National Highways Authority of India --0 (Ministry of Road Transport & Highways New Delhi, India ) Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan for Lucknow-Ayodhya Section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass. RP228 VOL.6 .... ~~A, , L- dPackagI .5~~~~~~%L ~ -~ --'Y \) C A~ Package 11 DHV~ ~ ~~ Loslat in7itetrwt DPCnutnsPt t 1WLT, Pack gell~~~~~~~~£ -~~ ,~ .,-4- ~~J' i~'1Gorakhpur Bypass DHV Consultants in joint venturs wit MDP Consultants Pvt. Ltd DHV Consultants Shri V.K. Sharma Branch Office General Manager C-154, Greater Kailash-l Social & Environmental Development Unit New Delhi - 110 048 National Highway Authority of India Telephone +91-11-646 6433/6455/5744 Plot No. G 5 & G 6 Fax +91-11-622 6543 Sector - 10, Dwarka E-mail: dhvindia@del2.vsnl.net.in New Delhi New Delhi, I 9th January 2003 Our Ref. MSP/DHV/0401.0012 Subject Submission of Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan for Lucknow- Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Dear Sir, Please find enclosed herewith the Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass for your kind considerations. Our project team have made several trips to the project site to verify the data as well as intensively interacted and discussed with the DPR consultants on various issues related to Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the above mentioned road sections. On the basis of the same DHV Consultants in joint venture with MDP Consultants Pvt Ltd have endeavoured to consolidate the RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass and hope you would appreciate our efforts in carrying out the assignment. We look forward to receive your feedback on the above and would incorporate the comments in the Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan report. Thanking you, Yours sincerely DHV Consultants 4, M.S. Prakash (Dr.) T eam Leader Encl.: As above (I X | > DHV Consultants is part of the DHV Group. -( . X.,,, Bahn-ma Bangladesh, Belgium, Bolswana, Orazil, Chma. Czech Republic, Ecuador, Egypt. Gernany, Guatemala, Hungary, liong Kong. India, Indonesia, Isracl, Kenya, Laos. Mozambique. Nanibha, Nepal, the Netherlands, Nigena, Pakistan, Poland, Ponugal, Qatar, Russia, South Afnca, Spain, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Tanzania. Thailand, Tunisia, United Kingdom, Vienam., Zimbab,e The qua ly managemcnt system ofDliV Consultants has been approsed against NEN ISO 9001. Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Undese t {ev e ai CorSdao of EMP & RAP for A id llhd=akhpur Bypass 3; ifl! ^ s a ffla«eResettlement Action Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS PAGE NO 1.1 Introduction 1-1 1.2 Project Description 1-2 1.3 Approach and Methodology 1-3 1.4 World Bank Guidelines & R&R Policy Framework 1-3 1.5 Minimizing Negative Social Impacts 1-3 1.6 People affected Families Titleholders & Non Titleholders 1-3 1.6.1 Titleholder 14 1.6.2 Non Titleholder 1-4 1.7 Profile of the Project Affected Households (PAHs) 1-5 1.8 Loss of Livelihood 1-6 1.9 Resettlement Sites 1-7 1.10 Estimates Of Land Requirement 1-7 1.11 Common Property Resources 1-8 1.12 Entitlement Framework 1-8 1.13 Participation Of Stakeholders 1-9 1.14 Institutonal Arrangement 1-9 1.15 Implementation And Arrangement Schedule 1-9 1.16 Monitoring And Evaluation (M&E) 1-10 1.17 CostAnd Budget 1-10 2.1 Approaches and Methodology 2-1 2.2 The Methodological Framework 2-1 2.3 Primary Data Collection And Analysis 2-2 2.3.1 Preliminary Social Screening Survey 2-2 2.3.2 Census Survey 2-2 2.3.3 Socio-economic Survey 2-3 2.3.4 Data collection of Land records 2-3 2.4 Secondary Data Collection And Analysis 2-3 2.5 Public Consultations 24 I 3.1 Introduction 3-1 3.2 Minimize Negatlve Social Impacts in the Project Area 3-1 3.2.1 Concentric widening 3-2 3.2.2 One side widening 3-2 3.2.3 Realignment 3-2 3.2.4 Raised Carriageway (RCW) 3-2 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secion on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 3.3 Amenities And Facilities 3-3 3.3.1 Underpass 3-3 3.3.2 ROB 3-3 3.3.3 Service Road 3-3 4.1 Background 4-1 4.2 Regional Setting of the Project Area 4-1 4.3 Socio- Economic Profile of the project area 4-1 4.3.1 Demographic Profile 4-1 4.3.1.1 Category of Loss 4-3 4.3.2 Economic Profile 4-5 4.3.2.1 Work Force participation Rate of the Project Districts 4-5 4.3.2.2 Occupational structure of the Project Area 4-6 4.3.3 Social Profile 4-6 4.3.3.1 Overview of Family types in the project area 4-7 4.3.3.2 Land Holding of Project Affected Households 4-8 4.4 Condusions 4-8 5.1 Approach And Methodology 5-1 5.2 Resettlement & Rehabilitation Principles And Guidelines 5-1 5.3 Resettiement & Rehabilitation Principles And Guidelines 5-2 5.3.1 Abbreviatons 5-2 5.3.2 Terms 5-3 5.4 Definitons 5.4 5.5 Issues 5-5 5. 6 Broad Entitlement Framework 5-5 5.7 Titleholders 5-5 5.8 Non Titieholders 5-7 5.9 Resettlement And Relocation 5-8 6.0 Entitiement Matrix 5-10 6.1 Community ParUcipation In The Project Area 6-1 6.2 The Consultation process adopted in the project area 6-1 6.2.1 Public Consultations held at Lucknow Ayodhya section of NH-28 6-1 6.3 Stage One Focus Group Discussions 6-2 6.4 Main Findings & Observations 6-10 6.5 Gorakhpur Bypass Stretch 6-10 6.5.1 Main Findings & Observations of the Gorakhpur Bypass 6-11 7.1 Background 7-1 7.2 Project Road Description and AlignmenVRoute 7-1 7.2.1 Bypass at Barabanki, Ramsanehighat: 7-1 7.2.2 Constraints in widening existing NH-28 in Gorakhpur city and Provision of Gorakhpur Bypass; - 7-2 7.2.3 Alignment options: 7-2 7.2.4 Selected Alignment 7-3 7.3 Land Acquisition 7-3 7.4 Land for Lucknow -Ayodhya section 74 7.4.1 Land required to for Specific purposes (Lucknow-Ayodyhya section) 7-4 ---- ~ -'-i -,1VffA-4b _ _ Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass o, j Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 7.4.2 Intersections, Interchanges & Flyovers 7-5 7.4.3 Rail Over Bridges 7-6 7.5 Land for Gorakhpur Bypass: 7-6 7.5.1 Land required for specific purposes on Gorakhpur Bypass; 7-7 7.6 Impact of Land Acquisition 7-8 7.7 Severity of Impact due to Land Acquisition 7-9 7.8 Process of Land Acquisition 7-9 7.9 Appointment of Competent Authority 7-10 7.10 Details of Land Acquisition Procedure (Requirements) 7-11 7.11 Acquisition of Land and Determination of Replacement value of land & provision thereof in the budget 7-12 7.12 Procedure/Methodology to be followed for payment of Land compensation 7-13 7.13 Acquisition of Properties / Assets Including common property resources and Valuation thereof 7-13 7.14 Disposal of Acquired Properties 7-14 7.15 Deposit and Payment of Land Compensation Amount -3H 7-15 7.16 Hearing of Objections within 21 days of Publication of Notification under Secton 3A 7-15 7.17 Hearing of Objections received within 21 days of Publication of Notification under section 3D 7-15 7.18 Land Acquisition Plan and Implementation Schedule 7-16 7.19 Transfer of Govemment Land 7-16 7.20 District's Average Land Holding 7-16 7.21 Cut-Off date 7-18 7.22 Land Availability for Displaced persons for Resettlement and Budget Provision thereof 7-18 7.23 Land Use 7-19 7.24 Agriculture, Inigaton and cropping pattern 7-19 7.25 Expeditng the Process of Land Acquisition 7-20 8.1 Implementation Arrangement And Schedule 8-1 8.2 Institutional Arrangement At NHAI-HQ And PIU 8-1 8.2.1 Existing Institutional Arrangement at the NHAI- HQ and PIU 8-1 8.2.2 Proposed Institutional Arrangement at the NHAI- HQ and PIU 8-1 8.3 Grievance Redressal Mechanism 8-2 8.3.1 Grievance Redressal Committees 8-2 8.3.2 Grievance Redressal Mechanism 8-2 8.4 District Level Committcc 8-3 8.5 Role of Various Stakeholding Agencies In The Project Area 8-4 8.5.1 Competent Authority 8-4 8.5.2 Non-Govemment Organizations 8-4 8.5.3 Evaluation Consultant 8-4 8.5.4 Roles and Responsibilities 84 8.6 Implementation Issues 8-7 8.7 Capacity building & Training 8-7 8.7.1 Training for the NGO Personnel 8-7 8.7.2 Training for the Beneficiaries of the Project 8-8 8.7.3 Training for NHAI Staff 8-8 I 9.1 Introduction 9-1 9.2 Livelihood Affected Families 9-1 9.3 Eligible Families For Income Restoration 9-2 9.4 Occupational Profile of The PAPs 9-2 9.4.1 Assessment of Training Needs for Eligible PAP's 9-3 IAAA ^W A_ Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 04 9.5 Training Delivery Strategy 9-3 9.5.1 Income Restoraton Plan 9-3 10.1 Introduction 10-1 10.2 Summary of R&R Budget 10-1 10.3 Value of Land and Structures/Assets 10-1 10.3.1 Compensation 10-1 10.4 Assistanco 10-2 10.4.1 Transitional Allowance 10-3 10.4.2 Economic Rehabilitation Grant [ERG] 10-4 10.4.3 Shifting Allowance/Assistance 10-4 10.4.4 Rental Allowance 104 10.4.5 Subsistence Allowance for Share Croppers 10-4 10.4.6 Plots/Development of Resettlement Sites 104 10.4.7 Assistance/Compensaton for Relocation of Common Properties/Community Structures 10-4 10.5 Training 10-5 10.6 Support 10-5 10.7 Highway Related Diseases 10-5 10.8 Fees, taxes and Other Charge 10-5 10.9 Disbursement Of Assistance 10-5 10.10 Payment of Compensation 10-5 10.11 Mode Of Payment 10-6 11.1 Significance Of Monitoring And Evaluation In The Project Area 11-1 11.2 Intemal Monitorng Of Project Activities 11-1 11.3 Components Of Intemal Monitoring 11-2 11.4 Components Of Extemal Evaluation 11-3 11.5 Evaluating The Project Activities 11-5 11.6 Measuring Changes in the Quality Of Life 11-5 11.7 Reporting 11-6 11.8 Institutional Mechanism 11-7 11.9 Thematic And Other Related Studies 11-7 12.1 Significance Of Assessing HIV/Aids Health Risks In The ProjectArea 12-1 12.2 HIV /AIDS and Health Risks in the Project Area 12-1 12.3 The main objectives of the surveys 12.2 12.4 The process for assessing HIV/AIDS disease in the project area 12.2 12.4.1 Location Specific Study 12.2 12.4.2 Village level Survey 124 12.5 Observations and Discussions 12-5 12.6 Recommendations and Measures for Awareness Generation 12-5 rl--- A A; A &.10f AW A _ Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan ! Table 1.1 Project Road 1-1 Table 1.2 District Wise Details Of The Project Stretch 1-2 Table 1.3 Package Wise Details Of The Project Stretch 1-2 Table 1.4 Affected Households, Families and Persons (Titleholder) 1-4 Table 1.5 Affected Households, Families and Persons (Non-titleholder) 1-4 Table 1.6 Displaced Households, Families and Persons (Titleholder) 1-5 Table 1.7 Displaced Households, Families and Persons (Non-tleholder) 1-5 Table 1.8 (A) Detail of Vulnerable Families(Encroacher) 1-5 Table 1.8 (B) Detail of Vulnerable Families (Squatter) 1-6 Table 1.8 (C) Details of Vulnerable Families (Tenant) 14 Table 1.9 Vulnerable (Titleholder) 14 Table 1.10 Loss Of Livelihood 1-6 Table 1.11 Eligible families for income restoration-Titleholders and Non-Titleholders 1-7 Table 1.12 Distictwise Land Acquisition 1-7 Table 1.13 Common Property Affected 1-8 Table 1.14 The sub-head wise estimated Cost and budget. as under (in million Rs.) 1-10 Table 3.1 The varous options explored for minimizing negative social impact for Gorakhpur Bypass Project 3-2 Table 3.2 Minimizing Negative Social Impacts 3-2 Table 3.3 Summary of Amenities and Fadilities for Lucknow-Ayodhya section -NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass 3-3 Table 4.1 Demographic Profile of Project Villages (2001) 4-1 Table 4.2 Demographic Profile of Project Disticts (2001) 4-2 Table 4.3 Population Growth Rate (2001) 4-2 Table 4.4 Project Affected Titleholders 4-3 Table 4.5 Project Affected Structure Titleholders 4-4 Table 4.6 Project Affected Non-Titleholders 4-5 Table 4.7 Work Force Participation Rate (2001) 4-6 Table 4.8 Occupatonal Structure of the Project area 4-6 Table 4.9 The Literacy Trend in the Project Distridct and Project Area (2001) 4-7 Table 4.10 Overview of family Types in the Project area 4-7 Table 4.11 Land Holding Size 4-8 Table 6.1 Initial Focus Group Discussions held at 12 Major Locations in the Project Area 6-3 Table 6.2 Initial Focus Group Discussions held at the Major Locations in the Barabanki Bypass Stretch 64 Table 6.3 Initial Focus Group Discussions held at the Major Locations in the Ram Sunehighat Bypass Stretch 6-5 Table 6.4 Local Level Public Consultations held at the Major Locations in the Barabanki Bypass Stretch 6-5 Table 6.5 Local Level Public Consultations held at the Major Location at Ram Sunehighat Bypass Stretch 6-6 Table 6.6 Local Level Public Consultations held at the Major Location in the Project area 6-6 Table 6.7 Local Level Public Consultations held at the Major Location in the Project area 6-8 Table 6.8 Public Consultations held at 9 Major Locations in the Project Area 6-10 Table 7.1: Available and Proposed ROW 7-3 Table 7.2 District wise Land Acquisibon 7-4 Table 7.3: Package wise location of proposed Bus Bays with land area requirements 7-5 Table 7.4: Package wise location of proposed Truck Lay-byes with land area requirements 7-5 Table 7.5: Location of toll plaza and land Area Requirement Package II 7-5 Table-7.6: Package Wise List of Proposed Intersection Development 7-6 Table-7.7: Details of Rail Over Bridges (Package Wise) 7-6 Table 7.8: Land Acquisition for Gorakhpur Bypass 7-7 Table 7.9: Location of Junctions, interchanges and toll plaza with Land area Requirements 7-7 Table: 7.10: Location of Bus Bays with Land area Requirements 7-7 Table: 7.11: Location of Truck Lay-byes with Land area Requirements 7-8 I,A AKA_ Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secion on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 7.12: Severity of impact due to land acquisition 7-9 Table 7.13: Impact on Common Propertes 7-14 Table 7.14: Average size of landholdings of Lucknow, Barabanki, Faizabad and Gorakhpur distridcts 7-16 Table 7.15: Details of landholdings in comparison to average land holdings of the distridct before & after acquisition 7-17 Table 7.16: Details of HH below & above average land holding of the distridct after acquisition 7-17 Table 7.17: Details of Vulnerable Agricultural THs (PAHs and PAFs) 7-18 Table 8.1 Role & Responsibilities for Implementation of the RAP 8-6 Table 8.2 Training Plan for NHAI Staff 8-8 Table 8.3 Implementation Schedule of LA and R&R Activities for Package 1 (8.25 km to 44.762km) of Lucknow-Ayodhya secion of NH-28 8-10 Table 8.4 Implementation Schedule of LA and R&R Acivites for Package 11(44.762 km to 92.683km) of Lucknow-Ayodhya secion of NH-28 8-11 Table 8.5 Implementation Schedule of LA and R&R Activities for Package 111(92.683 km to 15km of Ayodhya Bypass) of Lucknow-Ayodhya section of NH-28 8-12 Table 8.6 Implementation Schedule of LA and R&R Activities for Package I (Okm to 15 km) of Gorakhpur Bypass 8-13 Table 8.7 Implementation Schedule of LA and R&R Activities for Package 11 (15km to 32.469 km) of Gorakhpur Bypass 8-14 Table 9.1 (A) Livelihood Affected Families - Commercial loss 9-1 Table 9.1 (B) Livelihood Affected Families -Residential cum Commercial loss 9.1 Table 9.2 Livelihood Affected Families (Vulnerable) 9.2 Table 9.3 Eligible families for income restoration-Titleholders and Non-Titleholders 9-2 Table 9.4 Eligible families for income restoration - Titleholders and Non- Titleholders 9-3 Table 10.1 The sub head wise provision is summarized as under (in million Rs.) 10-1 Table 10.2 Showing detailed Los of Structures distridct wisc 10-2 Table 10.3 Abstract of Loss structures Area (sqm) 10-2 Table 10.4 Total Compensation for acquisition of land and R&R assistance to be provided towards the land acquisition 10-3 Table 10.5 Titleholder and Compensation, Assistance & Replacement valuc 10-3 Table 10.6 ResettlementAction Plan Budget 10-7 Table 11.1 Monitoring input and output indicators of project 11-2 Table 11.2 Evaluation Framework for Physical Achievement 114 Table 11.3 Evaluation Framework for Financial Achievements 114 Table 11.4 Evaluation Framework for Social Impact Assessment 11-5 Table 11.5 Evaluation Framework for Participation 11-5 Table 11.6 Indicators for Assessing Changes in the Quality of Lifc 11-6 Table 12.1 Location Specific Survey for assessing the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in NH-28 section 12-2 Table 12.2 Location Specific Survey for assessing the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in Gorakhpur Bypass 12-3 Figure 1.1 Base Map of the Project Area Figure 1.2 Base Map for Lucknow-Ayodhya Section NH-28 Figure 1.3 Base Map for Gorakhpur Bypass Figure 2.1: Methodological Framework 2-1 Figure 2.2 Overview of the Project Affected Persons Based On Their Ownership Category 2-2 Chart 4.1 Population Growth Rate (2001) 4-2 Chart 4.2 Project Affected Titleholders and Non-Titleholders 4-3 Chart 4.3 Project Affected Titleholders in Project Area 4-3 Chart 4.4 Project Affected Non-Titieholders 4-5 Chart 4.5 Work Force Participation Rate (2001) 4-6 Chart 4.6 The Literacy Trend in the Project Distridct and Project Area (2001) 4-7 Fig 6.1 The Consultation Procedure Adopted In The Lucknow-Ayodhya Section-NH-28 6-2 Figure 8.1 The Institutional Arrangement 8-3 Fig. 8.2 Grievance Redressal Mechanism 8-5 Figure 9.1 Income Restoration Plan 9-6 Annexure 1.1: Database of Titieholders -Land Owners Lucknow Ayodhya section NH-28 I -- a D Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass i Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acion Plan Annexure 1.2: Database of Titleholders -Structures Lucknow Ayodhya section NH-28 Annexure 1.3: Database of Titieholders -Land owners Gorakhpur Bypass Annexure 1.4: Data of Title holder - Structures Gorakhpur Bypass Annexure 1.5: Database of Non-Titleholders -Squatters Lucknow Ayodhya secion NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Annexure 1.6: Database of Non-Titleholders -Encroaches and Tenants Lucknow Ayodhya section NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Annexure 1.7: Database of Non-Titleholders -KIOSKS Lucknow Ayodhya secion NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Annexure 2.1: Census and Socio-Economic Survey- Lucknow Ayodhya Section NH-28 for Land owners Annexure 2.2: Census and Socio-Economic Survey- Lucknow Ayodhya Secion NH-28 for Structures (Title Holder & Non Title Holder) Annexure 2.3: Census Survey Schedule - Gorakhpur Bypass Annexure 2.4: Socio-Economic Survey Schedule - Gorakhpur Bypass Annexure 3.1: Details for Minimising Negative Social Impacts Annexure 4.1: Population Projection of villages in Lucknow District Annexure 4.2: Population Projection of villages in Barabanki District Annexure 4.3: Population Projection of Villages in Faizabad District Annexure 4.4: Population Projedion of villages in Gorakhpur District Annexure 7.1: Land Estimate for Lucknow - Ayodhya Annexure 7.2: Land Estimate for Gorakhpur -Bypass Annexure 7.3: Land Cost, Landuse Break up for Evaluation purposes- Lucknow- Ayodhya Section Annexure 7.4: Land Cost, Landuse Break up for Evaluation purposes- Gorakhpur -Bypass Annexure 8.1: Format For Preparation of Micro plans Annexure 8.2: Format For Identity Cards Annexure 8.2: TOR for NGOs (Lucknow Ayodhya Section NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass) Annexure 11.1: Quarterly Monitoring Format for Staffing l I I I I I I I I I I I CHAPTER I I I I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I I I i~I I I l Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 INTRODUCTION India has embarked on a 10-year highway transportation improvement program as a part of the national policy to globalize its economy and to increase safety and efficiency in trade and business besides free movement of traffic. To achieve this, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) an autonomous body under the Ministry of Road Transport (MoRT&H), envisages the implementation of sustainable transportation system in India. With its mandate to develop and maintain an enhanced quality of National Highways, NHAI under the National Highway Development Plan (NHDP) has embarked on its second phase relating to the creation of a North-South corridor connecting Srinagar with Kanyakumari and of strengthening and enhancing the East-West corridor of the country linking Silchar with Porbandar. The Government plans to complete the second phase of NHDP by December 2007, which includes development of two corridors the North-South Corridor and the East-West Corridor. Of the 6858-km NS-EW corridors, 630-km have already been four-laned, while 416-km was under implementation and the contracts for the remaining 5812-km will be awarded under phase -II. The East-West Corridor comprising the second phase of NHDP, propose to have public-private partnership projects. As there's a growing realization that an indepth comprehension of resettlement and rehabilitation issues with its social, cultural, psychological, economic and environmental ramifications will have strategic consequences in infrastructure related projects, this document provides a detailed social assessment of various choices of project options for combating the complex issue of involuntary resettlement. Consequently, the preparation of comprehensive Resettlement Action Plan for Lucknow-Ayodhya section of NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass a new alignment falling within the NH-28 section is being carried out by the project consultant, Consulting Engineering Services Pvt Ltd and is being strengthened by the (DHV- MDP) Consultants. The East -West Corridor includes four laning of Lucknow to Muzaffarpur of NH-28 section in Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. The details of the consultancy packages are as follows: The project road starts at Kamta (near Lucknow at km 8.25) and traverses through Lucknow, Barabanki, Faizabad, Gonda, Basti, Sant Kabir Nagar and Gorakhpur districts in UP and Gopalganj, East Champaran (Motihari) and Muzaffarpur districts in Bihar. The project road ends at Chandni Chowk in Muzaffarpur. The entire project road stretch has been divided into five consultancy packages as depicted in Table 1.1. Table 1.1 Project Road Section From To Lenyth (km) District State I Lucknow Ayodhya 1 9.700 Lucknow, Barabanki, Faizabad UP II Ayoydhya Gorakhpur 115.200 Faizabad, Gonda, Basti, Sant Kabir UP Nagar and Gorakhpur III Gorakhpur Gopalganj 106.200 Gorakhpur and Gopalganj UP and Bihar IV Gopalganj Muzaffarpur 134.000 Gopalganj, East Champaran and Bihar Muzaffarpur Gorakhpur Kaleshwar Koni 32.476 Gorakhpur UP Bypass 3 Not funded by te World Bank I _ 1 - 1 1- Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass l Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan First two sections of the project road lie in the state of UP. Section 11 partly lies in UP and partly in the state of Bihar and the IV section in the state of Bihar only. The Gorakhpur Bypass lies in Uttar Pradesh. This document pertains to social assessment of Section I i.e., from Lucknow - Ayodhya (km 8.25 to 122.275 and 15 kms on Faizabad Bypass) and the Gorakhpur Bypass section of the project road. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project road from Lucknow to Ayodhya (as stated above) lies in the state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) and traverses through the administrative boundaries of Lucknow, Barabanki and Faizabad districts. The project road (Section-I) has been further sub-divided into three construction packages as detailed in Table 1.3. The Gorakhpur Bypass on the other hand traverses an approximate length of 32.476 Km and encompasses the administrative boundary of the Gorakhpur district and 37 villages. The Gorakhpur Bypass has been divided into two-construction packages. (Refer Figure 1.1 for Index map and Figure 1.2 and Figure 1.3 for Lucknow -Ayodhya section and Gorakhpur Bypass respectively) Table 1.2 District Wise Details Of The Project Stretch Chainage (start Chainage (end Districts Tehsils Villages Km) Km) 8.25 17.00 Lucknow Sadar tehsil 8 17.00 69.00 Barabanki Nawabganj, 48 Ramsanehighat 69.00 122.275 and 15 Faizabad Rudauli, Sohawal & Sadar 68 Kms on Faizabad bypass BYPASSES Name Chainage (start Km Chainage (end Km) Villages Barabanki Bypass 20.00-(Sarthara Village) 32.46 (Sursunda Sarthara, Bhuhera, Dharsania, village) Asaini, Kurauli, Darapur, Badel, Sukalai, Plahari, Dulhipur & Susunda Ramsanehighat 63.00 (Kashipur village) 69.70 (Asraf Gangraila) Kashipur, Dilona, Bhendua, Brahaman, Chandauli, Dharauli, Narayanpur, Bhundehri, Malinpur, Kushari and Asraf Ganraila GORAKHPUR BYPASS Gorakhpur Bypass 251.680 279.80 37 Table 1.3 Package Wise Details Of The Pro ect Stretch Length Package From (km) To (km) (km) District A 8.25 44.762 36.512 Lucknow and Barabanki B 44.762 92.683 47.921 Barabanki and Faizabad C 92.683 122.275 and 15 44.592 Faizabad kms along the Faizabad bypass Total 129. 025 Gorakhpur Bypass 251.680 279.80 32.476 Gorakhpur _ .. w _ 1-2 0 , 8a~~~Sar~~~'~~~ NI RSANEHIGHAM S BRBANKI CPA$S ' BY PAS$B Aeb< -B - FA IZABAD~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~- Y T A~I Fig 1.1 INDEX MAP LEGEND: N. H. Number (H) MAJOR NH-CORRIDORS PROJECT ROAD BYPASS ROADS DELHI 0 Lujcknow ~~y~~~a ~~hpu r i K ~. >-' 0 > __41 \SILC R C h3fl Jt / \3 0 P h R t 0fi) © )) 3 C W . 2/Onlwu K0LKA0 PORBAND I MUMBAI 2zP. KA NYA KUMARI Lfr @ _ BASE MAP (FOR LUCKNOW- AYODHYA SECTION NH- 28 SCALE a a a a a a a a a~~~~~2 37 a a6 a7 -7 a a1 -4 a C~~CCCS0CC PCCC~~~~~~~~CCSCCC CCCCCCCC ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 26' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~CC~CZC - 37CCCCCCNC CCCCCCCCCC 7 A-1 I' 4~~~~~~~~~~~~OCO .4 a CCCC CE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CCCCC 5CCCSR- 6- ' N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CCCCCo CCCC CCCC -~~~~~~~~~~ 4 - C - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~T 26' 26~~~~~~~~~~~~ 40' N 26' ~~~~~~~~~~_____ C26 C 40 37N - oCt ' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~6 8 3 "A"'26' 38' 23" N 26' 23"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CCCS RAILWAY LINE RIVER BRIDGE SERVICE ROAD~~~~N TC B'CCCCC CCCCS C'C CCC ;H. MDR'ODR VIADUCT/~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CC CCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCC C BYPASS BUND POWER LINE INTER SECIION ROBS C VAT'ER BODY PROPOSED BYPASS VILLAGE UNDERPASS~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~CC6 ~~~~ESERVEDFOREST PLANTATION~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Cˇ jCCCC CCCy4 ~ ~ CCC CCCCCCSCCFig:C3CCBCCC MA Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 1.3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY The data collection and analysis for the project affected persons for the preparation of RAP has been carried out at the backdrop of NHAI's entitlement framework. The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared on the basis of the primary and secondary data and in extensive consultation with the stakeholders. For Lucknow -Ayodhya section of NH-28, preliminary social screening survey was carried out to assess the possible impact of the project. This survey was followed by a detailed 100 percent census survey based on the door-to door interview basis of families that were being directly affected (within ROW) by the broadening of the road section. The census survey was initiated on 21.8.2003 and the socio-economic survey was carried out on 25 percent basis. For the Gorakhpur Bypass similar approach was adopted wherein 100 percent census survey was executed and 25 percent socio-economic survey was carried to assess the family details; occupation (agriculture, share cropper, business, service), occupational skills, literacy level, economic status and other socio-economic information of the family for determination of the entitlement framework of the project affected persons. 1.4 WORLD BANK GUIDELINES & R&R POLICY FRAMEWORK The population distribution and social impact scenario of the project indicate that the OP 4.12 would be applicable to this project. OP 4.12 deals with involuntary resettlement, which may cause long term hardship and impoverishment and which needs mitigation measures. The O.D. 4.20 pertaining to indigenous people is not applicable and cannot be triggered in this project, as there are no ST families affected in the project area 1.5 MINIMIZING NEGATIVE SOCIAL IMPACT The integration of social and environmental aspects along with the design issues made it possible to reduce the negative social impact for both the consultancy packages as detailed below. For the Lucknow-Ayodhya section previously, the widening of the existing alignment in Barabanki and Ram Sanehighat would have affected quite a large number of structures, kiosks and other assets. In Barabanki alone the number of project affected persons would be approximately one third of the total affected persons for the entire project road. The widening the existing road would affect as many as 425 structures and 275 kiosks comprising 2770 and 1600 persons respectively but with the proposed bypasses there are only 24 kiosks and 11 structures getting affected. The details of minimization efforts have been provided in the concerned chapter. For Gorakhpur Bypass project, the reconnaissance and social survey of various alignment options were made keeping in mind the social and environment aspects while finalizing the project design and engineering aspects. Of the various alignment options, the present alternative (option no 2, as indicated Table 3.1 in chapter 3 and Figure 7.1 in Chapter 7) was considered most feasible as it avoids major settlements to be disturbed, had reduced numbers of PAPs being affected, and minimal land acquisition requirements as compared to the other options. 