Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 | ~~~~~~~~RP1 48 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2003 CONTENTS PAGE NO 11 Introduction -------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- 1-1 12 Project Description ------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------1-2 13 World Bank Guidelines ------------------------------------ ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-3 1 4 Minimeing Negatrve Social Impacts- -------- - ------------------------------------ - ------------------------------------------------------ - - --1-3 1 5 Land Estimate and Common Properties -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-4 151 Land Acquisition ------------------------------ -- … -----------------------…------------------------------------ - - - - - - 1-4 152 Common Properties -- … … …------------ -… -------------------------------------------------------- 1-4 1.6 Details of Affected Families ----- -------------… … -------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - …- … 1-4 16 1Ttleholder ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------…---------------1-4 162 Non-title Holders ------------------ - ------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------- -5----------------------------------- - ----------- -5 163 Vulnerable ----------------------------------------…- -----------------------------------------------------------…--------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-6 1 64 Project Displaced Families ----------------------------------------------------- -----------…------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-6 165 Vulnerable PDFs ----- -------------------------------------------------------…--------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1-7 166 Loss of Lveelihood -----------------------------------------------------------------------------…------------------------…----------------------------------------------------------------------1-7 1 6 7 Vulnerable Families Losing their Sources of Livelihood ------------------------------------------ - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------1-8 1 7 R&R Entitlement Framework-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-8 18 Income Restoration --------------------------- - … --------------- ----------------------- -_------- ------ - ------- ------ *-_---------------- --- - --- -----1-9 1 9 Paricipation of Stakeholders ------------ -- ------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------…-…------------- ---------------------1-9-------- 1-9 110 Institutional Arrangement ------------------------------------------------------…---------------------------------------------…- --------…… … … --… …--1-9 111 Implementation Arrangement and Schedule--------------------------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------1-----1-10 112 Budget--- ---------------------------------- -…- - … --- 1-10 113 Monitorngand Evaluation ------ … -------------- - ------------------------------ -------.- - -- - --- - _ - - - . .. 1 10 21 Approach and Methodology _… - - ---- …- _ ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2-1- 2 2 The Methodological Framework ------------- ---- - ------------------- ------------ --------------------------------- - ----------- ------- --------------------------------------2-1 2 21 Analysis of Alternatives -------… - ----_-- _------ ------------------------------------------------------------------…-------------------------------- ---------- 21------2-1 2 2 The Methodological Framework --------------------- ----------------------------- ----------…-------------- --- - ---------------------------------------- -------- --------2-1 22 2 Preliminary Social Screening Survey ------------------------ - --------------------------------------- ------------------- --…-------------------------------------2-1 2 2 3 Physical Survey Vis-A-vis Design Modiications and Finalization of alignment & ROW ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2-1 2 2 4 Collection of Land records (Khataunr) for PAP Identification -------------------…---------------- - ---------------------------------------------------------- -------- ------2-2 2 2 5Data Collection -----…--- --_- --_--- ----_ -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2-2 L I 2 26 Census Survey ------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ----------…---------------------------------- - ---------- 2-------------------2 2 27 Socio-Economic Baselme Survey --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2-2 2 2 8 Data Collection from Secondary Sources ---…------------…----------------------…-------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- ------------2-33 2 2 9 Consultations _ -_----------…--------------------_--------------- --------_----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- 2-3 Page 1 of 7 In Usoclau0n VAIn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Altahabad Bypass of NH-2 3 1 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- 3-1 3 2 Measures to MMinime Negatrve Social Impacts ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- - --------------------------------------- … 3-1 3 3 Summary of Measures Taken and their Impacts in Minimizing Negatrve Social Impacts in the Project Area ------------------------------------------------------- 3-1 3 4 Impact on Land Acqusition ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------3-2 3 4 1 Impact of Settlements ------------------------…--- -- --------------------------- -------------------------2--------------------------------------------------------- 3-2 3 4 2 Impact on Religious Structures ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3-2 3 4 3 Impact on Common Property -- -----------------------------------2-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3-2 3 4 4 Impact on Private Property ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------- 3-3 3 4 5 Impact of Commercial Establishments ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3-3 3 5 Minimizing Hardships by Providing Accessibiliy ----------------------------------- - ------------------------------------------…---- --…- -- - …- … --3-3 41 Background ------------- -----------…-…----------------------------------------- ------------ ---------------------------------------------- ---------- 4-' 4 2 Regional Setting of the Protect Area-------------------------------------- ------------…------------ ----------------- -----------------------------------------------------------4-1 4 3 Socio- Economic Profile of the project area .........-.--.-.......-.-..-.-.................-.-....-..-..-.-.....-.-..-.........--..........- ...........-- -------------------------------------4-1 4 31 Demographic Profle ----------------------------------…----------------------------------------------- _…------- _------ ----------------…------------- ---------- 4-1 4 3 2 Economic Profile ------------------------- --------------- ------------------------ -- - ----------------------------- - ---------------------------------------- …----4-2 4 3 3 Social Profile ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------4-2 4 4 Role of Allahabad Development Authority of Regional Development ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-4 [d 211.uI: = -$-TvTII IS 4 Y 4 ll l> f:X L ol J mF-:1*:lle I U: Il IlS{7le: i: to]ll Tz : F 5 1 Introduction------- ------- - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- 5-1 5 2 Entitlement Framework--------------------------------------------…----------- ---------- - -- ---- …-------------------------------------------------5-1 5 2 1 Entilement Categories ------------ -----------… - . ....................... . ---------- . -- . --------------------5-1 5 2 2 Cut of Date …----------- - -----…----- ---_---- ----- ---- _------------ -------_----------------------------------------------------------------------------------5-2 5 2 3 Fial Entalement Matrix - ---------- ------------------- -------------------------…-…------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5-2 5 3 Abbreviations and Terms -------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------…----5-2 5 31 Abbreviations ---------------*------------------------ - ---------…--- -----_ -- ------------------- ----------- -------------------------------------------------------s-2 5 3 2 Terms ---------- ----------------------------- -- --------- ------------------------ - ----------- - ----… -- -- ------ - ------ …-- - ----------- 5-3 5 4 Definiions ----------------------------------------------------------------------… - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5-3 5 41 Cut-of date --------------- --- ------------------------ --- . ------- -- - _-- _-- - _-_-_-----------------------…--- … --…------- ------- 53 5 4 2 Prolect Afected Person (PAP) -------- - ------------------- -----------------…----------- ------------- - ---------- ----…--_ - --- - ---------- 5-3 5 4 3 Prolect Displaced Person ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5-4 5 4 5 Definition of Family --------------------------------- -------------------- -…… … -4 --------._ - _ - ----------- - _ 5-4 5 4 6 Minimum Economic Holding -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- ------------------------------------------------------5-4 5 4 7 Landless Agricultural Laborer ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5------------r------- 5-4 5 4 8 Wage Eamer - --- ------------ -------------------------------------- ---- … - _ - _- ---- … 5-4 5 4 9 Below Poverty Line ---- --- …-- - ------ --- - ---- ------ - ------------ --- -----5--- ----------- - __ - ----------- 5-5 5 4 10 Income ------------------- -- -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- _ - _ -_ 5.5 5 4 11 Vulnerable Person ---------- --------------------- ------------ - … ---------------------------- ------------------…-------------------------------------------------- …--------5-5 6 1 Significance of Public Consultation -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------6-1 6 2 The Consultation process adopted in the project area --------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------6-1 6 3 Local Level Consultations------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ----- ------ ----- - ------- --------- - 6-2 6 3 1 Outcomes and Findings of Local level Consultations ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6-5 z Z>r In Page 2 of 7 assoclatunn with Consolidation of Resetlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 6 4 District - Level Consultations ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------6-6 6 4 1 Objectives and Contents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- -------------- -- -- -- -- ------------6-6 6 4 2 Major observations and Findings --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- ----------- ---- ------ 6-9 6 5 State - Level Consultation----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6-9 6 5 1 Malor Observations and findings of state level consultations -----------------------------------------------------------------------------*--------------------------------6-11 6 6 Consultation for the Underpass and Overpass options of the Proposed Allahabad Bypass Section------------------------------------------ - --------- 6-14 6 7 Plans for Continued Participation - -------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6-14 6 9 Conclusion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6-16 7 1 Background ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ------------------------------7-1 7 2 Land Acquisfion --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------- ----------7-1 733 Impctopa anctofLandAc -------u----ition--------------------------------------------…------------------------------…--------7-7 2 7 4 Severny of Impact due to Land Acquisition --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------…---------------- 7-2 7 5 Process of Land Acquisition --------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7-3 7 6 Appointment of Competent Authordy ----------------…------------------ ------------------------------ - ----------------------------------------------------7-4 7 7 Details of Land Acquisiion Procedure (Requirements) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-4 7 8 Acquisnion of Land and Determination of Replacement value of land & provision thereof budget ----------------------------------------------------------- - 7 6 7 9 Procedure/Methodology to be followed for payment of Land compensation --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7-7 7 10 Acquisition of Properties / Assets and Valuation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7-7 7 11 Disposal of Acquired Properies -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-8 7 12 Deposit and Payment of Land Compensation Amount -3H -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- 7-9 7 13 Land Acquisition Plan Schedule under NHAI -Act -Targets and Achievements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-9 7.14 Hearing of Objections wahin 21 days of Publication of Notification under Section 3A---------------------------------------------------------- -- -- --7-10 7 15 Hearing of Obtections received wihin 21 days of Publication of Notification under section 3D *-------- ----------…----------- ------------------------------------7-11 716 Transfer of Govemment Land -----------------------------------------------…---- ------------ ------ -------------- ---- 7-11 7 17 Minimum Economic Holding (MEH) and District's Average Land Holding - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------…-------- 7-11 718 Entitlement Matrix ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7-12 719 Land Estimates…---- --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-13 7 20 Land Requirements for Different Purposes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-13 7 21 Land Use ----- ----------------------…----------------- ------------ -------------------------- --------------------------…---7-1-----4------------ - - - - - 7 '4 7 22 Agriculture, Irrigation and Cropping Patem r--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-14 7 23 Expediing the Process of Land Acquisf ,ion - . - - .