 Silte 11.6 Tigrawi 1.9 NA 1.9 Total 100.0 Resettlenment Action Plans - Final 30 Februaty. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Aitihor-ity PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazarethl - Assela - Dodola and Shlashe,nienc - Goba Road Upgr-ading Project Table: 5.3 Religion of the Project Affected Person Religion Percentage Muslim 25.0 Christians 71.2 NA 3.8 Total 100.0 5.1.5 Educational Background of the Project Affected Person Data on educational background for all the population couldn't be made available, the educational background of the Project Affected Person ranges from literates to certificate level. Detail information on sociological background of the PAP is found in Annex 3. 5.1.6 Historical, Cultural, and Religious Resources The Ethiopian Tourism Commission has published a Tourism Master Plan (Tourconsult, 1995) which identified a number of sites of historical, cultural, religious and archaeological importance in the country and none of these are located along the Project Area. Enquiries to residents along the project road have indicated that there are no known sites of historical or archaeological significance in the vicinity of the road. 5.1.7 Social Acceptability of thie Project Road Questionnaires were designed to test the public awareness of and attitudes to the project and its consequences on the daily life and general livelihood. Although no previous efforts were made to present the project to the communities and involve them in the development process as stakeholders, all PAP consulted were aware of the project. They also have clear ideas as to what the project is all about and what are beneficial and detrimental impacts for their life. Therefore, their knowledge about the project is good and their perceptions (expectations) is positive. During the consultation, they have confirmed that the project road is immensely important to the lives of residents, in terms of providing access to health facilities, irregular trips taken for meeting people, and for hauling food, supplies and other items. Social acceptability of the upgrading the existing project road is very high. All people interviewed along the road, including PAP, elders and elected members of the community, have given clear information of acceptance of the road improvements. Official attitudes at various levels of the local government Resettlement Actionz Plans - Final 31 February. 2003 Ethiopian Roadis Atithotity PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashenmene - Goba Road Upgt ading Pt oject (Woreda and Zone) are very encouraging. This project is also accorded a very high national priority and the Minister for the Ministry of Infrastructure Development is closely following the progress of this project. 5.2 Socio-Economic Impact of the Project Over much of the length of the road, the widened carriageway, shoulders and lateral drains can be accommodated within the existing ROW, without the need for land and property expropriation. There will be no realigned section through any of the towns traversed by the road. However, in some of the towns, there is insufficient clearance between the properties on either side of the road to accommodate the proposed works. In these locations, a relatively narrow strip of additional land will be needed and properties will have to be demolished. The potential impacts of the project associated with expropriation of land are described in the following sections. 5.2.1 Social Impacts in Urban Areas The social impacts on urban areas is basically limited to houses and built structures. Based on this assessment, a total of 52 households with an estimated 396 people in 9 different towns will be affected. This comprises 11 residential houses, 34 business only and 7 multi-functional (business and residence) will be affected. Under the classification of "Urban Towns", small rural towns are also included and therefore the urban definition of Ethiopian settlements with over 2,000 people doesn't strictly apply. In additition to the 52 HH, two governnent buildings (a service cooprative office and a grain store) will be affected. During the validation field visit, it was observed that there will be no affected households in Dera town and the RAP has been revised accordingly. The impact is quantified and presented in the table 5.4. The figures are obtained through an intensive investigation on the basis of a predesigned questionnaires and consultation meetings held with the affected population and local authorities (Woreda and Kebele). The family size of each household was collected through information obtained from the household heads. In cases where the household head was not available during the survey, the data was collected either by their family members or else by their neighbors and cross checked from kebele authorities. Resettlement Action Plans - Fiiial 32 February. 2003 Ethiopian Roads A uthority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shlashemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project Table 5.4 Total Urban Population to be affected by the Project Roads No. Of Total Project No Road Name Town Affected Affected Household Person 1 Nazareth - Assela Sub Total 27 183 Assela 7 47 Awash Melkasa* 14 83 Gonde* 6 53 2 Assela-Dodola Sub Total 6 47 Junction Assasa 1 5 Bekoji 3 23 | Merero 2 19 3 Shashemene- Sub Total 6 53 Dodola Kofele 6 53 4 Dodola-Goba Sub Total 13 113 Adaba 4 23 Dodola 9 90 Grand Total 52 396 Note Awash Melkasa and Gonde towns has one government building each Based on the Robe and Goba towns master plans, recently the municipality of these towns have already widened the width of the road to 34 meters. Therefore, these two big towns are completely free from any potential land and property expropnation. This was made possible without any form of compensation provided to the people. The owners of the houses have removed their houses on voluntary basis without getting any sort of financial support from any source. The list of names of the PAPs was collected during the socioeconomic survey in the Project Areas is presented in Annex 3. The 53 affected houses belonging to the 52 HH and the 2 Government buildings have a total compound area of 6,773m2 and the average land holding size is 130.3m2. This is by far under the Region's recommended minimum compound area for residence, which is 200 m2 (this is what the municipalities give for the construction of residential houses currently. Out of this total plot area, only 956.5 22 m (14.1%) will be affected by the project and the remaining 5,816.5m2 (85.9%) land will not be affected. It is from this area of land that a total of 396 persons or 52 households and 2 Government buildings will be affected. The extent of the project impact varies from one individual to the other. Some will be affected completely while others will lose strips of their land and on the remaining land area they could continue living and working in their original location without being affected much in terms of the portion of their compound area they have to lose. The reconstruction of their houses within their previous compound would allow them to live there without moving out of the area. On the Resettlement Action Plans - Final 33 Februan' 2003 Ethiopian Roads Atiho,ity PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola anad Shla(sheineene - Goba Road Upgradiing Project contrary some have to be relocated to other places. The overall summary of the project impact on the urban areas (building and built-up structures) along the project road is presented in Annex 5. As observed during the field survey, due to the location advantage which is created as a result of the presence of the road, out of the 55 affected houses (52 households), 35 houses are used for various types of commercial activities, 7 are used partly for residence and partly for commercial activities and the remaining 11 for residence. Hence, categorization of the effect (partially and fully affected) and compensation entitlement stem from the assessment that recognizes the former use and practice of the houses, the possibility of reestablishing them in the same but remaining plot and choice of the PAP's for re-housing. Fully Affected: The reason for fully affected HH is that almost all the plot area is taken and the PAP cannot reestablish herself/himself in the remaining compound area for the former use and practice of the houses. A total of 16 households in 6 different towns (out of the 9 affected towns) will be fully affected. In addition to these houses one more government office at Awash Melkasa will be fully affected. These HH will be receive full compensation to rebuild new house, Compensation value (inconvenience cost) and compensation for income restoration during construction and transfer for loss of business. The lists of names of the PAPs that will be fully affected and the entitlement are given in Annex 5 and 6. Partially Affected: Based on the field assessment, a total of 36 households in 9 different towns will be partially affected. These HH will be able to continue living and working within their present plot without any need of relocation on a new plot of land. In addition to these houses one more government office at Gonde will be partially affected. The lists of names of the PAPs that will be partially affected are shown in Annex 5 and 6. The type and the purpose of the houses are not identical. Out of the affected 55 houses 46 are made up of wood and mud with corrugated iron sheet roofing whereas 5 houses are made of Hollow block and the remaining 4 are masonry houses. The following table presents the summery of the type and the purpose of the houses whereas the details are presented in Annexes 6. Table 5.6 Type of Affected Houses No. Type of the Houses No.* I Mud walls with corrugated iron sheet roofs 46 2 Hollow concrete block with corrugated iron sheet 5 roofs 3 Masonry stone with corrugated iron sheet roofs 4 Total 55 Note * The total includes the 2 affected govern1ment buildings Resetuleient Action Plans - Final 34 Febriary, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Autihority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assel(i - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project The major identified types of the commercial activities include barbershop, bar and restaurant, cafeteria, Grocery, Shop, hotel, retail trade and for selling local drinks such as tella. Table 5.7 Purpose and Function of the Affected Houses No Purpose and function of houses No. * 1 Residence only 11 2 Residence & small businesses 7 3 Business only 35 4 Govt. building/Service Cooperatives 1 5 Govt. building/Grain Store 1 Total 55 Note * The total includes the 2 affected government buildings 5.2.2 Impacts of tihe Project in Rural Areas In riral areas, the main social impacts of the road project are on strips of farmland along the road. During the field survey, the potential impact of the project on rural areas was assessed. In the rural parts of the road there are some farmers that farm their land within the ROW of the road. In some rural areas the road passes through unutilized government land. In addition to farn lands there are also a number of permanent trees in some parts along the road. 5.2.2.1 Impact of the Project on Farm Lands In rural section of the project road, an estimated 112ha of strips of farmland belonging to 442 HH or 3,35 9 people will be partially affected. The names of the 442 heads of households who will lose the strips of farmland, will be established by ERA and the Woreda and the Kebele administrations at the beginning of the implementation of this RAP. The compensation for the forgone benefits from affected farmlands will be paid on the basis of the unit rates established in this RAP. 5.2.2.2 Impact of the Project on Roadside Trees It is estimated that a total of 2,000 eucalyptus trees will be affected. 5.3 Social Services to be interrupted Resettletnent Action Pl/is - Final 35 Febnrary. 2003 Ethlopian Roads Autho-rity PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazai eth - Assela - Dodola and Sliashietnene - Goba Road Upgrading Ploject In the entire project area, people have informal social association, which are known as Edir and Baltina. These two major associations are also common in the majority of the rest of the country. People form them entirely on voluntary basis and they contrnbute a fixed sum of money on a specified time periods. In times of the occurrence of incidence upon any of the members, the victim gets a fixed amount of financial assistance and also other form of close assistance from the association. It is a form of association that gives confidence for its members that is why people establish them in many places. The potential to interrupt the PAPs from these social services was assessed. Based on the survey, the fully affected 16 HH will be relocated in the same locality and they will not be interrupted from these social services. 5.4 Disruption to Services In the larger towns, small diameter water mains run at the margins of the road and there are also water points close to the road, and may lie under the road in places. Phone and low tension electricity lines, supported on posts, also run near to the road margins. Some of the town services will need to be relocated, in order to accommodate the widened road. Outside the towns, there are no known services that will be affected by the construction activities. Electricity and Telephone Poles: The study team has tried to assess the magnitudes of the losses that would occur on the electric and telephone poles found along the project road. However, the branch offices of the Ethiopian electric light and power Corporation and the Ethiopian Telecommunication Corporation in Nazareth town were not able to provide the required properly quantified information on relocation costs. According to both organizations to estimate the relocation cost they might need to conduct an intensive field trip, which may take them up to of three months time at the minimum. Despite this, for the sake of budget preparation, some estimates have been made on the basis of previous experiences. Water Supply Services: The water pipes of four towns, namely; Assela, Dera, Awash Melkassa and Gunde will be affected. In all these towns, the water pipes will be relocated. The following table shows the diameter and total of the pipes by towns. Resettlement Action Plans - Final 36 February, 2003 Etiziopi(atn Roads Authority PANAFand AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Sliash/erieme - Goba Road Upgrading Project Table 5.8 Water supply Schemes that will be affected by the Project Pipe Size in Pipe Le ngth (m) No diameter/inch Awash Dera Gunde Assela Melkasa 1 8 20 20 2 6 3 4 4 3 100 100 5 2 1/2 300 50 6 2" 200 50 7 1 /2 200 75 75 8 1 150 75 100 Source Arsi Zone WSS office 5.5 Impact Associated With Ancillary Works The construction camps, borrow and quarry sites, as well as access roads will require land both on temporary and permanent basis. In addition, land for detour and spoil dump may also be required during the construction of the road. There is uncertainties regarding the nature and extent of associated with these ancillary works sites. However, the approach taken to compensation recognizes the fact that there will be uncertainties until sites have been selected and it is known precisely how the contractors propose to develop them. However, based on current practice the impact due to these ancillary works is quantified. The average area of land required for the site office and residence campsite is taken from the current practice of other roads in the region. Hence, based on current practice in the area, 40,000 m2 is estimated for the contractor's site office. The following table depicts the area of land that may be required by each of the campsites. Table 5.9 Camp site Area Estimations (in 000 m2) No Section Supervision Contractors Detour and Total Camps Camps soil Dump I Nazareth -Assela 20 40 40 100 2 Assela-Dodola Junction 20 40 40 100 3 Dodola -Goba 20 40 40 100 4 Shashemene-Dodola 20 40 40 100 Total 80 160 160 400 Soutoce T/e above estimate is based on tie Mieso Residence Cattip Resettletineit Action Plans - Final 37 Februgary. 