1.6 PROJECT AFFECTED FAMILIES-TITLEHOLDERS & NON TITLEHOLDERS People likely to be affected mainly belong to two broad categories; viz., Titleholders and Non- titleholders. Titleholders are the ones have legal papers for the property units in their name, whereas Non-titleholders include encroachers, squatters, tenants and kiosk owners. Despite best efforts to minimise the negative social impact, there would be considerable number of persons who would be affected/displaced by the project. The details of Project area for Lucknow-Ayodhya section NH-28 1_Jw _ 1-3 .& wA Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secton on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acfion Plan and Gorakhpur Bypass for Titleholders and Non-Titleholders has been provided in Annexure 1.1- 1.7. The average number of affected persons for Lucknow-Ayodhya stretch and Gorakhpur Bypass has been elucidated in the following tables. 1.6.1 Titleholder Census and Socio-economic survey has enumerated 4153 PAHs and 21190 PAPs among Titleholders. This includes both land and structure affected persons (Residential, Commercial, Residential cum Commercial, Agriculture etc.) and also accounts for people loosing other property units like well, hand pump/ tube well, boundary walls etc. Detail of impact of the project on Titleholders in terms of type of loss is provided in Table 1.4 Table 1.4 Affected Households, Families and Persons (Titleholder) Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Total Gorakhpur Total Type of PAHs PAFs PAPs PAHs PAFs PAPs PAHs PAFs PAPs PAHs PAFs PAPs PAHs PAFs PAPs PAHs PAFs PAPs loss Land 79 174 382 1250 2750 6038 371 816 1792 1700 3740 8211 1436 5026 8042 3136 8766 16253 Residential 20 44 97 53 117 256 106 233 512 179 394 865 23 81 129 202 474 993 Commercial 114 251 551 148 326 715 127 279 613 389 856 1879 2 7 11 391 863 1890 Residential cum 43 95 208 75 165 362 82 180 396 200 440 966 8 28 45 208 468 1011 commercial Other Property 97 213 469 69 152 333 50 110 242 216 475 1043 0 0 0 216 475 1043 Units Total 353 777 1705 1595 3509 7704 736 1619 3555 2684 5905 12964 1469 5142 8226 4153 11046 21190 1.6.2 Non Titleholder The percentage distribution of the Non Titleholders exhibits that kiosks account for maximum share (54.62 percent) followed by Tenants (17.45 percent), Encroachers (16.60 percent) and Squatters (9.54 percent). The distribution of PAHs, PAFs and PAPs analyzed further in terms of use of the structures has been elucidated in Table 1.5. Table 1.5 Affected Households, Families and Persons (Non-titleholder) Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Total En Sq Te Sh' K En STe Sh KEn S qneSq Te SKh K K EnSqTeSh Sq Te Sh K Residential 5 0 1 0 0 18 3 130 0 180 133 26 0 0 16 8 0 0 0 219 144 40 0 0 Commercial 26 6 78 0 196 52 9 157 0 486 101 106 166 0 1407 0 0 0 0 15 179 121 401 0 2104 Residential cum 8 25 22 0 0 57 26 77 0 0 87 48 89 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 153 103 188 0 0 commercial Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 69 0 Other Property 28 0 14 0 0 18 0 20 0 0 43 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 0 45 0 0 Units Total PAHs 67 31 115 0 196 145 38 267 35 486 411 287 292 15 1407 17 12 0 19 15 640 368 674 69 2104 Total PAFs 147 68 115 0 196 319 84 267 35 486 904 631 292 15 1407 60 42 0 19 15 1430 825 674 69 2104 I_Jw _... 1-4 Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secton on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acfion Plan The project displaced families for Titleholders account for 19.3 percent of the total affected families in the project area. It can be viewed that Faizabad accounts for maximum non-titleholder families in the squatter category followed by Barabanki and Gorakhpur Bypass. The distribution of displaced households, families and persons in the titleholder and non-titleholder category has been depicted in Tables 1.6 and Table 1.7 Table 1.6 - Displaced Households, Families and Persons (Titleholder) Type of loss Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Total PDHs PDFs PDPs PDHs PDFs PDPs PDHs PDFs PDPs PDHs PDFs PDPs PDHs PDFs PDPs I Agriculture 4 9 19 195 429 942 55 121 266 226 791 1266 480 1350 2492 Residential 4 9 19 29 64 140 60 132 290 22 77 123 115 282 572 Commercial 5 11 24 80 176 386 56 123 270 2 7 11 143 317 692 Residental cum 3 7 14 37 81 179 34 75 164 8 28 45 82 191 402 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 16 35 77 341 750 1647 205 451 990 258 903 1445 820 2139 4159 Table 1.7 - Displaced Households, Families and Persons (Non-titleholder) Type of loss Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Squatter Tenant Squatter Tenant Squatter Tenant Squatter Tenant PDHs PDFs PDHs PDFs PDHs PDFs PDHs PDFs PDHs PDFs PDHs PDFs PDHs PDFs PDHs PDFs Residential 0 0 1 1 3 7 4 4 133 293 22 22 8 28 0 0 Commercial 6 13 23 23 9 20 124 124 106 233 81 81 0 0 0 0 Residential cum 25 55 3 3 26 57 39 39 48 106 42 42 4 14 0 0 commercial Others 0 0 3 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 Total 31 68 30 30 38 84 169 169 287 631 149 149 12 42 0 0 1.7 PROFILE OF THE PROJECT AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS (PAHs) The Hindus constitute the majority of the affected families followed by Muslims, Sikh and Jain. Amongst the Hindus, Other Backward Castes (OBC) are found in majority followed by Scheduled Caste. The entitlement framework for the project defines vulnerable families as families below poverty line, belonging to SC/ST, women headed households, handicap and destitute. The details of titleholder and non-titleholder vulnerable families identified according to type of loss categories and their social & economic categories have been provided in Table 1.8 (A) to Table 1.9. Table 1.8 (A) - Detail of Vulnerable Families (Encroacher) Lucknow Barabanki I Faizabad | Gorakhpur Social Impact W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Toti W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Tot Residential 0 0 0 1 1 2 3 2 0 1 1 7 9 43 0 7 7 66 0 15 0 1 0 16 Commercial 2 3 0 0 0 5 2 3 0 4 2 11 4 7 0 1 5 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential cum Commercial 4 0 0 1 0 5 2 0 0 3 5 10 6 2 0 3 4 15 0 1 0 0 0 1 Other 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 3 1 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total PAHs 7 3 0 2 1 13 7 5 910 31 20 540 11 16 101 0160 1 0 17 Total PAFs 157 0 4 2 29 15 11 020 22 68 44 119024 35 222 0560 4 0 60 _ - w _ 1-5 4 Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acfion Plan Table 1.8 (B) Detail of Vulnerable Families (Squatter) Social Impa t Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Soiala Impac W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Tot Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 42 0 10 0 57 0 5 0 1 0 6 Commercial o 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 9 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential cum 2 1 0 5 0 8 0 0 0 7 0 7 2 2 0 6 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 1 Commemcial Other o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total PAHs 2 1 0 7 0 10 0 0 0 9 0 9 10 53 0 17 0 80 0 6 0 1 0 7 Total PAFs 4 2 0 15 0 22 0 0 0 20 0 20 22 117 0 37 0 176 0 21 0 4 0 25 Table 1.8 (C) Details of Vulnerable Families (Tenant) Soc I I Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Social Impa,L W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Tot Residential 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 2 7 0 1 0 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial 5 0 0 2 3 10 0 8 0 24 7 39 2 17 0 22 7 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential cum 4 3 0 1 3 11 1 6 0 17 2 26 1 6 0 7 5 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial Other 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 7 0 8 0 2 0 5 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total PAHs 9 3 0 4 7 23 1 17 0 51 11 80 3 26 0 35 14 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total PAFs 9 3 0 4 7 231 170 51 11 80 3 260 35 14 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table 1.9 - Vulnerable (Titleholder) Lucknow Barabanki I Faizabad | Gorakhpur Social ImpaL1 W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Tot W SC ST BPL Dis Toti W SC Sr BPL Dis Tot Agriculture 1 1 0 5 0 743 2570 289 15 604 11 740 59 4 148 42 173 0 3760 591 Residential 1 1 0 3 1 6 0 17 0 1 1 19 4 17 0 4 6 31 0 0 0 2 0 2 Commercial 2 0 0 3 4 9 3 10 0 11 10 34 1 12 0 3 5 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential cum 2 1 0 1 3 7 3 6 0 5 10 24 3 6 0 3 6 18 0 0 0 3 0 3 Commercial Other 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 6 0 3 5 15 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total PAHs 6 3 0 12 10 31 50 296 0 309 41 696 19 109 0 70 22 220 42 173 0 381 0 596 Total PAFs 13 7 0 26 22 68 110 651 0 680 90 1531 42 240 0 154 48 484 147 606 0 1334 0 2086 1.8 LOSS OF LIVELIHOOD & ELIGIBLE FAMILIES FOR INCOME RESTORATION A total of 7248 families would be losing their livelihood as indicated in Table 1.10. The details of the income resfo ion mechanism for Titleholders and Non-Titleholders have been provided in the Table 1.11. The vulnerable families would receive additional support in the form of Economic Rehabilitation Grant to enable to increase their earning capacity. Table 1.10 - Loss Of Livelihood Commercial & Residential cum Commercial loss Affected Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Total PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs Titleholders 157 345 223 491 209 460 10 35 599 1331 (Structures) Squatters 31 68 35 77 154 339 4 14 224 498 Encroachers 34 75 109 240 188 414 1 4 332 732 Kiosks 196 196 486 486 1407 1407 15 15 2104 2104 Tenants 100 100 234 234 255 255 0 0 589 589 Total 518 784 1087 1527 2213 2874 30 68 3848 5254 _ 1-6 W Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass I Draft Finai Consolidated ReseIement Adion Plan The number of families eligible for training reflects that 4300 titleholders families would receive training, whereas 1304 families would receive training for in non-titleholder category. The eligible families would receive support because of loss of livelihood during project implementation and would be enabled to improve their economic status and standards. In addition to this economic rehabilitation grant would be extended to vulnerable families to uplift their status in both titleholder and non-titleholder category as elucidated below. . Table 1.11 - Eligible families for income restoration-Titleholders and Non-Titleholders Titleholders Displaced Land unviable after Commercial Residential cum Total Titleholder Displacedacquisition Commercial Cmeca Training 629 2340 863 468 4300 ERG 629 2340 141 118 3228 Non-Title Tenants Encroachers Squatters Sharecroppers Wage Total holder Saerprs earners Toa C RC C RC C RC Training 401 188 179 153 121 103 69 90 1304 ERG 97 56 73 70 35 59 69 0 459 1.9 RESETTLEMENT SITES The NHAI's entitlement framework has provision for constructing resettlement colonies for displaced commercial as well as residential families in groups of 50 and 25 respectively. The project authorities would develop the resettlement sites if the option of land is available and in consultation with the eligible PAPs during the implementation stage (as a more accurate estimate for land requirement can be formulated during that stage). However, a preliminary assessment and provision for resettlement sites has been made in the cost and budget. 1.10 ESTIMATES OF LAND REQUIREMENT The district wise land to be acquired has been given in the Table 1.12. The table indicates that impact on Gorakhpur would be maximum and Lucknow would be the least impacted district. The number of affected villages is maximum in Faizabad followed by Barabanki, Gorakhpur and Lucknow. Table 1.12 District wise Land Acquisition District Chainage (km) No. of Villages Land in ha Govt./ Gram Sabha Affected (Private/Govt./Gr /Community land (ha) am sabha land) Lucknow 8.250 -17.000 8 7.8 3.00 Barabanki 17 - 68.5 48 170.0 18.0 Faizabad 68.5 -122.275 and 0 - 15.00 of 67 38.2 9.00 Faizabad bypass Gorakhpur 0 - 32.469 (Bypass chainage) Km 37 261.00 15.50 251.700 - 279.800 of NH-28 Total 160 477 41.5 Gorakhpur bypass falls in Gorakhpur district and affects 37 villages through which bypass passes. Total land requirement works out to 261.00 ha. However, after allowing deduction for transfer of Govt. land /Gram sabha land comprising of waterways of streams/canals/drains and roads etc/ net private land acquisition will be about 245.5ha. Iq _ 1-7 0DA Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acton Plan 0 1.11 COMMON PROPERTY RESOURCES The habitation along the road is invariably linked to the growth of infrastructure facilities and amenities near settlements. Acquisition of additional land width for widening of the project road would affect many educational institutions, health facilities, potable water sources, religious and cultural properties, etc. The summary of common property resources likely to be affected has been provided in Table 1.13 Table 1.13 Common Property Affected Category Lucknow Ayodhya section Nh-28 Gorakhpur Bypass Fully affected Partially Fully affected Total affected Religious Structures (Temple 42 4 1 47 & Mosques) Mazar & Samadhi 8 - 8 Graveyard 2 2 Schools 11 10 21 Health facilities 2 7 9 Bus Stand Hand Pump 414 - 5 419 Dharmshala 1 1 Police Station/Chowki/ Post 11 - 11 Other Government Structures 6 6 Well 14 - 1 14 Pond 2 2 Nursery 2 2 Village Gate 1 - 1 Panchayat Bhawan 1 1 Others 9 9 Total 552 Fully affected temples and mosques would be relocated to the near by locations as discussed during the FGDs and public consultation with local peopl and religious committee of the area. However, during the implementation stage the NGO would interact with community people and involve implementing authority, district administration and other persons having influence over their community in resolving the issue of relocation of religious and cultural properties. Compensation would be paid to the schools, colleges, health facilities and any other structures being fully affected. Partially affected property units would also be paid compensation and in order to build the new structures in the adjacent area and/ or the implementing authority will construct the similar kind of structure as mutually agreed with the concerned department on a case-to-case basis. The implementing authority shall suitably locate drinking water sources before the civil construction starts. 1.12 ENTITLEMENT FRAMEWORK The NHAI has prepared the entitlement framework for the people who would be affected by the project. The framework describes the principle and approach to minimize and mitigate the negative social and economic impacts caused by the project. I _. ~ 1-8 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan It also provides assistance for restoring the livelihood to the eligible persons with additional ERG support to the vulnerable displaced livelihood affected families. 1.13 PARTICIPATION OF STAKEHOLDERS The Public Consultations for both the consultancy packages Lucknow-Ayodhya section as well as Gorakhpur Bypass was mainly held at the local level i.e. at the village level so as to incorporate the perceptions of the stakeholders in the planning and implementation of the RAP. There were a total of 27 FGDs and 9 Public Consultations held at Lucknow Ayodhya section and 9 consultations/FGDs heldTfor the Gorakhpur Bypass stretch. However, since public consultation and community participation forms an integral part of R&R implementation process, the State level and District level consultations and interaction with the concerned urban development authorities would be undertaken during the implementation stage.. 1.14 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT Implementation of Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R & R) component would be the overall responsibility of the Environmental and Social Development Unit (ESDU) of NHAI at head quarters for both the stretch Lucknow-Ayodhya and Gorakhpur bypass. The ESDU is presently headed by General Manager and is assisted by one Deputy General Manager and a manager ensuring sustainable implementation of RAP and looking after the environmental components. The responsibilities of EDSU also include policy guidance, planning, implementation and monitoring, contingency planning; R & R related programmes and reporting during RAP. The NHAI's existing capacity includes a Project Implementation Unit (PIJ) at Gorakhpur headed by a Project Director. It has been proposed to have five additional CRROs-one for each construction package to look after the R&R works. 1.15 IMPLEMENTATION AND ARRANGEMENT SCHEDULE The institutional arrangement and implementation schedule provides a detailed mechanism for the implementation of the RAP. The ESDU of NHAI at Head Office would be responsible for the implementation of the action plan through PIU at Gorakhpur. The ESDU is headed by the General Manager and supported by Dy. General Manager and a manager (Environment and R&R). Furthermore, a Non-government organization (NGO) would be appointed by the ESDU for the implementation of RAP. The NGO would work in close co-ordination with CRROs and affected persons. The Grievance Redressal Committee and District level Committee would be set up to facilitate the quick redressal of grievances of project affected persons and implementation of R&R activities respectively. An external evaluation consultant would also be appointed to evaluate the project progress. A time based RAP implementation schedule has been prepared by NHAI to complete the R&R works on time. However NHAI has already initiated the following activities, which would support the implementation of RAP. These include: * Establishment of PIU . Initiation the process of land acquisition. * Appointment of NGOs by end of January 2004 The schedule would facilitate EDSU, PIU, NGO, Evaluation Consultants and other stakeholders in coordinating the completion of their activities and taking corrective measures in time, so that the _dN _ 1-9 AW as_M Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan project would be completed as per schedule. This would also assist PIU to complete land acquisition and initiate resettlement activities in a planned manner, so that civil works may commence by October 2004. 1.16 MONITORING AND EVALUATION (M&E) The ESDU - NHAI and the PIU would be responsible for the internal monitoring of the progress of R&R activities. An external agency would be hired for the evaluation of the impact on socio- economic condition of the PAPs through one annual evaluation, one mid term and one-end term final evaluation report for both the project stretch i.e Lucknow Ayodhya section and Gorakhpur Bypass stretch. . 1.17 COST AND BUDGET The estimated budget comprises land and asset acquisition and supports in re-establishing the livelihood and shelter of the project affected persons. It also has provisions for training of the NHAI staff and NGO, requirement of staff for the implementation of the RAP, highway related disease etc. The estimated budget for RAP implementation has been provided below, wherein the details have been elucidated in the respective chapter. Table 1.14 The sub-head wise estimated Cost and budget as under (in million Rs) SI.No Item NHAI World Bank Amount (Rs.) 1. COMPENSATION 806.356 ----- 806.356 2. ASSISTANCE 519.920 519.920 3 TRAINING 8.906 8.906 4. Support - Implementation of RAP 22.500 22.500 5. Highway Related diseases (HIV/AIDS) 1.500 1.500 6. Fees, Taxes and Other Charges 135.918 7. Contingencies 29.902 Grand Total 1525.00 _ _ _ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~1-10 e U I I I I I I I I I I CHAPTER 2 I I I APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY I I I I I I Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 1 2 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 2.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY This section provides an in-depth insight into the methodological framework and approach adopted for carrying out social impact assessment and data collection in the project area. It also discusses the various methods used for field surveys and outlines the areas of concern and issues during the preparation of Resettlement Action Plan (RAP). The Draft Resettlement Action Plan has been prepared by the primary consultant-Consultancy Engineering Services Private Limited. With a view to comply with appropriate national laws, local guidelines/laws and the World Bank Operational Policy (4.12), the social assessment has been carried out in close coordination with environmental assessment and engineering design team. There have been intensive consultations with various stakeholders for providing necessary inputs to the project. 2.2 THE METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK The project tasks incorporated integration of engineering, environment and social components within the planning exercise. A broad framework of the processes involved in carrying out the social assessment has been elucidated below: I~~~~~~~~~~~I . A area~~~NiG iieaA! I -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- *o EIIlSEI I~o F~~~~~~~~~ U~ t' S_ i U%is X I~G I Figure 2.1: Broad Methodological Framework for carrying out the Data collection in the project area I ~ ~ ~ - - 2-t1 25 5 *Workers 2 20 0 = Marginal workers I _0 _ _ _a Total workers I U~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur District 4.3.2.2 Occupational structure of the Project Area The occupational structure of the PAHs in the project area reveals that majority of the PAHs are engaged in agriculture. The household industry includes dairy, poultry, carpenter and barbers. Table 4.8 - Occupational Structure of the Project area District Number of PAHs in different Occupations Agricultur Business HH Labour Govt. Pvt. Total e Industry (Non_Agric Service Service ulture) Lucknow 78 - - - 1 - 79 Barabanki 1160 7 21 41 35 21 1285 Faizabad 321 12 6 24 21 - 384 Gorakhpur 1219 8 21 15 Source: Primary Data 4.3.3 Social Profile Social development issues forms an important component in determining the social fabric of the project area. Table 4.9 - The Literacy Trend in the Project District and Project Area (2001) District Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Project Project Project Project Project Project Project Proje District Area District Area District Area District ct Area Literates 61.22 55.45 48.71 44.65 57.48 47.68 60.96 49.42 Illiterates 38.78 44.45 51.29 55.35 42.52 52.32 39.04 50.58 Source: Census of India 2001 and Primary Data Chart 4.6 - The Literacy Trend in the Project District and Project Area (2001) 4 -6 in joint venture with w 4W Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan - Literacy Pattern in Project Area and Project District 70 2 60__ _ 50 :40 L Project District e30 _ _ Project Area I ~ ~ ~ 20 - - -~2 10- Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur District Source: Census of India 2001 and Primary Data The literacy pattern in 2001 for the three districts can be divided into literates and Illiterates. It is evident from the Table 4.9 that Lucknow has the highest literacy rate (61.22%) followed by Gorakhpur (60.96%), Faizabad (57.48%) and Barabanki (48.71%) among the project districts. The same trend is followed at the project area also. It is evident that in both the cases the highest literacy rate is in Lucknow district. 4.3.3.1 Overview of family Types in the Project Area The households have been classified as Joint, Nuclear and Extended typology in the project areas. Out of the total family units in the project area, approximately 32.0 percent of the PAFs reside in Barabanki district followed by Gorakhpur, Faizabad and Lucknow district with 32.00,18.65, and 8.94 percent respectively. The district of Gorakhpur indicates a larger percentage (59.05%) joint family category followed by Faizabad, Barabanki and Lucknow with a percentage of 54.04, 44.47, and 24.00 percent respectively. Table 4.10 - Overview of family Types in the Project area District Type of Family Joint(%) Nuclear (/) Extended (%) Lucknow 24.00 35.42 40.58 Barabanki 44.47 51.75 3.78 Faizabad 54.04 42.55 3.41 Gorakhpur 59.05 37.03 3.92 Source: Primary Data 4.3.3.2 Land Holding of Project Affected Households District wise land holding of the project affected households is given in Table 4.11. Average land holding size in Barabanki, Faizabad and Lucknow districts is 8.93, 8.02 and 10.03 Bigha respectively. Overall average landholding size works out to be 8.77 Bigha per household. in joint venture with C0 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 4.11 - Land Holding Size Land Holding Size Number of Households Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Total Upto 2.5 Bigha* 7 198 66 271 - >2.5 to 5 1 197 59 257 > 5 to 10 Bigha 3 227 59 289 >10 to 15 0 99 32 131 >15 to 20 0 57 12 69 >20 to 30 2 25 6 33 >30 to 50 1 23 5 29 >50 0 11 3 14 Total 14 (79) 837 (1250) 242 (371) 1093 (1700) * One Pucca Bigha = 2529 Sqm or 0.253 Ha. One Kutcha Bigha = 260 Sqm or 0.026 Ha 4.4 CONCLUSIONS * The percentage of population of Project Area to the total population of the district is highest in Barabanki district (4.26%) whereas the percentage of affected persons to the total population of Project Area is highest in Lucknow district (40.50%). * Among the Project districts the highest sex ratio is in Gorakhpur whereas in case of the Project Area the highest sex ratio is in Faizabad with 959 and 877 females for every thousand males respectively. * The decadal growth rate (1991-2001) of Lucknow is highest in the Project District and also in the Project Area. _ * The majority of affected land titleholders and structure titleholders are in Gorakhpur and Faizabad district respectively. * The occupational structure of the PAHs in the project area reveals that majority of the PAHs are engaged in agriculture. 4 ~~~~~~~~~in joint venture with Wo,t I I I I I I I I I I I CHAPTER 5 I 1 ENTITLEMENT FRAMEWORK I I I I I I Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass. Draft Final Consolidated Resetilement Acfion Plan *I 5 ENTITLEMENT FRAMEWORK 5.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) on behalf of the Government of India is preparing the Lucknow-Muzaffarpur National Highway Project as part of East-West Corridor Project. The project involves four-laning and strengthening of the existing two lane stretches of NH-28. The entitlement framework has been prepared in accordance with the World Bank O.P. 4.12, will be applicable to any investments made under the loan assistance of the World Bank provided for this project and Gorakhpur Bypass funded by NHAI. The total length of the proposed project is 511 Km. The entitlement framework describes the principles and approach to be followed in minimizing and mitigating negative socio-economic impacts caused by the project. 5.2 RESETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES The resettlement and rehabilitation principles adopted for this project will provide compensation, resettlement and Rehabilitation assistance to all project affected persons (loss of land, residences, business establishments and other such immovable properties), , including the informal dwellers/ squatters in the corridor of impact (COI) which is 45 m on the existing alignment and 60 m for the bypasses. The basic resettlement principles and guidelines include: * Where land acquisition is required, it will be carried out according to the National Highway Act (NH Act), 1956 and in a way to minimize the adverse impacts and to avoid displacement as much as possible. * Cash compensation for the land, at market value, to households affected by the loss of acquired land will be paid by the competent authority appointed under NH Act. Assistance will be provided to meet the replacement value, over and above the compensation amount. * Cash compensation for the affected structures of the titleholders will be paid by the competent authority. Assistance will be provided to meet the replacement value, over and above the compensation amount. The replacement cost will be calculated by the certified valuer as per the PWD BSR rates, without depreciation, of the concerned district/division/zone of the concerned state for the structure of the titleholders. In case the building material items that are not covered under BSR, market rate analysis will be considered. * Provision for multiple options for resettlement (self- relocation or assisted relocation) of the affected residential structures, including informal dwellers/ squatters. * Provision for relocation of the SBEs (Small Business Enterprises) in the form of vendor market as well as assisting restoration of businesses and local economies. * Non-titleholders (Squatters and vulnerable encroachers) will be provided replacement cost of their structures. The replacement cost will be calculated on prototype basisl. The government- approved valuer will establish the replacement value. A prototype means classifying various types of structures into different categories, i.e., semi pucca, temporary, temporary etc., and working out the cost on the basis of relevant BSR without depreciation. The drawings of such structures will be prepared and annexed to microplan so as to justify the cost provided. 