- -- …-- …---… …7-14 asoItoPage 3 of 7 ~* r Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 81 Background-- ------------------------- -----------…------------------------------------ -------------- --------------------------------- ------…---8-1 8 2 Existing Instilutional Capacity----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --1------8-1 8 3 Proposed Instdutioral Framework-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ----------- 8-1 8 3 1 Proposed Organisational Structure at the NHAI Head Quarters--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- -- ---- -- -- --8-1 8 3 2 Proposed Organisational Structure at PIU--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------8-3 8 4 Distnct Level Committees------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-3 8 5 Gnevance Redressal Committees------ --- ---- ------- ------- - - …-- --- - -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-4 8 5 1 Gnevance Redressal Mechanism-------------------------------- ----------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------8-4 8 6 Competent Authoryy ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------8-5 8 7 Non - Govemment Organisations --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- -- -- 8-5 8 8 Evaluation Consultant---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8-5 8 9 Roles and Responsibilties-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --… 8-5 810 Training and Capacity Builiding ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8-5 8 11 Implementation Issues------------------------------------------------------------------------…---------------------------------------------… … - …… --8-8 812 Implementation Schedule --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------8-8 8 13 Capacity Building Trainig -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-8 8 13 1 Training for the NGO Personnel-------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8-9 8 13 2 Training for the Beneficiaries of the Proect------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-9 813 3 Training for NHAI Slaff------------…----------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------…------------------------ 8-9 813.4 Overall Trainig Plan for NHAI Staff -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-10 814 Implementation Schedule ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------811 91 Introduction----- - --------------- - -- ------------------------------------------------… - … - … - … ----------- - - - - - - 9 1 9 2 Status of Livelihood Affected Families in the Protect Area----- -- ----…--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-1 9 3 Income Restoration Measures------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-1 9 4 Families Eligible for Income Restoration----------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------9-2 9 5 Occupational Pattem and Competency Levels in the Project Area-------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 9-3 9 6 Assessment of Training Needs for Eligible PAP's-------------------------------------------------…---------------------------------------------------------- - -9-3 9 7 Training Delivery Strategy -------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9-4 9 8 Income Restoration Plan--------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-4 101 Itrdcin Introduction ----------------------------------------- …----------------------------- ---------------------…---…-…-- - -……---10-1 10iJ ! !2. Sumayf&Rugt --- … …… …-… - ---- -- 1- 101 2 Sumpnarodon------------- ------------------------------- -----------… - ---------- ---------_------- - 1-------- - _ - _ 10-1 1032ASummtanyc &RBdet-- … -- - …- … ---- ---- -- -- -------- …- ……… ------------------- .............................-_______10-2 10 3 Value of Land and Structures ----------------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- --------------- --- - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 0-1 10 31 Compensation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _------- -- _------_- 10-1 1032 Assistance-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10-2 10 3 3 Transional Allowance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------10-2 10 3 4 Economc Rehabilriation Grant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------…------------…-----------…---------------- 10-2 1035 Shit gAllowance---------------… -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10-2 10 3 6 Rental Allowance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10-2 10 3 7 Share Croppers -------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- --- -------- ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------- ---- ------------ 10-2 10 3 8 Training ------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------------------ ------------------------ ----- ----- ------------------------ ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ -------------10-2 10 3 9 Compensation for Relocation of Common Properies/Communtry Structures --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10-3 10 3 10 Grant for Relocation of Kilns-------------------------------------------------------------…-- ---------- ---------- ---------- -----------------------------------------3103 In Page 4 of 7 w a r Inassociation with Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan tor Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 10 311 Tubewells and Wells.------- ----- ---------------------------- -- - - ----------------------------- -------- ------------ 10-3 10 3 12 Highway Related Disease (HIV/AIDS) -.----- ----------------------------------------------------.-- ----.----.--- -------------10-3 10313Dsbreen Dissbucrsemen----t-----------------OfA-----------s-------------si---s--lanc-e--- ------------.-..--. .--------------------- ---10-5 10 314 Compensation .---- ----- ---------------------..- - .---------- -- -- --- --------.---- ----------------- -.-----.--. -.---. ------10-5 10 315 Mode of Payment . -......... ............................... ... .... ......-........ . .......I- .--.------------ .--.------- --10.5 re .K0 I- am 0, 51 S I Ib* *I I111 Introduction.- -------------------------------------------------------- --------. ... . .- .--- ------ . -------------- - ----- -111 I112 Internal Monitoring --------- ----- -. - - .----- . ----- - -- ----------- - --. -- ------ -- -- ------ -------------..- -- --.----- ------11-1 113 Itrn lMo ioinndR potnterna-----------------oni-----t-------o ----ingand------------Repor---ting---- ------ --- -- --------.-.- . -. .. 1 1 3 1 Monitoring Indicators ------- ----- ------------ ----- ------------ ----------- --------..... -- . --.--. .-------------------11-2 1 13 2 ProcessMAndOutputM onitoring----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.--.... . . .... .. .- --. 11-2 1 1 3.3 Organization for Intemal Monitoring and Reporting ------ ----- ---------- ----- -------------.. .. - - . - --.--------- ---.-- . 1------- 11-4 11 4 External Evaluation & Reporting .--------- . -------------------. ----- ---- ----------- ------------.-..-.- .-- . .------ - ------- ---11-5 1 14 I Monitoring the Protect Objectives .------.-- - --.----------- ----------------------.---..----.--------------------- - ---- ---- --11-5 11 42 Measuring ChangesintheQ aiyOfLe----------------------------l----------------------------------------------.. - .-.-.. .-.11-6 1 14 3 Indicators for Overall Evaluation----------------------------------.-.. . . . -------------------.--------------. .--.--- --.----------11-7 ll14 4Reporling -- ------------------ ------------------------- ----------.-..-.-..-.-- ---. -. -------------------------- - -. . --------. 11-7 re] m M. - II - 12 1 Background.-.------------- ----- ------------------------------- ----.- --- -. ---- --- - ------- - -. ------------ .--.--- ------ -12-1 12 2 HIV /AIDS and Health Risks in the Project Area --------.---------------------- ----------------------------------- --12---------- 11 - 12 3 The main obtectives of the surveys ---- ------------------------------------------------------ -- --.-.--..--. - .--.----------122 12 4 The process adopted for assessing highway related disease in the projecl area.---.--- ----------------- --------.----.-- -------------12 2 1241 ke p cfi td -- ----- -------rea----S-------pe-----c-------------- ------------c-------tud-----y ------------.-.-.-.-.-.-.---.-.-.-12 2 12 42 Village level Survey ---- - -- -------- -------- ----- ----------------------. .-.--.-.-. ---.------------------------- -. - .------12-3 12 5 observations and Discussions - - .------------ ----- ------------------ ----- -----------------.-.-.-.-.--.-.-.-. - .--.----------12-4 12 6 Recommendations and Measures for Awareness Generation and arresting the spread of HIW/AIDS.------------------ -------.-. ---.----------12-5 12 7 Institutional Arrangement and Co-ordination wflh other Agencies-------------------------------------------------------.-. . - - ---.----------12-6 Table 1 1 Stretches of the Golden Quadrilateral, North-South & East-West Corridors--------------------------------------------------------..-.-- 1-1 Table 1 3 Five Contract Packages of Package Ill- ----- -------------- ---------------------.----.------- ------.- .. .--.--- ------1-2 Tablel14 Protect Area--------------------------------------------------------- ---.-----.-- .--..--. - - .---.--- ----- --- --.- ------1-3 Table 1 5 District wise Land Acquisition ----------------------------------- --------- ---. .--.-------------- ----- -.--.-------- ---1-4 Table 1 6 Common Properties Getting Affected .------------------------. - - .- -.---------- ------.- - -..--.------------------- -----------1-4 Table 1 7 Protect Affected Families - Tdle holders -----------------------------------------------------.-.- ------- - ---------.- --.--------- ---1-5 Table 1 8 Distribution of Non TCIe Holder Project Affected Families------------------------------------------------------.----.-- ---. 1-5 Table 110 Project Displcted Famlea uleal aegri--l-----------------------s-T------------------------ I------------e Holer---.--..--- -. 1-7 Table 111 DistributionlofeProtectiDisplaced Famliers---------------------Vunrbe--.----------------------- ---------------. -------- ---. -----------. 1-7 Table i112 Distribution of Project Affelcted Families -VLosing Their ---------------- Livelihood-------.- .------ -- ----.--------.--------.--------- 1-8 Table 1 13 itiuino rjc fetdFmle Lossngofi Livelihood of-Vulnerable-Project-Affected-Families- ---- - ---. ..----- ----- ---------.--- ------1-8 Tal 13 LsofLvlhoofVleable14 Protect Affected Families Eligible-for-Income-Restoration .------------. -.-.-.-----.------- ----------------- ------1-9 Table I115 Budget for Resettlement and Rehabiflfation Activities.--.--- ----- ------------------------------------------------.--------1-10 Table 3 1 Measures to Minimizing Negative Social Impact.----- -------- -----. ------. -------- ---------------------------- ------3------- 1- Table 3 2 Minimize Negative Social Impacts--------. - .--.------- ----- ---------- ------- - - ----- ------------ ---.-..-.---- - .--.----------3-2 Table 3 3 Minimize Negative Social Impacts------------.-. - .------ . ------ -----------------------------.----- .- .------.------------------. 3.3 Table 4 1 Work-Force Participation in the protect area - - .----.----------- ----... .. ....... ..... .........-......- .............. 