2003 Ethiopiain Roads Auithority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola anid Slhasheineae - Goba Road Upgrading Project The affected area is assumed to consist only farmlands. In spite of the present uncertainties, the approach provides a safer approach. The estimation of these lands on the basis of the farmland enables to allocate safer compensation budget so that any surprises can be handled. Compensation will be paid for temporary loss of strips of land due to the ancillary works. Based on this assumption, the impact due to these ancillary works is quantified and compensation cost is estimated and presented in this report. However, it should be noticed that land for ancillary works is most often acquired from non-farmland. Farmers who may lose land permanently due to ancillary works will be compensated with new land. This compensation arrangement includes any farmer who may lose land permanently. This arrangement has been confirmed by the Bale Zone and Woreda Councils (See Annex 8). However, due to non-availability of farmland in the Arsi Zone, cash compensation will be paid to affected HH. Also, should the lost strips of farms to diversions and borrow pits not be restored to their original land use/status at the end of the civil works, then farmers should be compensated for permanent loss of strips of land before official handing over of the road to ERA. It is possible that there could be a minor road alignment change during the actual construction stage and the decision to use borrow and quarry sites is also lie with the contractors and some of the sites will probably continue to be used after the construction period (to provide aggregate for periodic surfacing maintenance). Therefore, identification of PAP related to these ancillary works and the extent of PAA are to be determined during the construction of the road. 5.6 Impact on Vulnerable Groups The socio-economic survey identified 19 vulnerable PAPs. Out of the 19 vulnerable PAPs, 10 are female and 9 are elderly people (above the age of 60). During implementation of the RAP, this group will be given attention and care. The list of project affected vulnerable people are given in the Table below. Resettlement Action Plans - Fitial 38 February. 2003 Ethiopi an Roatds Autthority PANAF and AFRO Consilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola anid Slhnshecmene - Goba Road Upgt ading Project Table 5. 10 List of Project Affected Vulnerable People Nr Town Name of the HH Head z Nazareth - Assela Section 1 Assela W/o Aselefech Nigatu 01 NA F 60 Female & Old age 2 W/ o Zenebech Asede Worku 01 106 F 62 Female & Old age 3 Awash W/o Fikirte Zewde Adefs 01 055 F 45 Female 4 Melkasa W/o Meseret Kabte 02 NA F NA Female 5 W/o Atsede Ashune 02 NA F NA Female 6 W/o Wegayehu W/Meskel Abeta 01 387/365 F NA Female 7 Gunde W/o Shimbeza Redi Seid 01 F 27 Female 8 _ Ato Tsegaye Tesema 01 NA M 60 Male & Old age Assela Dodola Junction Section 9 Ato Alemu Gemeda 01 NA M 60 Male & Old age 10 Bekoji W/o Belaynesh Tere 02 341 M 67 Male & Old age 11 Ato Ibrahim Husen Igiso 01 NA M 70 Male & Old age Merero 12 W/o Worke Musa Ahmed 01 108 F 70 Female & Old age Dodola - Goba Section 1 3 Adaba W/o Eneayehu Zeleke Gesese 01 NA F 35 Female 14 Ato Beyene Denegdi 01 B054 M 58 Male & Old age 15 Dodola Ato Gizaw Demeke 01 NA M 56 Male & Old age 16 W/o Jemila Ahmed 02 NA F 40 Female Shashemene Dodola Section 1-7 W/o Zemeba Ali 02 482 F 54 Female 18 Koffele W/o Yltaktu Tekle 02 NA F NA Female 19 Ato Chaka Dima 02 NA M 80 Male & Old age Resettlenient Action Plans - Final 39 February. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Auithority PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazat ethi - Assela - Dodola annd Slhasheemene - Goba Road Upg adling Pt oject 6 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA ERA has committed itself to take into account World Bank requirements for determining compensation. Thus, the eligibility criteria contained in OP 4.12 of the World Bank's operational manual on involuntary resettlement is the one that ERA follows when determining eligible persons for compensation. The eligibility criteria set by the World Bank is basically in line with the national legal requirements. Therefore, the following criteria for eligibility for displaced persons contained in OP 4.12 are adopted in this RAP i. Those who have formal legal right to land (including customary and traditional rights recognized by law of the country); ii. Those who do not have formal legal rights to land at the time the census begins but have a claim to such lands or assets- provided that such claims are recognized under the laws of the country or become recognized through a process identified in the resettlement plan and iii. Those who have no recognizable legal right or claim to the land they are occupying (see p. 6 of OP 4.12). Persons who encroach on the area subject to expropriation after a 'cut-off date' are not entitled. During consultations with local officials, they were informed that no one would be entitled to compensation after the survey was conducted. For Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba road, the 'cut-off date' is 20th January 2003. A list of eligible persons was established and pictures of properties were taken (see Annex 9 Project Photos). This documentation was submitted to the local administrations between 7th and gth March 2003. Also, the number of PAPs per households and the affected properties (including properties and farm lands found within the right-of-way) were determined including the compensation rates taking into account the ERA's Resettlement Policy and World Bank requirements. However, during implementation of this RAP each affected Household head or individual person or party that claim entitlement have to prove their legal rights over the property to be expropriated in order to qualify as a legitimate stakeholder and receive compensation. Resettlement Action Plans - Final 40 Febnurary 2003 Ethiopian Roa(ds Autthority PANAF and AFRO Consuhlt Naza ethi - Assela - Dodola and Sh1ashlemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project 7 METHODS OF VALUING AFFECTED ASSETS 7.1 Compensation for Loss of Houses and Business 7.1.1 Methlods Of Valuing Replacement Cost for the Affected Houses According to the Resettlement /Rehabilitation Policy Frame Work of the Ethiopian Roads Authority, the basis of valuation of houses is Gross Current Replacement Cost (GCRC) (ERA, Resettlement /Rehabilitation policy Flamentonc, February 2002, pp-26). This is defined as the estimated cost of erecting a building as new having the same total external area as that existing with the site works and services on a similar piece of land. The valuation process also consider the use of compensation value for affected properties. "Compensation Value" is defined as the amount to be paid to the lease holder which is calculated as an amount which is above the gross current replacement cost, including the costs for the inconvenience caused to the leaseholders by relocation, and to enable the same leaseholders to build slightly better houses than what they currently occupy (RPF, Feb. 2002). In determnining the replacement cost for affected houses, the following points are considered: * the current construction cost for replacement(with no allowance for deprecation) is considered; * depreciation of the asset and the value of salvage materials are not taken into account, nor is the value of benefits to be derived from the project deducted from the valuation of an affected asset; * for those houses that are partially demolished/affected are assumed as if the entire house is affected. Therefore, compensation for the entire house will be paid; * The compensation rate is estimated on the basis of the type of the affected houses. The cost of each house that would be replaced is estimated on the basis of specification and bill of quantities prepared by the municipalities of each zonal town and verified with PAP; and * The households who lose their houses due to the project will receive full replacement cost plus compensation value. The compensation value is the family's expenses and loss in income in making the transition is duly recognized and accounted and compensated for to cover the loss of established business, and the social disruptions and inconveniencies. With this compensation value, the affected people can cover any expenses associated with their relocation/re-housing including access to social and public services. Rcsetlenient Actiont Plaiis - Fitnal 41 Februaty. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authiority PANAF a/md AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shiashe,nene - Goba Road Upgrading Project The compensation principles for various affected population groups is given in the table below. Compensation Principles for Various Affected Population Groups Affected Population Categories Compensation Entitlements Compensation Strategy - Full compensation to rebuild new - Relocate/rebuild house within the house remaining plot - Compensation value Residence inconvenience cost, to enable PAP to build better house and the cost of during transfer to the new place o - Full compensation to rebuild new Relocate/rebuild house within the house remaining plot 0 - Compensation value inconvenience cost, to enable the PAP to build better house and the Business cost of transport during transfer to _ _ the new place ; t:E- Compensation for Income D. Xrestoration during construction O and transfer Z - Full compensation to rebuild new -Relocate/rebuild house within the house remaining plot - Disturbance allowance to cover -Residence and Business (multi- loss of income and relocation purpose) cost -Residences - Land replacement for housing Provide new land for rebuilding house - Full compensation for housing in the same town - Disturbance allowance to cover cost of relocation and transport -Business - Land replacement to re-establish New plot with locational advantage to similar busincss reestablish business (income o restoration) - Residence and Business - Full compensation to rebuild new Provide new land for rebuilding house house and reestablish business - Disturbance allowance to cover cost of relocation and transport - Adequate compensation to replace _~ lost income Resettlement Action Plans - Fintal 42 Febriaiay. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consiult Nazat eth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upg ading Project - Compensation Value (Disturbance - The local administration will be allowance) to the tenants paid the appropriate compensation - Full compensation to rebuild new and rebuild new houses within the Partially Affected house remaining land - Retain the right on the new house to be rebuild within the existing compound |- co - Compensation Value (Disturbance - The local administration will be allowance) paid the appropriate compensation - Full compensation to rebuild new and rebuild houses within the 0 house remaining land and allot to the Fully Affected - Retain the right on the new house same renter with the same rate X to bc rebuild within the existing compound - The housing right at the same rate on new site - Full compensation for rebuilding - New land for rebuilding the Government Buildings new offices facilities - Land on abandoned route after - Relocate on/provide new farmland Due to realignment reinstating on abandoned route - Forgone benefits for the duration - Minimize impacts where possible of impact - Forgone benefits for the duration - The temporary access road will be Due to Temporary access or of impact restored and retumed back to the detour - Restored farm land after the same owner after the construction impact is over - Forgone benefits for the duration The temporary access road will be Borrow and Quarry Sites temporary of impact restored and retumed back to the - Restored farm land after three same owner after the construction years is over Borrow and Quarry Sites Permanent - Forgone benefits for ten years Note: * Land loss due to borrow and quarry areas is a temporary loss to the PAP Onlj wvhen ERA decides to retai,i the sitesfor routine ,nainte,iance will the loss bepermianent 7.1.2 Compenisation for Loss of Houses Re-housing/Relocation Options Based on the current findings about 52 households will lose their residential houses and/or business by the implementation of the proposed Nazareth - Asela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba road upgrading project. The socio-economic survey made by the study team indicated that PAPs were aware that they will have to move during construction of the road project. During the interview of the PAPs and their leaders, the re-housing options (self or assisted) and location preference for re-housing (on the remaining land or new location) were identified as suitable compensation/re-housing measures for the loss of their residential houses and/or livelihood. Resettletment Action Plans - Final 43 Febmary, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Auitilority PANAF and AFRO Conisult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Sliashemiene - Goba Road Upgrading Project Almost all PAPs did not much like the idea of assisted relocation, if required to move, they preferred to resettle themselves. However, their main concern was that the move should result in an improved standard of living. Out of the 52 household heads to be affected, 44 or about 5 per town want to rebuild their houses themselves. The compensation to all PAPs will be paid by ERA. To ensure that compensation will be used for building new houses, ERA and the Kebele will establish re-housing compensation committees. The constitution of these committees is given in section 9.1. The entitlement for each PAP is detailed in Annex 6. Replacement Cost Irrespective of the location in the project area, the unit costs are taken to be identical for the same type and purpose of the houses. This conclusion was reached at by analyzing the construction cost of the different areas. The following table presents the unit costs of the houses that are in use for the estimation of the reconstruction of the houses. Table 7.1 Unit cost of the replacement cost of the houses Nr Type of the House Birr/m' 1 Wood and Mud with CIS Roofing 500 2 Hollow Block Concrete 1,000 3 Masonry 1,200 The project affected households and institutions that would be relocated from their current location will receive compensation equivalent to the location advantage they might lose with the project. The unit rates for wood and mud type houses is 500 Birr/m2, for the Stone masonry type house, 1,200 Birr/m2 and 1,000 Birr/m2 for houses constructed with hollow concrete blocks. The above rate would allow and enable the affected households to build a house that has similar standard/quality to their present house. In towns, there is no shortage of land for replacement housing. During the consultation meeting held with the local authorities at zonal and woreda level they have agreed to provide the affected households with a replacement land as