1 J _ 5-1 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan - * Shifting assistance to the owners of residential structures and informal dwellers/squatter households and titleholders for shifting of household goods and assets * Transitional assistance to PAPs due to inability to maintain livelihood during shifting. 2 * Affected persons will be assisted in their efforts to improve their livelihood and standards of living or at least to restore them, in real terms 3 Rehabilitation assistance i.e., assistance for re-establishing lost businesses and workdays (including employees) due to the project. * Special measures and assistance for vulnerable groups e.g., female - headed household and disabled persons etc. * PAPs will be meaningfully consulted and will have opportunities to participate in planning and implementing resettlement programs * Appropriate grievance redress mechanism (in form of Grievance Redress Committee at District level) will be established at the district level to ensure speedy resolution of disputes, if any. * All activities related to resettlement planning, implementation, and monitoring would ensure involvement of women. Efforts will also be made to ensure that vulnerable groups are included. * Before taking possession of the acquired lands, the compensation will be paid to the project affected people prior to civil construction work and R&R assistance will be deposited in the joint account within three months from the date of award. 3 Provisions will be kept in the budget for those who were not present at the time of enumeration. However, anyone moving into the project area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to assistance. * The Resettlement Plan will include a fully itemized budget and an implementation schedule. 5.3 RESETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES 5.3.1 Abbreviations Following abbreviations have been used in the entitlement framework. WB World Bank PAP ProjectAffected Person PAF Project Affected Families BPL Below Poverty Line SBEs Small Business Enterprises COI Corridor of Impact CPRs Common Property Resources EP Entitled Person Ha Hectare LAA Land Acquisition Act NGO Non-Government Organisation NHAI National Highways Authority of India NH Act National Highways Act, 1956 PIU Project Implementation Unit 1w _ 5-2 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan RAP Resettlement Action Plan CRRO Contract Resettlement and Rehabilitation Officer ROW Right of Way R & R Resettlement and Rehabilitation SES Socio-Economic Survey SC Scheduled Caste ST Scheduled Tribe u/s Under Section 5.3.2 Terms Hectare A unit for measuring land area. (Hectare equals 10000 Square Meters). Corridor of Impact Width of corridor required for the construction of road, service lane, drain, footpath, access, tree plantation and for safety zone Development Block A number of villages grouped together form a Development Block. Tehsil/Subdivision A group of Blocks Panchayat Samiti Local Self-governing body at Block level is Panchayat Samiti. District Collector /Magistrate Administrative head of a District. Divisional Commissioner Administrative head of a division comprising a number of districts. Panchayat Elected local self-governing body at village level. Poverty Line A family whose annual income from all sources is less than a designated sum as fixed by the concerned State Govt. in which the project falls, will be considered to be below Poverty Line. Sarpanch Elected chief of a village. Gair Khatedar Includes allotees, holders of muafi lands Jambandi Basic record of Basic record of land rights land rights Khatedar or tenant According to Law, all land belongs to the State and all According to Law, all land so-called landowners are tenants of the State. They belongs to the State and all so- are called Khatedars called landowners are tenants of the State. They are called Khatedars. Muafi Lands Include lands attached with Temples, Mosques, Gurudwara, Churches etc. Pucca Cement, bricks or concrete build structure Semi Pucca Structures with tiles/ thatch roof/ brick cement wall Kachha Structures with stone/ mud wall/ thatch roof Replacement Cost Amount paid over and above compensation to enable PAP to buy land, house, or any such immovable productive asset. Entitled Person A person adversely impacted by the project and is entitled to some kind of assistance as per the project entitlement framework Titleholder A person who possess legal documents towards the claim for the property Grievance Redress Cell A cell set up by the project authority headed by District Magistrate/or his representative to look in to grievances of a PAP _Jw _ 5~~~~~~~~-3 10AOP r Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 5.4 DEFINITIONS Cut-Off Date Cut-off date shall be the following: * In the cases of land acquisition affecting legal titleholders, the cut-off date would be the date of issuing the notice u/s 3A of the NH Act, 1956. * In cases where people lack title, the cut-off-date shall be the date of start of the Census survey undertaken by the project authority. Project Affected Person Affected persons are those who stand to lose all or part of their physical and non physical assets including homes, productive land, community resources, commercial properties; livelihood; and socio-cultural network. Project Displaced person A displaced person is a person who is compelled to change his/her place of residence and/or work place or place of business, due to the project. Definition of Family (a) A "Family" shall mean karta, spouse (Husband/Wife), and all dependents, including minor children (b) In a household every son or unmarried daughter who has attained the age of 18 years on or before the cut-off-date will be treated as separate family, if not covered under (a) but affected due to project in the form of loss of livelihood. (c) Every divorced, widowed, or separated daughter living separately or with the family on or before the cut-off-date will be treated as separate family. Wage Earner A person who is working with SBEs, which are being affected by the project. Share Cropper Those who have formally or informally come to an agreement with private property owner to cultivate the land. Encroacher A person, who has trespassed Govt. land, adjacent to his/her own land or asset, to which he/she is not entitled, and deriving his/her livelihood prior to the cut-off date. If such a person is vulnerable, he/she would be entitled to assistance as per the provisions in the entitlement framework. Squatter Squatter is a person who has settled on publicly owned land without permission and has been occupying publicly owned building without authority prior to the cut-off date. I 5-4 U~~~~ Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass . Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Income Income of a PAP shall mean the amount of income as shown in his Income Tax Return prior to the cut-off date. In absence of such a return, his income shall be calculated by an objective assessment applying the same method as adopted by the Govt. agencies for identifying B.P.L. families. The certificate of B.P.L. from the block / Tehsil will be used for identifying the B.P.L. Vulnerable Person Unless otherwise specifically mentioned in this document, a person who has been designated under 'Below Poverty Line' category as identified by the concerned State Govt. level will be considered a vulnerable person. Disadvantaged persons belonging to SC, ST, disabled, handicapped, orphans, destitute persons and woman heading the household are also recognized as vulnerable person. 5.5 ISSUES Large variations were observed between the Land record database with the PWD and the revenue records in Uttar Pradesh/ Bihar. The gaps have also been observed in the land record system with the revenue department and the field level situation particularly the share of legal heirs due to lack of updating of transfers/ mutations, sale of land without mutation etc. Number of settlements have developed along the NIH by subdividing the agricultural land for residential and commercial activities due to the potential of location but the revenue records does not contain the updated status with respect to change in the land-use. The number of cases has been found where the land was given to a person/ group of persons under various government schemes or by the institution of local self government (allotted/ leased/ land share after Chakbandi etc), or allotted/ leased land transferred through power of attorney or any other legal instrument, but the ownership records are not clear. In addition, in some cases it has been found that the land was acquired (as per PWD records) in earlier road expansion schemes but the subject is under the judicial consideration/ dispute at the time of cut-off date. All these have lead to complications in deciding the actual ownership of the titleholder and eligibility as per the NHAI/ LA Act for compensation. Based on the past experiences in other NH Projects, the issues flagged above are critical and appropriate policy measures are to be planned in order to fulfill the objectives of R&R. For the smooth implementation of the project, it is proposed to provide replacement assistance at the replacement value of land for the cases where the ownership falls under the above or such similar categories. 5. 6 BROAD ENTITLEMENT FRAMEWORK Based on the assessed impacts and the broad entitlement framework, the affected persons in the project will be entitled to five types of compensation and assistance: (i) compensation for loss of land, crops / trees; (ii) compensation for structures (residential/ commercial) and other immovable assets; (iii) assistance for loss of business/ wage income; and (iv) assistance for resettlement and relocation, (v) rebuilding and/ or restoration of community resources/ facilities. A detailed description of each compensation measures and assistance for the different categories of affected persons are provided in the following paragraphs. 5.7 TITLEHOLDERS a. Agricultural Land Losers Replacement value of land will be calculated by the following three methods and the highest value of the three shall be considered: I 5-5 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan -^f * Taking into account such prescribed rates or the average of the actual transaction rates of similar lands for contemporary years for which sale deeds are registered. * Taking into consideration 20 times of the annual value of gross production of the concerned land, averaged over preceding five years. For this purpose, authentic secondary data from the district statistical Handbook, the data from the local agricultural produce sanities, and agricultural department should be used. * Fixing up market value of land equal to the minimum land value if so prescribed by the State Govt. under Indian Stamp Act for the purpose of registration of sale deeds under Indian Registration Act of 1908. If the compensation decided by the competent authority is less than the replacement cost, the difference will be paid to the EP in the form of assistance. In some cases it may so happen that after acquisition the remaining plot of the EP may not be viable (More than 75% of the land holding of the EP is acquired, or the remaining land holding is below average land holding of the district). In such cases, the EP will have the option of either keeping the remaining land or getting the replacement value of the entire land, including the remaining unviable piece of land that shall also be acquired by NHAI. If EP is from vulnerable group, compensation for the entire land may be provided by means of land for land, if so wished by the EP, provided that the land of equal or more productive value is available. In cases where agricultural land has not been alienated but is being physically used for residential/commercial purpose, plotting has been done for residential/commercial purpose, and, transactions have taken place on square meter basis, then the replacement value will be worked out on the basis of the circle rate fixed by the district of concerned State Govt. for residential/commercial category or the registration rate, whichever is higher. However, this provision will be applicable in cases where the plotting has been done in clusters; and not in isolated cases. In cases where, in the revenue records, the land is in the name of the head of the household, but actually possessed by some other member of the household, then the assistance amount (difference between the replacement value and compensation), transitional allowance, additional grant of 10% for severance (if applicable), and Training/ERG (if vulnerable) will be paid to the person who is actually loosing the land. In such cases though, as per revenue records, the compensation will be paid to the titleholder, but NGO will do the facilitation for convincing the titleholder to transfer the compensation amount to the person who is actually loosing the land. In cases of disputes such as where land records are not updated/mutated or where the EPs are unable to produce the desired documents, then the compensation amount will be deposited with the competent authority till the disposal of the case. All fees, taxes and other charges, as applicable under the relevant laws, incurred in the relocation and resource establishment will be borne by the project. EPs loosing agriculture land are entitled to rehabilitation assistance in accordance with S.No. IA of the Entitlement Matrix. (a) Land losers with unclear titles For the categories of PAPs whose ownership titles are not clear, like people residing in the abadi lands, or where the land was given to a person/ group of persons under various government schemes or by the institution of local self government (allotted/ leased/ land share after Chakbandi etc), or allotted/ leased land transferred through power of attorney or any other legal instrument, but the ownership records are not clear; the replacement cost of the land would be provided in the form of I 5 so Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan replacement assistance. For such cases rehabilitation assistance would be provided as for the non- agricultural titleholders (S. No. lB of entitlement matrix). (b) Non-agricultural Land and Structure The replacement cost of the residential or commercial structure (part or full), will be calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule of rates without depreciation, subject to relevant "quality standards" of BSR as maintained by Government/ Local Bodies/ Authorities. If the compensation for the structures decided by the competent authority is less than the replacement cost, the difference will be paid to the EP in the form of assistance. For calculating the replacement cost of structure, the viability and safety of the remaining part of the structure would be assessed by a qualified architect/ engineer and based on the recommendations of the architect/ engineer, the valuation would be carried out by the registered Valuer. In case, the structure becomes unviable due to safety reasons as recommended by the Architect/ Engineer or the structure becomes inhabitable, then the PAP has the option to surrender the remaining part of land and structure for which the compensation and assistance would be calculated as per the above process. In cases where the property is under mortgage, the outstanding amount will be paid to the lending agency from the entitlements due to this. The EPs will have the right to take away the salvaged materials from the demolished structure. The absentee landlords will receive only the compensation at "replacement cost". In addition to the replacement value for land and structure EPs will be entitled for rehabilitation assistance as per S.No. 1 B of the entitlement matrix. 5.8 NON TITLEHOLDERS a) Tenants The tenants will be compensated for any structure that they might have erected on the property of the landlord. They will also be paid the amount of deposit or advance payment paid by them to the landlord or the remaining amount at the time of expropriation. All such amounts paid to the tenants will be deducted from the payment due to the landlord. The tenants will be entitled for rehabilitation assistance in accordance with S.No. 1 C of entitlement matrix. b) Wage earners Wage earners are those whose livelihood is affected due to the displacement of the employer. They will be entitled for rehabilitation assistance in accordance with S.No. 2A of entitlement matrix. c) Squatters The squatters will receive no compensation for land. They will, however, be Compensated for loss of structures at replacement cost. A lump sum shifting allowance will also be paid to the squatters. They will have the right to salvage their materials from the demolished structure. They will be entitled for rehabilitation assistance in accordance with S.No. 3B of entitlement matrix. d) Encroachers Encroachers will be notified in time, preferable two months in advance in which to remove their assets (except trees) and harvest their crops. The encroachers will receive no compensation for land. However, all the vulnerable encroachers will be paid assistance for the affected structures at replacement cost as applicable for squatters, calculated by the method described above. All the encroachers will have right to salvage their materials from the demolished structures. The vulnerable IJw _ 5-7 0 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secton on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan - encroachers will be entitled for rehabilitation assistance in accordance with S.No. 3A of entitlement matrix. e) Share croppers The formal sharecroppers would be eligible for income restoration assistance for loss of his earning which will be equal to 12 months wages calculated at the wage rate for unskilled labour prevalent in the district, considering 26 days a month. The informal sharecroppers would be eligible for subsistence allowance calculated at minimum wages for nine months. The entitlements for the formal and informal sharecroppers are given at S. No. 2B. f) Kiosks Ambulatory vendors will be considered as kiosks. They will receive lump sum shifting assistance of Rs. 800.00 5.9 RESETTLEMENT AND RELOCATION The displaced titleholders and non-titleholder loosing residential/commercial properties may opt for resettlement sites if more than 25 displaced titleholders loosing land or houses opt for it. The commercial titleholders, non-titleholders, and kiosks may opt for vendor market if their number is more than 50. However if the number is below 50 but more than 25 then option of vendor market may be considered on case to case basis depending on the need of the market. 1. The PDPs will be resettled preferably in a place close to the area where they were residing prior to the project. This will be implemented on the basis of providing options for relocation which include: option 1. Squatters may choose self- relocation with compensation for their structures and related assistance and, option 2. for squatters who are unable to self- relocate, PIU/NGO will examine on a case by case basis each households access and ability to find appropriate replacement land for dwelling and if they are unable to find or afford land themselves, then NHAI will provide the required suitable land for this purpose. 2. In case the group has already identified a potential site, NGO shall visit the site along with representatives of the community for assessing the adequacy and suitability of the site. NGO shall also collect information regarding its title and availability from local revenue department. In case the identified land is govemment/community land, NGO shall have to obtain No Objection Certificate from Revenue Dept. 3. NGO will also collect information on Government/community land available in the vicinity of project road, from the office of Circle Officer/ Circle Inspector. 4. NGO shall prepare a consolidated village wise list of government and community land. For relocation of PDPs, NGO shall ensure that PDPs are relocated along with their peers so as to maintain the existing social fabric. 5. The size of the plots will be equal to 50 sq. m. for residential houses in rural areas and 25 sq. m. in case of urban/ semi-urban areas. Similarly, for commercial shops, the area would be 15 Sq. m. in rural areas and 10 Sq. m. in urban areas. 6. Site selection will be assessed from the point of view of the impact on host communities. Issues like land quality, carrying capacity of the site, common property resources, social infrastructure will be considered for selection of the site. 7. Prior to acquisition of the land, a resettlement plan will be developed and the consent of the PDPs will be taken in writing. 8. In case where government land is not available the certificate for the same will be obtained from the District Collector and then NHAI will purchase land for development of resettlement site/shopping complex. 5-8 A M r Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 9. At the new settlement centers, civic amenities like drinking water, internal link roads, drains, electricity will be provided along with any other amenities with PDPs had at their abandoned place. Any facilities provided by the Govt. & all common resources properties being availed by the displaced and affected persons prior to the project will as far as possible be provided/continued at Government cost at the new place of their resettlement or at the old place, as the case may be. 10. If the construction of shops/houses at the resettlement sites is done through NHAI, then NGOs will facilitate the process of arranging loans for PDPs through financial institutions for meeting the expenditure of the houses/shops over and above the entitlement amount. The financial institution will provide loan to the individual PDPs, and the loan recovery will be done by the institution, as per the arrangement agreed between the PDPs and the financial institution. 11. The other option will be that NHAI will do the plotting on the resettlement site and provide infrastructure facilities.The construction of house and shops will then be left to the PDPs. NGO will facilitate the process of arranging loans through financial institutions for the PDPs. 12. Once the site is developed, then the houses/shops/plots will be distributed to the PDPs on the basis of local draw in presence of EPs. 13. As a yet another alternative, wherever possible, PDPs may be resettled in colonies being developed by local Government agencies. In this case also the additional amount over and above the entitlements may be borrowed by the PDPs from the financial institutions with the help of the NGOs. 14. As described above, plots for houses/shops at the new resettlement sites will be provided to the PDPs on payment basis except for the vulnerable person. The allotment of plot for house/shop will be in the joint name of husband and wife. Cost of registration to that effect would be borne by the project authority. 15. Customary right and land tenure system of the tribal PDPs and EPs would be protected. 16. Any facilities provided by the Govt. & all common resource properties being availed by the displaced and affected persons prior to the project will as far as possible be provided/continued at project cost at the new place of their resettlement or at the old place, as the case may be. All resettlement planning would consider increased costs resulting from relocation. Such cost may be related to changes in occupation, absence of subsistence crops transportation. 17. If the resettlement site is developed by NHAI (> 25 PAPs), then the minimuim amount for each house will be equivalent to the norms of the concemed state government for the Economically weaker sections. In such cases if the replacement cost of the structures falls below the norms of the EWS, then the difference will be paid by NHAI as ex-gratia amount. The entitlement matrix is given in the following pages. I 5-9 Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Resettlement Acton Plan 5.0 ENTITLEMENT MATRIX SL. CATEGORY TYPE OF LOSS UNIT OF ENTITLEMENT DETAILS NO ENTITLEMENT IA Private Agricultural Titleholder Compensation at 1. If the replacement cost (determined as per para 5.1(a) of the entitlement framework) is more than the Property land and 'replacement cost' compensation, as determined by the Competent Authority, then the difference is to be paid by the (Titleholder) assets or 'actual market project in the form of "assistance". value' 2. If the residual plot(s) become non-viable due to acquisition of more than 75% of land, or the remaining land falls below the average land holding of the district, the following options will be given to the EP: a. The EP keeps the remaining land, and the compensation and assistance is paid to the EP for the land to be acquired. b. Compensation and "assistance' are given for the entire plot including residual plot, if the owner of such land wishes that his residual plot should also be acquired by the project authority. The residual plot so paid will be acquired by the project authority. 3. If EP is from vulnerable group, compensation for the entire land is by means of land for land if so wished by EP provided that the land of equal or more productive value is available. Family 4. Transitional allowance of Rs.2000 per month for 9 months if the residual land is not viable (due to acquisition of more than 75% of land, or the remaining land falls below the average land holding of the district) or for 3 months if the residual land is viable Note: If the total landholding of a titleholder before acquisition is already below the average district land holding, he will be entitled for 9 months Transitional allowance only if he becomes vulnerable or looses 75% or more land. 5. In case of severance of agricultural land, an additional grant of 10% of the amount paid for land acquisition. 6. All fees, taxes and other charges, as applicable under the relevant laws, incurred in the relocation and resource establishment, are to be bome by the project. Family 7. If the agriculture titleholder falls under vulnerable category after acquisition of his land, or his land holding becomes unviable; then a. The PAP will be entitied for training for upgradation of skills or acquiring new skills @Rs. 1500 per PAP. b. The vulnerable project affected family (PAF) (as per the definition given in this entitdement framework) would also be eligible for one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) equal to the amount defined for the poverty line by the concemed State Govemment norms per family. 1B Private Non- Titleholder / Compensation at 1. EP will be provided replacement cost of the affected part of the residential structure (part or full), Property agricultural owner: "replacement cost' which will be calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule of rates without depreciation, subject to land and Residential relevant "quality standards' of BSR as maintained by GovemmenyLocal Bodies Authorities. assets 2. Compensation for the loss of residential land will be paid at replacement value (Titleholders 3. If replacement cost is more than the compensation (as determined by the Competent Authority), then ) the difference is to be paid by the project in the form of "assistance". Family 4. Transitional assistance of Rs.2000 per month in the form of grant for nine months. 5. A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs.800 for temporary, Rs.1500 for semi-permanent and Rs.2500 for Family permanent structures. 6. Absentee landlords will receive only the compensation at "replacement cost". 7. Right to salvage materials from the demolished structure. Titleholder / 1. EP will be provided replacement cost of the affected part of the commercial structure (part or full), owner: which will be calculated as per the prevailing basic schedule of rates without depreciation, subject to Commercial relevant "quality standards" of BSR as maintained by GovemmentVLocal Bodies Authorities. 2. Compensation for the loss of commercial land will be paid at replacement value 5-10 ,, PI in joint venture with A 7z MV _ _ _ _ m m m m m - m m - m - _r mmI Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass A Draft Resettlement Action Plan SL. CATEGORY TYPE OF LOSS UNIT OF ENTITLEMENT DETAILS NO ENTITLEMENT 3. If replacement cost is more than the compensation (as determined by the Competent Authority), then the difference is to be paid by the project in the form of "assistance". Family 4. Transitional assistance of Rs.2000 per month for 9 months in the form of grant. Family 5. A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs.800 for temporary, Rs.1500 for semi-permanent and Rs.2500 for permanent structures. 6. Absentee landlords will receive only the compensation at "replacement cost". 7. Right to salvage materials from the demolished structure. Family 8. Training would be provided for upgradation of skills @ Rs. 1500/= per family Family 9. The vulnerable project affected family (PAF) (as per the definition given in this entitdement framework) would also be eligible for one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) equal to the amount defined for the poverty line by the concemed State Govemment norms per family. IC Private Non- Non-Titleholder Assistance 1. The amount of deposit or advance payment paid by the tenant to the landlord or the remaining amount Property agricultural / Tenant at the time of expropriation. (This will be deducted from the payment to the landlord). land and Residential 2. A sum equal to nine months rental @ Rs. 2000/= per month in consideration of disruption caused. assets (Non- (Family) 3. Compensation for any structure the tenant has erected on the property. (This will be deducted from Titleholders) the payment to the landlord). 