4-2 --- - In Pae5oassoclalion with Consolidation of Resentlement Action Plan for ADlahabad Bypass of NH-2 Table 4 2 The Leracy trends in the Proect Area------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------4-2 Table 4 3 Overview of family types in the Project Area -------------------------------------------------------------- -4-3 Table 4 4 Occupational panern of the proect affected families in the project area --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4-3 Table 4 5 Number of PDFs losing Agricultural Land and becoming landless---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4-4 Table 4 6 Categorization of PAFs based on their type of landholding ---- ------- ---------------------------------------------------- --------------4-4 Table 5 1 Detailed Enttlement Matrix ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------56 Table 6.1 Local Level (Village level) Consultations during the Screening Study -2001 ----------------------------------------------------- - -------------------6-3 Table 6 2 Summary of Block Level / Village Consultations --------------------- -----------. - - . - ------ 6-4 Table 6 3 District Level Consultations ---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------67 Table 6 4 State Level Consultation as held on 25-02-2002 at AJlahabad -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6-10 Table 6 5 Consultation with women ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------6-12 Table 6 6 Continued Participation Mechanisms-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6-15 Table 7 1 District wise Land Acquisiion------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- ----------------- ----- 7-2 Table 7 2 Severdy of Impact due to land acquisition--- . ---.. ... .. . - . - ............ . .....................----........... .. .-.-..7-2 Table 7 3 Impact on Common Properies ------------------------------------------------------------------------------*----------------------------------------------------7-8 Table 7 4 Acquisition Plan / Schedule For The Protect ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-.-.-. - .- .----- 7-9 Table 7 5 District wise applications received U/S 3A by competent authorities and their disposal is as under------------------------------------------------------------7-10 Table 7 6 Average size of landholdings of Allahabad, Kaushambi & Pratapgarh districts--------------------------------------.-------------------------- ---------- 7-12 Table 7 7 Details of landholdings in comparison to MEH before & afer acquision -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-12 Table 7 8 Land required for the protect------------------------------------------7------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- 7-13 Table 7 9 Land required for speciic purpose for Allahabad bypass-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------7-13 Table 8 1 Role & Responsibiliies for Implementation of the PAP ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------8-6 Table 8 2 Training Plan for NHAI Staff -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-10 Table 8 3 Implementation Schedule -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-11 Table 91 Project Affected Families Losing Lvelihood-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-1 Table 9 2 District Wise Families Eligible for Income Restoration-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-2 Table 9 3 Categories of Families Eligible for Training under Income Restoration -----------------------------------.- .------- - . 9-3 Table 9 4 Occupational Pattem in the Prolect Area------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9-3 Table 9 5 Proposed Income Restoration Model-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-3 Table 101 Resettlement Action Plan Budget --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - .--------- ----------------------------------------------10-3 Table 11 1 Montoring Framework for Physical Progress-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11-2 Table 11 2 Monitoring Framework for Financial Progress ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11-3 Table 11 3 Monioring Framework for Social Progress -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11-4 Table 11 4 Monioring Framework for Paricipation-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------114 Table 1 5 Elements Constituting Perception Rating ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - . - -. 11-6 Table 11 6 Indicators for Assessing Changes in the Qualiy of Lte----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------11-7 Table 12 1 Survey points for HIV/AIDS Surveys ---------.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------12-3 Table 12 2 Plan for Awareness Campaign and Prevention of STDs/AIDS in Atlahabad Bypass Protect .--- -- - -- - 12-9 Table 12 3 Action Plan for Combating the Spread of HIVIAIDS in the Protect Area--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- 12-10 In Page 6 of 7 In usciatin vilh --0rJMV Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan tor Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 Figure 8 1 The InstRutional Arrangement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8-2 Figure 9 1 Income Resoraion Plan------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9-6 Figure 9.2 Implementalion Schedule for Training Income Restoration Plan -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------9-7 Annexure 1 I Protect Affected Families- Agriculture Annexure 1 2 Protect Affected Families- Residential Annexure 1 3 Project Affected Families- Commercial Annexure 1 4 Project Aftected Families- Residential cum Commercial Annexure 1 5 Project Displaced Families- Agriculture Annexure 1.6. Project Displaced Families- Residential Annexure 1 7: Project Displaced Families- Commercial Annexure 1 8 Protect Displaced Families- Residential cum Commercial Annexure 2 1 Schedule for Census Verification Annexure 2 2 Schedule for Socio-economic Survey Annexure 3 1 Details of Minimizing Negative Social Impacts Annexure 3 2 Proposed Vehicular cum Pedestrian Underpasses Annexure 3 3 Details of Overpasses, Underpasses, Bridges and Culvets Annexure 7 1 Land Estimate Annexure 7.2. Sample Objection application U/S 3A Annexure 7 3 Details ot 110 Villages along the alignment Annexure 7 4 Community Property Resources geting affected in the project Annexure 8 1 Terms of Reference for NGOs Annexure 8 2 Formats for micro-Plans Annexure 8 3 Formats for Identity Cards Annexure 8 4 Village-wise list of PAFs Annexure 11 1 Monthly Monitoring Format for Land Acquisition (Separate for Title Holders & Non-Titleholders) Annexure 11 2 Indictors for Progress Monitoring Annexure 11 3. Reporting Mechanism for Flow of Information Page 7 of 7 with ^ z e 7 ~~~~~~~~~in associatUon wlith? t Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 L3i~IiiJ Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction India has embarked on a 10-year highway transportation improvement program as a part of the national policy to globalize its economy and to increase safety and efficiency in trade and business besides free movement of traffic. To achieve this, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was constituted by an act of Parliament, the National Highways Authorities of India Act, 1998. The NHAI is responsible for development, maintenance and management of National Highways and for associated issues. National Highways comprise about 2% of total road length in the country and yet carry over 40% of total traffic across the length and breadth of the country. The first and foremost task mandated to National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is the implementation of National Highways Development Project (NHDP) comprising the Golden Quadrilateral and North -South and East-West corridors. The golden quadrilateral (GQ) comprises the following stretches Table 1.1: Stretches of the Golden Quadrilateral, North-South & East-West Corridors Stretch Length, Km Delhi - Kolkata 1469 Kolkata - Chennai 1751 Chennat - Mumbai 1278 Mumbai - Delhi 1454 (GQ) Total 5952 The National Highway-2 (NH-2) is a part of Golden Quadrilateral connecting Delhi and Kolkata. Four laning of NH-2 from Delhi to Kolkata is under progress. Four laning of Delhi-Agra section has been completed. Similarly, on the other end of the highway, a substantial portion between Dhanbad and Kolkata has been completed, and work is in progress for the remaining stretches. The highway stretch between Agra and Dhanbad has been undertaken for four laning with the World Bank funding. This stretch has been divided into five consultancy packages, each of approximately 200 km length. The five packages are further sub-divided into 19 construction packages, and have been covered under the three "World Bank" projects, viz., "Third National Highway Project" (TNHP), "Grand Trunk Road Improvement Project" (GTRIP), and the "Allahabad Bypass Project" (ABP). The detailed of these construction packages are given in Table 1.2 below: Table 1.2 Details of Construction Packages on NH-2 from Agra to Dhanbad Stretch Chainage Length Fund. StatuslAgency ( {Km ) (Km) ig Delhi- Mathura 0 145 145 ADB 4 lane Completed Mathura - Agra 145 199 66 54 66 OECF 4 lane Completed Agra - Sikohabad Contract I A 199 66 250 5 50 84 WB - IV Awarded and four lanning in progress Sikohabad - Sari Ikdil Contract lB 250 5 307 5 59 02 NHAI Awarded and tour lanning in progress by M/s ______ __________ ~~~Bhageeratha_Enqq_India Sari lkdil - Sikandara Contract I C 321 1 393 72 82 WB-IV Awarded and four lanning in progress Etawah Bypass 3075 321 1 136 6 In assoclatlon with l0 4100#90, I/W _0* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'- 4W Consoltidation of Resetlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 Stretch Chainage Length Fund- StatuslAgency (Kin) tng From To (Km) (Km) Sikandara-Bhaunti Contract It A 393 470 61 6 WB-tII Awarded and four laning in progress ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ __ By M/s IT, Thai-Somdatt Builders, tndw(JV) Bhaunti - Fatehpur Border, Contract IIB 470 38 51 WB-IV Awarded and four lanning in progress Fatehpur Border-Khaga Contract 11 C 38 115 77 WB-III Awarded and four laning in progress Khaga - Kokhral Contract III A 115 158 43 WB-111 Awarded and four laning in progress by M/s IRCON India Kokhral - Paharpur Village Contract IlIl B 158 245 84 7 WB-IV or To be Awarded (Allahabad Bypass) BOT Paharpur Village - Raja Talab Contract 245 317 72 WB-III Awarded and four laning in progress III C by MWs Centrodorstroy Russia Varanasi Bypass-Mohania Contract IV A 317 329 78 WB-IV Awarded and four lanng in progress 0 65 Mohania-Sasaram Bypass Contract IV B 65 110 45 WB-III Awarded and four laning in progress by _Vs L G Engineering Korea Sasaram - Dehri on Sone Contact IV C 110 140 30 WB-IV Awarded and four lanmg in progress Dehrn on Sone - Aurangabad Contract 140 180 40 WB-111 Awarded and four laning in progress by M/s Ssang IV D yong Korea-Oriental Structural Engg India (JV) Aurangabad-Barachati Contract VA 180 240 60 WB-t11 Awarded and four laning in progress Barachatti - Gorhar Contract VB 240 320 80 WB-IV Awarded and four laning in progress Gorhar-Barwa Adda Contract VC 320 398 75 79 WB-11t Awarded and four laning in progress Barwa Adda-Barakar 398 75 442 43 25 ADB-I1I Ul Date of completion BSC RBM PATI (Indo- Malaysian JV) Barakar-Raniganl 442 475 33 WB-ll Ul Date of completion Raniganj - Panagarh 475 517 42 ADB-111 Ul Date of completion BSC RBM PATI (Indo- Malaysian JV) Panagarh - Palsit 517 581 64 BOT Awarded and four laning in progress _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~~ ~~(Annuity) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Palsfl -Dankuni (Durgapur Expressway) 581 666 69 BOT Awarded (Annuity) Dankuni -NH-2/NH-6 Junction near 5 BOT 4 Laning complete Calcutta 4 Laned (Annuiy) Vrvekananda Bridge and Approach 6 BOT 6 lane completed The Allahabad bypass is a part of consultancy Package III. The package III runs from Khaga (Km 115) to Varanast (Km 317) havtng a total length 202 Km. This package has been divided into five construction packages in order to ensure timely completion of project. The five construction packages are as gtven in Table 1.3 below: Table 1.3: Five contract packages of Package III Packages Section (Km) Length (Km) Package Ill A Khaga - Kokhral (Km 115-158) 43 Package IlIl B (i) ABP-1 Ganga Bridge (Km163 267-164,280) 1 013 AJlahabad Bypass (ii) ABP-2 (Km158-163 267 and Km 164 280-198 000) 38 980 (84 708 Kin) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (nii) ABP-3 (Km 198000- Km 242 708) 44 708 Package III C Handia - Varanasi (Km 245 000 - Km 137) 72 The work is under progress on all the construction packages, except those falling under the Allahabad Bypass Project, for which the present Environmental and Social Assessment has been undertaken as part of the Detatled Project Report. The base map showtng Allahabad bypass has been depicted in Figure 1.1. 