much as possible with equal locational advantage compared to their current location. Land acquisition have been confirmed durng the 2nd field visit. The house plots and dwelling sizes allocation at new site ensures improved standards and conditions. No PAP will be relocated out of her/his community. All PAPs will be re-housed within their own towns and villages. Therefore, there are no tribal PAPs whose traditional lifestyle could become compromised through the re-housing process. Resettlement Action Plans - Finall 44 February, 2003 Etlliopian Roads Aiutlority PANAF and AFRO Consiult Nazar-eth - Assela - Dodola and Slhasitemene - Goba Road Upgrading Ptoject As shown in the table, a total of 16 households will need full reallocation to a new plots of land. The highest number in any town is 6, the average per town is 2.7 households. Town Fully Affected Assela 3 Awash Melkasa 6 Gunde 1 Kofele 2 Adaba 3 Dodola 1 Total 16 Source Consultants field survey 7.1.3 Compensation for Business For the owners and renters of commercial and mixed property, the consequences of having to move away from the main road are considerably more significant than for house owners, since the main road of all the towns concerned is effectively the main commercial area and business losses may be considerable. Therefore, they will be paid adequate cash compensation for rebuilding (or alternative premises provided for those who rent from government). They will be allowed to retain the remaining portion of the house for commercial use and will also be paid compensation value for loss of earnings and to cover any of the other incidental expenses associated with having to move. The majority of the PAPs were not able to exactly estimate their daily or monthly income levels. The refusal to disclose their income is related to tax. Therefore, before implementation this will have to be discussed with the affected PAPs. That time because they will know it is real, they will be open to disclose their income. For this RAP, the following set of principles are adopted for adequately compensating for loss of business and properly rehabilitating the PAPs. * The process of land reallocation and compensation will be preceded by a detailed inventory of individual businesses. * Compensation for loss of business during relocation to a new site is estimated to cover a three month net loss of income. * The compensation payment takes into account that the PAP will receive land for land compensation for relocation with equally suitable location for business activities as committed by the local authorities. * All of these activities will be carefully planned and completed well in advance of actual construction to allow enough time for appropriate resettlement and relocation of project affected persons. Resettlement Aciion Planis - Final 45 Feb,utarv, 2003 Etliopian Roads Attlority PANAF and AFRO Conisult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Silashlemlene - Goba Road Upgraling Project * No construction commence until all land and property expropriation procedures have been completed, replacement land allocated, and cash compensation paid. The 2 affected government buildings will be compensated based on the unit rates developed for this RAP. 7.1.4 Compensation for Renters of Kebele Houses For those affected HH who live in Kebele - owned rented accommodation, the local Kebele Offices will be paid cash compensation for construction of houses and will provide replacement houses for these affected households an alternative rental accommodation for the same cost. See Table below for the number of households who live in rented Kebele houses. The highest number in any town is 9, the average per town is 2.9 households. Town No. of tenants Assela 2 Awash Melkasa 9 Gunde i Bekoji 1 Kofele 3 Adaba 2 Dodola 2 Total 20 Source Consultanits field survey 7.2 Compensation for Loss of Farmlands 7.2.1 Method of Valuing Replacement Cost for Loss of Strips of Farmland Taking into account the nature of road upgrading project, the extent of land expropriation on the sections concerned, it is unlikely that there will be anything other than a low level of (partial) impact as far as agricultural landholders and the overall project are concerned. Strips of farmiland along the road alignment will be temporarily affected. Therefore, to compensate the forgone benefit from agricultural land, a cash compensation is considered in this RAP. There is an established practice within the Oromiya Region that 10 years income from farmland will be calculated and given for the farmers to be affected as compensation if the land is required for development purposes. The basis for the valuation of compensation is based on the different types of crops grown in the area and according to its current market prices. Other crops could possibly be also grown but to a very limited scale. Therefore, in order to carry out the estimate compensation for the loss of crops the valuation for compensation is calculated on the above crops that commonly planted and grow in the PAA. The following table shows the type of major crops that are grow in Resettlemenit Actioi Plans - Final 46 Febmag, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgl ading Pr oject the area and it also shows the percentage proportion and the highest possible market price the products could fetch in the local market. Thus, teff occupies 2% of land out of the entire farmlands of the areas and wheat occupies 25% and the same procedure applies for the rest of the crops shown in the table below. Table 7.2 Estimates of Gross Income from one hectare of land Land Crop Yield Yield Market Price .Gross Gross Crops proportion Area (e Qt/Crop income/Ha Income (%) (Ha (Qt/ha) area Birr/quintal (Birr) (Birr) Teff 2% 0.02 15 0.3 200 3,000 60 Wheat 25% 0.25 30 7.5 160 4,800 1200 Barley 20% 0.2 20 4 150 3,000 600 Maize 20% 0.2 20 4 120 2,400 480 Bean 15% 0.15 15 2.25 130 1,950 292.5 Soya Bean 10% 0.1 12 1.2 170 2,040 204 Pea 8% 0 08 15 1.2 [ 220 3,300 264 Total 100% 1 20.45 l 164 2,927 3,100.5 Source: Woreda Agricultural Office The above table represents the level of gross income that could be obtained from a given hectare of land. The gross income that can be obtained from one hectare of land is therefore calculated to be Birr 3,100.5. The possible highest market prices of the crops are taken in order to base the compensation estimate at to a fair level. The production of crops is possible only through the application of different types of inputs ranging from human labor up to the application of modem inputs .The identified major inputs and expenses of the farmers required from one hectare of land also can be calculated using area specific figures. The following table presents the input requirements for one hectare of land. Table 7.3 Cost of Production per Hectare of Land Input Unit of Input Required Per Average Unit Total Price Measurement Ha of Land Price (Birr) (Birr) Fertilizer 50 Kg 2 200 400 Weeding Man days 20 5 100 Pesticide Unit 4 0.75 3 Tractor Tractor 1 170 170 L a n d Tra c t o r 70 70 reparation roduction Kg 20.45 12 245.4 Harvest/ Land Tax 90 Total 1078.4 Source: Woreda Agricultural Office Resettleneiit Action Plans - Final 47 February, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consilt Nazateth - Assela - Dodola and Shiashetnene - Goba Road Upgtading Project The over all input requirement for one hectare of land is estimated to be Birr 1,078.4. The production of the gross income of farmn products is possible through the application of the above level of expenses incurred. Therefore, by deducting the input cost estimate from a gross income of the farmn land, the net income from one hectare of land will be obtained. The following table shows the level of net income that could be obtained from one hectare of land. Table 7.4 Average Annual Net Income from one Ha of Farmland (in Birr) Crops Average Annual Average Cost of Average Annual Gross Income Production Net Income Teff 60 21.568 38.4 Wheat 1200 269.6 930.4 Barley 600 215.68 384.3 Maize 480 215.68 264.3 Bean 292.5 161 76 130.7 Soya Bean 204 107.84 96.2 Fea 264 86.272 177.7 Total 3100.5 1078 4 2022.1 Source: Woreda Agricultural Office According the calculation made in the above table, from a given one hectare of land the net annual benefit of Birr 2,022.1 can be earned through the application of modern farm inputs. The application of modern inputs such as fertilizer and seeds has become a common practice in the whole of the project area. According to the established practice in the PAA, when one is to be affected from his/her place, the ten-year gross income from the specified areas will be calculated and is given as a compensation for the Project Affected Person. However, the study team couldn't get the written guidance for the use of such procedure. If one is to lose the land at permanent level, the limitation of compensation to only a specified period seems an irrational one. On the contrary it seemed reasonable if some one is basically provided with land for land compensation than giving the monetary compensation on the basis of this ten-year period. The user of the land will transfer his holdings to his off springs implying that the benefit that can be derived from the land continues indefinitely. Since farmers are going to lose their land permanently, they are also going to lose the benefits that could be derived from it. Therefore, the unit rate of compensating one hectare of farmnland for the indefinite period of time should be established. For a stream of net income (xi) accruing in each year (t), the present value (X) is given by applying the planning discount rate (i) over infinity: ReseutlementAetion Plans - Final 48 February, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authiority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shaslhem?ee - Goba Road Upgrading Project X = E xt (+r)' X=l This is a finite sum because the net income will not have a growth rate as high as the discount rate over any longer period. The present value of the above formula can be reduced to the following formula. X = xo / r where X = net present value r = discount rate The current discount rate of the country is 10% and therefore by applying the above formula, the net present value of the Birr 2, 022.1 is calculated as follows Net Present Value = Birr2, 022.1/0.1 = 20,221. 7.2.2 Compensation for Permanent Loss of Farmland The above method of calculation of the present value of the farm products over infinity is directly adopted from the work of E.V.K. Fitz Gerald entitled "Public sector investment planning for developing countries". Therefore, crops on farmlands that are found along this road, will be paid at the rate of Birr 20,221 for one hectare of farmland. This payment will be applied for those agricultural land that will be permanently expropnated. The formula applied is found out to be in conformity with the current compensation practice in the Oromiya region. The 10-year income of products comes to be the same as this figure (Which is Birr 2,022.1*0O=Birr 20,221). It is understood that the construction of camp sites, access roads, detour and soil dump areas temporarily require an estimated area of 40ha land. But due to the fact that a topsoil could be affected by the project and, that specific land might remain unproductive (or infertile) for unspecified penod of time. Campsites could also remain under the ownership of the client after the completion of the construction work for the sake of road maintenance works, and that will be expropriated by the project for the above purposes is considered permanently affected in terms of compensation to be paid. Therefore, land loss for campsites and ancillary work will be replaced by land in Bale Zone and in Arsi Zone will be paid in cash. Resettlement Action Plans - Final 49 Febmaty. 2003 Ethiopiasi Roads Authorlty PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashernene - Goba Road Upgrading Project 7.2.3 Compensation for Temporary Loss of Farmlanid The overall area of land required for campsites, borrow and quarry sites, detour, and spoil dumping is estimated to be 40 hectare of land. It is also estimated that 10% of the project road is under cultivation. Thus the area of crop land for which forgone benefit compensation would have to be paid is 60ha. The following table depicts the overall compensation amount which is required for the farmlands of the road and will be compensated to PAP in the same manner as those affected by the road itself. Compensating these PAPs is ERA's responsibility and this is discussed and agreed with them. Table 7.5 Compensation to Cover Forgone Benefits from Agricultural Lands Permanent Unit Rate Total Loss Unit Total Grand total No. Description Loss (ha) (Birr/ha) compensatio (ha) Rate compensation (Birr) in Birr Bir/a) in Birr 1 Contractors 8 20,221 161,768 8 10,110 80,880 242,648 camp 2 Supervision 4 20,221 80,884 4 10,110 40,440 121,324 Camp _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ 3 Spoil dumping 8 20,221 161,768 8 10,110 80,880 242,648 Site 4 Access road 6 20,221 121,326 6 10,110 60,660 181,986 construction Construction of 0 20,221 0 60 10,110 606,600 606,600 DetoLurI Total 26 20,221 525,746 086 10,110 869,460 1,395,206 For those agricultural lands, that will be temporarily affected a 5 years forgone benefits at the rate of Birr 10,110 will be paid. This will cover three crop years during construction and 2 years of soil recovery pernod after the land is returned to the holder. 7.3 Compensation for Eucalyptus Trees An estimated 2,000 eucalyptus trees will be affected during the project road construction. The compensation estimate for eucalyptus trees is calculated as follows. Eucalyptus tree can survive up to 30 years by actively giving production every five-years. For the first cut period, which is after five years from its plantation date, only one stem could be harvested. Then during its consecutive cut periods, the tree duplicates itself with a number of copies. Therefore, in its second phase i.e. at its 10th year of age, a number of 3 copies can be harvested from the same original root. In the same token, at the third phase 4 copies and at the fourth phase 5 copies will be harvested. Then after its fifth phase it will start declining and therefore at the fifth and six phase either 2 or 1 copies respectively will be harvested. Accordingly, the total active life span of one eucalyptus trees reaches 30 years time. The market price of one eucalyptus tree is Birr 4 in the local market. Resettletnent Action Plans - Final 50 February, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Autihority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashenmene - Goba Road Upgrading Project The present value of the stream of income that can be derived from one root of tree is therefore calculated by applying the following fomiula. PV =FV X PVF PVF=1/(l+t) PV=FV X 1/(1+t)n Where PV = Present Value FV = Future Value PVF = Present Value Factor and T = Discount rate which is 10%. By applying the above formula, the present value is calculated and presented in the following table. Table 7.6 Present Value of Affected Trees Year No.of Market Price PVF PV copies (FV) 5 3 6 0.6209 11.1762 10 4 6 0.3855 9.252 15 5 6 0.2394 7.182 20 3 6 0.1486 2 229 25 2 6 0.0923 1.1076 30 1 6 0.0573 0.3438 Total 31 3 The total number of eucalyptus trees counted along the project road is 2000 in number, and the compensation for these trees estimated to be Birr 62,600 at the rate of Birr 31.30 per tree. 7.4 Compensation for Affected Services Relocation is normally carried out by the service providers upon payment of relocation cost by ERA, and needs to be completed prior to commencement of the works, in order to avoid delaying the contractor. It is recommended that: ERA should advise all service providers of the intended road -works programme, at the earliest opportunity. ERA should then notify the appropriate authorities of the relevant dates, and request completion of relocation works before those dates. The following table presents the total budget requirement of the water supply schemes, which needs to be relocated during construction of the road. Resettlement Action Plans - Final 51 February. 