4. A lump sum shifding allowance of Rs.800. Non- Non-Titleholder Assistance 1. The amount of deposit or advance payment paid by the tenant to the landlord or the remaining amount agricultural / Tenant at the time of expropriation. (This will be deducted from the payment to the landlord). land and Commercial 2. A sum equal to nine months rental © Rs. 2000/= per month in consideration of disruption caused. assets (Non- (Family) 3. Compensation for any structure the tenant has erected on the property. (This will be deducted from Titleholders) the payment to the landlord). 4. A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs.800. 5. Training would be provided for upgradation of skills © Rs. 1500/= per family 6. The vulnerable project affected family (PAF) (as per the definition given in this entitdement framework) would also be eligible for one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) equal to the amount defined for the poverty line by the concemed State Govemment norms per family. 2 OTHERS 2A Livelihood Wage Individual Lump sum 1. They will be paid a flat sum of Rs. 2000/-as transitional assistance. eamers 2. Training would be provided for upgradation of skills © Rs. 1500/= 2B Formal Family 1. The formal sharecropper would be eligible for income restoration assistance for loss of his eaming Share which will be equal to 12 months wages calculated at the wage rate for unskilled labour prevalent in croppers the district, considering 26 days a month. 2. Training would be provided for upgradation of skills © Rs. 1500/= per family 3. The vulnerable project affected family (PAF) (as per the definition given in this entitlement framework) would also be eligible for one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) equal to the amount defined for the poverty line by the concemed State Govemment norms per family. informal Family 1. The informal sharecropper would be eligible for subsistence allowance calculated at minimum wages for Share nine months croppers 2. Training would be provided for upgradation of skills © Rs. 1500/= per family 3. The vulnerable project affected family (PAF) (as per the definition given in this entitdement framework) would also be eligible for one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) equal to the amount defined for the poverty line by the concemed State Govemment norms per family. 2C Non- Family Notice to harvest 1. They are entided to be given a notice substantially 4 months in advance. perennial standing crops 2. Grant towards crop lost before harvest due to forced relocation, equal to market value of crop lost plus corps cost of replacement of seeds for the next season's harvest. 5-11 4o2p in joint venture with b,, Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Resettement Acton Plan SL. CATEGORY TYPE OF LOSS UNIT OF ENTITLEMENT DETAILS NO ENTITLEMENT 2D Perennial Family Compensation at 1. Compensation for perennial crops and trees, calculated as annual produce value for one season. crops such 'market value' as fruit trees 3 ILLEGAL USE OF THE ROW 3A Illegal use of Encroachers Family Will receive no 1. Encroachers will be notified in time in which to remove their assets (except trees) and harvest their the ROW compensation for crops. land but assistance 2. Compensation for structures at replacement cost to the vulnerable person. for assets to the 3. Training would be provided for upgradation of skills © Rs. 1500/= per family vulnerable 4. The commercial vulnerable project affected family (PAF) (as per the definition given in this entitdement framework) would also be eligible for one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) equal to the amount defined for the poverty line by the concemed State Govemment norms per family. 5. Right to salvage materials from the demolished structure. 3B Squatters Family Will receive no 1. Compensation for loss of structure at replacement cost. compensation for 2. A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs.800 for temporary, Rs.1500 for semi-permanent, and Rs.2500 for land but assistance permanent structures. for assets. 3. Transitional allowance © Rs.2000 per family lump sum. 4. Training would be provided for upgradation of skills © Rs. 1500/= per family to the EPs loosing commercial activities 5. The commercial vulnerable project affected family (PAF) (as per the definition given in this entitdement framework) would also be eligible for one-time Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) equal to the amount defined for the poverty line by the concemed State Government norms per family. 6. Right to salvage materials from the demolished structure. 3C Shifting Mobile and Family They are not eligible (Ambulatory vendors licensed for fixed locations will be considered as kiosks.) Business ambulatory for compensation or 1. They will receive lump sum shifting assistance of Rs. 800.00 vendors "assistance' (Kiosks) 4. Community Common Community Conservation, 1. Easily replaced resources, such as cultural properties will be conserved (by means of special protection, infrastructure property protection, relocation, replacement, etc.) in consultation with the community. cohesion resources compensatory 2. Loss of access to firewood, etc. will be compensated by involving the communities in a social forestry and amenities replacement scheme, in co-ordination with the Department of Forests, wherever possible. 3. Adequate safety measures, particularly for pedestrians and children; Landscaping of community common areas; improved drainage; roadside rest areas, etc. are all provided in the design of the highways. 4. Employment opportunities in the project, if possible. 5. Loss of trees will be replaced by compensatory afforestation. 4 Any other Unforeseen impacts will be documented and mitigated based on the principles agreed upon in this A impact not entitlement framework framework. yet identified, whether loss of asset or livelihood 5-12 46 70 - u in joint venture with 004, I I I I I I I I I CHAPTER 6 I I 1 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION &CONSULTATIONS IN THE PROJECT AREA I I I I I Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass . Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 6 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATIONS 6.1 COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN THE PROJECT AREA It has been realized that for sustainable implementation of road projects the genuine participation of the beneficiaries and transparency in program formulation and implementation is very important. Previously, the opaqueness was very intrinsic in the functioning of the government bureaucracies and the exclusion of the beneficiaries from the project identification to implementation and management stage was very evident. However, the realization has dawned on both the implementation agencies and community organizations that people's participation is inextricably linked with sustainability and that emphasis must be laid on involvement of the communities from the inception of the project itself. Keeping in view the above perspective, community participation has been undertaken as an inherent component for this project on 4-laning of Lucknow-Ayodhya section-NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass. Through public consultation and participation, the key social issues were identified and incorporated in the project design for minimizing the perceived negative social impact. The consultation with the affected people provided feedback related to socio-cultural analysis and design of social strategy, institutional analysis and specifically addressed the issue of how the poor and vulnerable groups may benefit from the project. This project therefore ensures effective participation of the affected population and other stakeholders who have been informed, consulted, and allowed to participate actively in the development process. This process would be adopted throughout the project cycle right from the preparation, implementation, and monitoring of project results and impacts. The role of various stakeholders has contributed immensely towards problem solving and effective implementation of the project. Hence, public consultation process has been an important tool in assessing the people perceptions towards the project and helped in comprehending the priorities of the project-affected persons in the project area. 6.2 THE CONSULTATION PROCESS ADOPTED IN THE PROJECT AREA The consultation programme during project preparation was designed with the view to disseminate project information and to incorporate local people and PAPs' opinion in Resettlement Action Plan. The public consultations in the project area were mainly conducted at the local level i.e. at village level and were held at three stages in Lucknow-Ayodhya stretch. The public consultation meetings were also held in Gorakhpur at village level. 6.2.1 Public Consultations held at Lucknow Ayodhya section of NH-28 In the first stage, focus group discussions were held along the project road wherein core villages were identified to acquaint the affected persons about the project and hold discussions on few specific issues. The second stage involved a more intensive interaction of the Consultant with the villagers. The third stage again involved focus group discussions to come out with meaningful results and special care was taken to address the issues, which came up during the survey period. The different tools of consultation with stakeholders were used during project preparation, viz., in- depth interviews, public meetings, focus group discussions etc. To understand the socio-economic profile of the society, questionnaires were designed and information was collected from the individuals on one-to-one basis. The consultations was also carried out with special emphasis on the ,I_ 6-1 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan vulnerable and women groups. The key informants during the project preparation phase included both individuals and groups namely: * Head and members of the Households likely to be affected. * Group of affected persons * Village Panchayats: Sarpanch and members. * Local voluntary organizations and NGOs * Government agencies and departments * Other project stakeholders with special focus on women and PAPs belonging to the vulnerable group Fig 6.1 THE CONSULTATION PROCEDURE ADOPTED IN THE LUCKNOW-AYODHYA SECTION-NH-28 ........ . .... .. . . .. ....... .... ....... .. ............... ._- *. . . ................ I~~~~ _ '!!__ S_ _ *___ _ _ Thecosutato prgam duin prjc peatinws desige ihteve to dssmnt 63 STAGE ONEFOCUSGROUPDISCUS* . - ~~~~~~~~~~* - S S L 40 6-2 * 01,22A I_ ___ : _ _ _ *" 6. STG ON FOU GROU DICSIN * ~ ~~~ ~ Actio Plan. I~~~~~~~~~~ i_-2: Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan The initial FGDs were held at various locations of the project stretch on the basis of the intensity of perceived problems, population density of the sites and built up area. The FGDs were mainly held during March -April 2003. Table 6.1 Initial Focus Group Discussions held at 12 Major Locations in the Project Area Si. Month Chainage Village Issues discussed Outcome No. /year 1 March Km 19 Safedabad * Fair market price /replacement cost . During the FGD, the 2003 must be given to the PAPs for their affected persons were land, building, shop and other assured of a fair market establishments. prce/ replacement cost * As the land for shops were leased for their loss of assets from Zila Parshad, hence same and land land when acquired would mean compensation first to the Zila Parishad and thereafter other compensatory assistance would have to be provided to the tenants/lessees. 2 March Km230 Kurauli * Compensation issues * PAPs were informec 2003 * Issues related to whether the PAPs that their fertile lanc agricultural land would be dug up for will not be used for roac road filling purpose. filling * Adequate compensation would be paid to the affected persons. 3 March Km35 Rasauli 2003 * Road safety issues must be taken * Assurance was given tC care of PAPs regardinc adequate provision for road safety measures which would be incorporated in the project design. 4 March Km56 Kotwa * Structures getting affected on both 2003 Sarak sides of the road. * Loss of livelihood of the * Loss of livelihood of the PAPs affected anc Relocations compensation issues Compensation issues would be redressed 5 March Km 63 Ram Sunehi * Compensation issues . Assurance for adequate 2003 Ghat * PAPs expressed their discontent over compensation would be road widening and affecting their paid to the affectec assets persons. 6 March Km 67 Tala * Relocation issues * Gram sabha land woulc 2003 * Livelihood loss be available for relocation purpose. March Km 71 Muwai * PAPs demanded that road wideninc * PAPs were assured of 2003 Chauraha should be done on both sides of the road widening on both road on equitable basis and within sides and that the available ROW. assistance would be in * Assistance must be provided as per accordance to WE WB guidelines guidelines. * Relocation issues * Gram sabha land woulc * Provision of road safety measures be available for relocation purpose * Assurance was given tc PAPs regardinc adequate provision for road safety measures which would be incorporated in the project design. 7 March Km 76 Mian Ka * Relocation of religious structure - * PAP agreed on 2003 Purwa imambara relocation of the _ J w _ 6-3 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass I Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Si. Month Chainage Village Issues discussed Outcome No. Iyear No. /year structure 8 March Km 82 Rozagaon * Compensation issues * Gram sabha land woulc 2003 * Provision of road safety measures be available for relocation purpose. * Assurance was given tc PAPs regardinc adequate provision for road safety measures, which would be incorporated in project design. 9 March Km 86 Bhelsar * Initial resentment amidst the PAPs * The PAPs were pacifiec 2003 (Rudauli) regarding road project and assured that * Demand for road widening on both minimum impact woulc sides of the road be there and adequate compensation will be paid * Road would be widenec on both sides 10 March KmlO8 Raunahi * Compensation issues * Gram sabha land woulc 2003 * Relocation of religious structure be available for * Relocation issues relocation purpose. The road wideninc would be done upto the gate of the religious structure so that it doesn't affect the whole structure 11 March Km1l8 Kotsarai * Compensation issues * Assurance was given to 2003 * Road safety issues PAPs regardinc * Widening on both sides of the road adequate provision for road safety measures, which would be incorporated in the project dqsign. Table 6.2 Initial Focus Group Discussions held at the Major Locations in the BaraBanki Bypass Stretch Si. Month Village Main features of the issues discussed in the fgd and its outcome No. /year 1 March Darapur * Villagers were in favour of the bypass 2003 * The agricultural land affected have mainly crops grown such as paddy, wheat, peppermint, sugarcane, pulses and green vegetables. * Cash was the preferred mode of compensation for land acquisition by the PAPs. 2 March Chhatarpal * Villagers were initially not in favour of bypass as their previous experience with the 2003 construction of SH-13 bypass had been not very good and compensation was not paid adequately * 2 temples and 2 ponds of the village would not be affected after discussions * No structures in the village would be affected 3 April * The villagers were initially not in favour of bypass as they have very smallholdings, 2003 Narek purwa which is their only source of income. * No structure or pond would be affected. * Suggestions were made that instead of a new bypass, if the existing SH-13 could be widened. * A demand was made with regard to the improvement of the intersection of SH-13 with NH-28. * Intersection needs proper road signs or should be manned by police. 4 April 2003 Sehila * Villagers were in favour of bypass and they want cash compensation for land acquisition. * The PAPS were concerned about the road safety issue * Structures, ponds, community grazing grounds- none would be affected. 3 J _ 6-4 Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 5 April 2003 Ganeshpur * Villagers were in favour of bypass and preferred cash compensation for land acquisition. The PAPS were concerned about the road safety issue Structures, ponds, community grazing grounds- none would be affected. 6 April 2003 )hawa . Villagers were in favour of bypass and prefer cash compensation for land acquisition. * No community structures would be affected by the project * PAPs were concemed that the existing tube wells should not be affected as they were deep captive tube wells built from the aid of the govemment for irrigation of their fields. * Intersecion of the village road with NH-28 should be improved. Table 6.3 Initial Focus Group Discussions held at the Major Locations in the Ram Sunehighat Bypass Stretch Si. Month Village Main features of the fgd and its outcome No. /year 1 March Chandauli * Villagers were in favour of bypass and wanted the cash compensation for land 2003 acquisition. * PAPs wanted cash compensation for the number of plantation trees to be cut 2 April 2003 3hunderi * They want cash compensation for the land acquired and the plantation trees that that would get acquired as well. * No structures in the village would be affected STAGE 11- LOCAL LEVEL CONSULTATIONS The number of participants increased at the second stage of the project. The issues, which were raised during the initial stage, sought solution during these consultation processes as well as through indepth interviews. Group level consultations were held with project-affected persons at the following places in May- June 2003. This was a more detailed exercise than the earlier one. One by one each issue was raised, discussed in the public meeting and probable outcomes were suggested. Table 6.4 Local Level Public Consultations held at the Major Locations in the Barabanid Bypass Stretch SI. Month /year Village Main features of the issues discussed in the pc and its outcome No. 1 March 2003 Jarapur * People consulted were finally in favour of bypass as bypass would be a long term solution. * Compensation should be paid to the affected families at replacement value. 2 March 2003 Chhatarpal * The villagers were initially not in favour of bypass as they felt that it would affect their agricultural land and feared that it would be a repetition of a bad example of proper compensation being paid to them of LA that was held for SH-13 * It was ensured that the affected persons were properly compensated ie. at replacement value. * Altemate suggestion for bypass was made - i.e to widen the existing SH-13 bypass for which land has already been acquired by the State Govt, but this suggestion could not be followed because of technical reasons 3 April 2003 * The villagers were initially not in favour of bypass as they have very Narek purwa smaliholdings, which is their only source of income but were assured of fair compensation. * It was felt that Intersection needs proper road signs or should be manned by police. 4 April 2003 SehIla * Villagers were in favour of bypass and they want cash compensation for land acquisition. * The PAPS were concemed about the road safety issue * Structures, ponds, community grazing grounds- none would be affected. _PJ~4.P 6-5 SD=> Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Si. Month /year Village Main features of the issues discussed in the pc and its outcome No. 5 April 2003 Ganeshpur * Villagers were in favour of bypass and preferred cash compensation for land acquisition. * The PAPS were assured about the road safety issue 6 April 2003 )hawa * Villagers were in favour of bypass and preferred cash compensation for land acquisition. * PAPs were concerned that the existing tube wells should not be affected, as they were deep captive tube wells built from the aid of the government for irrigation of their fields. However these wells were saved. * Intersection of the village road with NH-28 should be improved. Table 6.5 Local Level Public Consultations held at the Major Location at Ram Sunehighat Bypass Stretch Si. Month /year Village Main features of the pc and its outcome No. 7 March 2003 Chandauli * Villagers were in favour of bypass and wanted the cash compensation for land acquisition. * PAPs wanted cash compensation for the number of plantation trees to be cut Table 6.6 Local Level Public Consultations held at the Major Location in the Project area Si. Month /year Location Issues raised and solutions suggested Outcome of the consultation No. 1. April 2003 Nanek Purwa * Villagers were not in favour of bypass as it * The villagers were made to would affect their agricultural land. Land understand that though holdings of villagers are small. they had smallholdings but * Similar alternate suggestion for bypass as in only bypass could provide the case of Chhattarpal was made - that is long-term solution & widen the existing SH-13 bypass. adequate compensation * Improve the existing intersection of SH-13 would be paid. with that of NH-28. * Alternate suggestion could not be followed because of technical reason. * The entitlement framework would ensure replacement value of land acquired. 2. April 2003 SehIla * People consulted were in favour of bypass * The PAPs suggestions were and did not give any alternate suggestion. followed and the * Provide access road for the villagers to carry requirement of an out their day to day activities. underpass in the event of a * Cash compensation for land to be acquired. bypass was discussed with the highway design engineers and incorporated The R and R policy would ensure replacement value of land acquired. 3. April 2003 Dhawa * Participants were in favour of a bypass. * Alignment for the bypass * Did not suggest any other alternate but would be fixed ensuring cautioned the project authorities about safety for the existing affecting the existing tube well in the bypass. tubewell. * Cash compensation for land to be acquired. * Compensation would be * Intersection of the village road with NH-28 paid to the affected should be improved. families at replacement value. * Requirement of an underpass in the event of a bypass was discussed with the highway design * The PAPs suggestion would be incorporated in the design. 3_ ~7~ W6-6 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Si. Month /year Location Issues raised and solutions suggested Outcome of the consultation No. 4. May 2003 Ramsanehi . PAPs were in favour of cash compensation * Compensation would be Ghat for land acquisition paid to the affected Dhawa * Compensation for trees to be cut families at replacement value. * Compensation would be paid to the affected families for trees to be cut 5. May 2003 Bhunderi * Those who participated in the PC were in * Compensation would be favour of bypass and did not give any paid to the affected altemate suggestion. families at replacement * Access road for the villagers to carry out value. their day to day activities. * Favour of cash compensation for land acquisition 6. May 2003 Kotwa Sadak * Those who participated in the meetings were * The R and R policy would Lalpur in favour of bypass and did not give any ensure land for land as alternate suggestion. compensation. * Compensation for trees to be cut * Compensation would be paid to the affected families for trees to be cut 7. May 2003 Sohilpur * Those who participated in the PC were * Requirement of an initially not in favour of bypass and also did underpass would be not give any altemate suggestion. discussed with the highway * Access road for the villagers to carry out design engineers, if their day to day activities with provision of feasible - suggestion would underpass in the village be followed. * Land should be compensated by land * The R and R policy would ensure land for land as compensation. 8. May 2003 Kutti * Participants were initially not in favour of * PAPs were made to bypass and provided altemate suggestion for convince that the existing another road further north of this alignment option was the best option joining Lalpur, Sukhlanpur, Piprahiya with * Requirement of an Mohhamadpur underpass would be * Access road for the villagers to carry out discussed with the highway their day to day activities with the provision design engineers, if of underpass in the village feasible - suggestion would * Land should be compensated by land be followed. * Compensation for trees to be cut * The R and R policy would ensure land for land as compensation. * Compensation shall be paid to the affected families for trees to be cut 9. May 2003 Bhelsar * Participants were initially not in favour of * Compensation would be Bypass bypass and no alternate suggestion was paid to the affected Bhelsar provided families at replacement * Cash compensation for land to be acquired value. * Compensation for trees to be cut * Compensation would be paid to the affected families for trees to be cut STAGE III- FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS The third stage of FGD was held wherein all the project related issues were discussed at 10 critical locations and on the basis of previous consultations these extensive Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the potential PAPs. Approximately 20-25 local PAPs participated in these discussions and several observations related to the project were audio recorded and photographed. These were subsequently made into transcripts and sunmmarized as follows: S7 ~ 6-7 *~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass J Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Or Table 6.7 Local Level Public Consultations held at the Major Location in the Project area Si. Month Location Outcome of the consultation No. /year 1 17.09.2003 Maitri * All unanimously agreed that to adjust the heavy traffic, road widening was essential Chinhat or more suitably a bypass would serve the purpose. * The shopkeepers wanted compensation either from landlord or from the Govt. in such a fashion that their livelihood was maintained. * The cash mode of compensation should be according to the current market rate and not prevalent circle rate. * The Chinhat people raised the question of tree felling and made a clear demand that they wanted the Govt. to plant trees, which would grow fast and absorb most of the carbon that would be emitted from the vehicles passing by the highway. They expressed their willingness to cooperate with the Govt. agency in tree maintenance. * People were conscious of the HIV-AIDS syndrome but it is a non-issue here. 2 17.09.2003 Mian Ka * People consulted were in favour of bypass and did not give any altemate Purwa suggestion. * Cash compensation for land to be acquired. * Requirement of an underpass in the event of a bypass was discussed with the highway design engineers - suggestion followed. * The entitlement framework would ensure replacement value of land acquired. 3 16.09.2003 Sohawal * People acknowledged the advantages of road widening as it would improve the Chouraha business activities because of increased traffic * As for compensation, there was divided opinion. Many surprisingly prefer circle rate market rate and they seemed reasonable in their demands and were aware of what was happening elsewhere where LA was in progress. 4 16.09.2003 Firozepur/ * Compensation should be at market rate and not circle rate. Government should Mohammadp consider those whose land was not registered but the Panchayat was aware of such ur owners Bhawanipur . Mostly agricultural people initially seemed to be a bit hostile here and expressed wa). negative attitude towards the project but were later convinced of the merits of the project. * They expressed concem on the ways of water drainage and demanded covered drains along the road side to facilitate this process. 5 15.09.2003 Sursanda * People recognised the advantages of road widening as increased business activity for the local people, lesser number of accidents especially for children, land rate would increase and finally tree plantation would improve air quality to some extent. * The chief disadvantages seemed to be loss of home and livelihood. * They wanted separate side-laning for slow moving vehicles like cycle or those simply- walking (many women from this village walk to their place of work mainly cold storages at Barabanki town and face difficulty) and thereby accidents could be further avoided, which was accepted. * Cuts near the Chowk and Breakers near Abadi are other demands, which seemed reasonable and was adhered to. * AIDs awareness was less and it was recognised that the media has a role to play in this. Locally it was not a problem but there has been cases of death due to AIDs in this village. This was because young migrants who go to towns/cities in search of jobs often indulge in sexual activities and they become carriers of this deadly disease. 