1.2 Prolect Description The proposed Allahabad Bypass starts at Km 158 of NH-2 near Kokhraj in Kaushambi district and ends at Km 245 of NH-2 near Handta in Allahabad district, with an overall length of about 84.7 km. This bypass plans to avoid the traffic congesttons of the city of Allahabad. The bypass passes through three districts namely Allahabad, Kaushambi & Pratapgarh. The total number of Tehsils, blocks and villages affected from the project are presented in Table 1.4. 1-2 in association with 1~rAZAJIP 419~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~/ Consolidation of Resetlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 Table 1.4 Project Area Name of Affected Bypass Number of Number of Number of District Length, Km Affected Tehsils Affected Blocks Affected Villages Allahabad 71.67 3 6 97 Kaushambi 6.36 2 2 8 Pratapgarh 6.67 1 1 5 Total 84.7 6 9 110 Source: Pnnzary Data The proposed alignment entirely passes through plain agricultural fields and through rural settings of 110 villages. Starting at KmI58, on the existing NH-2, the bypass runs along it up to Km 160 then turns eastwardly to cross-river Ganga at nearly right angle on a comparatively narrow width of the river, and rejoins NH-2 at Km 245 km near Handia. The total length of the bypass is 84.7 km. The proposed alignment also crosses three rail routes, three state Highways, five ODRS and three rivers. The proposed bypass alignment would require 781 hectares of land, out of which 687 ha belongs to private owners. In the project influence area, agriculture is the mainstay of the people. The alignment passes through plain fertile agricultural lands with alluvial soils, belonging to Ganga and Yamuna river systems. Further, about 80% of the land under alignment has extensive irrigation facilities. A variety of crops are grown in the region. This mainly includes cereals and cash crops. Major crops grown in the region includes wheat, paddy, pearl millet, sorghum, gram etc. whereas, under cash crops major crops are watermelon, muskmelon, sugarcane and cotton. The prime occupation of people in the region is agriculture. However, most of the farmers belong to small and marginal category. A large percentage of population belong to OBC category. The basic objective of preparing RAP is to assess the negative social impacts of the proposed bypass and suggest socio-economic rehabilitation measures so as to maintain/improve the quality of life of the project affected people. The RAP is prepared in a manner such that it is able to reflect and address all possible project specific socio-economic issues. The objective of Resettlement & Rehabilitation (R&R) is to ensure that the corridor of impact is modulated within acceptable design principles and standards to minimise the negative social impact. 1.3 World Bank Guidelines a Ran Policy Framework The population distribution and social impact scenario of the project indicate that the OP 4.12 is applicable to this project. OP 4.12 deals with involuntary resettlement, which may cause long term hardship and impoverishment and which needs mitigation measures. The O.D. 4.20 pertaining to indigenous people is not applicable and cannot be triggered in this project, as there are only 3 ST families in the project area. IA Minimizing Negative Social Impacts To determine the most suitable alternative for the bypass, various alternatives were analyzed considering technical, economical, environmental and social aspects. The seven altemative routes were initially considered for the Allahabad bypass, five of them were on the northern side, one on the southern side, and another one as an elevated road through Allahabad. All the alternatives 1-3 In associationwih w0, Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 were compared with each other based on certain parameters and finally northern alternative AN-4 was preferred based on highest weighted marks. 1.5 Land Estimate and Common Properties 1.5.1 Land Acoulsltlon The Allahabad Bypass is a new alignment requiring large-scale acquisitton of the agricultural land. An assessment has been made for the land required for the Allahabad bypass. The total land requirements of 781 ha have been worked out for different purposes of the project. Out of this, 687 ha of private land would be acquired in the three districts covering 110 villages, while 94 ha of Govt./Gram Sabha land will be transferred to NHAI. The district wise land acquisition details are given in Table 1.5. Tablel.5 District wise Land Acquisition Name of district Chainage No. of villages Land in Ha affected (Private & Govt./ G. S Land) Kaushambi Km 158- Km 164.36 8 105.83 Pratapgarh Km 164.36- km 171.03 5 50.29 Allahabad Km 171.03-Km 242.70 97 624.88 Total 110 781 Source: Prinary Data 1.5.2 Common Properties In addition to land acquisition few other common properties are affected viz. 4 temples, 4 schools, one police station and 3 panchayat ghars. The table 1.6 gives the details of the CPRs to be acquired during the construction of the project Table 1.6 Common Properties Getting Affected S.No. Properties No. Remark 1. Schools 4 To be relocated 2. Temple 4 - do - 3. Panchyat Ghar 3 -do- 4. Police Station 1 - do- 5. Tube wells 37 - do- 6. Wells 44 - do- Soarce: Primary Data 1.6 Details of Affected Families The details of social impact on affected families (PAF) are presented in Table 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9 for the titleholders, non-titleholders and vulnerable families respectively. The details of the project affected families in terms of -Agricultural loss, Residential, Commercial and Residential cum Commercial loss village wise has been provided in Annexure 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 respectively. 1.6.1 Titleholder: Table 1.7 shows that the titleholder families constitute 98% of the total PAF of 4343. Out of total 4257 titleholder families, 97.61% are losing agriculture land, 2.23% are losing residential structures, 0.09% commercial structures and remaining 0.07% losing both residential & commercial structures. 1-4 In association with 4z7z4oyo /w Consolidation of Resetlemeni Aclion Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 The district wise distribution of the total 4257 titleholder PAFs indicate that 84.57% families belong to Allahabad, 6.86% are from Kaushambi and 8.62% from Pratapgarh districts. It is evident that majority of the titleholder families are affected in the Allahabad district. Table 1.7 Project Affected Families -Title holders No. of No. of No. of families No. of families families families loosing loosing residential Total Packages loosing loosing commercial & commercial agril. land residence structures structures Allahabad 3506 85 4 3 3598 Kaushambi 289 3 - - 292 Pratapgarh 360 7 - - 367 Total 4155 95 4 3 4257 Source: Primary data 1.6.2 Mon-title Holders: There are only 86 non-titleholder families getting affected by the project. Further, they mainly constitute the sharecroppers and interested persons. Interested Persons are those who do not have the title of the land / plot but due to the long duration / tenure of their occupancy of the plot they enjoy the rights of possession within the village community. These PAPs do not have any legal documents or registry entries to confirm their ownership of the plot. Since the ownership of the IPs towards the plot could not be established at the time of primary surveys they have been treated as non-titleholders, however if any decision regarding the IPs is taken at a later stage i.e. during implementation, the necessary changes in their entitlement shall be made by the NGOs executing the R&R activities. Sharecroppers may be defined as those persons who have formally or informally come to an agreement with private property owner to cultivate the land. The sharecroppers constitute about 2 percent of the total affected families. The sharecroppers have been identified during the primary surveys conducted by the DPR consultants through the detailed interviews with the landowners. It has been observed that only those people who belong to medium or large landholder category and those who are engaged in other commercial activities but own the agril. Plot have leased out their land to the sharecroppers. The number of medium and large titleholders is very less as only around 1.2% of the PAPs losing agril. Land can be categorized, as medium landholders while the large landholder titleholders are 0.38% of total TH losing agril. Land. During the implementation stage the NGOs shall be responsible for identifying the sharecroppers while collecting the primary census data during verification of the PAPs. The details of the non-titleholders getting affected are presented in the table 1.8 below. Table 1.8 Distribution of Non Title Holder Project Affected Families Categories/ Allahabad Kaushambi Pratapgarh Total Districts Sh C*X IP* Sh C IP Sh C IP Sh C IP Agriculture 69 7 8 84 Residential - 2 - - - 2 jTotal' 69 2 7 8 84 2 Source Primary data Sh C -sharecroppers. # IP - interested persons 1-5 ^fl/ 1 In assocIatIon with 4,,J.W Consolidation of Resefflement Aciton Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 6 The analysis of the distribution of the project-affected families reveals that the titleholder families (98%) is the most prominent category, whereas number of non-titleholders is very low (2%). 1,6,3 Vulnerable: As vulnerable section of the society are the most oppressed classes, careful planning needs to be done by integrating their views and perceptions into the planning process. The distribution of project affected vulnerable families (PAVFs) is presented in Table 1.9. It indicates that there are 914 (21.4%) vulnerable families out of the total 4343 PAFs. Further classification of PAVFs indicate that there are 52.3% SC (scheduled caste) families, 32.38% BPL (below poverty line) families, 15.21% WHH (women headed families) and remaining 0.3% ST (schedules tribe) families. It is also revealed that 95.7% of PAVFs are legal titleholders, whereas 4.3% are non-titleholders. Table 1.9 Project Affected Families - Vulnerable Category+ Social Allahabad Kaushambi Pratapgarh Total *W SC ST BPL TOT W SC ST BPL TOT W Sc ST BPL TOT W SC ST BPL TOT Agriculture 123 390 3 252 768 6 14 . 17 37 7 29 . 10 46 136 433 3 279 851 Share - 24 - 7 31 - 3 3 - 2 1 3 - 29 - 8 37 Sub-total 799 40 49 888 Residential 2 17 4 23 _ I 1 1 2 17 - 5 24 IP 2 2 2 2 Sub-total 25 26 Total 125 431 3 265 824 6 17 17 40 7 31 12 50 139 478 3 296 914 * W woomen headed houehold, SC -Achedul ed caste, ST-scheduled tribe, BPL-Below poverty line + the vulnerable category of PAPs on the basis of the MEH would be identified dunng the implementation and adequate provisions for providing the assistance to these PAPs would be made in the micro-plans to be prepared by the NGOs As shown in Table 1.9, a large percentage (93.1%) of vulnerable PAFs would be losing agricultural land, 4.1% would lose sharecropping activity and 2.8% would lose residential structures. Overall, majority of vulnerable families i.e. 97.2% are dependent on agriculture. The district wise distribution of the total 914 vulnerable PAFs indicate that 90.1% families are from Allahabad, 4.4 % are from Kaushambi and 5.5 % from Pratapgarh districts. It is evident that majority of the vulnerable families are from Allahabad district. 1.6A Prolect disPlaced familleS Table 1.10 reveals that a total of 560 families are likely to be displaced as a result of the project implementation. They comprise of 558 titleholders and 2 non-title holders. Out of these 529 families would be displaced from Allahabad, 30 from Kaushambi and only 1 from Pratapgarh. The village wise details about the PDFs in terms of loss of agriculture, residences, commercial structures and residential cum commercial structures are provided in Annexure 1.5, 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8 respectively. It may be noted that there are only 2 non-titleholder PDFs in the project area, which would be affected due to loss of residential structures. 1-6 41w ~ ~~~~~~~~In association with Al! 7/w~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2d Table 1.10 Project Displaced Families -Title holders No. o No. f famlies No. of families TH with No. of No. of families loosing holdings Districts Agricultural fmle loosing cmeca residential and Total below MEH Land rlosideng comercial commercial after residences structures structures acquisition Allahabad 485 40 1 1 527 2618 Kaushambi 30 - - 30 149 Pratapgarh 1 - - 1 46 Total 516 40 1 1 558 Source: Primary Data Project displaced Persons have been identified by using the following criteria: (i) Agricultural PAPs: those PAPs who are losing more than 75% of their land and as a result of the acquisition their residual landholding becomes less than the MEH (district average landholding). (I1) Residential / Commercial structures: those PAPs who are losing more than 75% of their plot / structure and the remaining portion is economically unviable or unsafe. 