2003 Ethiopian Roadls Authzority PANAF and AFRO Conrilt Naza,eth - Assela - Dodola anid Shasheinene - Goba Road Upgrarding Project Table 7.7 Water supply Schemes that could be affected by the Project Pipe Unit Towns Total Unit cost Total Cost Size Awash Dera Gund Assel Length (Birr) (Birr) No. in Melkasa e a (m) inch 1 8 M 20 20 40 800 8400 2 4 M 70 70 120 17000 3 3 M 100 100 200 85 25900 4 2 l/2 M 300 50 350 74 13000 5 2" M 200 50 250 52 15750 6 1IY2 M 200 75 75 350 45 8125 7 1 M 150 75 100 325 25 8400 Total 120,175 7.5 Assistance for Vulnerable Groups The vulnerable groups were identified during field data collection and through interview that was carried out with the affected population. Among the total number of 54 households affected by the project there are 19 vulnerable persons. These persons are constituted mainly heads of female households and elderly. Among the elderly, 9 are men and 10 female; and among the total vulnerable group At the time of implementing the compensation and the resettlement action plan of the project special attention, support and care will be given to female headed households and to the elderly. The support will be made in rebuilding their houses, transferring and transporting their household items and materials to the newly constructed residential houses or houses used for business purpose. Even though it may be difficult to quantify the support provided in monetary terms, these supports are to be considered as one form of "social compensation" for both the female headed households and elderly. For vulnerable groups that rent and live in kebele houses, the kebele is responsible to construct the house in the relocated site and also provide all services the vulnerable groups will move to the new location with the assistance of the kebeles. For other vulnerable groups that live in their own houses and who will be affected by the project assistance and support is expected to be provided by the extended family network close friends the kebele and ERA. The process through which the vulnerable persons will be assisted by the kebele and ERA is described under relocation options. In some extreme cases where the vulnerable group do not have extended family network and close friends the kebele administration will facilitate the administrative issues and will give priority in every matter to the group. Resettlement Action Plans - Final 52 Feb?ariy. 2003 Ethioptan Roads Atltaority PANAF and AFRO Consrult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Sliashiemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project 8 ORGANIZATIONAL PROCEDURES FOR DELIVERY OF ENTITLEMENTS The consultant has surveyed PAP and the number of PAPs per households, assessed affected properties and deternined the compensation rates taking into account the World Bank requirements. ERA will establish compensation committees in each local government (Woreda) affected by the expropnation comprising of representatives from local governments, representatives from project affect persons (PAPs) and the ERA right of way agent. Compensation, both small and large amounts, will be paid either in cash or by cheque, following agreement with individual PAP's. Disbursements will be ensured by ERA and will take place in the presence of the Compensation Implementing Committee as well as the spouse or spouses of the individual PAP. Institutions and Individuals responsible for the Implementation of compensation and their Assumed Responsibilities are discussed in section 10 of this report. In line with Art. 1478 of the Civil Code and as provided in the policy framework, all compensation will be effected ahead of the civil works. A written agreement from the various government agencies participating in the implementation of this RAP from the highest (zonal) to the lowest (municipality and PA) has been secured during the second field survey. The agreement is summarized below and the translation is attached is Annex 8. The local authorities will assist ERA in organizing the PAPs in the RAPs implementation. Managing RAP's implementation is the main responsible of ERA and the local authorities. These ensure close compliance with the approved RAP. The Implementing Committee will provide practical relocation schedule. If will coordinate and handle any problems encountered in RAP implementation, and will report progress (monthly) in RAP implementation to ERA and local authorities and assist in RAP monitoring and evaluation activities. Resettlermenrt Action Plais - Final 53 February, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shasheinene - Goba Road Upgrading Project 9 IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS FOR THE RAP 9.1 Implementing Committee ERAs Righ-off way Branch together with the local authorities will be responsible for the implementation and management of this RAP activities. Zonal and woreda authorities, rural and urban kebele administration officials that are found in each of the affected areas of the project were consulted as how to implement the compensation process either in rural or urban areas. The institutions that were consulted are the ones that have got direct responsibility on the issue. In the project area there are no any NGOs operating in any kind of activity related resettlement. Hence, the organizations that would be responsible to implement the project include government institutions and kebele associations/administration. During the field assessment organizations and institutions that were consulted include: 1. Zonal Administration Offices 2. Zonal Industry and Urban Development Departments 3. Municipalities 4. Woreda Administration Offices 5. Zonal Water Resources Offices 6. Woreda Water Resources Desks 7. Urban Water Supply and Sewerage Services 8. Zonal Agricultural Desks 9. Woreda Agricultural Offices In the entire project areas the above mentioned institutions were consulted about the mechanisms on the implementation processes and they have stated unanimously that the respective offices as well as the people are expecting the construction of the road since many years back, and they will provide any assistance that is believed to speed up the compensation and the civil work of the road. In all the affected woredas and towns councils, Composition of Implementing Committees have been proposed and the responsibilities assigned for each organization or body is mainly on the basis of their legal mandates responsibilities given to each office. The organizations as well as their assumed responsibilities are presented in summarized form in the table below. These proposed participants are to form an ad hoc committee, which assumes a form of organizational structure. Successful implementation of the RAP, because of its complexity requires careful management of RAP. To this end, strict management system will be established Resettlementi Actoio Plans - Final 54 Febnrary. 2003 Etiiopiain Roads A uthority PANAF and AFRO Consutlt Nazaetdh - Avsela - Dodola and Sliashitemne - Goba Road Upgradiig Project by ERA together with the Regional Government, affected woreda and towns. When approved by the Region, the compensation will be distributed to the PAPs and monitored by the IC for the proper accomplishment of resettlement. ERA's ROW Branch will be overall responsible for monitoring resettlement implementation. The office will coordinate, inspect and supervise local RAP implementation, and ensure a successful completion of RAP on behalf of ERA. EMB of ERA will be engaged in monitoring, supervising and assessing RAP operations. Figure 3 shows the Composition of the Implementing Committee in Urban and Rural Areas. Table 9.1 and 9.2 provides the list of institutions (and their area of responsibilities in both and urban and rural areas) that can be consulted or called for assistance during implementation of the RAP. Resettlement Action Plans - Final 55 February, 2003 Figure 3 Resettiment Action Plan - Composition of the Implementing Committee in Urban and Rural Areas ERA Government RAP ' npmei.-., Com-11e | RAP - IMpl m..t,rg Com-It.e t/1 _ ~~~~~~~~~~UREAN= REAS RURAL AREAS _; Ch | Represenlalive Irom t~~~~h. omMrcplt l RpeeareIo th. Afcted W-rda r x CHAIRMAN l9 ROW Agenlro ER W AgrtI 1 - SECRETARY l ROW Agent from ~~~~~~~~~~~~~SECET RA f,,enaue rm W-red Urban Devecop...t b ofIe epesntt .I m W-da Ag,cul... Off- _ A Representative Irom PAPS l l ~~~~~~~~~~~Repre-n10- Iro PAPs 0 V O- cav5"d 2 cwdoe[n ::1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~h O =D~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~h Etl iopianr Roads Auithor ity PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashzeinene - Goba Road Upgrading Project Table 9.1 List of Institutions that Can be Consulted or Called for Assistance During Implementation of the RAP: Urban Areas No Organizations Responsibility involved Ethiopian Roads Budget Allocation, Coordination and implementation of the I Authority compensation and resettlement action plan and Monitonng & evaluation. Coordinate restoration of services (water and electric) Oromiya Regional Coordination, awareness creation and monitoring and 2 Council evaluation 3 Zonal Administration Coordinate the whole resettlement issue, facilitate Offices compensation for PAP, and facilitate land for land compensation, facilitate the relocation sites and the restoration of services 4 Zonal Industry and Compensation of estimate for houses, prepare site plan for the Urban Development relocation of PAP Department 5 Municipalities Identify land for the relocation of PAP and provide support in restoration; and provide special attention and support for the disabled, sick, elderly and female headed households 6 Zonal Agricultural Coordination and support of PAP and preparation of cost Desks estimates 7 Urban Water Supply Relocation of water supply pipes and construct new line in Services areas where PAP will be re-housed/relocated 8 Kebeles and Elders Provide advice on the faimess in relocation process and valuation of compensation and coordinate on the support to be made for elders, FHH and disabled 9 Representatives of PAP Represents PAP in all meetings and discussions held with ROW branch of ERA and with other offices 10 Telecommunication Relocation of telephone lines 11 EEPCO Relocation of Electric poles Resettleriierit Action Plans - . iinal 57 Febunaty, 2003 Ethiopiani Roadls Authority 'PANAF and AFRO Consuilt Nazareth - Assela - Dodola antd Shoashemtiene - Goba Road Upgradizng Project Table 9.2 List of Institutions that Can be Consulted or Called for Assistance During Implementation of the RAP: Rural Areas Organizations Responsibility involved I. Ethiopian Roads Budget Allocation, Coordination and implementation of the Authonty compensation and resettlement action plan and Monitoring & evaluation. Coordinate restoration of services (water and electric) 2. Oromiya Regional Coordination, awareness creation and monitoring and Council evaluation 3. Zonal Coordinate the whole resettlement issue, facilitate Administration compensation for PAP, and facilitate land for land OfFices compensation, facilitate the relocation sites and the restoration of services 4. Woreda Identify land for the relocation of PAP and provide support in Administration restoration, and provide special attention and support for the Offices disabled, sick, elderly and female headed households 5. Woreda Preparation of cost for the valuation of compensation of crops Agricultural Offices and permanent Trees 6. Peasant Coordinating Re Settlers Associations 7. Representatives of Represents PAP in all meetings and discussions held with the PAP ROW branch of ERA and with other offices 8. Zonal Agricultural Participate in the implementation of the RAP (compensation Desks for land, crops and permanent Trees, etc.) The implementation of the compensation process will follow the following five different phases: Committee Formation Phase The Ethiopian Roads Authority should request the Oromiya Regional state to form a committee in different zones traversed by the project road including representative of the PAP. The notification should contain the above- recommended list of institutions that will be involved in the committee. It should also clearly put the time frame given to under take the task. The Oromiya regional state in return required to established Implementing Committee at zonal, woreda and in the towns to coordinate and implement the resettlement. Awareness Creation At this phase, the committee members will make themselves clear about the duties expected from them. Any clarification about the scope of the project should be given by the client. The committee members in return will elaborate to the Project Affected Person so that the compensation program can proceed with the full participation of the people. Resetile,ticit Action Plans - Fiiial 58 Febtua,y 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authloritty PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth - Asselca - Dodola and Slhashemene - Goba Road Upg; ading Pt oject Compensation Payment Phase This phase is a stage where by the compensation program will be executed. All form of compensations will be accomplished on the basis of the exact project area Based on this notification, the proper owners of the assets will be checked against the study document for compensation. Funds for payment of the compensation will be made by the ROW Branch or its Agent. Reporting The zonal administration will produce a report regarding their accomplishments and submit to the Oromiya Regional State. The Regional state in return will communicate to the client about the accomplished compensation process and the site is ready for the construction of the road. All the RAP activities will be monitored by the EMB. 9.2 Scheduling and Timing There are a number of crucial activities that will be performed to make the physical relocation of the people under this project possible. There will be many different activities which will be undertaken either by the direct involvement of the committee or the people themselves which may require longer period of time. Assuming no budget constraints, the tentative time within which the compensation program will take place is proposed to be 16 weeks. All of the compensation aspects of the program could be completed ahead of the civil works if it is planned properly. The re-establishment/re-housing transition penod is minimized and believed to be adequate (4 to 6 months) if proper support is provided during the transition period. The proposed time schedule is presented in the table below. From the point of view of giving high priority to the project, the officials have confirmed that implementation of the RAP will be effectively and efficiently undertaken within reasonable time specified by the client. 9.3 Budget Requirement for the Implementing Committee To plan, administer and oversee resettlement and compensation, it is recommended to establish an Implementing Committee (IC) composed of four members as shown in Figure 3. The Committee will have the mandate, authority and funds to ensure proper assessment and timely compensation to the PAPs. The committee would report directly to the responsible Regional Government Office, Woreda Administrator in rural areas and Head of the Municipality in urban areas, and ERA. Resettle,n eat Action Plans - Final 59 Februaty. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority lANAF and AFRO Conslult Nazarethi - Assela - Dodola and Shlasheniene - Goba Road Upgrading Project The task and responsibility of the committee is challenging and tiresome and demands extra effort. Hence, it is recommended to pay an allowance at the rate of 70 Birr per day. A number of professionals such as surveyors to measure the size of land and property will assist in day-to-day tasks. Table 9.4 estimates the funds required for the Implementing Committee. Table 9.4 Funds Required for the Implementing Committee No. Cost item Amount (birr) 1 Per diem for 4 members 120 days 70 Birr/day 33,600 2 Per diem for 2 surveyors 120 days 50 Birr/day 12,000 3 Per diem for I driver 120 days 50 Birr/day 6,000 4 Per diem for I Prof. From EMSB 45 days 70 Birr/day 3,150 5 Fuel and lubricants 12,000 TOTAL 66,750 Financial resources to carryout the compensation and re-housing plans will be made available by ERA when and where required and construction plan will be prepared in concert with relocation plans. The total amount will be Birr 66,750. This budget requirement includes for the implementation as well as monitoring and evaluation of the implementation of the compensation program. Resettlement Action Plans - Final 60 Febti ary. 2003 Ethiopiani Roads %ahtority* PANAF and AFRO Consuixi Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Sliashitiemee - Goba Road Upgrading Project Table 9.3 Synchronized Implementation Schedule for Road Project and Resettlement Action Plan No _ActioniYear 200: as3 _er2O _ __ ear 2f03 _ Year 2003 Ya2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Nil Alto MI J I J |IA | '1 C) J I FI MI AlM J J IA S 5 NJ J .IF MlA M J J IA SIF |I N D J| M A|M WJ I|I 1PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE * P 1 O E r 11 ERA Submits the RAP's budget to FDRE _-__ e ______________________t 1 4 Estroabihmn o'Af RvAP-implementng Commitee (IC)__ _ ______________________ _ 1 5 Tendenng and Award of Design and Superosion Contracts ME" ____________l ROW Report and detailed drawngs showing project land acquisition T1T r T T Detated drawings showmng mains services relocabon requirements Conduct a one day workshop for the IC members and local authontles rl ^11- - - - r-onfimm compensatton and rates and relocation options through . ||||||| Tr rm T1 1 7 2 consultation with RAP-IC and the Woreda Councils___ ____ ___ ____ _ ii 17 4 Provision of Land ___ < ____ l T r _______i3 1 7 6 Installation of Utilities for PAPs (water supply, electncity and telephone)___ ____ 7 7 7 7________ _ 17 Relocation ofPubic Utilities (water supply electncity,and telephone) by X{{ f 2 CONSTRUCTION PHASE lll _ |||||_ E||l|,i, 21 Procurement Process (render and award for construction) ___:|L _1 111111_ 22 Mobilization of the contractors___ ____ v T || Land/property expropnation process dunng construction so that the II IJllIIIiII|- I 2 3 contractor has unimpeded access to the site.___ ____ 2 4 Siteclearance ispection and certification on completion ofthe works ___lll___=4 l Resettlemnent Action Plans - Draft Final 61 February, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemenc - Goba Road Upgrading Projcct 10 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM Any compensation payments is to be effected in the presence of the Implementing Committee. Where dispute arises between the principal parties- in this case mainly between ERA and subsidiarily other local government authorities in the project affected area and the project affected persons- the initially preferred means of settling disputes is by arbitration. This is permissible under Ethiopian law (see Arts. 3325-3336 of the Civil Code), and also according to Art. 25 of the draft Oromiya Rural Land Use and Administration Proclamation. The number and composition of the arbitral tribunal may be determined by the concerned parties. In the case of a dispute arising regarding compensation amounts both in kind and monetary terms, it is suggested that the maximum number of the members of the arbitral tribunal should not exceed five. This would allow meaningful representation from local government authorities and project-affected people but exceeding this amount might create unnecessary delay in decision making. The composition of the arbitral tribunal could be decided from the outset instead of leaving it to the disputants to appoint the arbitrators. This would be the preferred option since it might take a lot of time to appoint arbitrators if left to the disputing parties. It would also allow the appointment of relevant persons from both the local authorities and project- affected people and as far as possible ' independent' persons to make the decisions. Individual members of the compensation committee who initially decided the compensation rates should by no means be members of the arbitral tribunal since they have already taken a position. However, they will initiate the arbitration process and assigning members of the tribunal. Accordingly, it is suggested that the following be members of the arbitral tribunal: A. In Urban areas (towns) 1. One member from the Woreda Council- Chairperson 2. One member from the Woreda Urban Development Department 3. One member from the Kebele Administration 4. Two members elected by the project-affected persons from the community where the resettlement/compensation is to take place. These two members must not be directly affected by the expropriation. B. In Rural Areas 1. One member from the Woreda Council- Chairperson 2. One member from the Woreda Agricultural Office 3. One member from the Kebele (peasant association) 4. Two members elected by the project-affected persons from the community where the resettlement/compensation is to take place. These two members must not be directly affected by the expropriation. 62 Resetlenrent Action Plans Febttary, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority i'ANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemnene - Goba Road Upgrading Project In case the dispute is not resolved by the Implementation Committee, then the Committee will initiate arbitral tribunal. If any of the Party disagrees, the aggrieved party has the right to appeal to the ordinary courts of law in the region. What should be underlined here is that the preferred option of dispute settlement ought to be the option of settling the dispute amicably because recourse to courts may take a very long time even years before a final decision is made and therefore, should not be the preferred option for both parties concerned. It can be said therefore that the approach taken by ERA regarding dispute resolution is generally consistent with both the Federal and Regional laws. Grievance Resolution Channels for the Project Affected persons is shown in Figure 4. 63 Resettlement Action Pl/tis Feb-unty. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authonty PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgrading Ilroject Figure 4 Project Affected persons Grievance Resolution Channels RAP IC eI-s 1i I I te,.alw, p=~ka to PAP rAOpttpihntS package T.PAPa ITt. PAP SeuS ID I-ea lR, Cttpt package. dt ho t esresaw, Ih tRAP-IC The eleed PAP gn- chat,,, by Ut. RAP ICu t The PAP Rtd A -e RAP-Ic lol1 tI.n md Afi. P." a,eu hn eIott | IT.M Th A . A b h e PAP ,ad | . RAP-IC rr, fe, d-elr | The PAP d Ih. TAP-I lat1 a. ed t PAP P,e.i- Att.ct. P.-ao ReeP R...Al t ActIon Pti. IT Ittplamnt.nltg TUet,eltt. 1, I~~~~~~ECvA EWIA,IS Read. Aeetd Thetblbd Itd" he. oItemt. PAP Walt. ROW- Righ-fe W.y Ageet RAP IT ma RTb= ghn A r.commet lit. RAP-IT t.,hetI The PAP teIoeg -ceti t pup t p PATP R The PAP gTes h A witCft | |ott.ettt A Ih. ROW-ArRAP IC | Te PAP t1ce Ate i |Th PAP Mtk_ r Act crec s.Iotltottr ERA RrgflIlhsA dmee Agem 64 Resettlemnent Action Plalis Febnrarv, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AlFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project 11 RAP IMPLEMENTATION COST The total estimated budget requirement for RAP will be 8.71 million Birr. The following table summarizes the financial budget requirement for the compensation including the contingency amount. Table 11.1 Resettlement / Rehabilitation Budget Item Description Compensation Estimate (in millions) Compensation for loss of houses 1.71 Compensation Value 1.71 Compensation for Loss of Business 1.63 Compensation for loss of crops and land * 1.40 Compensation for loss of trees (only eucalyptus trees 0.62 will be lost) Compensation for water pipes 0.12 Monitoring 0.07 Sub-Total 7.26 Contingency (20%) 1.45 Grand Total 8.71 Note * Land loss for contractors camp, materials site, detours and spoil dumping sites 65 ResettleinentAction P/ntis February, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authonty PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemenc - Goba Road Upgrading Projcct 12 CONSULTATION WITH PAP The local people specifically PAP were consulted at the maximum level. The views and the aspiration of each PAP were gathered and as far as possible the compensation is worked out on the basis of the demand of the PAP. Consultation with PAP has been made on issues including their livelihood, compensation estimates, etc. Consultation was also made with all responsible local government authorities and community institutions found in the project areas including local and international NGOs involved in development activities. With woreda and kebele administration, and the PAP consultation was made on the location and type of replacement of the houses and agreement and understanding was reached. Zonal and woreda administration, and urban kebele administrations have fully agreed to provide land for the affected for the construction of houses within the vicinity of the town. 66 Resetlelenit Action Planis Februaty 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project 13 MONITORING PLAN This monitoring plan is an integral part of this RAP and will oversee re- establishing process of the Project Affected Person (PAP). It will be a compliance monitoring and this will assist to follow the type of measures incorporated in RAP documents, and the extent to which recommendations on these matters, as set out in the RAP, are complied with. It is the objective of ERA to use lessons from the monitoring and evaluation results to enhance the preparation and implementation of future resettlement action plans. For the monitoring and evaluation activities, the Implementing Committee together with ERA's Environmental Management Branch (EMB) to be established will take a prime responsibility at the project area level. The committees through their coordinator which are the administration offices at zonal and the woreda levels will follow and clarify the implementation processes, and whenever found to be necessary arrange the ground for consultation with Project Affected Person (PAP). The monitoring and evaluation process if possible should be Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation including all the stakeholders (PAP, Zonal, Woreda and Kebele administrations, NGOs, other Government organizations, and host communities) ERA's Environmental Management and Safety Branch and ROW-A will be responsible to monitor and evaluate the process involved in implementing this RAP in consultation with Zonal administration offices and the PAP by adopting the following indicators; * Compensation to be made * Restoration and restitution of PAP * Appropriateness of relocation sites * Appropriateness of the time schedule for RAP * Public infrastructures and social services re established * Support and assistance made to vulnerable groups and women * Appropriateness of grievance redress mechanisms The monthly, quarterly and annual progress report during supervision of the construction project and the World Bank supervision mission reports will include information about each PAP and these reports will be submitted to all concerned stakeholders and partners. ERA's through the EMSB will assign qualified social scientist to conduct individual evaluations of PAPs re-establishment socio-economic progress. This service aims at evaluating, and reporting on, the level of living conditions and 67 Resettlement Action Plans Febooay. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AlFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project social services of the PAPs, both before and after the re-establishment. The evaluation will be done quarterly for two years and annually for the next two years. Socio-economic evaluation will be based on a number of key indices for selected households, in combination with the special observation by the social scientist. The monitoring report by EMB staff or RAP-Implementing Committee will be submitted to local authority (woreda for rural areas and municipality for towns). A copy of this will be summated to the zone and regional Resettlement office by the EB of ERA. It will also be enclosed in the construction progress, reports submitted by supervising engineers. Only in this may can RAP implementation be monitored and problems identified and quickly resolved. The estimated budget for RAP monitoring and evaluation is estimated to be Birr 0.07 million and will be financed from the RAP budget. 68 Resettlement Action Plonts Febrtary. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemenc - Goba Road Upgrading Project ANNEX 1 LIST OF REFERENCES Environmental Policy of Ethiopia: Environmental Protection Authority, Addis Ababa, April 1997 Draft Proclamation on the Establishment of Environmental Protection Organs: Environmental Protection Authority, Addis Ababa, 2000 Environmental Impact Assessment Guideline: Environmental Protection Authority, Addis Ababa, 2000 The Conservation Strategy of Ethiopia; Vol I-V: Secretariat for the Conservation Strategy of Ethiopia, Environmental Protection Authority in collaboration with Ministry of Economic Development and Cooperation, Addis Ababa, April 1996 Road Sector Development Programme 1997-2007. Second Draft Final Report. Ethiopian Roads Authority, Addis Ababa, January 1996 Ethiopian Roads Authority, Resettlement/Rehabilitation Policy Framework, February 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Roads Authority, Environmental Procedures Manuals, 2001, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Proclamation No.1/1995 The 1994 Population and Housing Census of Ethiopia; Results for Oromiya Region. Volume 1: Part I and VI. FDRE Office of Population and Housing Commission, Central Statistical Authority, Addis Ababa, April 1996 Environmental Assessment Source Book, (Volume I, II & III). World Bank Documents Number 139, 140 & 141, World Bank, Washington, DC: World Bank, Environment Department 1991 Roads and the Environment: A Handbook, World Bank Technical Paper No. 376, Washington, DC: World Bank, Environment Department, 1997. Environmental Assessment. Operational 4.01, Annex A. World Bank, Washington, D.C, 1989. Inception Report, Resettlement Action Plans of Nekempt-Mekenajo, Nazareth- Assela-Dodola and Shashemene-Goba and Dera-Mechara Road Projects (Package A), Pan African Consultants Plc. and Afro Consult and Trading Plc. January 2003, Addis Ababa. 69 Resettlement Action Plans Fcbnary. 