7 15.09.2003 Rasauli * Several advantages were identified by the locals that would occur due to road widening: * Time saving along with fuel saving * Number of accident cases would reduce * Among disadvantages, chief would be loss of livelihood and crop production would get adversely affected due to land acquisition. * The PAPs had several suggestions as to the design of the project which would facilitate them. For example: * They demanded underpass for animals and also humans to pass easily and suggested a location for construction of the same. This has been already considered and underpass has been provided at this village crossing. 8 15.09.2003 Baghora * Two points were very clear from the discussion that incase of loss of land and Purwa livelihood, PAPs demand cash compensation at market rate and secondly all compensation must reach them before the project commences. LA should be on both sides of the road and to facilitate crossing of humans and animals, underpass was suggested. But it was also mentioned that anti-social activities like dacoity, take place at underpass locations, so they preferred both underpass and over bridqe for locals to cross from one side to the other. Also the J3 6-8 A0M Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secton on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Si. Month Location Outcome of the consultation No. /year underpasses should be properly lit to avoid such incidents. 9 15.09.2003 Kotwa Sadak * In case of religious structures, respective committees were consulted for re-location. 10 17.09.2003 Bhelsar * They were not opposed to the idea of commercial complex where many displaced Chouraha shopkeepers could be rehabilitated. * They raised a very valid point that there would be many PAPs who have no documents/ paper showing their ownership rights. In those cases it was emphasized that they should not be out of the compensation package and that to identify such cases, the Panchayat or Gram Pradhan would certify those claimants. * This widened road should provide underpass for animals and humans to pass. Also the divider should provide cuts at village crossings (Abadi) so that people can cross road easily. * For free water drainage, they wanted covered drains along the service road. People in slow moving vehicles like cycles would use service road * 2 mosques and 1 temple would get affected because of the project. Effort should be made to save those structures, even if that means lessening ROW. If unavoidable, then the PAPs agreed that any religious structure could be re-built along the road side. * But there was one graveyard and they were opposed to the shifting of the same and the suggestion was accepted. 11 17.09.2003 Rozagaon - The PAPs raised two issues, those without documentary evidence of ownership right and the claiming rights of tenants. * Regarding road design, they suggested, cuts along the divider at strategic points (village crossings), traffic signals to facilitate road crossing, which was adhered. * HIV-AIDs was a non-issue here but due to increased vehicular traffic if the problem arises then the Panchayat would take all necessary action to caution people and take preventive measures. 6.4 MAIN FINDINGS & OBSERVATIONS The observations related to the three stages of public consultations and Focus Group Discussions, with the PAPs may be summarized as follows: * The majority of local people residing along the road who are likely to get affected were not opposed to the idea of road widening and were convinced with the advantages that would accrue with the four-laning of the road like increase of business activity, reduction in number of accident cases, lesser fuel consumption and time saving. However some participants opinioned that four lane was not essential, as high-speed vehicle would cause more accidents. Hence, assurance was given to PAPs regarding adequate provision for road safety measures, by the consultants, which would be incorporated in the project design. * Majority PAPs demanded compensation for structures in cash at market rate and not at circle rate. They insisted that proper valuation to be done by a committee having members comprising Gram Pradhan and PAPs before deciding on the compensation value. They all demanded compensation to be paid before the commencement of the civil work. * In case of any common property, which would get affected, like hand-pumps, schools, primary health care centres, would be relocated at nearby location along the road. People in most cases agreed to participate in the process of identifying alternative sites for relocation of their structures and community assets. In case of temples and mosques respective temple / mosque committees would be further consulted for solving this issue during the implementation stage. Mostly people were not opposed to relocation of religious structures. * With regard to road design, there was a common demand of underpasses at densely populated sections along the road for easy passage of humans and animals. (Underpasses have been provided at Rasauli, Baghora Purwa, near Yakub Ganj Market and Muhammadpur/ Firozepur as demanded by the affected persons), side lanes for bus stops and for movement of slow-moving vehicles has also been provided as per the PAPs demand. I 6-9 SD=> Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass ^ Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan * People were generally aware of air and sound pollution and suggested several methods to curb them. Fast growing trees and vehicles with horns that have milder effect on eardrums were suggested. Different modes of vehicles with different sound decibels was another suggestion so that even from a distance, people would be able to identify the type of vehicle. This was essential to avoid road accidents of humans and animals alike. * For proper water drainage, covered drains along the roadside were another demand and the demand was adhered to with provision of covered drains being provided in abadi areas). 6.5 GORAKHPUR BYPASS STRETCH There were total nine public consultations held during the census and socio-economic survey in the Gorakhpur stretch. The main public consultations meetings were arranged in the villages of Kurmol, Khanipur, Ekla, Manjharia Bistaul, Chauri and Araji Basdila, though there were few informal meetings for the alignment outside the GIDA area also. The main participants included the village leaders (Heads) and the local people who expressed their views regarding the forthcoming project in these forums and also gave suggestions on how to carry rehabilitation procedure. This was intended to reduce the psychological impacts like disruption of the normal life of the PAPs to a great extent. It was believed that these problems may be reduced if, as a part of the rehabilitation programme, the affected people were properly informed and consulted about the project and were allowed to make meaningful choices. These consultations may be summarized as follows: Table 6.8 Public Consultations held at 9 Major Locations in the Gorakhpur Bypass Stretch Si. Month Village Issues discussed Outcome No. /year 1 10.09.2002 Adilapur * Villagers were initially tensed and a Compensation would be paid at the agitated initially with the prospect replacement cost basis. of losing land but later convinced of the benefits of the project 2 10.09.2002 Amtaura . The villagers were initially not in * The PAPs were made to understand that favour of giving the land as it adequate compensation will be paid and would affect their social status training facilities would be provided to and will be reduced to BPL the eligible ones. * Provision of road safety measures * The provision of road safety measure was should be provided. adhered to. 3 11.09.2002 Ekala * The villagers were initially not in * Land Acquisition would be done at the favour of bypass as they have very replacement cost basis. smaliholdings, which is their only * Assurance was given to PAPs regarding source of income. adequate provision for road safety * Road safety issues must be taken measures, which would be incorporated care of in the project design. 4 11.09.2002 Manjharia * Loss of livelihood of the PAPs * Compensation would be paid at the Vistaul * Compensation issues replacement cost basis. * Training facilities would also be given to the PAPs 5 12.09.2002 Jungle * Compensation issues * Assurance for adequate compensation Ramgarh . PAPs expressed their discontent would be paid to the affected persons. Chauri over road widening and affecting * However after the consultations it was their assets observed that no community structures * The villagers were worried about were being affected in this area. the relocation of community structured being affected 6 12.09.2002 Araji * Villagers were initially not in * Compensation would be paid at the Busdila favour of bypass as their previous replacement cost basis. experience had been not very * Training facilities would also be given good and compensation was not to the PAPs. paid adequately I 6-10 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Si. Month Village Issues discussed Outcome No. /year 7 13.03.2003 Kurmol * Compensation issues and loss of * Compensation would be paid at the livelihood replacement cost basis. * Provision of road safety measures * Training facilities would also be given to the PAPs * Assurance was given to PAPs regarding adequate provision for road safety measures, which would be incorporated in the project design. 8 13.03.2003 Khanipur * Villagers were in favour of bypass * Adequate compensation be paid to the and preferred cash compensation affected persons. for land acquisition 9 17.05.2003 Motiram * The villagers expressed their * Compensation would be paid at the Adda- initial resentment to the replacement cost basis. Kusumi compensation related to the * Training facilities would also be given to Bazaar structures. the eligible PAPs 6.5.1 Main Findings & Observations of the Gorakhpur Bypass * The PAPs were initially apprehensive about the quantum and rate of compensation that would be given by the government and expressed their view that compensation for land structure should be given on the basis of prevailing market prices. * The villagers wanted road safety measures to be taken care of along the project road. * They affected persons suggested various vocational training programmes for their income restorationt, which was going to be affected due to this project. * The PAPs were generally of the opinion that they should be rehabilitated within their village itself and not somewhere outside the village. * The compensation should be paid before the start of civil work. - J _" OOW61 6-t ,<< I I I I I I I I I I I iI CHAPTER 7 I LAND ACQUISTIONS AND ASSETS if I , I LI I iI Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secton on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acton Plan O J 7 LAND ACQUISITION AND ASSETS 7.1 BACKGROUND National Highway (NH)-28 connecting Lucknow, the capital of Uttar Pradesh and Mokama in Bihar forms a part of the proposed 4 laning of existing National Highway East West Corridor from Porbandar (Gujarat) to Silchar (Assam). It also passes through Gorakhpur an important city and Divisional headquarter in the state of U.P. The existing NH-28 is a 2-lane facility with a carriageway of around 7.0m. The proposed widening to 4 lanes of NH-28 is necessary to cater for significant increase in traffic intensity to ensure safe and efficient movement of traffic. The review consultant have been entrusted with stretch of Lucknow- Ayodhya section and that passing through Gorakhpur City for proposed rehabilitation and widening of existing carriageway as well as bypass options for congested areas. 7.2 PROJECT ROAD DESCRIPTION AND ALIGNMENT/ROUTE Lucknow Ayodhya section of NH-28 starts from km 8.25 near starting point of Lucknow Bypass (near kamta Village) then proceeds upto km 122.275 near Faizabad, and thereafter, along Faizabad bypass, the project road bypasses the Faizabad town leading to Ayodhya and finally terminating at km 15.0 of Faizabad bypass from where Ayodhya Bypass is proposed to start. The road traverses the districts of Lucknow, Barabanki and Faizabad in the state of Uttar Pradesh. The important towns enroute are Barabanki, Ramsanehighat and Faizabad. On its way the project road crosses 3 small rivers namely Rapti, Kalyani and Kasera. 7.2.1 Bypass at Barabanki, Ramsanehighat: - Project road stretches passing through Barabanki town has lot of ribbon development on both sides and uncontrolled access for side/cross roads, which act as a major bottleneck to the free flow of traffic due to intermixing of local and through traffic. The existing ROW on the stretch varies from 25 to 30 m and this too has been encroached upon by abutting commercial and residential activities. Road widening here will cause lot of displacement of population and demolition of large number of structures. Barabanki town, particularly between km 29 to Km 30 is heavily congested specially near Haidergarh intersection and the situation demands separation between the conflicting traffic streams. Therefore, a bypass of barabanki has been proposed at Barabanki. The length of the bypass is 12.462 km. The alignment of Barabanki bypass takes off from chainage km 20 on NH-28 to the right side of existing road crossing Lucknow-Varanasi rail link, Reth river and thereafter crosses satrik road and SHI -13 and then follows existing SH-13 bypass for a considerable length and finally joins NH-28 at km 32.07. Similarly Ramsanehighat bypass has been proposed to provide free flow of traffic by avoiding intermixing of local and through traffic in the congested stretches of the town, avoiding displacement of population as also to save PWD bungalow and Ramsanehi Baba Temple on the right side of NH- 28. The length of the bypass is 6.700km. The alignment takes off from chainage km 62.775 on NH- 28 to the left side of the existing road and after crossing river Kalyani finally joins NH-28 at km 69.679. The alignment on the left side is chosen since a new bridge location on river Kalyani is preferred on the upstream of existing bridge (which has outlived its life and needs replacement) as on the downstream side river has meandering course. The provision of bypass at Barabanki and Ramsanehighat towns will be able to reduce the accident rate on the stretches besides reducing the number of project affected persons substantially. I J O 7-1 002 > Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 7.2.2 Constraints in widening existing NH-28 in Gorakhpur city and Provision of Gorakhpur Bypass; - Widening of the existing NTH-28 in Gorakhpur city would result in heavy social impact due to acquisition of developed land and nearly 1640 nos. commercial/residential buildings. The ROW of existing NH-28 varies from 26m to 35m except near river Rapti where it is around 45m, City limits starts almost near km250.00. From km251.500, a protection embankment (bund) has been constructed to the north of NH-28. MDR-49 joins NH-28 at km 260.0 from where residential and commercial buildings are being constructed towards south of highway. NH-29 takes off at km260.7 at Nausar Chauraha. Main Gorakhpur city is within chainage km262.00 to km 270.0 of NIH-28 stretch. The section from Km 261.00 to Km 264.100 is very congested stretch due to presence of Transport Nagar, residential buildings, and urban commercial activity. Bypass SH-1 and SH-1 meet NH-28 at km 264.20 and at km 268.50 respectively well within Gorakhpur town. North-Eastern Railway line from Deoria crosses NH-28 at km 269.70. Airforce station stretches on either side of the road to the east of railway crossing extending upto reserved forest. The ROW is restricted (Average 25m to 30m) in the Airforce station and Ramgarh Reserve Forest area. Acquisition of defence and forest land for widening could also be difficult. Thereafter the NH-28 passes through the Ramgarh Reserve forest which extents upto km 275.0. The road is congested at Kushmi bazaar where ODR joins the highway at km 276.8. Therefore, the entire stretch from km260.0 tokm280.0 has physical constraints and cause congestion due to road side developments and commercial activities, frequent road junctions, railway level crossing and slow moving city traffic. These physical obstructions pose problems for smooth passage of through traffic. Keeping in view these difficulties for widening the existing NH-28, bypass for Gorakhpur city has been proposed. 7.2.3 Alignment options for Gorakhpur Bypass Reconnaissance and social survey of following four alignment alternatives/options (three southern and one northern alignment options) was carried out. Option I (Southern Alignment) Alignment starting from km245.8 (start of GIDA area) on NH-28 crosses NH-29, ODR and Joining NH-28 at km 279.800 having total length of 39.4 km involving land acquisition of about 243.Oha and saving reserve Forest Land. Option 2 (Southern Alignment) Alignment starting from km 251.700 on NH-28 within industrial area of GIDA crossing NH-29, ODR and joining NH-28 at KM 279.800 have total length of 32.3km involving land acquisition of about 201.3 ha. and saving reserve Forest Land. Option 3 (Southern Alignment) Alignment started from km 245.8(start of GIDA area), following GIDA peripheral boundary road joining NH-29 at km 208.3 and then along NH-29 for about 8.5 km upto chainage km 199.8 and thereafter crosses Rapti river, Gaura Nalla, Tura Nalla, crosses SH- 1 and N-E railway line finally joining NH-28 at km 279.800. This alternative has a length of 43.3 km involving land acquisition of 267.0 ha. and saving reserve Forest Land. IJ w r 7-2 0 p Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 04 Option 4 (Northern Alignment) The alignment starts from km 242.650 on NH-28 just near level railway crossing. It crosses river Rapti and crosses Gorakhpur and Chhapria distributaries between SH-81 and Pipraich bound ODR and finally joins NH-28 at km 279.8. This option has a length of 56km involving land acquisition of about 321 ha. and saving reserve Forest Land. The above alignment options have been selected to avoid the major settlements to minimize the social impact. Considering the merits and demerits of socio-economic and R&R aspects as well suitability from environmental point of view, Option 2 is the most feasible option as it is technically viable, economically feasible and environmentally suitable and has finally been chosen for implementation. 7.2.4 Selected Alignment The enclosed map (Fig 7.1) shows the bypass alignment along with other salient features including the road network in the area. The preferred bypass alignment takes off from chainage km 251.700 of NH-28 just before Rapti flood protection bund along north of NH-28. The alignment starts near village Kaleswar and passes towards Southeast through Gorakhpur Industrial Development area (GIDA) land, alignment crosses 5 major roads (MDR-49 at chainage km 4.25, NH-29 at Km 9.749, touches and traverses along SH bypass from KM 18.825 to Km 19.550, SH-1 at km 24.567, and ODR at km 27.617), North Eastern Railway line i.e. Gorakhpur -Muzafarpur at km 25.944 and also crosses 5 rivers /Nallas (Sonwan Nalla at Km 5.0, Rapti River at Km 11.2-11.5, Gaura Nadi at km 17.862, Tura nalla at km 24.35 and Pharend nalla at Km 31.5671). The total length of the Gorakhpur bypass is 32.469 kms. The bypass ends at chainage km 279.800 of NH-28 near Jagdeeshpur settlement (RONI Village) (Refer Figure 7.1) 7.3 LAND ACQUISITION This project is for widening of existing 2-lane road to 4-lane divided carriageway along with provision of bypass where necessary. The land requirements depend upon the available Right of Way (ROW) and the proposed ROW; to meet the geometric designs requirements as per recommendation of IRC: 73 as also to meet requirement for provision of junctions, intersections, service road, bus lay byes, rest area, toll plaza etc at isolated locations for specific purposes where new ROW is required. Retaining wall structure will be used wherever necessary in case of embankment stretches or locations where service roads are being provided. However, existing road has certain limitations due to the presence of settlements in some stretches. Thus some compromise in design standard is required and necessary. The available right of way varies enroute, a 45 m ROW has been considered along the existing alignments (except urban/semi urban areas with significant roadside developments) and 60m ROW along new alignments/ bypass. Available and proposed ROW for various road stretches is tabulated below. Table 7.1: Available and Proposed ROW Section Road Chainage (kms) Available ROW (m) Proposed ROW (m) Lucknow- p8.250 - 20.00' 28.35 - 33.84 39.2/36.7/40.7 Faizabad 20.00 - 32.107 (Barabanki bypass for - 60 12.370kms) 32.107 - 62.775 20.42 - 30.18 36.7/40.7/45/54 62.775 -69.679(Ramsanehighat - 60/125(for toll plaza) bypass for 7.050 km) 69.679 - 92.760 30 - 39.5 36.7/45 92.760 - 122.275 54.86 54.9 Faizabad bypass 0 - 15 54.86 54.9 Gorakhpur City 260 - 280 25 - 35 60 (for Gorakhpur bypass) stretch I 7-3 41' 37" N a, 21 17 26 7'47" N N .71 26- 47' 37" N 26' 47' 37" N -T L-k 26' 45'A S' 4' N 45' N 71 E _-N -lva 1.2 - Mi 2S G I D A -1.1 T- 4z A"ikRNAIIV t . .1%, -.1-1 .... ...... 40' N 26- 40' N 26' 4 ?6- 40' 26' 4D: N X v 2 25- 38' 73" 1- 3"6' 38' 23" 13" 26' 38' 23" N 26' 38' 23" N I 2-4-7-8 2 9-4-7-8 JERNATIVE 3 2-4-5-7-8 ,TERNATIVE 4 1-6-8 Fig. 7.1 ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT OF GORAKHPLJR BYPASS Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettement Action Plan 7.4 LAND FOR LUCKNOW -AYODHYA SECTION This stretch of 130kms road has been proposed to be divided into three contract packages as per details given in land estimate Annexure 7.1. Based on land required for ROW and other specific enroute requirements, the total land area for this section works out to216 ha including that of Barabanki and Ramsanehighat bypasses. This also includes land needs for facilities such as service roads, intersections/junctions and interchanges, flyovers, Bridges over streams/drains, Rail over Bridges (ROBS) underpasses, Bus Bays, Truck laybyes and toll plazas as per the details given. This covers all the three districts (Lucknow, Barabanki and Faizabad) and 123 villages through which this stretch passes. However, after allowing deduction for transfer of government land/gramsabha land comprising of waterways of streams/canals/drains, road etc, net private land acquisition will be about 186 ha. (For Details Refer Annexure 7.3) District wise land to be acquired has been given in the Table 7.2 the table indicates that Impact on Barabanki is maximum and Lucknow is least impacted district. Table 7.2 District wise Land Acquisition District Chainage (km) No. of Villages Land in ha Govt./ Gram Sabha Affected (Private/Goft./Gra /Community land (ha) m sabha land) Lucknow 8.250 -17.000 8 7.8 3.00 Barabanki 17 - 68.5 48 170.0 18.0 Faizabad 68.5 -122.275 and 0 67 38.2 9.00 -15.00 of Faizabad bypass Total 123 Say 216 30.00 The land under borrow area is not added in the total land required to be acquired or transferred, because it does not fall in either of the category. This land will be taken on lease by the contractor temporarily and handed back after reclamation to the owners. 7.4.1 Land required for Specific purposes (Lucknow-Ayodyhya section) Upgraded plan for the present road also includes provision of bus-bays, truck lay-byes and toll plaza etc. There are a number of towns, villages and settlements along the project corridor. Lot of movement of passengers using bus takes place at these locations. So provision of bus-bays is essential to eliminate conflict between buses and other moving vehicles and also to ensure safety to boarding and alighting passengers. In order to facilitate route transfer for onward journey towards Gonda, Raebraily and Azamgarh etc bus bays need to be located near major intersections. Likewise truck lay-byes need to be provided at cluster of wayside amenities. Their locations have been identified based on parking surveys carried out in the project corridor. Lucknow-Ayodhya road is proposed to operate as access controlled facility, toll plaza has also been proposed for toll collection. 5.5 m wide and 100.93 kms long service road have been proposed either on left/ or right / both sides at enroute settlements / towns to give access and provide parking facilities to local traffic as also to take care of the conflicting traffic originating from there. 27 vehicular under passes have been proposed at different locations based on the importance of intersecting road and the settlement to provide access to local traffic and there by assuring the project road to be access controlled. In addition 6-pedestrian/ animals under passes have been proposed wherever needed. The land requirements for service road and under passes is included in the proposed ROW. 1Jw _ 7-4 A i Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettement Adion Plan 4 The bus bays, truck lay-byes, and toll plaza locations along with land area requirements are listed below: - Table 7.3 Package wise location of proposed Bus Bays with land area requirements S.No. Right Side of Chainage Left Side of Chainage Area for Bus Bay on each side Carriage way (km) Carriage way (km) as per standard/Dwg. of NHAI (sqm) Package-I I Chinhat 9.700 Chinhat 9.700 265(urban area) 2 Beginning of 19.800 Beginning of 19.800 525(rural area) Barabanki bypass Barabanki bypass 3 Barabanki bypass 27.900 Barabanki bypass 27.900 525 4 End of Barabanki 32.500 End of Barabanki 32.500 525 bypass bypass Package-II 1 Tala l 67.200 l Tala 67.200 l 525 Package-III 1 Beginning of 0.025 Beginning of 0.025 265 Faizabad bypass Faizabad bypass 2 Naka Chowk 3.925 Naka Chowk 3.925 265 3 Near Allahabad 4.525 Near Allahabad 4.525 265 Road, NH-96 Road, NH-96 4 Debvkali Chowk 8.075 Debvkali Chowk 8.075 265 5 End of Faizabad 15.000 End of Faizabad 15.000 265 bypass bypass Table 7.4: Package wise location of proposed Truck Lay-byes with land area requirements S.No. Right Side of Chainage Left Side of Chainage Area for Truck lay-byes as per Carriage way (km) | Carnage way (km) | standard Dwg. of NHAI (sqm) Package-I 1 l Barabanki l 19.400 l Barabanki l 19.400 4200 Package-III 1 Tashenpur 106.900 Tashenpur 106.900 4200 2 Faizabad bypass 7.125 Faizabad bypass 7.125 4200 Table 7.5: Location of toll plaza and land Area Requirement Package II Right-side of Chainage(km) Left-side of Chainage Area (sqm) carriage way carriageway Ramsenhighat bypass 3.020 - 3.620 Ramsanehighat 3.020 - 3.620 31225 for each side Total( bypass 31225*2)=62450 7.4.2 Intersections, Interchanges & Flyovers Beside the existing major junctions four new major junctions would be created at the start and end of the proposed Barabanki and Ramsanehighat Bypass. When the average speed of vehicles on the widened corridor increases substantially, the presence of these isolated conflict points will not only pose safety hazards but also reduce speeds considerably. Therefore, grade-separators are proposed at most of the existing and proposed major junctions. The details are given in Table- 7.6. _Jw _ ~~~~~~~~7-5 16AACM Independent Review and Consolidabon of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table-7.6: Package Wise List of Proposed Intersection Development S.N. | Chainage (km) | Location Nature of Interchange Package-I 1. 8.550 End of Lucknow Bypass Unidirectional Flyover 2. 20.000 Beginning of Barabanki Bypass Flyover 3. 32.107 End of Barabanki Bypass Vehicular Underpass Package-II 4. 62.775 Start of Ramsanehighat Bypass Y- Juncton 5. 69.679 End of Ramsanehighat Bypass IY- Juncton Package-III 6. 122.275 Beginning of Faizabad Bypass Unidirectional Flyover 7. 3.425 Naveen Chowk, intersection of Faizabad bypass with Flyover Raibenly Road (SH) 8. 4.000 Naka Chowk, intersection of Faizabad bypass with Flyover Allahabad Road (NH-96) 9. 7.475 Devkali Chowk, intersection of Faizabad bypass with Flyover Varanasi Road (MDR) The land requirements for the above intersections, interchanges and flyovers is included in the proposed right of way. 7.4.3 Rail Over Bridges The new 4-Lane ROBs in lieu of present level crossings and three 2-Lane ROBs parallel to existing ones are proposed. The details are given in Table7.7. Table-7.7: Details of Rail Over Bridges (Package Wise) S.No. | Chainage (km) | Location Remarks Package-I 1 l 0.420 l On Barabanki Bypass New 4-lane ROB Package-II 1 82.965 l At Rauzagaon | New 4-lane ROB Package-III 1 1.200 On Faizabad Bypass 2-lane ROB parallel to existing ones 2 1.950 3 10.600 The land requirements for above ROBs is included in the proposed right of way. 7.5 LAND FOR GORAKHPUR BYPASS Land for Gorakhpur bypass with proposed general ROW of 60m and total length of 32.469 kms has been estimated in detail as per Annexure 7.2 enclosed. The ROW required at specific locations has been proposed to include the area requirements for junctions at the start and end of bypass, toll plaza, interchange with NH-29 and SH-1 along with bus bays at these junctions based on detail design drawings. Land area required for bus bays and truck lay-byes at the start and end of bypass has also been provided as per design and drawings. ROW proposed in different stretches for land estimate also includes the land needs for facilities such as service road, intersections, flyovers, bridges over streams/drains and Rail over bridges(ROB) etc. Gorakhpur bypass falls in Gorakhpur district and affects 37 villages through which bypass passes. Total land requirement works out to 261.00 ha. However, after allowing deduction for transfer of Govt. land /Gram sabha land comprising of waterways of streams/canals/drains and roads etc/ net private land acquisition will be about 245.5ha. I 7-6 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secion on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass . Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 7.8: Land Acquisition for Gorakhpur Bypass District Chainage No. of villages Land in ha Govt./Gramsabha affected (Private/Govt./Gramsabha) land (ha) Gorakhpur 0 - 32.469 (Bypass 37 261.00 15.50 chainage) Km 251.700 - 279.800 of NH-28 7.5.1 Land requir6d for specific purposes on Gorakhpur Bypass; - Intersections and interchanges have been provided from safety considerations as well as to ensure smooth and efficient flow of traffic at major junctions including Y-j unction at start and end of bypass and two cross-junctions with NH-29 and SH-1. Bus bays on bypass have been proposed for long distance express buses that will not enter the Gorakhpur town to save time. Bus bays on NH-28 near start and end of bypass will facilitate Gorakhpur bound passengers to avail such express bus service. Bus bays are also required near the junction of NH-29 and SH-1 to facilitate route transfer for onward journey towards Varanasi or Deoria. Truck lay-byes have been proposed to meet parking demand for truckers entering Gorakhpur town at both ends of the bypass along NH-28. After construction of bypass it is proposed that through freight traffic should not be allowed to enter Gorakhpur town at all. However, there would be traffic originating and destining for Gorakhpur town. Toll plaza has also been proposed for toll collection. 5.5 m wide and 8.040 kms long service roads have been proposed (3.72 kms on left side and 4.32 kms on right side) at enroute settlements along the bypass to give access and provide parking facilities to local traffic as also to take care of the conflicting traffic originating from there. 14 vehicular under passes have been proposed at different locations to provide access to local traffic and thereby avoiding interference of the local traffic with through traffic thus assuring the project road to be fully access controlled. In addition 8-pedestrian under passes have been proposed wherever needed to provide access to pedestrian traffic and thereby assuring smooth flow of traffic along bypass. The land requirements for service road and under passes is included in the proposed ROW. The junctions and interchanges, toll plaza, bus bays and truck lay-byes location along with land area requirements are listed below: - Table 7.9: Location of Junctions, interchanges and toll plaza with Land area Requirements S. No. Description Start chainage End chainage Area (sqm) 1 Start Junction 0.000 0.206 37565.40 2 Toll plaza 2.775 3.955 127982.91 3 Interchange at NH-29 9.050 10.425 217043.46 4 Interchange at SH-1 24.300 25.000 132333.08 5 End junction 35.250 32469 30593.05 Table: 7.10: Location of Bus Bays with Land area Requirements S.No. Location Chainage (km) Area (sqm) 1 Kaleshwar (start of bypass) 251.700 to 251.700 3015 2 Junction with NH-29 9.550 to 9.950 3015 3 Junction with SH-1 24.467 to 24.667 3015 4 Jagdeeshpur (end of bypass) 280.200 to 280.200 3015 _ w _7 7 7.v^sX Average land District 0 - average land holding of district Total Landless holding of district Sub-total PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs Lucknow 4 9 63 139 67 147 12 26 79 174 Barabanki 195 429 842 1852 1037 2281 173 381 1210 2662 Faizabad 55 121 251 552 306 673 58 128 364 801 Gorakhpur 226 791 776 2716 1002 3507 430 1505 1432 5012 PAHs 480 1350 1932 5259 2412 6609 673 2040 3085 8649 3 7-17 SDM Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan ,4 Table 7.17: Details of Vulnerable Agricultural THs (PAHs and PAFs) Landless After Aca uisition below average land holding of district District SC ST BPL WHH Disable Total SC ST BPL WHH Disable Total PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs Lucknow 0 0 0 0 .1 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 0 0 3 7 1 2 0 0 5 11 Barabanki 37 81 0 0 50 110 8 18 1 2 96 211 181 398 0 0 195 429 29 64 10 22 415 913 Faizabad 10 22 0 0 9 20 2 4 1 2 22 48 53 117 0 0 40 88 6 13 2 4 101 222 Gorakhpur 28 98 0 0 66 231 11 39 0 0 105 368 98 343 0 0 216 756 27 95 0 0 341 1194 PAHs 75 201 0 0 126 363 21 61 2 4 224 629 333 860 0 0 454 1280 63 174 12 26 862 2340 7.21 CUT-OFF DATE Cut -Off date shall be the following: a) In case of land acquisition affecting legal title holders (THs), the cut-off date would be date of issuing notice U/S 3A of NH Act, 1956 b) In case where people lack title (NTHs), the cut-off date would be the date of start of the Census survey undertaken by the project authority- For Lucknow-Ayodhya section cut-off date is 21.08.2003 and for Gorakhpur Bypass cut-off date is 22.08.2002. 7.22 LAND AVAILABILITY FOR DISPLACED PERSONS FOR RESETTLEMENT AND BUDGET PROVISION THEREOF There are 8766 Titleholder agriculture families being affected by land acquisition out of which around 5982 families have holdings below average land holding of district. Most of the farmers have smallholdings and the average land holding along the alignment area is less than 0.5 ha. As a result of land and assets acquisition, 1350 families would become landless and 863 families lose commercial premises and 468 families lose there commercial cum residential premises. Kotwa Sarhak and Bilsar are the worst affected settlements along Lucknow-Ayodhya section and may need relocation There are two options for compensating the landless families: Option A- Arrange land for their land acquired /displaced person may buy land against compensation received. Option B- Pay replacement cost for land acquired. Option A-Is not feasible, as most of the farmers in project area have small holdings sufficient for self sustenance and have no surplus land for sale and secondly proper irrigated land cannot be provided for loss of agricultural land since there is hardly any government owned cultivable land in the entire stretch. Such a land, wherever available is infertile and non productive. As such, Option B-i.e. payment of replacement cost at market value for land acquired seems to be the best alternative and with land compensation received project displaced families will go in for self-relocation. _ JI 7-18 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Even in the entitlement matrix, in addition to compensation for lost assets, families requiring relocation will receive transitional assistance and shifting allowance for resettlement. PDPs affected by acquisition of their commercial! residential sites are just few in number and during interaction with them it was revealed they prefer to be near their acquired site and have expressed their desire for self relocation and hence will opt for and prefer cash compensation. However, adequate provision has been made for their resettlement. 7.23 LAND USE It is observed there the existing land use along side the Lucknow-Ayodhya section of NH-28 is agricultural land (50%) followed by commercial land (about 25%) and barren land (about 15%) and about 10% of the land fall under plantation. However, after land acquisition to meet the ROW requirements of Barabanki and Ramsanehighat bypasses over all land use along proposed alignment becomes 90% agricultural and waste land and about 10% for residential and commercial use. Lnad use along gorakhpur bypass alignment is predominantly agricultural (90%) out of which about 30 to 40% is prone to flood spills, about 2% for water bodies another 2% for settlements and remaining 5-6% is for grazing and barren/fallow land. The land use pattern of the area does not include any forest area. 7.24 AGRICULTURE, IRRIGATION AND CROPPING PATTERN Because of fertile alluvial soil of Ganga basin and abundant resource of surface water and ground water, the land use pattern in the project area is predominantly agricultural.Agriculture is the main stay of the people.However, the average land holding size is less than 0.5 ha so, with increasing population and most of the land holdings being uneconomical, a majority of the population works as landless labourers and survive at subsistence level. Water requirements for agricultural purposes is mostly met through irrigation canal comprising network of Sharda canal, Ghagra cannal, Sultanpur branch cannal and Barabanki cannal system. Tubewells, pumping sets and wells are other sources of irrigation from favourable ground water availability. Soil, topography and climate of the area are favorable to agriculture. Both Rabi and Kharif crops are grown with and without irrigation facility. The three crop growing seasons are kharif June to September Rabi October to March Zaid April to June A Variety of crops are grown in the region, crops can primarily be classified as: - Food crops/Grains Include Rice, wheat, barley, jowar, Bajra, Maize Pulses Pulses grown are urad, moong, arhar, gram and other pulses Oil seeds Oil seeds constitute lahi and mustard, ground nut and other seeds Other Crops Mainly cover cash crop like sugar cane, tubacco and potato Horticulture crops mainly mango and guava and vegetables Guava and mango orchards are quite common and is one of the major sources of livelihood of the project area. Dharampur sugar mill near km 81.750 enroute procures the sugar cane grown in the adjoining areas. I 7-19 I Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 0 7.25 EXPEDITING THE PROCESS OF LAND ACQUISITION Revenue Department has an influencing role in Land Acquisition proceedings and initiation of resettlement process. Unless compensation process is prompt and efficient, project implementation process will get delayed. Ensuring timely land acquisition is demanding and requires full time involvement of the designated officials. Chakbandi work is also going on in the area. Land records in respect of holdings and ownership is being updated by the DMIADM through Revenue Department working under his administrative control. Revenue Department may be prevailed upon to expedite updating of revenue record on priority along the alignment area: to avoid any difference in physical ownership versus revenue record; mutation not being carried out despite the sale / purchase; land still in the name of demised family head although division amongst his descendants/sons had been agreed and decided during his life time etc. Many a times, to save, registration charges levied by the state Govt. under Indian Stamp Act for the purpose of registration of sale deeds, transfer of land normally takes place without mutation, which creates problem for payment of land compensation to the real affected person. Sometimes several persons claim to be interested in the compensation amount. To ensure that land transactions are incorporated in the revenue record, provision should be made in the entitlement matrix for East-West corridor stating that in case of current land transactions, where process of mutation of the sale deed has not been carried out, PIU/NGOs shall facilitate the process of land registration and mutation. The cost of registration will be deducted from the total compensation and intimation to this effect will be submitted to District administration prior to the issue of section 3G notifications. However, in the Entitlement Matrix for East-West corridor it is stated that in case of disputes such as where land records are not updated/mutated or where PAPs are unable to produce the desired documents, the compensation amount will be deposited with Competent Authority till the disposal of the case. Complete coordination and rapport has to be maintained by the Project Director supported by CRRO/Managers (Technical) at PIU Gorakhpur and Lucknow with Revenue Department for getting full cooperation. GM (Environment), at NHAI headquarters should closely monitor the land acquisition status. To meet procedural requirements of the NH Act, retired revenue officer fully conversant with the Act may be employed to expedite land acquisition process. Detail land measurements, preparation of notifications, compensation/award papers is a very cumbersome, specialized process which can be expeditiously handled by experienced people in this discipline and for this NIHAI should place retired Revenue Officer with support staff at the disposal of Competent Authority (CA) to expedite land acquisition. This technique has proved very effective in implementing Land Acquisition process on other projects. Interaction with PAPs by Competent Authority and his officials explaining land acquisition process, dispelling doubts about assessment, valuation and final disbursement of compensation would go a long way in expediting / implementation of land acquisition. Taking over possession of land where crop is standing will not be a bottleneck with the provision of crop compensation for non-perennial and perennial crops (fruit trees) in the project entitlement matrix. Even crop compensation can be saved if timely notice taking into account the maturity of the crop and planned requirement of land is issued to the landowners. They are entitled to be given a notice substantially 4 months in advance to harvest standing crops under Entitlement Matrix for non- perennial crops. _ J _" I 7-20 0doA Ii I I I I I I I I I I ~~~~~~~~~~~~CHAPTER 8 I I I I I I I . Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acton Plan : 8 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT AND SCHEDULE 8.1 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENT AND SCHEDULE This chapter deals with the institutional arrangements and implementation mechanism for the implementation of RAP, the grievance redressal mechanism to be adopted in the project area and the training and capacity building of the project authorities for enhanced and systematic project implementation. 8.2 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AT NHAI-HQ AND PIU The success of the project depends on many aspects, the most important being timely establishment of institutional mechanism, which aids in maintaining the implementation schedule of the project thereby achieving the desired objectives. Major tasks in the project include land acquisition, payment of compensation and resettlement and rehabilitation activities. Institutional arrangements are required to be in place to carry out the various tasks under the project separately or simultaneously. 8.2.1 Existing Institutional Arrangement at the NHAI- HQ and PIU Implementation of Resettlement and Rehabilitation (R & R) component is the overall responsibility of the Environmental and Social Development Unit of NHAI at head quarters for both the stretch Lucknow-Ayodhya and Gorakhpur bypass. The ESDU of NHAI is presently headed by General Manager who ensures the implementation of R & R component through Project Implementation Unit (PIU), Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh. The responsibilities of EDSU include policy guidance, planning, implementation and monitoring, contingency planning; R & R related programmes and reporting during RAP. The General Manager is assisted by one Deputy General Manager and one manager at the Head Office. ESDU appoints the NGOs for R&R implementation, awareness creation on road safety, highway related diseases and other socio-cultural/health measures related to resettlement activities. They also appoint Evaluation Consultants for evaluation of impact of R & R activities. At the PIU level the Project Director at Gorakhpur would be responsible for civil construction work and implementation of resettlement action plan in field. The PIU Gorakhpur provides all information, progress report and all other matters related to R & R activities to the General Manager, ESDU at Head Office. 8.2.2 Proposed Institutional Arrangement The Environment and the Social Development Unit (ESDU) located at the NHAI head quarters would be responsible for overall monitoring and implementation of the RAP. The Project Director at the PIUJ level would coordinate all R&R activities at field level and would be responsible for the overall execution of the RAP. For R&R implementation, the office of the Project Director must be strengthened with one full time R&R managers, for each package, who would be in charge of the resettlement activities and would report to the Project Director. The R&R Managers would work closely with the District Collector/Competent Authority to expedite the payments of compensation for land acquisition and relocation of the PAPs, where necessary. They would also facilitate the formation of Grievance Redressal Committees for each district consisting of local representatives and other stakeholders, including PAPs to assist in the implementation of R&R activities within the district. The Project Director would monitor the progress of the work and ensure coordination between the relevant departments. The PIU would -*J w- 8-1 Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan appoint adequate supporting staff for resettlement management, preparation of details of land acquisition and its field implementation for expeditious implementation of the RAP. It's perceived that retired revenue officials of the state government may be employed as support staff for the land/revenue record works. 8.3 GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL MECHANISM 8.3.1 Grievance Redressal Committees Grievance Redressal Committees (GRCs) would be formed in every district through which the project stretch traverses. The GRC at each district will comprise the District Magistrate; Project Director, PIU-NHAI; CRRO, PIU-NHAI; a representative of the local bodies (Village/Block Panchayats or municipalities); a representative of the NGOs involved in implementing the RAP: and the representatives of the PAPs (at least two with one from vulnerable category). The main objectives of GRC would be to provide a platform/mechanism to mediate and reduce legal proceedings, which often results in delayed completion of the projects. Further, it's been proposed that the issues pertaining to titleholders can be discussed in Tehsil diwas, which would be held weekly at respective tehsils. The district administration authorities would allot a duration of one hour specifically to look in to the grievances / issues of the project affected persons. The CA would be present in the tehsil on the tehsil diwas along with the patwaris / lekhpals of the villages getting affected. 8.3.2 Grievance Redressal Mechanism The main objective of the grievance redressal mechanism would be to provide a step-by-step process for registering and addressing the grievances. It's expected that this mechanism would ensure redressal to the aggrieved party. The aggrieved party would have access to the committee, which would function through out the project period. Steps to be followed and response time for redressal of grievance is as follows: . In case a PAP has any grievance related to the acquisition of the land4 loss of property, valuation, deciding of compensation / assistance or payment of compensation / assistance he may seek the redressal of the same by reporting the matter in written to the concerned CRROs. . The CRRO after analyzing the nature of grievance would handover the case to the NGO for resolving the issue. The NGO would verify the nature of the problem and the status on the field by carrying out necessary investigations. . The NGO in close coordination with CRRO would then make efforts to resolve the issue and submit their report within 15 days of filing of complaint by the PAP. . In case the NGO is not able to resolve the issue the pending issue would be handed over to the CRRO along-with the action taken and outcome report. . The CRRO would take necessary steps for coordination with the Project Director & District Administration Authorities (if required) to resolve this issue. . In case the issue is resolved the report would be submitted by the CRRO to the Project Director regarding the actions taken and outcomes within 15 days after the handover of the issue by the NGO to the CRRO. . In case the issue cannot be resolved then the same would be handed over to the GRC for amicable solution. . The GRC would then call a meeting with all its representatives and the concerned PAP / PAPs to discuss the matter. . The GRC would take-up necessary steps to resolve the issue by coordinating closely with the concerned department / district administration authority. The GRC would submit its report to the Project Director and NHAI - HQ within 6 weeks after the case is referred to them. . In case the GRC is not able to resolve the issue the PAP has an option to move to the court for the resolution of the issue / conflict. _ _I_ 8-2 , 0 wo Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated ResetUement Action Plan . In case the issue is to be settled in the court the NHAI / CA would withhold any payment of 5 compensation or assistance till the decision from the court is finalized. Figure 8.1 The Existing and Proposed Institutional Arrangement NHAI HEAD QUARTER ORGANOGRAM l l l Member Technical (WB), NHAI l I CGM (World Bank) l l I General Manager (Environment) l Deputy General Manager (Environment) l l l Manager (R&R) I THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT AT GORAKHPUR I Grievance | Project Director (PD), PIU, NHAI Redressal CommRteess' One CRRO for each package CA District Level . .. (5 Committee ( NGOs 2rebred revenue Evaluation offidals I Consultant ... C I Existing Institutional Set-up Proposed Addition 8.4 DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE 3 District Level Committee (DLC) would be an integral part for the implementation of the R and R activities in the project area. The DLC would comprise the Project Director, Competent Authority, Revenue Officer, representatives from district administration, representatives from Panchayats, * _4up 8-3 S - e Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secton on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan representatives of PAPs, NGOs and any other persons of local eminence. The District Magistrate would head the DLC. The basic purpose the District Level Committee would be to facilitate the implementation of R&R activities in both the consultancy packages with local inputs and community participation. However, the DLC would not be responsible for endorsing the micro-plans. 8.5 ROLE OF VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS IN THE PROJECT AREA 8.5.1 Competent Authority Under the NHAI Act, the Competent Authority (CA) means any person or authority authorized by the Central Government through the notification in the official Gazette to perform the functions of the competent authority (for land acquisition) for such area as may be specified in the notifications. The Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (a) of Section 3 of NH Act of 1956 through gazette notification authorities ADM / DM / SDM / Special Land Acquisition Officer to acquire land, determine & disburse the compensation thereof. 8.5.2 Non-Govemment Organizations NGOs would be the cornerstone in the implementation stage of the RAP. The NGO would help in implementing various components of the RAP, particularly in verifying the number of PAPs and assessing the loss incurred by the individuals and compensation to be provided. They would be responsible to prepare micro plans for PAPs and help the PAPs in better utilization of the compensation and rehabilitation assistance for more productive purposes may include loan arrangements, training etc. The NGOs would report to the CRROs The NGOs would be involved during the entire duration of RAP implementation. Thus, involvement of NGOs would ensure that all the eligible PAPs would receive appropriate and justified entitlement and at the end of the project the PAFs/PAPs would have improved (or at least restored) their previous standard of living. The detailed TOR of the NGOs for carrying out the R&R activities has been enclosed in Annexure 8.3 for both the Consultancy packages. 8.5.3 Evaluation Consultant An independent Evaluation Consultant would be hired by ESDU, NHAI to evaluate the impacts of R&R implementation on the socio-economic condition of the PAPs and analyze the efficiency of the process adopted by the NGOs in order to achieve the objectives of the project. The internal monitoring of project activities would be carried out by NHAI. 8.5.4 Roles and Responsibilities The Table 8.1 provides a brief description of the roles and responsibilities assigned to the different key players for efficient and timely implementation of the RAP. IJ _ 8-4 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Fig. 8.2 - Grievance Redressal Mechanism H~~~~~~~~~ F-vjPf It *f Fn I (nf I ' | Grievances Structure and R & R provisions | j Redressed |- CRRO/NG; I Not Redressed Redressed I GRC Not Redressed | I Redressed I NHAI/PI U, HQ | I Not Redressed I Redressed j Arbitration I Not Redressed 3 f Redressed H Civil Court IJ w _ 8-5 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 8.1 Role & Responsibilities for Implementation of the RAP Level Implementation Roles and responsibilities staff Corpora * Overall in charge of all the project activities. te Office Member * Oversee the progress of land acquisition and R&R activities. Technical (WB) . Participate in the State level committees to facilitate land acquisition. Corpora GM * Coordinate implementation of R&R activities with corporate and field staff te Office (Environment) * Processing of micro R&R plans prepared by the PIU and NGO * Organize training for the PIU and NGOs for capacity building to implement the R&R. * Monitor the progress on R&R and land acquisition. * Prepare Terms of Reference and facilitate the appointment of the external agency for Evaluation. * Contracting the NGOs and Evaluation Consultants for implementation of RAP. * Prepare Terms of Reference for any studies required and qualitative dimensions for the implementation of the R&R and facilitate appointment of the consultant to carry out the studies and coordinate them. Corpora Manager (R&R) * Processing & review of micro-plans submitted by the NGOs for approval. te Office * Monitor the process of land acquisition and R&R activities * Coordinate with the PIU and the other stakeholding agencies for timely implementation Project Project Director . Overall responsibilities for land acquisition and R&R activities in the field. Site . Make budgetary provisions for land acquisition and R&R activities. Level * Liaison with district administration for land acquisition and implementation of R&R Monitoring activities of NGOs * Review and examine the micro-plans prepared by NGO/CRRO * Review the progress of R&R activities with respect to time frame * Coordinate the training program for income generation activities * Monitor the disbursement of money to PAPs * Monitor the quality of the resettlement activities * Holding review meeting every month. Project R&R * Facilitate formation of Grievance Redressal Committees Site Manager/CRRO * Co-ordinate with district administration, PAPs and NGOs responsible for land acquisition and Level R&R.Translation of R&R Policy in local language, * Prepare pamphlets on the policy for information dissemination to PAPs. * Print Policy and Identity Cards for the PAPs. * Ensure that the contractor has paid the mutually agreed amount to the people for the land taken as borrowed areas and also ensure that the land is returned back to the concemed people within the stipulated time as per the agreement and has not made it unproductive. * Ensure that the land acquisition plans as per the alignments are submitted to the district administration for acquisition. * Ensure the development of resettlement sites, whenever required. * Participate in the allotment of residential, commercial and agricultural plots. * Liaison with the District Administration for dovetailing Government's schemes for income generation and development programs for the PAPs. * Ensure the inclusion of those PAPs who might not have been covered during the census survey. . Facilitate the opening of joint account in local Banks to transfer the rehabilitation assistance for the PAPs and also organize distribution of cheque payment of compensation and rehabilitation assistance, in transparent manner in Gram Sabha or public meetings specially organized for distribution of cheques. * Monitor physical and financial progress on land acquisition and R&R implementation activities * Organize bi-monthly meetings with the NGOs to review the progress of R&R. Project GRC * To provide support for the PAPs on problems relating to resettlement and rehabilitation Site * To record grievances of the PAPs and make efforts to resolve them Level * To inform PIU/SDU of serious cases within an appropriate time-frame * To report to the aggrieved parties about the development regarding their grievances and the decision Project DLC * To provide support for the PAPs on problems relating to resettlement and Site rehabilitation Level * To facilitate the implementation of R&R activities in the project area Project Non . Co-ordinate with the R&R Managers to implement R&R activities Site Government . Census and socio-economic verification of PAFs. Level Organization * Preparation of the micro-plans. Format for micro-plans is provided in Annexure 8.1. * Computerization of the database collected from the field. . Issue Identity Card to the PAFs. Format for I. Cards is provided in Annexure 8.3. . Facilitate R&R Managers in organizing the public information campaign at the commencement and during implementation of the R&R activities. 