1.6.5 Vulnerable PDFS: There are 171 vulnerable families (30% of the total PDFs) to be displaced by the project. Table 1.11 provides category-wise data on project displaced vulnerable families. It can be inferred that amongst the vulnerable families, the percentage of SC families is the highest i.e. 52.6%, followed by BPL 36.25% and 11.1% WHH families. It also reveals that no ST family would be displaced by the project. Further analysis of the vulnerable PDFs reveals that 92.4% of the famulies belonging to the vulnerable group are losing their agricultural land, whereas 7.6% would be losing their residential structures (including 1.2 % IPs). Table 1.11 Distribution of Project Displaced Families - Vulnerable Allahabad Kaushambi Pratapgarh Total Category/ Type of vulnerable family* Type of vulnerable family Type of vulnerable family Type of vulnerable family W SC ST BPL TOT W sc ST BPL TOT W SC ST BPL TOT W SC ST BPL TOT Ttle hotder 17 81 _ 54 152 1 - 4 5 _ 1 1 17 83 58 158 Residential- 2 7 2 11 2 7 2 11 Title holder Residential NonTite 2 2 - - 2 2 holder (IP) 90 6 Grand Total 1988 58 165 1 4 5 - 1 19 90 62 171 Source: Primary Data * W wotneni headed how,ehold, SC-scheduled caste, ST-it heduled tribe, BPL-Below poverty ime TOT Total 1.6.6 Loss of lvelihood Loss of livelihood may be defined as the loss of source / means of income, directly or indirectly, due to acquisition of agril. Land and commercial property. The survey and analysis indicate that the Allahabad bypass would traverse through rich fertile agricultural fields. The construction of this bypass therefore will have considerable impact on the agriculture activities, as an extensive acquisition of land and property 1-7 zfl/ W In association With Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 would be required for the construction of the project as a result of which the people who are dependent on the land/property being acquired would be losing their source of income / livelihood. It was observed that out of the total of the 4343 households getting affected, 4239 are entirely dependent on agriculture, while only 7 would be losing their commercial structures. Table 1.12 indicates that out of a total of 4246 families, 4155 families would loose their agricultural land, whereas 7 families would be losing their commercial activities and 84 families would lose their share cropping activity (means of livelihood). Table 1.12 Distribution of Project Affected Families Losing Their Livelihood District Type of Livelihood Loss Grand Total Agricultural Loss Commercial Loss Title holders Share croppers Allahabad 3506 69 7 3582 Kaushambi 289 7 296 Pratapgarh 360 8 _ _368 Total 4155 84 7 4246 The Table 1.12 indicates that the 98.0% families losing their livelihood belong to the titleholder category besides about 2.0% belonging to non-titleholder sharecropper category. 1.6.7 Vulnerable families losing their source of livelihood: Table 1.13 presents the distribution of a total of 888 vulnerable families losing their livelihood. Out of these, 95.8% families are losing their livelihood from agriculture land, where as 4.2% families would be losing their livelihood as sharecroppers. Table 1.13 Loss of Livelihood of Vulnerable Project Affected Families Categories Allahabad Kaushambi Pratapgarh Total Ag Sh c Ag Sh C Ag Sh C Ag Sh c SC 390 24 17 3 29 2 433 29 ST 3 - - - 3 WHH 123 6 7 136 - BPL 252 7 17 10 1 279 8 Total 768 31 37 3 46 3 851 37 1.1 RaR EntUtlement Framework The substantial land acquisition and loss of residential and commercial structures shall cause not only loss of assets but also the income through agriculture, business etc. This would upset the whole economic fabric of the area and the standard of living of the families. Therefore, after understanding the project ground conditions and the needs, an entitlement framework for the project affected families has been developed. The entitlement of the PAPs is based on the entitlement framework of the R&R Policy. The entitlement framework and the R&R Policy framework for Allahabad Bypass is provided in the annexure 5 1 -8 In association with Consolidation of Resentlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 1.8 Income Restoration The basic objective behind the income restoration activities and schemes is to restore the economic status of the affected persons enjoyed prior to the project commencement. There are two categories of the people i.e. those engaged in commercial activities and those engaged in agricultural activities including sharecroppers, who are eligible for income restoration. Table 1.14 provides details of families eligible different modes of income restoration. This includes transition allowance to agricultural titleholders, economic rehabilitation grant to all the project displaced vulnerable families engaged in agriculture (including share croppers) and plots to establish commercial structures to families loosing commercial structures, training to all title holder vulnerable families engaged in agriculture and commercial activities, besides all the sharecroppers. Table 1.14 Project Affected Families Eligible for Income Restoration Category Allahab Kaushambi Pratapgarh Total L Sh.C Corn L Sh.C Corn L Sh.C Cor. L Sh.C Co M. Economic Rehabiitiation Gran 152 31 5 3 _ 1 3 _ 158 37 (ERG)___ Transitional allowance (T A) 2618 - - 149 - - 46 - 2813 - (9 Months) Transitional allowance (T A (3 Months) 235 23 - 171 - 429 Subsistence Allowance (SA) 69 7 7 8 - 84 7 Training (Tng ) 152 69 7 5 7 _ 1 8 - 158 84 7 L - Legal holder Sh.C---Sharecropper, Com.--- Commercial Transitional Allowance equivalent to basic minimum wages for 9 months is paid to those titleholder PAPs whose agril. Land / commercial structure would be economically unviable after acquisition i.e. the residual plot is less than the MEH (district average holding). The TA for 3 months is paid to those titleholder PAPs who is losing their source of livelihood and after the acquisition the residual plot is still economically viable i.e. above MEH. 1.9 Participation of Stakeholders The RAP implementation action plan has been prepared through participatory process specially focusing on the vulnerable groups. The consultations organized at villages and at the district provided key inputs to finalize the design and measure to develop the mitigation plans. 1.10 Institutional Arrangement The Environmental and the Social Development Unit (ESDU) located at the NHAI headquarters will be responsible for overall monitoring and implementation of the RAP. The unit is presently headed by a GM and has one Deputy General Manager looking after Environment component besides implementation of RAP. It is now proposed to have one additional manager, independently looking after R&R work, within ESDU. The NHAI's existing capacity includes a Project Implementation Unit (PIU) at Allahabad headed by a Project Director and one manager (technical and environment). For implementation of 1-9 In association with -110 4,,J.ZA Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 RAP for the Allahabad bypass Project, an R&R cell will be created within PIU headed by the Project Director. 1.11 Implementatlon Arrangement and Schedule The detail implementation schedule has been prepared listing the chronological steps to have smooth implementation of resettlement & rehabilitation plan. The exercise of verification of PAPs and PDPs, would be done by NGO on the site during implementation of RAP. The actual affected PAPs & PDPs will be issued necessary identity cards. RAP further describes the linkages between resettlement implementation and set of institutions for civil work for each component of the project. To facilitate the implementation, NGOs would be contracted and trained. The implementation of the project is likely to be completed in three years. To evaluate the impacts of the project activities on the socio-economic condition of the PAPs an independent Evaluation Consultants would be hired by NHAI. 1.12 Budget The RAP estimate provides for resettlement, rehabilitation and mitigation costs. Details are presented in Table 1.15. Table 1.15 Budget for Resettlement and Rehabilitation Activities SI.No ITEM Amount (Rs.) 1. COMPENSATION 87,82,14,274 2. ASSISTANCE 30,79,46,011 3. TRAINING 8,73,500 4. SUPPORT - IMPLEMENTATION OF RAP 1,30,00,000 5. HIGHWAY RELATED DISEASES (HIV/AIDS) 5,00,000 120,05,33,785 GRAND TOTAL Say Rs.120, 05.34 Lakhs 1.13 Evaluation of RaB activities The ESDU - NHAI and the PIU shall be responsible for the internal monitoring of the progress of R&R activities and land acquisition process and progress. An external agency shall be hired for the evaluation of the impact on socio-economnic condition of the PAPs through annual, mid-term and final evaluation studies. -~~~~~~11 In assoclation with , Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 j Approach and Methodology 2.1 Approach and Methodology This section deals with the approach and methodology adopted for data collection and analysis for social impact assessment in the project area. It also discusses the methods used for screening and identifying areas of concern and methodology for preparation of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP). The Draft Resettlement Action Plan has been prepared by the primary consultant-Gherzi Eastern Limited. With a view to comply with appropriate national laws, local guidelines/laws and the World Bank Operational Policy (4.12) and Operational Directive (4.20), the social assessment has been carried out in close coordination with environmental assessment and engineering design team. There have been intensive consultations with various stakeholders for providing necessary inputs to the project. 2.2 The Methodological Framework The project tasks incorporated integration of engineering, environment and social components within the planning exercise. The various processes involved in carTying out the social assessment included the following: 2.2.1 AnalYsls Of Alternatives The Detailed Project Report (DPR) Consultant team comprising experts from social, environment and engineenng areas carried out a study to identity the most suitable alignment option for constructing Allahabad bypass. The seven alternative routes were initially considered for the Allahabad Bypass, five of them on the northern side and one on the southern side of Allahabad and another one incorporating an elevated road through Allahabad. The finalization of present alignment is based on the analysis of these seven alternatives. The decision on the most suitable route for the bypass was undertaken by assigning different weights to factors like capital cost, scope of future widening, land acquisition/ displacement requirements, user cost, environment impacts and technical suitability of the alignment. Based on this, alternative route AN-4, located on the northern side of Allahabad has been found technically feasible, economically viable and socially & environmentally acceptable. 2.2.2 Preliminary Social Screening Survey The basic objective of the preliminary social screening survey was to assess the possible impact of the project on people as a result of construction of the Allahabad Bypass. The survey also aimed at culling out people's perceptions and their initial reactions to the resettlement and rehabilitation policy of the NHAI. 2.2.3 Physlcal survey Vis -a-vis design modifications and Unalization of alignment & ROW The social and environmental team jointly carried out a detailed physical survey of the selected route to provide inputs to minimize displacement and reduce negative social and 2-1 In assoclation with ,W ZC Consoltdation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 environmental impacts resulting in minor design modifications and finalization of the bypass alignment. The alignrrnent/ROW was laid in the field by NHAI and the ROW was marked on the land revenue maps. 2.2.4 CollectIon of land records (Khataunil for PAP idenUficaton After the transfer of the bypass alignment/ROW on the village land revenue maps, the relevant land records were collected for purpose of identifying the plots getting affected. The plot numbers identified after the collation and analysis of the land/revenue records were verified to identify the owner of the plot through primary surveys. The information gathered through primary surveys and from the land records facilitated the notification for land acquisition. Simultaneously, a team comprising social and environmental experts, field investigators, surveyors and engineers carried out physical survey of the entire length of the bypass to measure land and structures to be affected by the bypass. The legal ownership of land, residential and commercial structures and other immovable properties were also established. 