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authiority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shashemene - Goba Road Upgrading l'ioject Road Sector Development Programme Sipport Projects - Phase II, Environmental Impact Assessment Final Report, Aficon International, 2001, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Feasibility Study of RSDP II: Seven Roads Projects: Final Study Report, Volume 1, 1999, Kocks Consult GMBH Consulting Engineers in assosciation with Metaferia Consulting Engineers, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Detailed engineering design review, pre qualification of contractors and evaluation of bids for Nazreth - Assela - Dodola and Shasnene - Goba roads upgrading project. Engineering design report, part B Land acquisition drawings, RITES Ltd, in Association with UNICON, December 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Detailed engineering design review, pre qualification of contractors and evaluation of bids for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba roads upgrading project. Engineering design report section - x - drawings Dodola Junction - Goba road contract N° 3, RITES. Ltd, in association with UJNCON, October 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Detailed engineering design review, pre qualification of contractors and evaluation of bids for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba roads upgrading project. Engineering design report section - x - drawings Shashemene - Km 35 road contract No 4, RITES Ltd, in association with UNICON, July 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Detailed engineering design review, pre qualification of contractors and evaluation of bids for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba roads upgrading project. Engineering design report section - x - drawings Nazareth - Assela road contract No 1, RITES Ltd, in association with UNCON, July 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Detailed engineering design review, pre qualification of contractors and evaluation of bids for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba roads upgrading project. Engineering design report section - x - drawings Assela - Dodola junction road contract no 2, RITES Ltd, in association with UNICON, August 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Detailed engineering design review, pre qualification of contractors and evaluation of bids for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola and Shashemene - Goba roads upgrading project. Engineering design report section - x - drawings Km 35 - Dodola junction road contract No 5, RITES Ltd, in association with UNICON, July 2002, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Acres International Ltd., Engineering Economics and Finance, February 1994. 70 Resetilemient Action Plans Februauty, 2003 Ethiopian Roads Authority PANAF and AFRO Consult Nazareth -Assela -Dodola and Shaslhemene - Goba Road Upgrading Project Ministry of Economic Development and Cooperation (in collaboration with the development and Project Planning Centre, University of Bradford, UK), National Economic Parameters and Economic Analysis for the Public Investment Program in Ethiopia, December 1997. ANNEX 2 PERSONS CONTACED AND INSTITUTIONS VISITED Nr Town Name Organization Position Tele. Address Dera Town Ato Taha Heyi Municipality Head 33/Dera 2 Nazareth Ato Mengistu Adama Special Head, urban 02-11-28-61 Mekonen Zone davit and industry 3 Nazareth Ato HusseinWariyo Adama Special Head, Road 02-11-20-03 Zone Maintenance 4 Adaba Ato Dejene Geleta Ind.& urban devt Head 06-65-02-22 5 Dodola Ato Gashe Ramade Administration Head 66-00-44 6 Dodola Ato Tiruneh Nega Administration Head, finance 66-01-07 & admin 7 Robe Ato Habtamu Dadi Administration Head 65-02-51 8 Awash Ato Efa Durecha Municipality Head PbxO2 Melkasa 9 Awash Zenebech Jabesa Municipality Surveyor PvxO2 Melkasa 10 Assasa Ato Abdella Wata Administration Head 11 Assasa Ato Mengistu Doti Administration Head 05 12 Assasa Ato Husen Hamde Municipality head 05 13 Adaba Ato Dereje Mekonen admin head 45 14 Asela Ato Ashenaki Disasa Urban devt and ind head 31-12-87 15 Asela Ato Kebede Chala Urban devt and ind head 3 1-17-19 16 Asela Ato Asrat Zarfu Water head 31-10-30 17 Asela Ato Belachew Tefera Urban devt and ind head 18 Asela Ato Awgichew Urban devt and ind head 31-17-18 Dugne 19 Asela Ato Selomon Tadese Municipality head 3 1-12-06 20 Asela Ato Niguse Walle Municipality head 31-12-06 21 Asela Ato Husen Hamde Municipality head 09-11-04-32- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 6 0 - 22 Asela Ato Kume Kedir Water resources head 31-10-46 71 Resettlementi Actioi Plans Febnaory 2003 Annex 3 - Socio - Economic Prorile of the Project Affected Population No. Town Name of the H4ouse Hold z on . SD SD 00 Nazareth - Assela Section I Ato Markos Zeanbesa Wafe 01 060 M 55 10 Prist jAmhara Amaharic Christian iGuard 325 2 Ato Abera Beyecha Muleta 0l 072A M 40 II1 10 Oromoo Oromifa Christian Hlealth assistant 500 3 Ato Worku Endale Gebre 01 NA M 44 7 12 G urage Guragigna Christian Health technician 100 4 Assela Ato Sisay Mekonen 01 NA M NA S NA Amhara Amharic Christian NA NA 5 Ato Seyife Asfaw 01 068 02 M NA 6 NA Oromoo Oromifa Chnistian Pensioned NA 6 Ato Fikadu Asfaw 01 79 M 55 4 NA Oromoo Oromifa Christian Pensioned NA ___71 _____W/o Aselefech Ntgatu 01 NA F 1601 4 NA Amhara Amharic iChristian Pensioned 50 8 Ato Habte Mikael G/Egziabher 01 10442 M 55 5 NA lErithrian TiTin NA INA NA 9 Ato Tsadikan Seyum T'esfaye 01 050 M 55 3 NA Tigray Tigrigna Christian Farmer NA 10 W/ o Zenebech Asede Worku 01 106 F 62 8 NA Amhara Amharic Christian Trade NA I I W/o Fikirte Zewde Adefs 01 055 F 45 5 NA Amhara Amharic Christian Trade NA 12 Ato Mandefro Tsegaye Wodneh 01 019 M 42 II1 NA Amhara Anmharic Christian Tailor NA 13 W/o Meseret Kabte 02 NA F NA 6 NA Oromo Oromifa Christian Trade NA 14 Awash W/o Atsede Ashine 02 NA F NAI 4__NA Amhara Amharic Christian Trade NA 15 Melkasa Ato Serawit Mamo 02 NA iM NA 10 NA Amhara Amaharic Christian NA NA 16 W/o Rehima Abdo 02 NA M NA 7 NA Oromo Oromifa Muslim Trade NA 1 7 Ato Techane H/Weld 02 NA M NA 6 NA Amhara Anmharic Christian NA NA 1 8 Ato Mekonen 02 NA M NA 4 NA Amahara Amharic Christian NA NA 19 Ato TIenkir Fuje 0 NA M 0 5 NA Guae Guriaggna~ Muslim NA NA 20 Ato Senbcta 0 NA M 0 6 NA Oromo O0romifa Muslim NA NA _ 21 Ato Mandefro Tasegaye Wodneh 0 NA M I 0 13 NA Amhara Amnhartc Christian INA NA 22 Ato Lalo Mehamed 0 1 NA M 43 9 3 Silte Siltigna Muslim Trade NA 23 W/o Wegaych W/Meskel Abeta 01 387/365 F Died 7 NA Amhara Anaharic Christian NA NA 24 Gude W/o Shimbeza Redi Seid 01 NA F 27 8 Illitrate Silte Siltigna Muslim TIrade 500 25 Ato Tsegaye Tesema 01 NA M 60 7 Illitrate Amhara Amharic Christian Trade 2000 26 Ato Flai Entele Dubero 0 1 NA M 55 9 Illitrate O0romo Oromifa Christian Trade Unknown 27 Ato B3edru Nuru Ahmed TF_T M 43 3 NA G UTage Giuragegna Muslim Irade Unknown - Assela Dodola Junction SectionIII 28 Assasa Ato Mohammed Haji 01 NA M NA 5 NA Oromo Orom ifa Muslim farmer t00 29 ~ Ato Admasu Ayalew Folle 02 385 M 45 7 10 Gurage Guragna Christian fIrade NA 30 Bekoil Ato Alemu Gemeda 0 1 NA M 60 9 Illitrate Oromo Oromifa Christian Pensioned 170 .31 __ _ IW/o Belaynesh Tere 02 341 M 67 7 lllitrate G urage Guragna Christian Hotel TIrade 200 32 MecoAto Ibrahim Hlusen Igiso 01 NA M 70 IS5 Illitrate iSilte Siltigens Muslim Trade 300 3 W/o Worke Muss Ahmed F TW F 7 4 Illitrate STite Silitigna utis rim Tr-adTe -3 Dodola - Gobs Section 34 Adanech Taye,Ketema Hailu Jitu Ab( 02 NA M 35 5 Na Amahara Amaharic Christian Trade Na 35 AaaW/o Eneayehu Zeleke Gesese 0 1 NA F 35 5 Na Amhara Amhartc Christian Pensioned Na 36 Ato Desalegne Meskele Yenebse 0 1 NA M 37 5 Na Amhara Amharic Christian Trade Na 37 Ato Niguse Seido 0 1 NA M 39 8 _ Na Amhara Amha-ric Christian NA Na 38 Ato Abdulahi Shenkule 02 137 M 50 3 Basic O0ronso Oiomifa Muslim Trade & Farmer 300 39 Ato Beyene Denegdi 01 B054 M 58 2 1 lllisrate Gurage Guragna Christian Trade 3000 40 Ato Shikuru Ahined 01 BICO M 501 16 Illitrate Silte Siltigna Muslim iTrade 3000 41 Ato Garma 02 NA M 35 5 llitrate NA NA NA None NA 42 Dodola Balambaras Mitku Seyoum 02 001 M 50 13 Illitrate Amhara Amaharic Christian Trade 400 43 Ato Gizaw Demeke 01 NA M 56 6 G-12 Amhara Amharic Christian Driver 400 44 ATo Melese Gelete 0 1 NA M 45 7 lllitrate Amhara Anmharic Christian Labourer 40 45 Ato Habib Kedir Ahmed 0 1 -NA M 50 12 lllitrate iSilte Sitin Muslim trade 2000 46 W/o Jemila Ahmed (Ato Musa Ibrahii~ __A F 40 7 rm OromifaW vus iM fTrade TO Shashenienie Dodola Section 47 W/o Zeineba Ali 02 482 F 54 4 NA Oromo Oromifa Muslim Trade 450 48 Ato Senbeto Debela 02 485 M NA 13 NA Oromo Oromifa Christian Farmer NA 4 KfeeW/o Yitaktu Tekle 02 NA F NA 5 NA Amhara Amharic Christian Trade 240 50 Ato Edakob beketa 02 NA M NA 1 3 NA Ambiara IAmharic Christian Trade 200 5I Ato Duse Yeke 02 NA M NA 9 NA !Gurage IGuragegna Christian Pensioned N ~52 Ato Chaka Dima _~T N_A _M _W -9 N A 1Curage I iurngegna Christi~an Pensioned_____ Annexes 3,4,5,6,7 Nazareth - Asela - Gobs XIS March 23. 2003 xIs1 Annex 4 - Re-housing Options for Affected HH Nr Tov.n/P Name of the Affected ilousehold Kebele House Gender Age Ownership of Re-hol in? Options Preference for Re-housmg Il Head No the house Self Assisted Existing Location New locatio. Nazareth - Assela Section 28 Assasa Ato Makos Zcbdsa Waft 01 060 M 55 Private X X 2 Ato Abera Bcyccha MiFlta 01 072A M 40 Pnvate X X 30 BekojAto Worku Endale 01 NA M 44 Pvatec X X 31 Assela Ato Srsay M Tkoner 01 NA M NA Pnvate X X Ato Sbyrfc Asfw Oe 06S 02 M NA Pnvatc X (By KXb___)_ _ 3 Adto Fkadu Asfaw c0 79 M 55 Kebele ) X 37 VW/o Aselefech Nlgatu 01 NA F 60 Kebele X (By 1X60,) X E Ato Habte Mokanl G/Egzlabhcr 01 0442 M 55 Pnvate X X 9 Ato Tsadik3e syc - resfaye 01 050 M 55 Kebele X Y 0 AW/ o Zenebech Asede Worku 01 106 F 62 Private X 42 DodolaBV/o Fekbia ZeMtde Adcfs 01 055 F 45 Private X X 4 2 Ato Maudtcero Tsegay 01 019 M 42 Prvate X X 13 W/o Meseet Ka,bte 02 NA F NA Kebele X X Awash H/o Alsede Ashnme 02 NA M NA Private X X I . Melkasa Ato Scra,s it Mamo 02 NA M NA YKebele X X 6 t W/o Rchima Abdo 02 NA M NA Kebele X X 7 Ato Techane Ai/Weld 02 NA M NA Kebeve X X 40 Ala SecttoMckonen 02 NA M NA Kebele X _ I of Ato Tenkir Tule 0 NA M 0 Kebele X . 20 Ato Senbeta 0 NA M 0 Kebele X X 21 Ato MandefTo Tsegaye 0 NA M 0 Kebelc X X 22 Ato Lalo Mehmed 01 NA M 43 Pnvate X (B! K,b,l,) X 23 W/ogW egaych W/Meskel Abeta 01 387/365 F ehed Pnvate X X 22 Gunde W/o Shumbeza Red, Sc,d GI NA F 27 Kebele X 7 7 I'At H.1a, Entelc Dubero 01 NA M 60 Pnvate X X A2 Ato Ben Nuru Ahmed 0 1 -364T M 4-3 Pn,ate Asset. D. dola lunction Section 2E Assasa Ato Mohammd I lal 01 NA M NA Private X X 29 Ato Admau Ayakcs Folle 02 385 M 45 Pisvate X X 30 Bekoj- Ato Alemu Gerneda 01 NA M 60 Kebeke X X 31 W/o Belayncsh Terc 02 34 i M 67 Private X X 32 At bao lut tio0 NA M 70 Pnvate 3 ecoW/o WVorke Nimia Ahmed 01 108- F 70Fo Pnvate X _ X Dodola - Goba Section 34 A Aaech raye 02 NA M 35 Kebele X X 35 Adb / ncaychu Zeldke 01 NA F 35 Kcbele Y X 3t Ato Dcs.lcg-s Meskele 01 INA M 37 Pnv=t X X 37 Ato Nigusc S.,do 01 NA M 1 39 Private X Y 38 Ato Abdulahi Shenk.lc 02 137 M so Private X X 39 Ato Bcyc.e Dcnegdt 01 B054 M 58 Kebele X (B) K,b,l,) X 40 Ato Shikumu Ahmed 01 B100 M 50 Private X X 4 1 Ato G,mlu 02 NA M 35 Private X X 42Dodola Balambaras Matku Seyoum 02 001 M 50 Private X |X 43 Ato G.za, Demcek 01 NA M 56 Pnvate 4$ ATO Melese Gelete 0 1 NA M 45 Private 45 Ato Habib Kedir Ahmed 0 1 NA M so Private 4 W/o Jenrifa Ah.,d 02 NA F 4 bl XX Sh.she.eule Dodola Section 471 W/o Zemeba Ali 02 482 F 54 Private X X 48 Ato Scnbeto Debela 02 485 M NA Kebele XX 45Koffele W/o Yitaktu Tekle 02 NA F NA Kebele I X 5( Ato Edakob beketa 02 NA M INA I Kebele XX 51 Ato Duse Yelke 02 1NA M INA I Pn,ate XX 5. Ato Chaka D.ma 02 NA M I 80 PrivatcXX Annexes 3,4,5,6.7 Nazareth - Asela - Goba xls March 23, 2003 xls Annex 5 - Impact Categories and Entitlements _ . Effect on the House Land Take Relocation on existing Relocation on new I ~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~land land Nr Name of the Affected Household Head Purposeof the Affected X 3 Houses E '2 E ~ ~~~~ Housing Business Housing Business Nazareth - Assela Section Ato Markos Zeanbesa Wafe 01 060 Residence 46 5 53 II 3 200 0 7 0 193 0 35 X 2 Ato Abera Beyecha Muleta 01 072A Residence & Shop 67 9 255 37 6 126 0 30 0 96 0 238 X X 3 Ato Worku Endale Gebre 01 NA Hotel & Shop 180 69 0 383 300 0 69 0 231 0 230 X 4 Assela Ato Sisay Mekonen 01 NA Residence 32 45 I 0 3 1 33 0 I 0 32 0 3 0 X 5 Ato Seyife Asfaw 01 068 02 Residence 16 4 6 28 8 16 0 5 0 II 0 3 13 X 6 Ato Fikadu Asfaw O0 79 Residence 88 10 11 4 9 0 1 0 80 ( _ __ x 7 W/o Aselefech Nigatu 01 NA Residence 32 45 1 0 3 1 33 0 I 0 32 0 3 0 X 8 Ato Habte Mikael G/Egziabher 01 0442 Residence & Grocery 28 4 0 14 3 35 0 4 0 31 0 11 4 X X 9 Ato Tsadikan Seyum Tesfaye 01 050 Shop 44 66 0 6 1 3 58 0 2 0 56 0 3 4 X 10 W/ o Zenebech Asede Worku 01 106 Grocery 39 9 8 6 21 4 40 0 9 0 31 0 22 5 X 11 W/o Fikirte Zewde Adefs 01 055 Grocery 51 84 112 216 108 0 26 0 82 0 24 1 X 12 Ato Mandefro Tsegaye Wodneh 01 019 Cafteria 53 32 10 0 187 6500 1( l0 549 0 15 5 X 13 W/o Meseret Kabte 02 NA Residence & tella trade 14 25 05 3 5 140 1 0 13 0 7 1 X X 14 Awash W/o Atsede Ashine 02 NA Residence 47 43 19 4 40 9 48 0 20 ( 28 0 41 7 X I5 Melkaa Ato Serawit Mamo 02 NA Residence 3 11 31 9 8 3 1 0 3 0 28 0 97 _ X 16 W/o Rehima Abdo 02 NA Tea Room and Shop 300 2 0 6 8 30 0 2 0 28 0 67 X X 17 Ato Techane H/Weld 02 NA Residence 26 8 4 8 17 9 27 0 5 0 22 0 18 5 X 18 Ato Mekonen 02 NA Trade (Fruit) 18 25 4 5 247 18 0 5 0 i3 0 278 X 19 Ato Tenkir Fuje 0 NA Trade (Fruit) 213 4 8 22 5 21 0 5 0 16 0 238 X 20 Ato Senbeta 0 NA Trade (Fruit) 58 4 364 62 3 58 0 36 0 22 0 62 1 X 21 Ato Mandefro Tsegaye Wodneh 0 NA Trade (Fruit) 24 8 2 8 11 3 25 0 3 0 22 0 120 X 22 Ato Lalo Mehamed 01 NA Trade 48 2 5 52 59 0 3 0 56 5 1 X 23 W/o Wegayeh W/Meskel Abets 01 ,387/365 Residence 67 3 5 5 2 125 0 3 5 121 51 2 8 X ____ W/o Vegayeh W/Meskel Abeta Bar 67 2 0 3 0 125 0 2 0 123 0 1 6 X 24 Gunde W/o Shimbeza Redi Seid 01 NA Residence &Trade 49 05 2 3 4 6 1000 2 0 98 0 2 0 X X 25 Ato Tsegaye Tesema 01 NA Store 54 99 0 7 373 0 3 0 370 0 0 X X 26 Ato Hai Entele Dubero 01 NA Trade 59 52 3 2 5 4 125 0 3 0 122 0 2 4 X 27 AtoBedruNuruAhmed 0 1 -T Trade 48 4E l 16 l 8 x Assela Dodola Junction Section I__ 28 Assasa Ato Mohammed Haji 01 NA Restraunt 15 6 i 3 8 3 1000 50 95 0 50 X 29 Ato Admasu Ayalew Folle 02 385 Grocery 58 5 6 0 103 59 0 16 0 43 0 27 1 X 30 Bekoi Ato Alemu Gemeda 01 NA Residence & Trade 60 48 8 7 14 4 500 0 58 0 4420 I 6 ( X 31 W/o BelayneshTere 02 341 trade 462 87 18 8 5000 58 0 442 0 11 6 _X 32 Ato Ibrahim Husen Igiso 01 NA Shop 1705 10 5 9 32 0 10 31 0 3 1 X 33 Merero W/o Worke Musa Ahmed TF f Shop 4 1t 2 7 72 (-T 4 X __X Dodola - Goba Section 34 Adanech Taye,Ketema Hailu Jitu Abera 02 NA Residence & Shop 129 6 126 0 97,2 130 0 126 0 4 0 96 9 X X 35 Adaba W/o Eneayehu Zeleke Gesese 01 NA Shop 33 11 24 5 74 1 33 0 25 0 8 0 75 8 X 36 Ato Desalegne Meskele Yenebse 01 NA shop 33 11 24 5 74 0 33 0 25 0 8 0 75 8 X 37 Ato Niguse Seido 01 NA Residence 26 22 26 2 100 0 26 0 260 00 100 0 X 38 Ato Abdulahi Shenkule 02 137 Hotel & Shop 48 36 57 11 8 73 0 20 0 53 0 27 4 X 39 Ato Beyene Denegdl 01 B054 Hotel 54 75 11 0 201 500 0 20 0 480 0 4 0 X Annexes 3,4,5,6,7 Nazareth - Asela - Goba xIs March 23, 2003 xIs 1 40 Ato Shikuru Ahmed 01 BIOO Trade 36 54 1 5 4 1 37 0 2 0 35 0 54 X 41 Ato Girma 02 NA Trade 29 925 32 10 7 30 0 4 0 26 0 133 X 42 Dodola Balambaras Mitku Seyoum 02 001 Business 127 5 12 0 9 4 372 0 45 0 327 0 12 1 X 43 Ato Gizaw Demeke 01 NA Shop 37 8 2 7 7 1 38 0 3 0 350 79 X 44 Ato Melese Gelete 01 NA Shop 87 7 3 8 3 87 0 7 0 80 0 80 X 45 Ato Habib Kedir Ahmed 01 NA Shop 26 535 2 6 9 8 27 0 3 0 24 0 III X 46 W/o Jemila Ahmed NA Shop 7 04 6 8 1 7 C 52 0 X Shashemene Dodola Section 47 W/o Zeineba Ali 02 482 Residence 36 96 28 74 132 0 220 1100 167 X _ 48 Ato Senbeto Debela 02 485 Residence & Trade 4 14 0 5 13 0 49 0 2 0 47 0 4 1 X X 49 Koffele W/o Yitaktu Tekle 02 NA Trade 122 31 5 25 8 122 0 67 0 55 0 549 X 50 K Ato Edakob beketa 02 NA Barbery 14 85 83 556 720 90 63 0 125 X 5 1 Ato Duse Yeke 02 NA Trade 65 45 83 12 6 1020 130 89 0 127 X I 52 Ato Chaka Dima I NA Trade 1 44 461 8 3 g t 6 577 ( n ._x IGovernment Buildings Awash . 