2.2.5 Data Collection To prepare the RAP, social impact assessment has been carried out on the basis of * Primary data: collected through census survey and socio economnc survey * Secondary data * Consultations with various stakeholders, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) and PRA 2.2.6 Census Survey In order to establish the legal entitlement of the project affected families/people a census survey was undertaken. To carry out the census survey, an exhaustive interview schedule was prepared and tested for its smooth administration (The interview schedule is enclosed as annexure 2.1). The door-to-door interview method was used for census survey, wherein 100 percent census of families/people to be directly affected (within ROW) by the construction of bypass was carried out. All structures and plots of land getting affected were measured. Their location, size, geometry, type of construction of the structures, name(s) of the owner(s), address(es), legal/entitlement documents (if any, towards claim of the property), tenure status, possible project induced losses etc. were also recorded. Information about family details; occupation (agriculture, share cropper, business, service), occupational skills and literacy level of male and female members; economic status, income and other social information of the family to determine their vulnerability (for special considerations under the entitlement framework of the project) was collected. Information on project affected common/community property like religious structures, public property (offices, post office, police station etc.), and institutions including details of boundary walls were also recorded. 2.23 Soclo-Economic Baseline Survey A sample socio-economic survey of 25% PAPs was conducted to provide a representative database and to assist in development of indicators for monitoring and evaluation of RAP. The aim of the baseline socio-economic survey was to determrune distribution of socio- economic groups on the map, analysis of social structure and income resources of the In association with 2-2 Consolidation of Resefilement Action Plan for Ailahabad Bypass of NH-2 PAPs, inventories of the resources, which the PAP use as well as the data on the system of economic production. The data collected through the survey included * Demographic profile of the PAFs * Social characteristics (type of family, head of family, religion/caste, vulnerability etc.) * Economic conditions (occupation, income, assets, resources use pattern etc.) * Educational and Cultural aspects However, the limitation of the survey has been that despite prior information to the affected people, there were cases of absentees in field. The efforts were made to survey the sites again and only in case of non-availability of the respondents they were treated as absentee titleholders. The socio-economic survey schedule is attached as annexure 2.2. 2.2.8 Data CollecIon Irom secondary sources The secondary data/information was collected from various agencies; so as to ascertain/verify the ground realities and comprehend the soclo-economic characteristics, physical features and cultural set-up of the project area before undertaking detailed field investigations. Relevant documents were collected from Telhsil Offices, DRDA and others agencies, besides collecting various published/unpublished reports on the issues, which have also been used in the preparation of the RAP. 2.2.9 Consultations The Consultations were undertaken with various stakeholders at different levels i.e. district, block, village (focus group discussions) and the state level for information dissemination of the project to the project affected people. It was also held so as to incorporate the perceptions of the stakeholders in the planning and implementation of the RAP. A total of 13 public consultations were held at the village level / Block level, 3 at district level and one at state level to have public participation into the project. Public consultations assisted in finalizing various issues related to the location of proposed underpasses/overpasses, car/bus shelters, truck lay-byes, conservation of religious/cultural structures, possible realignments, etc. Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with women, SC, ST and other vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups. This assisted in formulating a RAP, which is more responsive to the needs of the community and the affected groups. Besides this rapid assessment technique was used to assess STD/HIV (highway related diseases) vulnerability of different population groups at specific locations of the project corridor so as to suggest mitigation measures, action plan for addressing the target groups and roles and responsibilities of the stakeholding agencies in implementation of the action plan. The objective of the district level and block level consultations was to build awareness about the project amongst the people, district level administration, NGOS, and to enlist their support in preparation and implementation of the project. The state level consultations included consultations with key project officials and stakeholding organizations to discuss state level legal and policy issues besides enlisting their support. In association wIth C04 Consolidation of Resetlement Action Plan tor Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 e 3 Minimizing Negative Social Impact 3.1 Introduction Social Impact assessment is an important component of project preparation during design stage so as to minimize, reduce and mitigate negative social impacts of the project. The Allahabad Bypass project traverses through 110 villages requiring large-scale land acquisition of fertile lands as well as causing loss of commercial/non-commercial structures and assets. These would entail loss of settlements/livelihood of a substantial number of families. Although many benefits are expected from the project, the social assessment has identified potential adverse impacts on the people losing agricultural land, other assets and livelihood. Therefore, every effort has been made to reduce potential negative impacts both in terms of environmental and social aspects. Wherever feasible from technical and economic perspectives, the designs have been modified to minimlize negative social and environmental impacts. 3.2 Measures to minimize negative social Impacts As the highway passes through rich fertile agricultural belt, the project would impact a number of people owning agricultural land. Therefore, the RAP for the project would need to address the issues related to titleholders losing agricultural land and assets. The aim of integration of social components in the design phase is to mnnimize the hardships of the affected people. The RAP also aims to help the PAPs to either better or at least maintain their livelihood. Based on consultation with various stakeholders and project social assessment report, the Project engineering team developed guidelines to mininmze negative social and environmental impacts/displacement, reduce disruption of livelihoods, protection of environmentally sensitive features etc. Table 3.1 provides the measures that have been adopted for offsetting the impacts. Table 3.1 Measures to Minimize Negative Social Impacts Criteria Design Approach Minimization of Tree Loss A _ _ _l_ignment shifting___ Displacement of important Religious Structures Alignment shiftn Minimization ofroprty cquision lignment shiftting l Displacement of commercial properties Alignment shifting 3.3 Summary of measures taken and their Impacts In minimizIng negative social ImPacts In the prolect area To minimize negative social impacts, the alignment has been fixed in such a way that there is least impact on the settlements. Efforts have also been made to avoid sensitive structures, like mosque, temples, schools and places of cultural importance. To achieve this, the alignment has been shifted at various locations to save abadi area of villages, structures, temples, graveyards, mosques, orchards, community structures, ponds etc. 3-1 In assocIatlon with C. Consolidation of Resetlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 Secondly, for implementing project activities, initially the engineering cell had suggested a ROW of 70 m (minimum) to 120 m (maximum). However, in order to minimize land acquisition, the design has been modified to a ROW of 70 (minimum) - 90 m (maximum). As a result of the interventions to minimize negative social impacts, several categories of losses have been minimized. The same after consolidation are presented in Table 3.2 and the details are provided in Annexure 3.1. Table 3.2 Minimizing Negative Social Impacts S No Category of Loss Numbers saved due to change in alignment and reduction of ROW 1 Villages 6 2 Mosques 2 3 Temple 3 4 Schools 1 (impact on boundary wall only) 5 Grave yard 2 6 Pacca Structures 123 7 semi Pucca Structures 4 10 Brick kiln 2 Note Chainage & settlement wise details are given in the Annexure 3 1 3A Impact on Land Acuulsitlon The bypass mainly passes through rich fertile land with irrigation facilities. Normally, farmers in the area take up to three crops (Rabi, Kharif and Zaid) in a year. The reduction in ROW to 70-90 m, from the earlier design of 70-120 m, has resulted in a saving about 13% land requirements i.e. from about 904 ha to 781 ha and in the long run led to reduction in loss of livelihood of the PAFs. &AL1 Impact on settements The measures could save six settlements and various structures. The settlements, which were saved include following villages Sapatua (km 171.2), Thanlapur (km 218.7) with one helmetlDhanii(Kml 219.2), Bagai Kurd (Km 220.3), Chak Mohammed Asimn (Km 230.95), Mahrupur (km 231.8) and Rahimizpatti (Km 237.1). This was possible due to shifting of alignment after physical survey and due to reduction in ROW. 34.2 impact on religious sifuctures: Temples, mosques and other religious structures are important to uphold local religious importance as well as from historical/archaeological considerations. Upholding the religious sentiments, efforts were made to reduce impact on religious structures. Keeping in view the technical feasibility, alignment shifting could conserve two mosques at village Sihori (km 161.66) and one temple each at village Bhadshiv (km 169.5), Dighiya (km 196.7) and at village Mahrupur (km 231.6). 8A] Impact on Common Property The measures could reduce the impacts on common property to the extent possible. Major common properties considered were schools/educational institutions, police station, panchayat ghiars, post offices, water ponds, graveyards etc. Change in alignment and ROW resulted in saving one school (only boundary wall is impacted) at village Mograon 3-2 In assocIatIon with Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 ev and Kushari (km 241.3); two graveyards at village Shivgar (km 195.3) and Usmanpur (km 229.1), besides 6 water ponds of different sizes. UA Impact on Private Property The measures to reduce negative social impacts resulted in saving of 123 pacca structures, four semi-pacca structures and a large number of kaccha structures/huts etc., thus reducing both displacement and financial implications. Details are given in Annexure 3.1. 3.5 Impact ol Commercial Establishments The shifting of alignment resulted in saving one brick kiln at village Singraur-I (km 175.1), thereby ensuring continuity of commercial activities and labor deployment. 3.5 Minimizing Hardships by providing accessibillt As per the directives of MORT&H, the bypass is designed as fully access controlled toll road with parallel service roads and fencing. The project design has considered the provisions of overpasses and underpasses at strategic locations, with particular attention to rural areas so that farm families have easy and safe accessibility to their fields. Also, the design has the- provisions for bus and truck stops, which will reduce roadside congestions and reduce the likelihood of accidents. Traffic management features such as signs, markings, cross walk, inter-section layout, and, control and provisions for different types of road users have been included in the road improvement plans. Service roads on both sides of the bypass would segregate local traffic and would link them to the nearest underpass/overpass for better accessibility to local markets. The service roads together with underpass and overpass will help to remove whatever disturbance/severance is caused in vehicular mode of traffic movement in the existing local networks due to the construction of the bypass. The basis for providing the service roads/underpass/overpass and selection of the locations of those has been to see that mobility of local people at large is not jeopardized with the construction of the bypass. Adequate provisions have been made for underpasses, overpasses and culverts etc in the project area for ensuring safe accessibility and movement of the local people to/through the bypass with minimum disturbance, the details of which have been attached in Annexure 3.3. An overview of the underpasses reveal that there are two types of under passes a) Pedestrians crossing and b) Vehicular cum pedestrian crossings. There area total 39 under passes, out of which 7 are pedestrians crossings and 32 are vehicular cum pedestrian crossings. The details of vehicular cum pedestrian underpasses have been attached in Annexure 3.2. There are 8 overpasses in the project area. 3-3 In association with Consolidation of Resenlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 4 Socio-Economic Profile of the Project Area 4.1 Background The socio-economic profile of the project area provides a comprehension of the spatio- temporal trends of the demographic features, socio-cultural characteristics, politico- administrative divisions and economic way of life of the project-affected families. In order to determine the project impacts on the PAFs, this section analyses and presents a comparative picture of the field level data with that of secondary information related to the project vis-a-vis the ground truths. 4.2 Regional Setting of the Project Area The districts of Pratapgarh, Allahabad and Kausambi are strategically located districts in the state of Uttar Pradesh and are adjoined by the districts of Mirzapur, Gyanpur, Jaunpur and Sultanpur on the south-eastern, east and north eastern side. The southern side of the project area is bounded by the state of Madhya Pradesh. Districts of Chitrakoot, Banda, Fatehpur and Rae Bareli on the south-western, west and north-western sides. The major roads intersecting the proposed Allahabad Bypass are the state highways SH-7, SH-9 and SH-38. There are three railway lines intersecting the bypass. The three rivers namely Ganga, Doab and Mansita also intersect the bypass at three locations. 43 Soclo- Economic Profile of the prolect area For effective planning and implementation of resettlement and rehabilitation activities in the project area, it is imperative to analyze and understand the socio-economnc profile of the area and livelihood pattern of the project affected families. Hence in present context, the socto-economic analysis of the project area helped in preparing a comprehensive Resettlement Action Plan for the proposed bypass. 4.3.1 Demographic Profile The demographic trend in the project area indicates that Allahabad has had a considerable population growth of 30.7 percent during last decade (1991-2001), which is much higher than the state's decadal growth rate. This in turn has caused a phenomenal rise in population density in Allahabad i.e. witnessing an increase from 712 persons per sq km in 1991 to 911 persons in 2001. This growth may be well attributed to the increased economic activity and associated urbanization in the district. The decadal growth for Kaushambi and Pratapgarh has observed a much lower growth rate. The number of male PAPs above 18 years of age is 10,477 and the number of female PAPs above 18 years of age is 7,743. Percentage of male PAPs above 18 years of age is 36.2% and female PAPs is 26.7%. Viewing the rural-urban dichotomy, Pratapgarh district indicates 94.7% rural population followed by 92% in Kausambi whereas Allahabad accounts for 75.4 percent share. From this, it can be inferred that Allahabad is comparatively more urbanized with a larger percentage of population living in urban areas. Further, the male to female ratio reveals 4-1 ^fl/W In association with Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 that Pratapgarh has maximum females per thousand males (983), which was higher than other two districts. 4.3.2 Economic Prrofle As per the Census of India, the total WFPR in all the three districts, Allahabad accounts for 37.28 percent followed by Pratapgarh (24.68 percent), while Kausambi has the least work force participation rate. Hence it can be seen that Allahabad is comparatively the most advanced district in terms of workforce followed by Pratapgarh.(Census of India, 2001) The primary data on workforce participation rate (WFPR) indicate that PAPs in Allahabad has a WFPR of 38.6 percent followed by Pratapgarh (28.1 percent) and Kausambi (21.6 percent). Table 4.1 Work-Force Participation in the Project Area Districts Allahabad Kausambi Pratapgarh Males Female Total Males Females Total Males Females Total 5 Workers 5276 1589 6865 131 22 153 329 61 390 Non- 4168 6734 10902 252 303 555 413 586 999 Workers I_I Total 9444 8323 17767 383 325 708 742 647 1389 WFPR () 55 9 19.1 38.6 342 6 8 21 6 443 94 28 1 Source Primary Data 4.3.3 Social Profile Social development issues form an important component in determining the social fabric of the project area. The literacy patterns in 2001 for the three districts can be divided into rural and urban, which may be further subdivided into males, females and overall literacy pattern. However the urban literacy pattern reveals that Allahabad district accounts for highest literacy rate of 80.7 percent (86.20 % for males and 73.87 % for females). The least literacy level was in Kausambi coupled with low rate of social development in the district. It can be viewed that Pratapgarh district accounts for highest overall rural literacy pattern of 57.7 % and 74.0% for males and 41.3% for females. This is closely followed by Allahabad district with 56.5% (overall) literacy arte and 73.6% for males and 37.3% for females. Table 4.2 The Literacy trends in the Project Area Literacy Allahabad Kausambi Pratapgarh pattern________ -Males %/o Females 0 Males 0/0 Females °/o Males %/o Females % Literates 56.3 24. 2 68.8 14 74.7 14.2 Illiterates 43.7 75.8 31.2 86 25.3 85.8 Source census 2001 4.3.3.1 Religlous Composition: The major religions followed in the area are Hindu and Isla,n. The analysis of data of Gol Census indicates that Hindu religion is pre-dominant in all three districts. As per census their percentages are 86.7 percent, 86.5 percent and 83.1% in Allahabad, Pratapgarh and Kaushambi districts respectively. The respective population 4-2 ~~~fl/ W ~~~~~~~~in association with Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for AJlahabad Bypass of NH-2 of Muslinis in the three districts was 12.9, 13.2 and 14.6%. The balance belonged to other religions i.e. Sikhs and Chlristiatis The field level analysis also exhibits similar trends with Kaushambi contributing to 17.4% Muslimns i.e maximum with respect to other districts.. The vulnerable category including families below poverty line (BPL), women headed families (WHH), scheduled castes (SC), schedules tribes (ST) and families of other backward classes (OBC) indicates that OBC accounts for 58% of the depressed class population, followed by SC with 15.4 percent population and rest belonging to ST category. The category wise analysis of vulnerable project affected families' reveal that schedule caste accounts for highest percentage of 52.3 percent in the project area. In detail, Pratapgarh has about 62.0 % SC families, followed 52.3 percent in Allahabad and 42.5% in Pratapgarh. The Below Poverty Line PAFs is maximum in Kausambi district, accounting for 42.5% percent of the total vulnerable sections in the district. The percentage of schedule tribes is 0.4% in Allahabad, whereas there are no scheduled tribes in other two districts. However, OBC and SC have been grouped into one category in RAP. 4.3.3.2 OvervIew of family types In the prolect Area: The family types have been classified as Joint, Nuclear, and Extended typology in the project area. Out of the total family units in the project area, approximately 85 percent of the PAFs reside in Allahabad district followed by Pratapgarh and Kausambi with 8.2 percent and 6.8 percent respectively. Analysis of primary data indicates that there are 44.5% joint family units amongst the PAFs in the project area, followed by nuclear fanmilies amounting to 40.5 percent. The district of Allahabad indicates a larger percentage (47.3%) under joint family category followed by Kaushambi & Pratapgarh with 33.4% & 25.6% respectively.. Table 4.3 Overview of family types in the Project Area Districts Type of Family Joint (0/%) Nuclear (0/o) Extended (0/c) Allahabad 47.3 35.8 16.7 Kausambi 33 4 59 7 3 Pratapgarh 25.6 62.1 12.2 °/O of total PAFs 44.5 40.5 15 Source Primtiary Data 4.3.3.3 Occupatlonal Structure of the PAls n the project area: The occupational pattern of the PAFs in the project area reveals that majority of the PAFs are engaged in agriculture. However, Allahabad district exhibits a comparatively diverse pattern with respect to occupation. Table 4.4 Occupational pattern of the project affected families in the project area Districts Number of PAFs in Different Occupations Agricul- Sh C Business HH Labor Govt Private Total ture Industry (non- Service service agriculture) Allahabad 3506 69 7 5 3 39 40 3669 Kausambi 289 7 2 - 1 299 Pratapgarh 360 8 - 2 1 3 1 375 Souse Pnm.ry D.e.* Sh C sharecropper # HH Household 4-3 In assoclatlon with C Consolidation of Resetlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 From the above Table, it is clear that most of the project affected families are engaged in agriculture in all the dtstricts. 4.3.3.3 Share Croppers: The share-croppers are those people, who are working as the cultivators cum agricultural laborers, on the fields of landowners, on the basis of produce/profit sharing. 4.3.3.4 People becoming landless: The PAPs, who are losing more than 75% of their land and if the residual land is becoming economically unviable for agricultural production i.e. their residual holding becomes less than the district average, have been considered as people becoming landless (PBL) in the project. The number of the people becoming landless is quite significant in Allahabad district (485) and they account for about 94% of the total PBL (516). The reason for people becoming landless is that most of the farmers particularly in Allahabad district belong to marginal farmer category and have a land holding of 0.25 - 0.5 ha (1-2 bigha). Therefore, acquisition of even a small area would make the land econormcally unviable and thus the farmers would be considered as PBL (people becoming landless). Table 4.5 Number of PDFs losing Agricultural Land and becoming landless District Number of PDFs becoming No. of TH below MEH after landless acquisition Allahabad 485 2618 Kaushambi 30 149 Pratapgarh 1 46 Total 516 2813 Source Primary Data Table 4.6 Categorization of PAFs based on their type of landholding District Marginal Small Medium Large Total <0.5 ha 0.5-2 ha 2-5 ha >5 No. Avg. No. Avg. No. Avg. No. Avg. No. Avg. Allahabad 2085 0 18 712 0.86 40 2.62 16 6.47 2853 0 42 Kaushambi 113 0.22 54 0.85 5 2.11 - - 172 047 Pratapgarh 29 0 19 183 0.88 5 2.31 - 217 0.82 Total 2227 0.9 949 0.86 50 2.54 16 6.47 3242 0.45 Source Primary Data 913 TH are absentee landlords From the table 4.6 it is clear that the maximum number of the landowners belong to the marginal & small landholder category, which constitutes 53.6% & 22.9% of the total agril. PAPs. The average landholding of the PAPs, which is another indicator of the socio- economic profile of the PAPs, indicates that the average landholding of the PAPs is below the average district landholding in Allahabad & Kaushambi (0.75 Ha). While in Pratapgarh the average landholding of the PAPs is the highest and is greater than the district average landholding (0.5 Ha) 4.4 Role of Allahabad Development Authoritg on Regional Development The discussions with the Allahabad Development Authority revealed that the proposed Allahabad bypass did not fall under the purview of the Master Plan-2001, as the geographical limit of the Allahabad city extends up only to 10kms radius, whereas the bypass falls outside 30 kms radius of the city. 4-4 In association with Consolidation of Reseflement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 The Allahabad Development Authority also indicated that if the proposed corridor came within the gambit of urban area, its incorporation within the Proposed Master Plan 2001- 2021 would become integral, but as of now no such plans have been drawn. 