53 Melkasa Grain Markeing 02 1 NA IGov Off 60 991 29 6 48 6 61 0 30 0 31 0 49 21 X 54 Gonde Kebele Service cooperative Office A Gov Off 86 92 25 T xl 84 U 3 4 x I Annexes 3,4,5,6,7 Nazareth - Asela - Goba xIs March 23, 2003 xIs 2 Annex 6 - Compensation Cost for Project Affected Persons/HH (in Birr) Relocaflon ono usting land Relocation on new, land Cash Compensation for affected houses Nr rosson Nan,se of the Affected Honsehold H ead Kehete TOpufteAfetdPTSH t.Afce ,nersh,p Unit Cost of Gross Corrent Covraio d,hcoose Restorahon oa oneeao Houses o.su ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Gross Area Bil Cost (Birr) Hloosing Bloiniess Housing Bosiness (. Reptocessient Reptacemeont Cost (ir Nazareth - Assela Section I Ass Ma,kos Zanobesa Walke St WOOd and Mod- R-sdesr Privte op ______ 46 5 50( 23,250 23.250 46,500 2 At. Abeea Be'echo M.Icta St Wood aod Moud Residenco & Sho ri'mate El 44 67 9 50 533950 33 950 1,200 69 tOO 3 Ato Wok.s Endete Gehre St Stone Masso-na Hotel & Sho Pnsvate 1i ISO 0 20 26 0 216,000 3,900 435,900 4 Assets Ato Sisay Mielone SI Wood -od Mod Resdence Prr,ate ____ _32 5 50( 16,250_ 16.250 _________32,500 Ato Sc)dr Asfws St1 Wood anod Mod Residene P-sate ________16 050( 0,000 t.000 16,000 6 Ato Ftkado, Asfit. St Wood aid Mud Restdeoce Kebele 0 6 50( 4,400 4 400 0.000 __7 W/__\Vo Aselelcfh Nicato SI Wood sod Mod Rooesce- Kehele 32 5 SO(_____0 65 16,250 32,500 0 Ato H,ihte Mktisl G/Ew.sbhse, 0 11 HCB Wial ti od Resideroe & Gtrue Priate 111 _______2 0 _________ 20 000 28,000 3 000 59,000 9 Ato Tsadd.no Secan Tesfave 01 HCB Sho Kebete ______________ 44 tO00 44,660 44,660 I 200 90.520 tO WI o Zeneech Asede Woeko St HCB Grocr Pr.ote ______ 1 39 AI00 39,900 39 900 3.000 02.800 It1 WIo F,k,nceZevdceAdels 0 1 Mavtooa Grocer Pn,ote Si1 120 62 200 62.208 3.000 171 12 Ato Mauidefo Tseoa Wodoch 01 HCB Coflena Proe te 53 3 _________ 53 320 53.320 2,250 ISO 809 1 3 W/o Mesreet Kabte 02 Wood & Mod Resulence & Teode Kebetc +51 __ 14 3 SO______5 7,125 7,125 1 500 15,750 14 Awash W/o Atsedr Ashu,n 02 Wood & Mod R-sdre.c pn... e 475 474 5 23 715 23,715 47 430 IS 5MeISa Ato Se-sIt Moos 02 Wood & Mod Rmsdece Kehele ______ ____________ 31 1 50( 15.555 15.553 _______ 31.11 0 1 6 W/Ithes,-seAbdo 02 Wsood & Mo,d T.aRoosand Sho Kehble _____ 1 30 1 50 15,045 IO 045 1,500 3 1590 17 Ala Tech.so H/Wctd 02 Wood & Sled Resideoce Khetde ______ ____ _2608 50 13,400 13.400 ________26,8000 t Ato Mekehor, 02 Wood & Mad Trade (Fnst) Kcbhete ISI13, S0 9.125 9.125 100(0 20.050 19 Ato Te-kir F.oe 0 Vr oodt& Mad Trade (Fost) Kehete1,1 21 3 50 10.650 10,650 1,000 23,100 20 Asa Seoheta 0 Wood & Mod Trade tFrutt) Kehete +1 50 4 SD 29,200 29,200 I 000 60,200 21___At. Maudefro Tscgoye Wodoeh 0 Wood & Mod Trade (Fru,tS Kebete 1 240 8______ 50 12 400 12.400 I Boo 26,600 22 Ato Lato Mehlaoed 01 Wood anod Mod Trad P.svte +4 0 _______50 24.000 24 000 1.500 49,500 23 WI. Woo,civc W/,tesket Ahota 01 Wood sod Mud Rcsadoc Ps-stc t11 _____ 67 50 33,500 33,500 67,000 W/o Wegaych. W/MrIskcI Abes 01 Wood sod Mad Bior Pri-te 11 ______ 67 50 33,500 33.500 3,000 70,000 24 Goode WI. Shsonhco Red, Seed 01 Wood sod Mod Rcsideoce &Tcade Kchcte ______ + _____ 49 I 50 24.525 24,525 1,505 0,5 25 AtoseaeTswn0 Wood od Mud Stor P ... te 114 Ss____ 5 50 27 495 27.495 1.500 56,490 26 Al. fin OoEte Dher 0 1 Wood aod Mod Trade Or-ate ______ 1 59 5 5( 29,760 29.760 1506,2 27 IAto Bod:n. N-os Ahosed 01 Wood nod Stud Trade, P., ot. ______ 1 48 50 24,000 24 000 1.500 49,500 lAssela Dodola Janctton Section 28 Assaso Ato Moh-nso-ed lie,. 01 Wood & Stud Restaoot Pn, ote 15 _____ 15 6 50 70800 7,000 2.250 170850 29 Ato Adorsu Ayatev FolIce 02 Wood nod Stud Gtroer Private 41 _____505 50 29.250 29,250 3,000 61.500 30 &oekp At. Aletn GIjeo ,,i 0 1 Wood nod hMod Rrasdence & Trade Kcbele,1 605 5 5030,240 30,240I 1.000 619800 3 1 W5/o Beluvoeh Toe 02 Wood anod Mud trade Pns.-te 154 46 250 23,100 23,100 1.500 47,700 32 Ato thruh,ot Hoses Igso 01 Wod nod Stud Sho P-scte I15 17 I SI 8.525 0,525 1,200 10 250 33 W/o Workc NtasaAlsod 01 Wood and Stud Ohw Privte 1,11 403 ______ 50 20,255 20,235 1.200 41,670 Dodola - Gob)a Sectton 3.4 Adooeh Ta-eKesee- Hail. hi,s Aho- 02 Wood & Mod R- ,d-n & Sho Kbehetei5 129 6 ______50 648~00 64.000 1,200 IS0 B00 35 Wto Enraveho Zelcke (teses 01 Wood & Stud Oho Keheec15 ____ 33 1 Six_____ 5 6,555 16,555 I,2D0 34.3 10 36 At. Desotroor Mteskele Yenebse 01 lWooad & Stud sho Private ______ 1 ___33 I Si 16.555 16.551200340 __37 ___ At. Nosose Se,do 01 Wood & Stud Resideoe P-avte 1 ______ 26 02ISixI 1310 I3tO1 26.220 30 At.oAbdotoh, Shru.lce 02 WVood oud Mud Hotel .0 Oho Private _ ____ _____ _____ 1540 4 500 24,100 24.180 3,900 52,260 39 Ate Bevroc Dcegrdi Ot Wood -ud SMud Hotel Kehetlc _____ '1 _____ 54 850 27,375 27.375 3 900 58.650 40 Aito Sh.koe, Ahosed 01 Stone Massory Trade Private ______ 36 120 450840 43.048 I 500 89,196 41 Ato Qn,,,. 02 Woodand Mud Trade P-aete '15 29 9 50x 14,963 14 963 1,500 31,425 42 Dodo]. B,flan-biaras Mnsi. Scyous 02 Stone Massoory R-sdence Prviate 1 127 5 120( 153,000 153,000 306,000 43 Ato Gt=,zei Dernseke SI Wood and Mtod Shop ___ Privose 370 8 Six___ 5 18,900 18,900 1.200 39,000 44 ATO Mcs,ee Getrie 01 Wood and Ma.d Sho Priate 87 ___________ 43.500 43,000 1.200 88.200 45 Ato Habib Kedir Ahrred 0 HCSbPnivate ___________ _____ ___ _ 26 5 100( 263535 26.535 1.200 54 270 46, .__ 90Jol bsdAoSuarho 2 'iVoCd and Sled iSb eee _____ ______ _____ ______ 5 ______ 2592.2 .004 Annexes 3,4.5,6,7 Nazareth - Asela- Goba xIs March 23. 2003 xlto Shashenieie Dodola Section _ 5 5,640 47 W/o Z-mea Al, l 2 ood & Mud Rcs,dence Pmnat t 37 0 5O 13,480 ........ .... 36,960 48 Ato Srrbebo [ebela 02 Wood & Mud Remrdenrce & Trade Kebele 4 1 5 2,070 2 070 1,500 5,640 49 Koff IW/o Yn.ako Tekle 02 Wood & Mod Trade Kebele 122 0 5 61,000 61.000 I 500 123,500 Sof fdI Alo Edakob beketo 02 Word & Mod 3arberY Kebele 1,1 I 14 9 5 7425 7,425 1,200 16,050 51 Ato Duse Ye,e, 02 Wood & Mud Tnode Patle t4 65 5 50 32,725 32,725 1 500 66,950 52 Ato Chaka Dlurro 02 Wood T&WMud 1 nde P-iate 1 44 5 0.22,230 22,230 1,500 45,960 Total Rrolarenent Coot Estmoate of tbie hoose(6B-r-) 1,634,104 1 634,104 1,634,104 4,902,311 Gor ..ernne.t UIldt,gS 53 Gr.t Mrkemoto 02 Wood & Mud rde(Fr-t Govt 61 Sr 30,495 30,495 60,990 54| Kebele Scrvrce per-alIt e Office 01 00 aWoodandMud l:raroITra" Kebele 1 | 8691 50r 43,460 43,460 86,920 T.w R__-tCs st t tt, -tb,d.(- 73,955 73,95 5 147,910 GrUod Total Rrwoleeent Cost (Brr) 1,708,059 1,708,059 5,050,221 Annexes 3,4,5,6,7 Nazareth - Asela - Goba xis March 23. 2003 xls 2 Annex 6 - Compensation Cost for Project Affected PersonslHH (in Birr) Relocatio, on easting land Relocation on new land Coash Cootpenaation for affected bouses Nr T.-n Nans of the Affected Household Head Kebtel.Type fteAftdPrps fteAftd Onoershp Urot Cost of Groat CurrenCt C.T tmV lue tInote Restoration Ta.CoV ato Hous" Homes Homing Business ~~~~~~~~~~~Groat At-ea (B )coal (liter) Iloattg Btusness HosIg intn Replace,menvt Replacemsent Coat (s5 (lEhrrltm2) (Brrr) Nazareth - Assela Section I Ate Mtarkon Z-eariec Wafe 01 Woo-d and Med Resident-n Pnvnte 41 6 5, 90 23 250 23,2S0 46,500 Ato Abeia Bieeha Mulet, 01 Wood and M ud Residec. & Sho Petvate 414 '14 672 50 33,950 33 950 1 200 691100 3 Ate Workia Ed.tle Gebe- 01 StorelMassonar iotel & Sbo Pri-te 011 tOO 120 216,000 216 000 3,900 435,900 4 Asan,lt Ate Stsav Nhtmehno 01 Wood and Mttd Restdence Private i432 5 ______ 50 16,250 16,250 ________ 32 500 5 Ate S 'tfe AfAre 0 Wood and Mad Restidence P-e te '1' 16 _________5( 8.000 80000 ________ 16,000 6 Ate Fkd.ad Asfan 0 1 Wood and Mud Resuler,,e Kebele oil____ 1 8_____ 0 50 4,400 4,400 0,800 ___7 ___W/o Aselefech Ni eta 01 Wood and Mud Residenc Kebele '1op ____ __________ 32 5 50 16,250 16,250 32 500 0 Ato H4abte btd.ael GIEg sabher 01 IHCB Wall -uth Res,denc,e & GroPryvate El4 '1 280 tO0 28,000 128 000 3,000 50,000 6 At,oTsadtkon Seyum Tesfa e 01 HCB Sho Ke,bele '14 44 7100 44,660 44,660 1,200 90,520 tO W/In Z"ebneh Asede Woklc 0 1 HCB Geocer P-ctin '1 3949 100 39,900 39 900 3,000 02 006 I I W/.oFtkne -tZ de Adel§ 0 1 hta,snoy Grocy Prvate 41' 5108 120 62,200 62,208 3,000 127,4 16 1 2 Ato Mandefro Tueg y Wodoh 01 H-CB CAlhrt Priate '14 53 3 loot 53,320 53.320 2,200 100,890 1 3 W/n M-ent-e Kahte 02 Wood & Mod Res,d- c& Trade Kebele '1' '1 _____ 14 3 _______50 7.125 7,125 1,500 15,750 14 Awnsb W/o Atuedt, Ahrre 02 Wood & Mud Restdence Pri-te ______ '4 ____ _ 47 4 Sly_____ 23.715 23.715 47,430 IS Meik.a Ato S-rut hNI.- 02 Wood & Mud Resudeece Kebele _______ 1 31 I _____ _ 50 153535 15,533 31,110 16 Wi/o R,,hraAbdo 02 Wood & Mod Tha Room and Shop Kebele '14 '1 E____ 30 1 _____ _50 15,045 15.0145 1,500 3 1,090 12 Ato Techane H/Weld 02 Woed . Mud R,,sui-ne Kebele 264 266 5 13,400 13 400 26,800 to Ato Mekonen 02 Wood & Mud TrdPat Kebele '14 10 3 5o 9,125 9.125 1,000 205050 IS AtoTenkieFue 0 Wood & Mud Trade (Feit Kebrle '14 21 3 50( 100560 10,650 0,00 23,100 20 Ato Sebeta 0 WoodS. Mod Trade (Fe-ti Kebel '4 _____ 50 41______ 50 29,200 29.200 1,7000 60200 2 __Ato Mandefio Tsaye Wod.eb 0 WoodS. Med Trade (F-o,tt Kebdel '14 ______ 240 Si ___ _ 50 12,400 12.400 1.8000 26,600 22 At. Labo Mehanted 01 Wood anod Mud Trade Privte '18 0 50 24,000 24,000 i 500 494506 23 W/. Wregyeh WtiMeskel Aheta 01 Wood anod Mud Residence Priate El4 67 5D 33.500 33 500 67,000 W/o Wnuayehu WV/MNikel Abeta 01 Wood and Mud Oar Prvte '467 S D 33,500 33,500 3,000 20,000 24 G.otde W/o Shuin-eza Red, St-id 0 1 Wood and Mud Res.de-e &Trade Kele '4 1 49 I 5D 24.525 24.525 1,500 50 550 25 1At Ta euea0 Wood mid Mud Store Pri-te 114 55 s( 27,495 27 495 I 500 56.490 26 AE. Ha i fotele Dubero 01 WVod and Mad Trade Priate ______ '4 ______ 59 5 50 29.760 29,760 1.500 61,020 27 __ Ate Bed.e Non Abhted 01 Wooid and Mud Trade Primatec _____ '4 _____ 480 50 24 000 24 000 1,300 49,506 lAssela Dodola Junction Section 20 Auau At. Mhiboammd Halt 01 Wood & Mud Restroont Pre-te '14 ____61 I 50( 7000 7,006 2,250 172,06 29 Ato Ad- tAval1- FolIe 02 Wood and hMnd Grocery Priva te '450 5 50 291250 29,250 3.000 61,500 30 Bckoji At.oAl-ioGeetda 01 Wood and hind Residecc & Trade Keb,le '460 5 50( 30,240 30,240 1,500 61,9800 31 _ W/o Bel.i esh Te 02 Wood and hMnd it-ode Privte '14 46 2 50C 23,100 23,100 1,500 47,700 32 M_.Ato Iheahum Haum tg.. 01 Wood aed hMnd_ Sho Privte 17 I 50( 0,525 0 525 1,200 10.2500 Mere oWi Worke htatoAbhmed 01 Viood nod hind Sbo Private i4______ 40 5 _____ 50( 20.235 20.235 1,200 41 670 Dodola - Goba Secftion 34 iAdmcchTv.MKveiee Haia hitu Abe-a 02 WoodS hMud R-id-ec& Shop Kehele 1____ _____ '4'~29 6_______50 64,800 64,000 t,200 130,050 35 h,W/o cEraeha Zeleke Dintse 01 Wood Mu ShpKc 3 5016556,51203430 36 Ala Desnleinee lmkele Yent-bsn 0 1 Wood & hiud shop,,,,,,,,,,,,, Private _____ ____________ 1433 I 50( 16.555 16,555 1,200 34,310 3_ 37 __ Ate Ni use Seido 0 1 Wood & hind R-adrnce P-tetn _____ _____ 1 26' 25o 13,110 13,110 26,220 30 Ate Abdulahi Sheehule 02 Wood and hMud Hotel & Shop Private _____ _____1440 4 50( 24.180 24,100 3.9D0 52 260 39 Ato B me Denteadt 0 1 Wood and Mund Hotel Kehele 1 540S 50 27,375 27,375 3,900 08,650 40 Ato Sinkur Abhted 01 Stone Minsuitay Trade Private '436 5 120- 43,048 43,040 1,500 09,106 41 Ate Ge-tea 02 WVod and Mud Trade Primate i429 9 ______50 14,963 14,963 1.500 31,425 42 Dodl Balan.ib Mitku SVOun 02 1stone Massuo- Residence Privte '1 _____ _____127 5 120 153,006 153,000 306000O 43 Ate Gm-at Denk 01 Vood an Mud Shop ,,,,,,,,,,,, rvt 43708 50 101906 108900 1.200 39.006 44 !AT. h'elme eli01 Wood and Mud S ho Prvi81 7 5 O 43,500 43.500 I 200 88,200 45 Ato Habib Kedn-rAhmed 01 IHCB SPrivate '1426 5 100 26.535 265-35 .0 54 275 46, W___ /o Jen1. Ahmend ~Ate Ntua Ibrahim) 02 IWood and Mad StKebcle 11457 50 28,520 2026i,0 58.240J Anvnees 3,4,5,6.7 Nazareth -Asela Goba x1s March 23, 2003 xls 1 Shashemene Dodola Section 47 W/o Zuembu Al- 02 Wood & Mod Rmstd."ce Prn- te 37 0 50 18,480 18,480 _ _ - 36,960 48 Ato Seubcto Debola 02 Wood & Mud Reside,ce & Trude Kebele t i 4 1 5 2270 70 70 1,500 5,640 49 Koff,, Wlo Yilkt. Tekle 02 Wood & Mod Tnde Kebele 0 122 0 50 61 000 61,000 11500 23,500 5s Ato Edakob beket. 02 Wood & Mod Birbety Kebde 4 14 9 500 7,425 7,425 1200 16,050 51 Ato DGse Yrke 02 Wood & Mud I rdc Pr avet 655 5 32,725 32,725 _,500 66,950 52 Alo Chak DGrout 02 W d Trde PTsae 44 0 22,230 22.230 1,500 45,960 Total Reflpcelret Cost Est,ote of the housr,OB-) 1,634,104,1,634,04 _ 1634,104 4,902,311 C.,ernttttf u.Iftugs 53 GraumarIrro 02 Wood & Md oTrade Frtr Gust 6| 5 30.495 30,495 60990 54 L e Seryrec eratreOfGice 01 W 5 0 t trO C Kebele T.R. 66, Oo 43.460 ,60 86,920 Total Retluceoset Cost Estmote of the Govt b,ddr,gs(Br,) 73,95 147910 Gunrd Total Repl.aceo=te Cost (Boo) 1,708,059 1,708,059 5,050,221 Annexes 3,4,5,6.7 Nazareth - Asela - Goba xis March 23, 2003 xis 2 Annex 7 - List of Project Affected Vulnerable People Nr Town Name of the HH Head z Nazareth - Assela Section I Assela W/o Aselefech Nigatu 01 NA F 60 Old age 2 W/ o Zenebech Ascdc Worku 01 106 F 62 Old age 3 Awash W/o Fikirte Zewde Adefs 01 055 F 45 Female 4 Melkasa W/o Meseret Kabte 02 1 Don't F NA Femalc 5 W/o Atscde Ashine 02 1 Don't F NA Female 6 W/o Wegayehu W/Meskel Abeta 01 387/365 F NA Female 7 Gunde W/o Shimbeza Redi Scid 0] F 27 Female 8 Ato Tsegaye Tesema 01 Fnknow M 60 Old age Assela Dodola Junction Section 9 Ato Alemu Gemeda 01 None M 60 Old age 10 Bekoji W/o Belaynesh Tere 02 341 M 67 Old age II Ato Ibrahim Husen Igiso 01 Na M 70 Old age 12 W/o Worke Musa Ahmed 01 108 F 70 Fcmale & Old Dodola - Goba Section 13 Adaba W/o Encayehu Zeleke Gesesc 01 NA F 35 Female 14 Ato Beyene Denegdi 01 B054 M 58 Old age 15 Dodola Ato Gizaw Demeke 01 NA M 56 Old age 16 W/o Jemila Ahmed (Ato Musa lbrah 02 NA F 40 Female Shashemene Dodola Section 17 W/o Zeineba Ali 02 482 F 54 Female 18 Koffele W/o Yitaktu Tekle 02 NA F NA Female 19 Ato Chaka Dima 02 NA M 80 Old age Annexes 3,4,5,6,7 Nazareth - Asela - Goba xis March 23, 2003.xls ANNEX 8 - MINUTES OF MEETINGS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES ANNEX 8- 1 SUMMARY NOTES OF THE MEETINGS HELD WITH THE WEREDA ADMINISTRATIONS, TOWN AND MUNICIPAL COUNCIL MEMBERS AND PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Road Upgrading Proiects List of the Participants of the Meeting Regarding to the Resettlement Issue Issues of the Proiect Road. 1. Road Project: Nazareth Assela, Assela Dodola, Shashemene Goba Meeting Place: Office of Industry and Urban Development/ Nazareth Meeting Date: 17/05/95 E.C List of Particioants Nr Name Organization Position I . Ato Mengistu Mekonen Adama Special Zone Head, Urban davit and industry 2. Ato Hussein Wariyo Adama Special Zone Head Road Maintenance 2. Road Project Nazareth Assela, Assela Dodola, Shashemene Goba Meeting Place: Zone administration office/ Robe Town Meeting Date: List of Participants Nr Name Organization Position 1. Ato Habtamu Dadi Administration Head Administrator RAP forNazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-1 3. Road Project: Nazareth Assela, Assela Dodola, Shashemene Goba Meeting Place: Office of Industry and Urban Development/Awash Melkasa Meeting Date: 17/05/95 E.C List of Participants Nr Name Organization Position 1. Ato Efa Durecha Municipality Head Mayor 2. Ato Zenebech Jabesa Municipality Surveyor 4. Road Project: Nazareth Assela, Assela Dodola, Shashemene Goba Meeting Place: Administration office of the Dodola Town/ Dodola Meeting Date: 02/4/95(10/01/2003) List of Participants Nr Name Organization Position 1. Ato Gashe Ramade Administration Head 2. Ato Tiruneh Nega Administration Head, finance & 5. Road Project: Nazareth Assela, Assela Dodola, Shashemene Goba Meeting Place: Administration office of the Adaba Town Meeting Date: 5/5/95 List of Participants Nr Name Organization Position 1. Ato Dereje Mekonen Administration Head 2. Ato Dejene Geleta Ind. & urban devt Head 6. Road Project: Nazareth Assela, Assela Dodola, Shashemene Goba Meeting Place: Administration office of the Asasa Wereda/ Assasa Meeting Date: 5/5/95E.C List of Participants Nr Name Organization Position 1. Ato Abdella Wata Administration Head 2. Ato Mengistu Doti Administration Head 3. Ato Dereje Mekonen Municipality Head RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-2 7. Road Project: Nazareth Assela, Assela Dodola, Shashemene Goba Meeting Place: Office of Industry and Urban Development Assela Date: 02/4/95(10/01/2003) List of Participants Nr Name Organization Position 1 Ato Ashenaki Disasa Urban Devt and Ind Head 2 Ato Kebede Chala Urban devt and ind Head 3 Ato Asrat Zarfu Water Head 4 Ato Belachew Tefera Urban devt and ind Head 5 Ato Awgichew Dugne Urban devt and ind Head 6 Ato Selomon Tadese Municipality Head 7 Ato Niguse Walle Municipality Head 8 Ato Husen Hamde Municipality Head 9 Ato Kume Kedir Water resources Head 8. Road Project: Nazareth Assela, Assela Dodola, Shashemene Goba Meeting Place: Office of Industry and Urban Development Dera Town Date: 17/05/95 E.C List of Participants I Nr I Name Organization | Position 1. I AtoTaha Heyi Municipality Head Mayor Note: There were many more participants in each meeting and onlyfew are listed in the above tables as participants RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-3 DISCUSSION POINTS The Points of discussion with the officials were prepared on the basies of the Terms of reference give by the client. They include the following major points. 