4-5 In association with 44- Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 Resettlement and Rehabilitation 5 | Policies & Legal Framework 5.1 IntroducUon The Resettlement Action Plan for Allhabad bypass has been prepared on the similar guidelines of TNHP & GTRIP R&R policy of National Highways Authortty of India. The Allhabad bypass has been proposed on a new alignment traversing through predominantly agricultural area. It will, therefore have different impact scenario in comparison to TNHP & GTRIP Packages. Keeping this in view, necessary provisions have been made in RAP and the entitlement framework. The construction of Allahabad bypass would require substantial land acquisition. In this scenario large number of families are going to be affected in terms of loosing their fertile agriculture land. It is evident from the extent of land acquisition that majority of the families affected from the project would fall under the Agriculture loss. The efforts have been made to provide for the compensation and assistance in the form of training and ERG for the economic rehabilitation of the PAPs. 5.2 ENTITLEMENT FRAMEOWRK 5.2.1 EnUUement Categories: In the present project there are five categories of losses i.e. Loss of Agriculture Land, Loss of residential & commercial land & structures, loss of standing crops & trees, loss of community properties and loss of livelihood for mainly the sharecroppers. Out of these, the greatest loss to be suffered by the PAPs is loss of agriculture land in all the three districts. The entitlement framework for the PAPs has, therefore, been developed constjdering these facts. The RAP delivers a comprehensive package of compensation and assistance to entitled persons, families, and groups suffering losses as a result of the project. The RAP provides all the details about the project-affected and, project-displaced people, including the vulnerable categories. In addition to that entitlements for all the families / individuals eligible for compensation, assistance and training have been worked out to restore their economic conditions. The salient features of the RAP include: * All the land acquisition would be done under NH Act, which provides compensation for properties to be acquired and support to be extended for meeting the replacement value of property. The persons affected by the project thal do not own land but have economic interest or loose their livelihoods shall be assisted as per the entitlement framework. * Loss of land, including assets house or work place will be compensated. * Lost livelihood or income opportunities will be restored. * Collective impacts on groups, such as loss of community assets, common property resources and others will be restored. * All people above the age of 18 years have been defined as a separate family, and will be eligible for support if affected by the project. . The vulnerable group will comprise of those who are below poverty line of the concerned State. It also covers the disadvantaged persons belonging to SC/ST disabled, handicapped, orphans, women headed household and destitute. 5-1 In associatlon with 0 Consolidation of Resenlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 All loses will be compensated and assistance will be provided at replacement value, irrespective of their legal standing in the project area. Assistance will be extended to the vulnerable families to enhance their earnings as well new economic opportunities 5.2.2 Cut of Date: Cut-off date for titleholders will be the date of issue of the notice u/s 3A of NH Act. In case of non-titleholders it will be the date of start of the census survey, which is 15'h January 2002. 5.2.3 Final Entitlement Matr: In the present matrix the compensation and assistance have been provided to cover compensation for lost assets and restore or enhance the livelihood of all categories of project-affected person. The matrix given below provides details regarding application of principles, definition of entitled persons and their entitlements. 5.3 Abbreviations and Terms Following abbreviations and terms have been used in the policy: 5.3.1 Abbreviations: BPL Below Poverty Line BSR Basic Schedule of Rates CGI Corrugated Galvanised Iron COI Corridor of Impact CPR Common Property Resources EP Entitled Persons EWS Economic Weaker Section Ha Hectare LAA MEH Minimum Economic Holding NGO Non-Governmental Organisation NHA National Highways Act PAP Project Affected Persons PDP Project Displaced Persons RAP Rehabilitation Action Plan RO Rehabilitation Officer ROW Right of Way R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation SES Socio-Economic Survey SC Scheduled Caste ST Scheduled Tribe u/s Under Section PIU Project Implementation Unit DC District Collector PAF Project Affected Family PDF Project Displaced Family 5-2 4i^ ^.7,#,w In assoclation with CO4 Consolidaiion of Resetlement Action Plan for AJlahabad Bypass of NH-2 5.3.2 Terms: Acre A unit for measuring land area (Acre equals 4840 Square Yards). Corridor of Impact Width of corridor required for the construction of road and for its safety zone. Development Block A number of villages grouped together form a Development Block. Panchayat Samnti Local Self-governing body at Block Level is Panchayat Samuti. District Collector Administrative head of a District. Divisional Administrative head of a division comprising a number of districts. Commissioner Ghair Khatedars Includes alottees, holders of "Muafi lands". Hectare (Ha) A unit measuring land area. One Hectare equals 10,000 Sq. metres or 2.475 Acre. Jamabandi Basic record of land rights. Khatedar or tenant According to Law, all land belongs to the State and all so-called landowners are tenants of the State. They are called Khatedars. Muafi Lands Include lands attached with Templates, Mosques, Gurudwara, Churches etc. Panchayat Elected local self-governing body at village level. Poverty Line A family whose annual income from all sources is less than a designated sum as fixed by the concerned National Govt. in which the project falls, will be considered to be below Poverty Line for defining the income level of vulnerable people. Pradhan Elected head of a Panchayat. Sub-Tenants Persons, who not being tenants, are allowed to cultivate land on certain terms & conditions. Share-Croppers Persons who cultivate land of a khatedar on terms of sharing income there from with the khatedar. 5.4 Definitions 5.4.1 Cut-off date Cut-off date shall be the following: a) In the cases of land acquisition affecting legal titleholders, the cut-off date would be the date of issuing the notice u/s 3A of the NHA. b) For the Non-Titleholders the cut-off date shall be the date of publication of the 3A notification. 5A2 Prolect Affected Person IPAP] Unless otherwise specified in this Policy paper, a project affected person is a person who in consequence of the project, sustains damages (a) by reasons of severing such land or (b) by affecting his/her immovable properties in any manner or (c) by adversely affecting his/her livelihood/earnings calculated by an objective assessment. Project affected person includes Project Displaced Person. i) Project affected persons, individuals or members of an affected family, are divided into following categories: * Private property owners * Tenants 5-3 In association with 4 Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for Allahabad Bypass of NH-2 * Sharecroppers * Wage labourers * Squatters * Encroachers * Other categories such as groups or communities adversely affected ii) Private Property Owners: These are Project affected people who have claims to legal title to land, structures or other assets and are entitled to compensation under the NIH Act. imi) Tenants: Tenants are persons having bonafide tenancy agreement with a pnvate property owner to occupy a structure or land for residence, business or cultivation purposes. iv) Share croppers: Those who have formally or informally have come to an agreement with private property owner to cultivate the land. v) Squatters: Squatter is a person who has settled on publicly owned land without permission and has been occupying publicly owned building or land prior to the cut- off-date. vt) Encroachers: A person, who has trespassed Govt. land, adjacent to his/her own land or asset, to which he/she is not entitled, and deriving his/her livelihood there from prior to the cut-off-date. 5A.3 Prolect Dlsplaced Person A displaced person is a person who is compelled to change his/her place of residence and/or work place or place of business, due to the project. 5A.5 Deflnitlon of Family I) A "family" shall mean karta, spouse (Husband/Wife), and minor children ii) Every son or unmarried daughter who has attained the age of 18 years on or before the cut-off-date will be treated as separate family. iii) Every divorced or widowed daughter living separately or with the family on or prior to cut off date will be treated as separate family. IV) Orphans in one single household will be clubbed together as one single family. v) Mentally handicapped persons irrespective of age and sex will be treated as one single family. 5A6 Minimum Economic Holding A titleholder whose total holding after acquisition is less than the district's average agriculture land holding (Earlier the holding less than Iha of irrigated or 2 ha of unirrigated land constituted the MEH) 5A7 Landless Agricultural Labourer A person who does not hold any agricultural land and who has been deriving his main income by working on the lands of others as sub-tenant or as an agricultural labourer prior to cut off date. 5AL Wage Earner A person who is earning his/her livelihood as an employee on the affected property. 5-4 In assoclaUan wiM O "4* Consolidation of Resettlement Action Plan for AJlahabad Bypass of NH-2 5AI 9 Below Poverty Line A household whose annual income from all sources is less than the designated sum as fixed/accepted by the concerned National Government prior to the census will be considered to be Below Poverty Line (BPL). The policy recognises the most current year poverty line definition accepted by the National Government prior to the Census. 5A10 Income Income of a P.A.P. shall mean the amount of income as shown in his Income Tax Return prior to the cut-off-date. In absence of such a return, his Income shall be calculated by an objective assessment applying the same method as adopted by the National Govt. agencies for identifying B.P.L. families. 5A11l Vulnerable Person The Vulnerable group may include but not be limited to the following: a) Those people falling under Below Poverty Line (National Government) category and earning upto 15% above the poverty line. b) Those whose total holding after acquisition is less than the district's average agriculture holding and whose income calculated from other sources is less than defined in (a). c) Member of Scheduled Caste / Tribe community d) Women headed households. e) Orphan and destitute. f) Disabled. g) Landless 5-5 In association withl a) - C '. w ~~~~~,~ .r0C3 t .-, ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~UC a 0 - - E) 0( C ( ( 0 E ~~ ~~ E o w ~ C C)-0~~~ cu 0, -o w~ .' o > u~~~~~~ -Z - E. :3 Is~~~~~~~V ( C)m (V -(V 00 E C p (V 0.V~~~~~~ .~~~ ~ 0 OC .- O: C) a) .( oc~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 0.~~ (V w 0 =03 C 3> CD C) 0. ~~~~~ .0E(V .=-oE~~~~~~~~~- ~ E u w~ Co~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .'- C) E c) -1 o E_ w CJ 0 .0 C .0 U~~V -6 0-ff (V 0 ~~~~~~~~~~ (VO~~~, ro- -~J d~ ~ 0 0 C)ca (-~~~~~~~~ (V~~~~~ ~ C) C) . O. 8 ot Di ~ 2. C E .0 Co r-~ ~ ~ cf C -C).C- '-E C0I ::' 7 u V C) C) C ~-0 00 U UI *~~~~~.-.(~C Di( -) EC)X 0.0 (V5(V~M 0"I 0 o .r-L C - M V . ~ - o 0~. C)) V 0> 0 Ew> 03 u ~~~-o ~~ .~ L 2 " _ _ 6, ~ C) GU, mr C) 0 u u _ w')~,Y a) C)O -a -( (.J E 00C r )Wa5( >E 0 - (VC)0 0. - - r-~~~ ~ ~~ r;. . * w r-Z:- . *U * a -o ~(UU Z vm C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C - C)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>> -( ~ z - I-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~nz= )v c C) *0 *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0 C W (V ( w _ _ _ _ _ _ _ E E0 z o .0 .0 > W ~~~ C)0 o~~~0 a..C L. I. (V0 0.0 .0 0. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ C-, I- _~~~~~- -- _ _ _ _ _ _ LO -0 16 B:3 o -5 -5 v) z 7.5Z cL) 2 u to 0 jo 0 R0 Q) o o : 1; 2 - t; Ea 0 c: m 0-1 c: 02 -0 OE "A -8 m 0- 0 a, c .2 (u :" u = cu Q"0 E rc =a)c n E-5 a) cu o T cu (u u - u -O a, mm c C, > m u -o.E -9 75 E: * t a! E! - >O 5 cr rr 0 E cu 13Jw 0 'pu (U a) cu ->..o c 0. =3 0 T :E Ar- 'm CL Oa Ln a 0w < 0 co 0 0 cam, (u tn u 0 o In cu tn , , T m a, 0 Q) p m - > -0 2 co: 2 Mc tn :3 o OE EL E v) o cnu .19 2 a) cm 0 8 E c cu 'Or- o M w 0 uw aal- cn. -Om E LA 0 :3 (U =1 0 E -2 7' 3' a' (Eu cu r- c0 Q) E c E cu E E 0 75 CD 0u . : = EE l2n -0 E -Y Co' Or- c '5 Ln0- oaj, (U LA E > iE > -cw ->O> cm D. -o E E o c:o m 0, c r0 Sj Di i "ou u UO 0v) 2 CT .2 -- cL, -,A> > >.- 0 N : 0 0)2 -CR u 0m >o 2 6 E w MCL a, 0- 0, 75 m Lq -c (u 0 E u '5 ( a' cr m t5 =3 u u c:0lo: wcm o (n E . c:m cm O> ou E o 0 u0, u r- ! M -5 -O 0 o m =0uro- Z3 C) 75 0, ol -0 :D: r- 'a a) mu z, mu w cu loc cu c: 3 -5 5; E -o w C, u E 0 -0 0 0 0 cm 3: E Lo .9 2 Zo, E O O o 6. 'm = 6. cL Q) u =3m m c) m ;5 c o w -cu Q) o > cu E (vw tn _ou (n -iti (uo u E (UM Q) (L) a) a) cn cum M 113 'A co a) E ct; E m >1 il 11 ca. Ln (u (u 0 c: m2 E-Ac CL E= :5 cu coo u u O. 104 E 0 m Ou Z3uE cu w o 75 2' 'A to Lo Lu om "u CL w > >. Ln Lu