1. Dispute resolution mechanism 2. Laws and regulations 3. Agencies and NGOs for resettlement activities 4. How to avoid inflow of people in the expectation of compensation. 5. General characteristics of the displaced people 6. Land tenure and transfer systems 7. Public infrastructure and social services to be affected 8. Definition for displaced persons 9. Proposed Compensation 10. Procedures for physical relocation 11. Availability and locations of potential land for reallocation. 12. Construction cost estimates In addition to the above points, several other points were also/ discussed the summary is present below. During the meetings there were many other participants from the PAPs. The Out Come of the Discussion Only,the major points which are forwarded by the officials are summarized and presented as fotlows. 1. All of the people and the officials wish the construction of the road to start as soon as possible. There is a feeling that the construction is delayed beyond the expiation of the public. The public at large have started demanding the road construction since many years back and this has remained to be one of the major cause for the dissatisfaction of the people. The people have an expressed their apprehension that RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-4 the construction of the road may not become materialized. However, they are ready to forgo their current holdings for the sake of the road construction without demanding any sort of compensation. 2. For the people to be displaced the agencies which will have a role in implementing the compensation process are identified and these include: * Woreda Administration Office * Wereda Agriculture Office * Municipality A Industry and urban development deptt. * Representative from PAPs 3. In the rural areas, the land allotted for residence and farming are different. Thus people can not encroach the row and built the houses for the sake of obtaining compensation. Although constructing houses and other buildings for the sake of compensation is not common, incase this is observed the officials will take an immediate action to reverse the situation. In the urban areas, the officials and the public will take possible measure to control any type of new construction activities along the road. Therefore, inflow of people into the road will not be a problem and can be handled very easily by the people and the local officials. On the contrary, it is observed that the people are ready to demolish their houses and be relocated to new places entirely by their own expenses -if the road is to be constructed. This has been witnessed in Robe Town very recently. 4. There are many places for relocating the project affected people. Due to the fact that there is no any limitation of free land, the best relocation site will be carefully selected and given for rehousing PAPs. Places for business, residence, and any other activities is already identified in the master plans of the towns and on the basis of that the places with equal locational advantage will be selected and provided to the PAPs. Upon notification by the client, the local authorities have promised to given land without delay. 5. The local authorities have expressed their commitment to provide instance to vulnerable groups as and when required. 6. The local authorities are informed that though the people to be displaced are identified at this stage, their could be some changes during construction of the road. There may be more additional people whose houses and holdings will be damaged or the effect could also be minimized compared to what is identified now. The budget that may be allotted for compensation will therefore be adjusted on the basis of the construction design. The local authorities and the people are informed to expect any changes. In the process if there will be more people to be displaced RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-5 than is currently expected, the people and the local authorities are ready to provide more free land for relocation and any other form of assistance for the people. Therefore, prior to relocating the people, the local authorities have requested the client work closely with with concerning the relocation of the project affected people. 7. For the people to be affected fully, 200m2 of land will be given on the basis of the existing guideline and practice in the region. In addition, the PAPs will be allowed to retain the left over land. 8. The assessment of compensation will be implemented on the basis of detailed each of the houses. The local authorities have suggested to add 100% additional cost is to be added on top of the replacement cost of the houses. This will earlier inconveniences as well as the market value of the houses which is much higher than the replacement cost of the houses. 9. For the water, pipes and telephone and electric pole lines that will be affected, land for relocation will be made available. 10. The local authorities have expressed houses which are built very recently without the permission of the municipalities they their reservation about ERA's compensation policy and they proposed that inorder to discourage illegal construction should not be compensated. If such houses are compensated, they will be a cause for the spread of illegal construction of houses within the row for the sake of obtaining compensation and this will en courage illegal construction of houses in the rest of the country. 11. There are no NGOs that can have a role in implementing the resettlement action plan. 12. The restriction not to use the land in the row for new activities will be notified to the people soon. 13. In Bale Zone, there is free land to be given for the farmers that may be affected by campsite etc. There is no shortage of land. But in Arsi Zone, there is a limitation of land and there fore, the farmers that will be affected should receive cash compensation. 14. Those people whose houses will be affected by the project need to have their houses rebuilt. This is the only major land acceptable form of compensation for them. 15. The people leaving within the kebele house will be transferred to the new houses for the same rent. 16. The resettlement action program should be implemented by the full involvement of the localities. Therefore, representatives from different local offices, public RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-6 infrastructures, the affected people, elders and religions leaders are were identified as potential members of the RAP implementing committee. 17. There is an established practice within the region of Oromyia that 10year income from the farm land will be calculated and given for the farmers to be displaced as compensation if the land is required for development purposes. 18. The houses which are built within the Row before the cut-off date have been noted by the local authorities. They have agreed to stops all future encroachment into the ROW. 19. The local authorities specially the municipalities and urban development depts.have provided the current construction estimate for the different types of houses. 20. The resettlement action program will be started and finalized based on the client's schedule. RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-7 Region: Town: Zone: Date: Woreda: 1. Any dispute resolution mechanism? 2. Laws and Regulations governing land tenure 2.1 Valuation of assets & losses 2.2 Compensation 2.3 Environmental laws 2.4 Social welfare regulations 3. Laws and Regulations relating to the agencies for resettlement activities 4. Name of agencies/NGOs for resettlement activities No. Name of Agencies/NGOs Responsibility 5. The institutional capacities of the Agencies and NGOs InstitutionfNGOs Capacities Others Manpower office Vehicle Others RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-8 6. How to avoid current inflow of people in the expectation of compensation 7. General characteristics of displaced persons 8. Provision to update information on the displaced people's livelihood and standard of living 9. Land tenure and transfer systems 10. Public infrastructure & social services to be affected 11. Definition of displaced persons 12. Proposed compensation under the local law 13. Institutional & technical arraignments for identifying and preparing relocation sites 14. Productive potential, locational advantages and other factors of the resettlement areas? (please indicate the relocation sites) 15. Procedures for physical relocation under the project Activity Time ,Site preparation Transfer Legal arrangement for regularizing tenure Transferring titles to resettlers Housing Infrastructure * Water supply * Feeder roads * Schools * Health Engineering & Architectural designs 16. Describe the boundaries of relocation area RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-9 17. EIA of the proposed resettlement area and measures to be taken to overcome the problems if there is any. 18. Monitoring of resettlement/rehabilitation activities 19. Any other issues 20. Estimated Construction cost of one m2 area of Chika house 21. Estimated Construction cost of one m2 area of Concrete house 22. Estimated Cost for relocating Telephone Pole of one unit 23. Estimated Cost for relocating Electricity Pole of one unit 24. Estimated Cost for water supply 25. Estimated Cost for modem fences 26. Cost for house compensation please attach the specifications for item 20-25 above. RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-10 ANNEX 8.2 - MINUTES OF MEETING WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES Summary notes of the meeting held with woreda administration; town and municipal council members concerning rural and urban kebeles where the Nazarath - Assela - Dodole - Shashemene - Dodola road passes through. The meetings were held between March 7 -9/03 in the following woredas and towns: 1. Arsi zone Industry and Development coordinating office 2. Bekoji Town council 3. Adaba Town council 4. Dodola Town council 5. Municipality of Awash Melkasa The rineetings with the local authorities were held and minutes the Amharic version of minutes of the meetings with each woreda land towns are attached with this Annex and are summarized below. The main discussion points of the meeting were: I 1. To provide the list of PAPs found in each section of the road (town or kebele) to woreda administration and town councils. 2. To inform local authorities that the cut off date for compensation was the date that the consultant carried out the field survey and recorded the list of PAPs (between 15th and 20th January 2003). 3. To ensure the availability of land in the area for replacement for fully affected PAPs. 4. To ensure that local administrations will construct similar houses using the compensation payment made to it as replacement cost for affected kebele houses, and shall provide the houses it construct for fully affected households and who reside in the affected kebele houses with the same amount of rent 5. The local authorities (woreda and kebele) shall monitor to ensure that PAPs who own private houses and received compensation from ERA will rebuild similar type of their previous house 6. Local authorities have agreed to maintain close contract and provide special support and assistance to identified vulnerable households (elderly and female headed households) while they are rebuilding their house and restore their income In all woredas where the consultant had meeting with woreda administrations, town councils, rural and urban kebeles have confirmed to: * Provide land for relocated houses * Provide assistance to vulnerable groups * Monitor that PAPs will rebuild their houses with the compensation they receive. They also have agreed to establish the controlling mechanism in consultation with the Implementing committee. RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-1 I * Monitor that no new construction is carried out in the ROW after the cut off date * To ensure that kebele administrations will provide similar houses to those PAPs who already rent kebele houses and affected by the project. RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-12 ANNEX 8-3 SAMPLE AMHARIC VERSION OF THE MINUTES OF MEETING WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES ''I. - A - n> ,.- ?# \"l'}l~t~ VI;I.P 7C ii lih11hl z 117 X 2j S gtj < _ t ;t j, (e t C.- Aa 4 I Af--4 1-t 1 Y?i1, Ai (SC 1 / To 0- q"A ' 6 '" A4IJ.)t Aa { n t l i; ' n, e-tX11. e. l nI;ye XA ,.>- ifllS Vt) l - fif2 - l'A-SlM 'i)'1 J fl" lX fl1l l), I I ",,'. , _JIl2l 4 /) C '7 at h 4 r) "'I. AI j ",.l7-45 MA Ci' t i:' g e All- 1 Iv l) .- I.U A 7Il '"ij r I i i A f I +T,7AT( > -if l lol ilt-I 1, lfo'}YS~1}11j1y ---l llot s , Xn} .ofs 4rilr t,otl.^ - IlVi 'P k LA\ e. -J. A" v4' )l, nr0. h1.>A,ID M it t i l fl:A7 7tl',9f>., / - Jz )7g Aa fil" A ""nItf-lhn lr ~b4 n -nt'11.- aV'5-C f-V< lt)- 'I4' rRnll Xli -to l /nJslC SIht'J Ill.( § )t h4iiv i'a'' A flAla-l} tilpI"hi SI 11 ,io71 'IS, Vtb s C/):)r It^r )'I A'/, M" S i 7 t"h A l.-t bGh I l' ( iS li 1i\tx l 17.Y7rIllti I ) ir AA' RAP fr Naaret - Asela Dodla -Shasemen -H Gob Annex 84 :-13,4S( ~l'' lI rtIA rl.- 7S ' AC/ S") l I I II" "I "5411 7l) I"''C' I 3'¶7lI'f M7 ¢t ^t-'{ SrTS S~.$~ Mvi a9L. FA-' >.f'2$ tr1s F t 6 I t IY>f$ ia ll l . ?; l' tih. ' l I Vbll It ' A 7/J I4A1 'i t "I lIft I' i 51.1' bDl)"'I -si< PI/E I" {"'Aii A"tj Vl l},lI si Yl < il' /fl 577¸1 A >7s .tfi 'C 'l ''t 1 I L'2A'I (L';-7 *- f RAP for Nazareth - Assela - Dodola - Shashemene - Goba Annex 8-13