3Jw _ 8-6 V12Ar Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secion on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan - Level Implementation Roles and responsibilities staff * Distribute the pamphlets of R&R Policy and also explain to them the meaning and measures of mitigation to eliminate, the feeling of insecurity among the PA Ps * Assist the PAPs in receiving the compensation, opening of the bank accounts and facilitate the vulnerable PAPs in ensuring that they get their dues on time and are not left out. Generate awareness about the altemate livelihood options and their viability, the Ensue the participation of PAPs in identifying the alternate sites for agriculture, residential and commercial plots * Participate in consultation for allotment of shops and plots to the PAPs. * Ensure timely distribution of compensation and other entitlements. I Ensure preparation of resettlement sites as per the guidelines laid in the policy, complete with the basic facilities. * Participate in the meetings organized by the PIU. Submit monthly progress reports. * Identify training needs of the PAPs for income generating activities and ensure that they are adequately supported during the post-training period on enterprise development, management, development of the backward and forward linkages, credit financing and marketing of the produce. * Participate in the disbursement of cheques in public meetings and Gram Sabhas. Ensure that the women headed households, and other groups of vulnerable PAPs are paid their due compensation and assistance in time. Project Evaluation * Annual Evaluation, mid term evaluation and end term evaluation of the R&R activities being Site Consultants implemented by the PIU and NGO . Level 8.6 IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES There are several implementation issues, which needs to be addressed during the implementation stage, which has been detailed as under: * Preparation and implementation of land acquisition plan * Assessment survey to prepare income restoration plan particularly to identify beneficiary preference for income generating activities * Selection and hiring of NGOs and Evaluation Consultants for RAP implementation * Preparation of relocation and resettlement plan and disbursement of assistance * Formation of GRC * Identification of relocation sites for private titleholder vulnerable PAPs and CPRs. 8.7 CAPACITY BUILDING &TRAINING Capacity building being an important part of the RAP has been specially emphasized as an integral part for the implementation of the resettlement and rehabilitation programmes. The capacity building initiatives undertaken by NHAI are at the moment adequate to face the challenge of handling resettlement issues. However, certain R&R issues require attention and further strengthening. Amongst them, the most crucial are the issues of land acquisition followed by ensuring women's participation in the project, identifying the income generating schemes and the process to be adopted for the implementation of IGS - providing training to the PAPs, formulation of the SHGs, establishing the linkage with the existing markets available and identifying and establishing the linkages of the PAPs with the source of credit to sustain their commercial activities. The following training modules are suggested, which includes: 8.7.1 Training for the NGO Personnel The NGOs would be required to upgrade their skill through training so as to deliver the R&R components more effectively over time. Documentation and reporting of the progress of implementation would also be done by the NGOs and therefore, the NGOs' staff would require training for such purposes before the initiation of implementation of project activities. 1J _ 8-7 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secton on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass, Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acton Plan 8.7.2 Training for the Beneficiaries of the Project The beneficiaries would be provided with training in vocational skill, technical know how and for starting of production units and businesses. These training programmes may be organized by the implementing agencies, based on the recommendations of the NGOs and depending upon the nature of skill requirement in the areas as desired by the eligible PAPs (choice of alternative livelihoods). In some cases such as the improved agricultural practices or handicrafts, which are dependent on the locally available raw materials etc., the NGOs can organize training by themselves. In the case of alternative livelihood schemes requiring technical expertise, use of technical training institutes such as Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) would be done. 8.7.3 Training for NHAI Staff The project officials or the NGOs can implement the RAP only when they gain conceptual clarity in translating the rehabilitation concepts in its correct perspectives. The RAP has to be viewed as a process of development and the implementation plan as a management tool. The 'target-fulfilling' approach would need to be changed if the RAP is to be implemented as a 'process of development'. The NHAI and PIU staff would need to be extended a full training programme in evolving a "people centered development' process in all its projects in general. The NHAI would also have the responsibilities of assessing the training needs of the NGOs, and identifying the right organizations for imparting training. At the backdrop of various training programmes conducted by the ESDU, headquarters at regular intervals and the objective to provide an enhanced learning platform for its NHAI staff as well as the other stakeholders for R&R implementation, a broad outline for the training modules for ensuring smooth implementation of the RAP have been provided below. The areas broadly demarcated would need to be revised periodically and would be modified pertaining to the individual training needs of the personnel actually involved in implementation of the RAP. The following are some of the training programs that would facilitate the RAP to be implemented in its correct perspectives. * Understanding the policy guidelines, national context and framework for R&R, and how it will impact the affected people; * Understanding the implementation schedule step-by-step, and following them in implementation; * Importance of the baseline data, methods of collecting, retrieval of data; understanding the MIS package for managing the information; * Understanding of the Land Acquisition Act and the NH Act, and their implications with reference to the Draft National Policy on Resettlement; * Preparing participatory micro-plans with the PAPs; * Initiating people's participation in income restoration; * Women's participation in income restoration through self-help groups; * Development of micro-enterprises with options available, harmonization of the micro-enterprises development schemes with the available resource base, and the, external factors and environment; and, * Development of social and economic indicators to measure the process of change. Table 8.2 Training Plan for NHAI Staff S Constituents of Topics for Training Mode of Duration No the Target Group Training I All NHAI Managers Regulations and Policies related to Land Acquisition Lecture 3 days (R&R) CRROs, NGOs Land Acquisition; NHAI entitlement framework; Basic Features Sessions of the RAP; Planning for Relocation; Social Assessment Methods; Institutional Arrangements Monitoring, Evaluabon & Reporting; Documentation Requirements of the Project. 3 8-8 SD - I Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass l 3 Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan . - S Constituents of Topics for Training Mode of Duration No the Target Group Training | ~~~~~II All NHAI Managers Effective R&R Implementation: Site visits 2 days (R&R), CRROs, NGOs, Experience sharing related to R&R Implementation; and R&R specialists of the Disbursement Mechanisms; Conflict Resolution Methods: Seminars * Supervision Supervision Consultants Contingency Management and Consultants Remedy; Rapid Appraisals; Documentation, Monitoring and Reporting. III All NHAI Managers Salient Features of NHAI R&R Policy: Workshop 2 days on (R&R), CRROs, NGOs, Entitlements as per the NHAI R&R Policy- Implementation and site I R&R Specialists of the Arrangements; Roles and Responsibilities; Grievance Redressal Seminars workshop in supervision Cells Continued Community Consultations and Feedback; each Consultants, Labor Laws, Gender Issues; Health and Hygiene Issues; package. Contractors, Environmental safeguards in the Project. Representative of the PAPs IV All NHAI Managers Long Term Social Issues in the Highway Sector: Group 1 day (R&R) CRROs Standardization of Processes and Methods, Analytical Tools, Discussions Social Assessment Methods, Monitoring and Evaluation, GIS and Lecture and Relational Database Management, Concept of R&R Sessions Resource Centres. V Officials of ESDU/ Integration of Social and Environmental Issues and Specialized 3 weeks Environmental Cell of Best Practices Training the NHAI, PD, CRROs (site visits to similar 3 projects) 8.8 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE I A time based RAP implementation schedule has been prepared keeping in view the schedule of civil works. The project would provide adequate advance notice to the PAPs, who would be paid their 3 compensation and assistance prior to start of the civil works. To complete the project on time, NHAI has already initiated the following activities, which would 3 support the implementation of RAP. These include: * Establishment of PIU * Initiation the process of land acquisition. 3 . Appointment of NGOs by end of January 2004 The schedule would facilitate EDSU, PIU, NGO, Evaluation Consultants and other stakeholders in coordinating the completion of their activities and taking corrective measures in time, so that the 1 project would be completed as per schedule. This would also assist PIU to complete land acquisition and initiate resettlement activities in a planned manner, so that civil works may commence by 1 October 2004. A detailed implementation schedule for the five construction packages have been provided in the ensuing tables. l I J 8-9 97OI- I~~~~ Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 8.3 Implementation Schedule of LA and R & R Activities for Package I (8.25 km to 44.762 km) of Lucknow Ayodhya Section of NH-28 Priority First Second Third No. of Villages/District 9/Barabanki 8/Lucknow I3/Barabanki 11/ Barabanki Chainage 32.487 km to 44.762 8.25 km to 19.950 km 19.950 km (start of km Barabanki bypass) to 32.487 km (end of Barabanki bypass) Date of Declaration U/S-3A 1.04.04 1.05.04 1.04.04 1.04.04 Date of Publication of 3A in Newspapers 15.04.04 15.05.04 15.04.04 15.04.04 Date of Declaration U/S-3D 15.06.04 31.07.04 15.09.04 Date of Determination of Compensation 31.08.04 31.10.04 31.12.04 amount &Issue of award by C.A Date of Disbursement of Compensation 15.10.04 30.12.04 28.02.05 Verification of PAPS/ Nos. 15.02.04 15.03.04 15.04.04 Valuation of Structures 1.03.04' 1.04.04 10.05.04 Preparation of Micro Plans 1.05.04 1.06.04 1.07.04 Approval from H/Q 30.07.04 30.08.04 30.09.04 Opening of Joint Accounts 1.09.04 1.10.04 1.11.04 Disbursement of Assistance 30.11.04 15.01.05 15.03.05 _ J _ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~8-10 < Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 8.4 Implementation Schedule of LA and R & R Activities for Package II (44.762 km to 92.683 km) of Lucknow Ayodhya Section of NH-28 Priority First Second Third No. of Villages/District 17/Barabanki 15/Faizabad 8/Barabanki I 2/Faizabad Chainage 44.762 km to 62.775 69.679 km to 62.775 km (start of Ramsanehigh at km 92.683 bypass) to 69.683 km (end of Ramsanehigh at bypass) Date of Declaration U/S-3A 1.04.04 1.05.04 1.04.04 1.06.04 Date of Publication of 3A in Newspapers 15.04.04 15.05.04 15.04.04 15.06.04 Date of Declaration U/S-3D 15.06.04 31.07.04 15.09.04 Date of Determination of Compensation 31.08.04 31.10.04 31.12.04 amount &Issue of award by C.A Date of Disbursement of Compensation 15.10.04 30.12.04 28.02.05 Verification of PAPS/ Nos. 15.03.04 15.04.04 20.04.04 Valuation of Structures 1.04.04 1.05.04 15.05.04 Preparation of Micro Plans 1.06.04 15.07.04 30.08.04 Approval from H/Q 1.07.04 1.08.04 30.09.04 Opening of Joint Accounts 15.09.04 15.11.04 30.09.04 Disbursement of Assistance 15.12.04 15.01.05 15.03.05 'dlow 8-11 s Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 8.5 Implementation Schedule of LA and R & R Activities for Package III (92.683 km to 15 km of Ayodhya Bypass) of Lucknow Ayodhya Section of NH-28 Priority First No. of Villages/District 50/Faizabad Chainage 92.683 km of NH-28 to 15 km of Ayodhya Bypass Date of Declaration U/S-3A 1.04.04 Date of Publication of 3A in Newspapers 15.04.04 Date of Declaration U/S-3D 15.06.04 Date of Determination of Compensation amount 31.08.04 &Issue of award by C.A Date of Disbursement of Compensation 30.09.04 Verification of PAPS/ Nos. 15.02.G4 Valuation of Structures 1.03.04 Preparation of Micro Plans 1.05.04 Approval from H/Q 30.07.04 Opening of Joint Accounts 1.09.04 Disbursement of Assistance 30.11.04 *As LA of 4335 Sqm is involved, hence only first priority has been proposed for this package. _ , 4 _ ~~~~~~~~~~~8-12 Al Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettement Action Plan Table 8.6 Implementation Schedule of LA and R & R Activities for Package I (O km to 15 km) of Gorakhpur Bypass Priority First Second Third No. of Villages/District 7/ Gorakhpur 6/ Gorakhpur 6/ Gorakhpur Chainage 0 km to 5.132 km 5.132 km to 11.647 km 11.647 km to 15 km Date of Declaration U/S-3A 1.04.04 1.04.04 1.04.04 Date of Publication of 3A in Newspapers 15.04.04 15.04.04 15.04.04 Date of Declaration U/S-3D 15.06.04 15.07.04 16.08.04 Date of Determination of Compensation amount 31.08.04 31.09.04 31.10.04 &Issue of award by C.A Date of Disbursement of Compensation 15.10.04 30.11.04 31.12.04 Verification of PAPS/ Nos. 15.02.04 15.03.04 15.04.04 Valuation of Structures 1.03.04 1.04.04 1.05.04 Preparation of Micro Plans 15.05.04 15.06.04 15.07.04 Approval from H/Q 1.08.04 1.09.04 1.10.04 Opening of Joint Accounts 1.09.04 1.10.04 1.11.04 Disbursement of Assistance 30.11.04 15.01.05 15.02.05 _ 8~~~~~~~~~-13 'AZE&AW Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettiement Action Plan - Table 8.7 Implementation Schedule of LA and R & R Activities for Package II (15 km to 32.469 km) of Gorakhpur Bypass Priority First Second Third No. of Villages/District 6/ Gorakhpur 6/ Gorakhpur 6/ Gorakhpur Chainage 15 km to 20.212 km 5.132 km to 11.647 km 11.647 km to 15 km Date of Declaration U/S-3A 1.04.04 1.04.04 1.04.04 Date of Publication of 3A in Newspapers 15.04.04 15.04.04 15.04.04 Date of Declaration U/S-3D 15.06.04 15.07.04 16.08.04 Date of Determination of Compensation amount 31.08.04 31.09.04 31.10.04 &Issue of award by C.A Date of Disbursement of Compensation 15.10.04 30.11.04 31.12.04 Verification of PAPS/ Nos. 15.02.04 15.03.04 15.04.04 Valuation of Structures 1.03.04 1.04.04 1.05.04 Preparation of Micro Plans 15.05.04 15.06.04 15.07.04 Approval from H/Q 1.08.04 1.09.04 1.10.04 Opening of Joint Accounts 1.09.04 1.10.04 1.11.04 Disbursement of Assistance 30.11.04 15.01.05 15.02.05 _ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~8-14 < I~~~~~~~~~~A2% I I I I I I I I I I CHAPTER 9 3 I INCOME RESTORATION MEASURES I I I I I I Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secton on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acfon Plan 9 INCOME RESTORATION 9.1 INTRODUCTION The fundamental objective of income restoration activities for resettlement and rehabilitation projects is to provides alternative income generation/skill development activities aiming at various enabling strategies, through which project affected persons can either, continue their previous occupation or can start new businesses. This also implies that restoration of pre-project level of income and cultural system of affected persons is one of the most important components of RAP. The R&R framework of the project provides following entitlements for income restoration of families whose livelihood would be affected by the project. Alternate economic rehabilitation support and training for up-gradation of skills or imparting new skills and various R&R assistance for vulnerable families have been provided for. This section focuses on the impact on the livelihood loss in the project area and provides a plan for restoring the income of PAPs in a way, that they are able to "regain previous living standards" or are left better off. 9.2 LIVELIHOOD OF AFFECTED FAMILIES Based on the census and socio-economic survey, the livelihood-affected families have been categorised under two types- land based economic activities and non-land economic activities. The widening of the road will have considerable impact on the business activities and the total livelihood affected families in both commercial as well as residential cum commercial category include 7248 families. Table 9.1(A) - Livelihood Affected families- Commercial loss Commercial loss Affected Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Total PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs Titleholders (Structures) 114 251 148 326 127 279 2 7 391 863 Squatters 6 13 9 20 106 233 0 0 121 266 Encroachers 26 57 52 114 101 222 0 0 179 394 Kiosks 196 196 486 486 1407 3095 15 15 2104 3792 Tenants 78 78 157 157 166 365 0 0 401 600 Total 420 595 852 1103 1907 4195 17 22 3196 5915 Table 9.1(B) - Livelihood Affected families- Residential cum Commercial loss Residential cum Commercial loss) Affected Lucknow Barabanki Faizabad Gorakhpur Total PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs PAHS PAFs (Structures) 43 95 75 165 82 180 8 28 208 468 Squatters 25 55 26 57 48 106 4 14 103 232 Encroachers 8 18 57 125 87 191 1 4 153 338 Kiosks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tenants 22 22 77 77 89 196 0 0 188 295 Total 98 189 235 425 306 673 13 46 652 1333 I7 in joint venture with , 09-1 .29 0101 in joint venture with V J Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 9.2 - Livelihood Affected families (Vulnerable) Title-Holders Non-Titleholders Socia H Squatter Encroacher Tenant Kiosk PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs PAHs PAFs SC 35 77 13 31 16 37 40 40 182 182 ST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 WHH 14 31 7 16 20 44 13 13 2 2 BPL 29 70 22 49 12 26 73 73 337 337 Disable 38 84 0 0 16 35 27 27 0 0 Total 116 263 42 95 64 142 153 153 522 522 9.3 ELIGIBLE FAMILIES FOR INCOME RESTORATION The details of the income restoration mechanism for Titleholders and Non-Titleholders have been provided in the table below. The vulnerable would receive additional support in the form of Economic Rehabilitation Grant to enable to increase their earning capacity. Number of families eligible for training reflects that 4300 titleholders families would receive training, whereas 1304 families would receive training for in non-titleholder category. The eligible families would receive support because of loss of livelihood during project implementation and would be enabled to improve their economic status and standards. In addition to this economic rehabilitation grant would be extended to vulnerable families to uplift their status in both titleholder and non-titleholder category as elucidated below. . Table 9.3 - Eligible families for income restoration-Titleholders and Non-Titleholders Titleholders Displaced acquisition Commercial Residential cum Total Training 629 2340 863 468 4300 ERG 629 2340 141 118 3228 Non-Title Tenants Encroachers Squatters Sharecroppers e Wage Total holder c C c R Cearners C RC C RC C RC Training 401 188 179 153 121 103 69 90 1304 ERG 97 56 73 70 35 59 69 0 459 9.4 OCCUPATIONAL PROFILE OF THE PAPS Based on the census survey and sample field data collected by the consultant, the major occupational pattern of livelihood affected PAPs are provided in Table 9.4. The occupational pattern identified in the project districts reveals that 95 percent HHs are engaged in agriculture and allied activities in Gorakhpur district, whereas the other three affected districts account for a diverse range of activities besides agriculture and allied activities being the dominant one in the proposed bypasses. The dominant skill/traits identified in the project area were masonry, carpentry, TV repair and driving. The petty commercial activity has been confined to pan, grocery cum general store (kinari) and teashop. 9-2 J1111700000W ~ ~~~~~~~~in joint venture with '.q 0 I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~e,4 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Other petty business activities include retail shop of food items, cycle repair, grocery etc. It has been observed through survey that majority families affected would require income-generating skills as it is lacking in most affected people. In general, competence levels of people involved with various occupations are low in order to adapt source of livelihood. Table 9.4 - Eligible families for income restoration-Titleholders and Non-Titleholders District Major Occupations Agriculture and Allied Occupations Skill based Occupation Business Marketing of agricultural produce (vegetables & Tailoring, carpentry, masonry, Tea and pan stalls, snack Lucknow fruit marketing) driving, TV & tape recorder shops, dhabas, hosiery, auto repairing, pottery repair Barabanki Farming, dairy, poultry, marketing of agriculture Masonry, TV & tape recorder Grocery, tea and pan stalls, produce (vegetables & fruits) repairing, pottery snack shops, dhabas, barber Faizabad Farming, dairy, marketing of agriculture produce Masonry, auto repair, pottery Tea and pan stalls, snack shops, dhabas Farming, dairy, poultry, marketing of agriculture Tailoring, carpentry, masonry, Tea and pan stalls, snack Gorakhpur produce (vegetables & fruits) driving, TV & tape recorder shops, dhabas, barber repairing, pottery 9.4.1 Assessment of Training Needs for Eligible PAP's The emphasis under training needs assessment in two folds: first to assess the marketable/commercially exploitable ventures in and around the project area, and second to assess the existing educational/professional and other backgrounds of the entitled PAP's. The identification of resources needed to run commercially exploitable ventures and present skill levels of PAPs provided the consultant with the knowledge, which could be used in developing a comprehensive income generation plan. With these preferences, educational background, a preliminary Training Needs Assessment (TNA) was made. Further a perception survey was carried out to detenmine their prioritization of various options besides preferring/prioritizing other areas for training. However, they were guided about the educational background and related parameters required to undergo various trainings. Based on perception survey results broad areas for training along with, background of PAP's opting such preferences, were made. Considering the present occupational pattern, potential areas and need to strengthen knowledge/skills, the broad areas identified for training include: Fitting, Welding, Auto-mechanic, Pump-repair, Electrician, Motor winding, TV Repair mainly in the Lucknow -Ayodhya section. Gorakhpur Bypass section would encompass training related to Fruit Processing, Horticulture (grafting, budding etc.), Nursery raising, Mushroom Cultivation, Spice making, Operation and Management of flour mill, Tailoring etc. 9.5 TRAINING DELIVERY STRATEGY For delivery of training programs following options have been investigated and identified. They include * Government run/supported training institutions * Private trainers/ Local Experts/ entrepreneurs * Government run income generating schemes The organizations like Industrial Training Institutes (ITIs) and Krishi Vigyan Kendras (minimum one in each district) are run/supported by Government and have been explored to provide specific skill based training. ITIs in these districts are providing training on welding, fitting, auto-mechanic, electrician, motor winding etc. Whereas, KVKs are imparting training on agriculture and allied areas like mushroom cultivation, spice making, papad making etc., where women can play a major role. However, for skills like tailoring, TV repair, computer operation etc., private trainers/entrepreneurs are planned to be used. Ir inP jointventurewith9-3 in joint venture with Ag p Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Besides these, Government of India along with the State Governments is running various poverty alleviation programs through the District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) in these districts. Some of the government programs that can be explored for income restoration include Prime Minister's Rojgar Yojana, Swaranjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana, Million Wells Scheme (MWS), Integrated Rural Development Program (IRDP), Rajiv Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission and Rural Sanitation etc. Efforts would be made for the participation of PAPs in those schemes to have short-term IR gains. However, the experiences from the TNHP and GTRIP project reveal that integration/dovetailing of income restoration schemes of government with the project's income restoration program requires dedicated efforts, co-ordination and defined roles and responsibilities. With limited budget under most of these schemes with specific objectives, dovetailing of these IR schemes has been kept as an additional option with limited success potential. However, all efforts would be made by NGO and CRRO to utilize these training programs for the PAPs. 9.5.1 Income Restoration Plan The income restoration plan has been developed on the basis of the findings of the primary surveys and viewing the ground realities. In order to ensure that all PAPs are able to restore their livelihood, the activity would be entrusted to the NGO deployed in the project area, who would be responsible for developing the entire framework for implementing income restoration / economic rehabilitation of the PAPs. The guideline for developing the Plan & implementation of the economic rehabilitation schemes is provided below and in table 9.1. * The skill analysis, training needs assessment and income restoration option analysis of the PAPs would be conducted by the NGOs at the time of verification. . After the collection of the relevant data and analysis of the same the training program for the PAP would be decided based on the income generating strategies as discussed in the earlier section . The training program thus decided would be conveyed to the PAP during the public consultation meetings to be held subsequent to the verification and prior to the preparation of the micro-plans. . The training program of the individual PAP would be indicated in the micro-plan prepared by the NGOs. . After the approval of the micro-plans the trainers/ would be institutions / agencies engaged in providing training to the rural youth would be contacted for organizing the program on site. . The training groups comprising of the PAPs with similar occupation / skills / education / geographic location would be constituted. . The trainers would be selected from the agencies or locally available skills for providing the training to the PAPs. . The location for providing the training would be selected which shall be convenient for both the PAPs and the trainer to attend and has the adequate training facilities. . After the successful completion of the training program the PAPs would be motivated to form economically functional self-help groups on the basis of their interests and occupation. . The NGOs shall coordinate to establish linkages with the existing markets for carrying out the commercial activities and the local / regional / rural / cooperative banks operating in the area for the credit facilities. . The NGOs shall be responsible for carrying out the coordination activities during the entire income restoration process. * The PIU - NHAI (Project Director & the CRROs) shall be responsible for monitoring the process and implementation of the IR activities. . The NGOs shall submit the report regarding the training programs organized, SHGs formulated, skills developed and linkages established, to the Project Director. 27,00 w in joint venture with I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~41 Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acton Plan Figure 9.1 Income Restoration Plan Verification of PAPs Identification of marketable skills, IGS and Skill analysis of PAPs Training Needs Assessment - considering IGS Identifying training programs and Training organizers Formation of training groups Selection of training ................................ organizations/trainers * Training organizations like Industrial Training Institutes, Krishi Vigyan Kendras etc. operating at District level * Private Trainers; For tailoring, driving, computer Organizing training programs operation etc. * Government run trainings for income generation, Ex. Food Processing, Horticulture, Nursery raising etc. || Formation of SHGs I t Preparation and Approval of of IGS plan Developing Linkages with existing Disbursement of ERG to vulnerable PDPs markets (commercial activity) & Banks {Cradit facilitiAsl Economic rehabilitation of PAPs 7 in joint venture with"9-5 in joint venture with 04 Training Schedule S. No. Activities Agency responsible 2004 2005 2006 J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A SO0 N D 1 Appointment of NGOs NHIA 2 Verification of EPs (Census & sm'o NGO economic) & preparation of updated data 3 Skill Analysis & Training Needs Assessmient NGO a a of PAPs 4 Idenfilication of trainng programs for EPs NGO 5 Preparation of Income Restoration Plans NGO /CRRO 6 Selection of trainers NGO /CRRO U E 7 Training of PAPs NGO/ CRRO 8 Identification of IG schemes NGO- 9 Developing linkages with IG schemes NGO 10 Greivanoe Redressal GRC 11I Appointmrent of Evaluation Consultants NHAI 12 Annual Evaluation survets EC 13 Annual Evaluation Report EC 14 Final Evaluation surveys & report EC EC: Evaluation Consultants I I I I I I I I I I I ~~~~~~~~~~~~CHAPTER 10 I I COST AND BUDGET I 1 I I I I Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final Resettlement Action Plan 10 COSTS & BUDGET 10.1 INTRODUCTION The budget is indicative of outlays under various sub heads and has been calculated at the 2003 price index. The costs are based on the information collected through the socio-economic survey and census of the PAPs and from the Revenue Department and market value. Considering the existing ground level information obtained during primary verification, the data on number of families have been collected under various socio-economic categories to provide various benefits as per R&R framework. Accordingly, necessary budget provisions have been made. These costs will be updated if more number of PAPs are found during implementation and if market value of the assets being ascertained by Govt. approved valuer is more than that provided in the circle rates. Some of the features of this cost estimate are outlined below: , The agricultural land will be compensated at replacement value worked out based on the methods discussed in Chapter 7. 4 Compensation for structures will be paid at replacement value to the legal titleholder, squatters and vulnerable encroachers. 4 Provision of additional grant for severance of land and any variation in area and rates of compensation, acquisition of unviable residual land has been made ( 10% of compensation amount, as per R&R matrix. 10.2 SUMMARY OF R&R BUDGET Table 10.1 The sub-head wise provision is summarized as under (in million Rs.) SI.No Item NHAI World Bank Amount (Rs.) 1. COMPENSATION 806.356 ----- 806.356 2. ASSISTANCE 519.920 519.920 3.TRAINING 8.906 8.906 4. Support - Implementation of RAP 22.500 22.500 5. Highway Related diseases (HIV/AIDS) 1.500 1.500 6. Fees, Taxes and Other Charges 135.918 7. Contingencies 29.902 Grand Total 1525.00 10.3 VALUE OF LAND AND STRUCTURES /ASSETS 10.3.1 Compensation The compensation for land has been worked out based on the circle rates fixed by the state. These rates form the basis of the payment of stamp duty for registry of properties. The circle rates have been fixed by the District Authorities keeping in view the proximity of land to NH-28, District and Village roads as well as away from roads depending upon land use like residential, commercial, and agricultural for areas falling in urban/semi-urban and rural areas.Like wise rates given in these notifications for evaluation of structures are based on PWD, BSR Schedule Of Rates both for pucca 3 10-1 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final Resettlement Action Plan and kutcha structures. For estimation purposes average rate of Rs 3500/ sq.m. for permanent, rate of Rs 2500/ sq.m. for semi-permanent and Rs 1500/ sq.m. for temporary/ kutcha residential structures and average rate of Rs 4000/ sq.m. for permanent, rate of 3000/sq.m. for semi-permanent and Rs 1 800/sq.m. for temporary/kuchcha commercial/ residential cum commercial structures without depreciation has been adopted. Detail basis of rates for land in different stretches of the project road and that for Bypasses is given in Annexure 7.3 &7.4 showing land use break up and corresponding rates in different stretches for all the four affected districts. Provision of Rs. 1 000.00/Ha. has been made for transfer of Government land to NHAI. The absentee landlords have been treated as single man family. Loss of structures area district wise as well as total is tabulated below Table 10.2 Showing detailed Loss of Structures district wise Type of use Class of Structures and Area (Sq.m.) P(I) P (II) SP | T District Lucknow R 616 0 0 73 C 1891 42 674 10.73 Rcum C 2228 26.7 67 0 Sub Total 4735 68.7 741 83.73 District Faizabad R 1242 1601 1455 860 C 2428 512 756 148 R cum C 2788 540 440 0 Sub Total 6458 2653 2651 1008 District Barabanki R 641 559 1032 735 C 2946 1346 1623 401 R cum C 4544 292 600 12 Sub Total 8131 2197 3255 1148 District Gorakhour R 1173.07 - 242.49 68.6 C 109.95 - - R cum C 758.66 Sub Total 2041.68 242.49 68.6 Table 10.3 Abstract of Loss Structures Area (sqm) Type of use Class of Structures and Area (Sq.m.) p( I)* P (II)** SP*** T**** R 3672.07 2160 2729.49 1736.6 C 7374.95 1900 3053 559.73 R cum C 10318.66 858.7 1107 12 Total 21365.68 4918.7 6889.49 2308.33 P(I)* Permanent Structure (First Class) SP*** Semi-Permanent Structure P(II) ** Permanent Structure (Second Class) T**** Temporary/Kuchcha Structure 10.4 ASSISTANCE The circle rates fixed by the State Govt. for Lucknow-Ayodhya section and that for Ayodhya- Gorakhpur section are quite close rather in some cases even more than the prevalent market rates as ascertained during extensive field survey of PAPs as well as market rates from the local people. The circle rates are indexed every year and are quite close to replacement value. The NHAI will provide assistance for land compensation i.e. the difference the replacement cost and compensation paid by the Competent Authority. For R&R budget assistance is estimated at 30% of the total compensation amount and is summarized in Tables 10.4 &10.5. *1 10-2 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final Resettlement Action Plan _ Table 10.4 Total Compensation for acquisition of land and R&R assistance to be provided towards the land acquisition S.No. Item Area (ha) Rate / ha. Amount (in million Rs.) COMPENSATION 1. District Lucknow (For details Refer Annexure 7.3) 1.2956 100lakhs along NH-28 129.560 2.0410 36 lakhs along NH-28 73.476 1.4426 30 lakhs along NH-28 43.278 Sub Total 4.7792 246.314 2. District Barabanki (For details Refer Annexure 7.3) 2.41 16 lakhs along NH-28 3.856 1.60 20 lakhs along NH-28 3.200 66.5 10 lakhs along Barabanki Bypass 66.500 50.15 6.5 lakhs along and near to roads 32.597 38.3 4 lakhs along Ramsenhighat bypass 15.320 Sub Total 158.960 121.473 3. District Faizabad (For details 22.21 98 lakhs along NH-28 & Faizabad 217.658 Refer Annexure 7.3) Bypass Sub Total 22.21 217658000. 00 4. A. District Gorakhpur (For 138.14 8.5 lakhs for Agriculture land 117.419 details Refer Annexure 7.4) 90 5 lakhs for Agri. land prone to 45.000 9.03 Flooding 35.217 8.33 39 lakhs along NH-28 17.326 B. Cost of land under 20.8 lakhs along Nh-28 residential and commercial structures affected by and along Gorakhpur Bypass in Gorakhpur district i) Residential 0.1650 0.742 ii) Under Commercial 0.0120 45 lakhs 0.060 iii) Under residential 50 lakhs 0.415 cum commercial 0.0830 50 lakhs Sub Total 245.76 216.179 Total compensation for acquisition of land and R&R assistance 801.625 Table 10.5 Title holder And compensation, assistance &Replacement value S.No. District Total compensation of Land & Replacement Value (in million RS.) Assistance (in million RS.) Compensation (70%) Assistance (30%) 1. Lucknow 246.314 172.420 73.894 2. Barabanki 121.473 85.031 36.442 3. Faizabad 217.658 152.361 65.297 4. Gorakhpur 216.179 151.326 64.854 5. Total 801.625 561.138 240.487 10.4.1 Transitional Allowance Transitional Allowance is given to those agricultural titleholders who are being displaced (1350); whose land is becoming unviable after acquisition (5259) and to those affected whose land is viable after acquisition (2040). The period, which the PAPS will take to restore his livelihood, is taken as nine months for displaced category, nine months for PAPS whose land is becoming unviable after acquisition and three months for those whose land is viable after acquisition. Transitional allowance will also be paid to THs loosing residential (474) and commercial (863+468) land in the form of grant for nine months. NTHs- Residential squatters (144) will also get transitional allowance @ Rs.2000.00 per family lump sum. The rate of transitional allowance is Rs.2000.00 per month. 3 - 7-10-3 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final Resettlement Action Plan 10.4.2 Economic Rehabilitation Grant (ERG) The objective of the entitlement matrix is to provide support to the vulnerable families losing their primary source of income, so that they are able to restore their livelihood above the poverty level. ERG is being provided to vulnerable titleholders, whose entire land is acquired (629 nos), and to those agricultural families whose remaining land after acquisition is unviable (2340 nos) and to the vulnerable category of sharecroppers. (69nos) .The vulnerable THs loosing commercial properties (141+118) will be eligible for ERG. NTHs like tenants loosing commercial, residential cum commercial properties (97+56) are also eligible for ERG. Other NTHs like vulnerable squatters loosing commercial, commercial cum residential properties (35+59) and vulnerable encroachers loosing commercial and residential cum commercial properties (73+70) will be eligible for ERG. Rate of ERG to vulnerable project affected families will be Rs.20000.00 per family. 10.4.3 Shifting Allowance/Assistance All the residential (474) & displaced commercial and residential cum commercial (863+468) families have been provided assistance to shift their belongings and salvaged material. A lump sum shifting allowance of Rs.800.00 for temporary, Rs.1500.000 for semi-permanent and Rs.2500.00 for permanent structures both for residential and commercial will be provided. Lump sum shifting amount of Rs.800.00 is also provided to NTHs- tenants both loosing residential and commercial properties (40+401+188). Kiosks will also receive a lump sum shifting assistance of Rs.800.00. 90 nos. wage earners whose livelihood is affected due to displacement of the employer will be entitled to rehabilitation/transitional assistance of a flat sum of Rs.2000.00. NTHs-squatters loosing commercial properties are also eligible for lump sum shifting allowance/assistance. 10.4.4 Rental Allowance/Assistance NTHs families-tenants compelled to change their place of residence (40) and business/commercial (401+188) shall be given a rental allowance of Rs.2000.00 per month per family for 9 months in consideration of disruption caused. 10.4.5 Subsistence Allowance for Share Croppers As per Entitlement matrix applicable to East-West corridor, informal sharecroppers will be eligible for subsistence allowance calculated at minimum wages for 9 months i.e. Rs.75.00/day for 26 days in a month for unskilled laborers (Rs.1950.00). 10.4.6 Plots/Development of Resettlement Sites The displaced THs and non-THs loosing residential/commercial properties may opt for resettlement through plots option if available. The size of the plots will be equal to 50sqm for residential houses in rural areas and 25sqm in case of urban /semi-urban areas. Similarly for commercial shops the area would be 15sqm in rural areas in rural areas and 10sqm in urban/semi-urban areas, to vulnerable THs and for this provision has been made in the budget. Provision for development of resettlement sites (about 5ha. @ Rs. 10lakhs/ha) along with civic amenities like drinking water, internal link roads, drains and electricity along with any other amenities, which PDPs had at their abandoned places. Vulnerable THs (residential-130, vulnerable non-THs residential-221(Encroachers)+149 (Squatters) +11 (Tenants) and vulnerable THs (commercial)-141+118 and non -THs (commercial)-73+70 (encroachers), 39+59 (squatters), and 97+56 (tenants) are all eligible for plots. 10.4.7 Assistance/Compensation for Relocation of Common Properties/Community Structures Adequate provision of assistance is being made for Community properties fully affected and needing relocation like religious places, schools, Panchayat Bhawan as well as tube wells/wells etc. while 3 10-4 /iA Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final Resettlement Action Plan 0 those partially affected are being compensated for loss/impact. One kiln align Gorakhpur Bypass has been partially affected without affecting kiln labor. Compensation for trees will be based on their market value in case of timber trees and replacement cost in case of fruit bearing trees as per the rates decided by the Competent authority in consultation with Department of agriculture, Forest, Horticulture and Sericulture etc. as the case may be. However, as per District Magistrate Lucknow's Notification timber wood trees more than 5 years old should be assessed @ Rs.5000.00 per tree while those with less than 5 years age will be assessed @Rs.2500.00 per tree. Similarly, rate for fruit bearing with more than 5 years age will be Rs.4000.00 per tree while those with less than 5 years age will be Rs.2000.00 per tree. For estimation purposes we may adopt these rates. 10.5 TRAINING Training would be provided to the vulnerable titleholders in the category of Agriculture displaced and those whose land after acquisition becomes unviable (displaced 629, MEH-2340) and all the sharecroppers (69). All commercial, residential cum commercial property losers THs (863+468) as well as NTHs loosing commercial activities (tenants 401+188) would also be imparted training for up gradation of skills. Similarly a provision of Rs. 1500/- per family has been made under this head for NTHs like encroachers, (179+153) squatters (121+103) loosing commercial activities. Wage earners (90) would also be provided training for upgradation of skills. 10.6 SUPPORT Lump sum provisions under NGOs assistance for RAP Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation Consultants and Capacity Building and Strengthening of Social and R&R cells at PIU and ESDU have been made in the cost and budget. 10.7 HIGHWAY RELATED DISEASES (HIV/AID) In order to study and assess the awareness level and prevalence of HIV/AIDS in the project area L.S provision of Rs. 15 Lakhs is proposed. 10.8 FEES, TAXES AND OTHER CHARGE A provision of 10% of the total budget has been made to take care of fees/remunerations, taxes and other charges including reimbursable charges. 10.9 DISBURSEMENT OF ASSISTANCE R&R assistance will be deposited in the joint account within three months from the date of award. A joint account will be opened in the local bank. The signatories will be PAPS, CRRO and representative of the NGO. All the assistance will be paid in cheques. Apart from shifting and rental allowance the other amounts would be deposited in the joint account. The amount will be withdrawn against purchase of productive assets. In case of structures, the withdrawal will be in three installments against the progress of construction i.e. - a) Foundation, b) Walls and c) Roof. 10.10 PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION As per the law the owner will receive cheques from the district administration for the entitlement compensation. Compensation will be paid before taking possession of land, structures and other properties. 3- i10-5 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final Resettlement Action Plan 10.11 MODE OF PAYMENT To ensure transparency all payments by cheques will be made in the villages/settlements in public meetings. The district administration, the CRRO and the representatives of the NGOs will be present for the purpose. Table 10.6 presents the detailed budget for the RAP Implementation based on unit rates details in Annexure 7.3 & 7.4. The total R&R cost of the project is estimated at Rs. 1525 million. NHAI will pay for compensation, assistance component comprising of rental, shifting allowance/assistance, transitional allowance, rental allowance, and development of resettlement sites and extension of government programmes, training and support will be paid by World Bank. - ^- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~10- 6 -/fif Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final Resettlement Action Plan _ Table 10.6 Resettlement Action Plan Budget SI.No. ITEM Unit Rate Area Numbers NHAI World Bank Amount Rs/Unit (Rs.) A - COMPENSATION FOR ACQUISITION OF LAND AND ASSETS 1 Land acquisiton (For details Refer Table 10.1 & 10.2) 561137780.00 - 561137780.00 a) i) Acquisition of pnvate 3500 3672.07+2 residential structures 160= (permanent) 5832.07 20412245.00 20412245.00 ii) Acquisition of private 2500 2729.49 6823725.00 6823725.00 residential structures (semi- permanent) ii) Acquisition of private 1500 1736.60 2604900.00 2604900.00 residential structures (temporary / kuchcha) 2 b) i) Acquisition of private 0318.66+1 81829240.081829240.00 commercial /R cum C Sqm 900+858.7 structure (permanent) = 20457.31 ii) Acquisition of private commercial /R cum C 3000 3053+1107 12480000.00 structure (semi -permanent) =4160 12480000.00 iii) Acquisition of private commercial /R cum C 1800 559.73+12 structure (temporary =571.73 1029114.00 1029114.00 /Kuchcha) Acquisition of Private Boundary 3 and others-THs in Lucknow- Sq. m. 3500 9012 31542000.00 31542000.00 Ayodhya section 4 Transfer charges of Govt. Land Ha 1000 30+15.5 45500.00 45500.00 Avg. 5000+2500 1220+630+5 5 Acquisition of trees (timber wood) No. =3750020 8887500.00 8887500.00 =3750 ~~~~=2370 386+449+28 6 Acquisition of fruit bearing trees No. 5000 66 18505000.00 18505000.00 =3701 7 Tube wells /wells No. 100000 14+15 2900000.00 2900000.00 Provision for variation in area and rates of compensation, acquisition 8 of unviable residual land and 56113778.00 56113778.00 grant/compensation for severance of land @ 10% of 1 above (Rs. 561137780.00) Sub Total 806356513.00 0 806356513.00 B - ASSISTANCE | 1 Land acquisition (For details Refer Table 10.2) 240484620.00 240484620.00 Subsistence Allowance to share 2 croppers @1950/month for nine No. 17550 - 50+19=69 --- 1210950.00 1210950.00 months 3 Financial Assistance to share Ha. 30000 29.5+26.5 1680000.00 1680000.00 croppers (Informal) =56 Transitional allowance for all the Per 4 displaced families Rs.2000/- (for 9 Family 18000 1350 24300000.00 24300000.00 months) Transitional allowance for 5 agriculture THs whose land Per 18000 5259 94662000.00 94662000.00 becomes unviable after acquisition Family Rs.2000/- (for 9 months) Transitional allowance for 6 agriculture THs whose land is Per 6000 2040 12240000.00 12240000.00 viable after acquisition Rs. 2000/- Family (for 3 months) Ua 10-7 A Z A Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final Resettlement Action Plan Sl.No. ITEM Unit RsUaite Area Numbers NHAI World Bank A(mRosu)nt Transitional allowance- all 7 residential THs (for 9 months FPerl 18000 474 8532000.00 8532000.00 @Rs.2000.00/month) aml 1 Transitional allowance - all 8 commercial and R&C THs for 9 Per 18000 863+468 23958000.00 23958000.00 months Family =1331 @ Rs.2000.00/month Transitional allowance to NTHs - Per 9 residential squaKters Rs.2000.00 Family 2000 144 288000.00 288000.00 lump sum Shifting assistance/allowance- 10 all residential THs Per Variable (taking @ 474 948000.00 948000.00 @800/1500/2500 One tme lump Family Rs. 2000.00) sum Shifting assistance/allowance- all 11 commercial and R8C THs Per Variable (taking @ 863+468 2662000.00 2662000.00 @800/1500/2500 One tme lump Family Rs. 2000.00) =1331 sum Shifting assistance/allowance- NTHs-tenants loosing both Per 40+401+188 12 residential and commercial Fail 800 =629 503200.00 503200.00 properties lump sum Rs.800.00 Family -69 one time Shifting assistance/allowance-to 13 all Squatters (NTHs) commercial Per Variable (taking @ 121+103 448000.00 448000.00 @800/1500/2500 One tme lump Family Rs. 2000.00) =224 sum 14 Shifting assistance -to kiosks lump Per 800 2104 1683200.00 1683200.00 sum @ Rs.800.00 Family 15 Rehabilitation/transitional Individual 2000 90 180000.00 180000.00 assistance to wage eamers Rental allowance-NTHs all Per 40+401+188 16 residential & commercial tenants Family 18000 =629 11322000.00 11322000.00 for 9 months @Rs.2000.00/ month Plots of 50/25 sqm to residential Per 37.5x(Rs.450/sqm) 130+221+149 17 THs & non-THs vulnerable Avg. Family =16875.00 +118623125.00 8623125.00 37.5sqm =511 Plots of 15/10 sqm to vulnerable Pe 12.5x (141+118)+(73 18 THs and non-THs commercial and Family (Rs.500/sqm) +70)+(35+59)+ 4056250.00 4056250.00 R&C property losers Avg. 12.5sqm Family =6250.00 (97+56) =649 19 Development of resettlement sites Ha. 1000000 5 5000000.00 5000000.00 Economic rehabilitation grant to Vulnerable Groups comprising of 20 vulnerable displaced agricultural THs, agrcultural THs whose land after acquisition is unviable, Family 17250 629+2340+69 52405500.00 52405500.00 sharecroppers @ Rs. 17250.00 =3038 Economic rehabilitation grant for 141+118 21 vulnerable commercial and R&C =259 4467750.00 4467750.00 THs @ Rs.17250.00 Per 17250 Family j ERG to NTHs, vulnerable tenants 22 loosing commercial and R&C sites 971+536 2639250.00 2639250.00 @ Rs.17250.00 Per 17250 Family ERG to NTHs- vulnerable 23 encroachers loosing commercial Per 17250 7143 2466750.00 2466750.00 and RcumC Family 24 ERG to NTHs- vulnerable squatter Per 17250 35+59 1621500.00 1621500.00 loosing commercial and RcumC . =94 loosing Family 94 I 3 10-8 /t- Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Consolidated Final ReseKtlement Action Plan SI.No. ITEM Unit RsUante Area Numbers NHAI World Bank A(mRosu)nt A- Fully Affected Community/Common Properties a) Relocation of Religious 25 structures (temples and No. 100000 41+1(gkp.) 4200000.00 4200000.00 mosques) No. 10000 8 80000.00 80000.00 b) Mazars & Samadhis No. 125000 11 1375000.00 1375000.00 c) Schools No. 100000 2 200000.00 200000.00 d) Health facility No. 8000 414 3312300.00 3312300.00 e) Hand pumps No. 300000 11 3300000.00 3300000.00 f) Police Station/Chowki/Post No. 30000 1 30000.00 30000.00 g) Village gate No. 200000 1 200000.00 200000.00 h) Panchayat Bhawan No. 50000 9 450000.00 450000.00 i) Others B- Partially Affected Community/Common Properties a) Relocabon of Religious structures (temples and 60000.00 60000.00 mosques) No. 15000 4 50000.00 50000.00 b) Graveyard No. 25000 2 20000.00 20000.00 c) Schools No. 2000 10 70000.00 70000.00 d) Health facilities No. 10000 7 10000.00 10000.00 e) Dharamshalas No. 10000 1 120000.00 120000.00 f Other Govt. structures No. 20000 6 10000.00 10000.00 g) Nursery No. 5000 2 50000.00 50000.00 h) One kiln along Gorakhpur No. 50000 1 Bypass Sub Total 519919395.00 519919395.00 C - TRAINING 1 Training to share croppers No. 1500 69 103500.00 103500.00 2 Training to wage eamers No. 1500 90 135000.00 135000.00 Training for Economic rehabilitation to Agricultural 629+2340 3 vulnerable Titleholders (Agriculture No. 1500 =2969 4453500.00 4453500.00 THs displaced and those whose land after acquisition is unviable) 4 Training to commercial and R&C No. 1500 863+468 1996500.00 1996500.00 THs =1331 5 NTHs- tenants Training for all No. 1500 401+188 883500.00 883500.00 commercial and R&C site losers =589 Training to NTHs-Encroachers (179+153) 6 and squatters losing commercial No. 1500 + 834000.00 834000.00 3 ~~~~~activities (Commercial and (12 1+103) RcumC) =556 7 Training to staff and NGOs LS - 500000.00 500000.00 Sub Total 8906000.00 8906000.00 D - SUPPORT 1 NGO assistance for RAP LS 15000000.00 15000000.00 implementabon 2 Evaluation Consultants LS 2500000.00 2500000.00 Capacity Building and 3 strengthening of Social and R&R LS 5000000.00 5000000.00 cells at PIU and ESDU Sub Total 0 22500000.00 22500000.00 E-Highway Related Disease L 500.0 10000 (HIVIAIDS) LS 150000000 1500000.00 Sub Total 0 1500000.00 1500000.00 TOTAL - 1359181908.00 F-Fees, taxes and other Charges 10% of the total . -- 135918190.00 TOTAL with Fees and Taxes etc. ---- 1495100098.00 G- contingencies @ 2% of the 29902002.00 Total 1525002100 GRAND TOTAL say Rs.15250 lakhs, 1525 million 3 yt - ~- ~--- -~-~:-l'o-9~:; -- - --D I I I I I I I I I I I CHAPTER 11 I I I MONITORING EVALUATION AND REPORTING I I I I I I Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass I Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan * I I MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING 11.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE PROJECT AREA Monitoring and Evaluation are critical activities in assessing the extent of achievements of resettlement objectives. While monitoring involves periodic checking of planned activities and provides midway inputs, facilitates changes if necessary and provides feedback for project management to keep the program on schedule, evaluation on the other hand assesses the resettlement efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability, drawing lessons to guide future resettlement planning. This section provides an insight into the Internal Monitoring and Periodic Monitoring, which would be carried out by the PIU/NHAI by developing suitable indicators. Internal Monitoring of project activities would mainly encompass physical and financial monitoring besides assessing the initial project impacts on social issues. The Project Evaluation would be carried out by an external agency that would be engaged in carrying out the evaluation of the implementation of the RAP. 11.2 INTERNAL MONITORING OF PROJECT ACTIVITIES The RAP implementation would be internally monitored by the ESDU at Head Quarters and the PIU through CRROs. Monitoring would be continuous and for a period of 36 months for both the consultancy package. The internal monitoring process would provide vital inputs to undertake appropriate actions for better performance of the R and R activities. The formats for monitoring developed by the NHAI for similar kind of projects would be used for monitoring of project activities for this project as well. The main agency for project monitoring the- PIU would ensure that RAP implementing agency complies with the deadlines fixed for the construction activities and the disbursement of the funds as compensation and or/ assistance to the PAPs and the implementing agency. The PIU would be responsible for the timely progress monitoring of the land acquisition. The PIU would collect information on all components related to implementation of R&R activities from the project site with the help of the NGOs. The information would then be screened and sent to NHAI Head Office. This exercise would help NHAI in strengthening work schedule to achieve the targets. In addition, the internal monitoring would aid NHAI in making changes in work program wherever necessary, in case of delays or problems. The sample formats for monitoring of activities related to RAP has been prepared (Refer Annexure 11.1), which indicates possible ways to monitor receipt of entitlements by the PAPs and community entitlements. It also provides formats for preparing monthly summary and cumulative reports by the NGOs and GRCs. The R&R cell would be responsible for compilation of all the reports available from the different sources in order to form an overview of the implementation of the RAP and undertake necessary remedial actions of the perceived emerging problems through issuance of instructions to the concerned NGOs and the GRCs. Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 11.3 COMPONENTS OF INTERNAL MONITORING The components of monitoring include performance monitoring and impact monitoring. The two broad categories of indicators, which would be monitored during the project include: . Input and output Monitoring Indicators Input and Output Monitoring Indicators relate to the physical progress of the works and include such items as extent of LA and compensation paid, number of families displaced and resettled, extent of government land identified and allotted to the PAFs, other R&R assistance extended and the related financial aspects. Monitoring of project inputs and output would be carried out by the implementing agency. Thus, financial, physical, social development indicators and participation indicators would be monitored in order to know the progress and effectiveness of the project. The details of items to be monitored under different categories, research tools to measure the indicators and the resultant output have been provided in Table 11.1. The input and output indicators would be carried out by the implementing agency through R and R Cell and NGOs. Table 11.1 - Monitoring input and output indicators of project A Physical Progress Methodology Output 1 Total land acquired Structured Schedule Compensation 2 Number of EPs whose land was acquired Structured Schedule Compensation 3 Number of EPs residential structures affected Structured Schedule Compensation and assistance 4 Number of PAFs residential structure acquired and Structured Schedule Compensation and assistance demolished 5 Number of EPs commercial structure acquired and Structured Schedule Compensation and assistance demolished 6 Number of EPs allotted agricultural land Structured Schedule Compensation and assistance 7 Number of EPs allotted residential plot Structured Schedule Compensation and assistance 8 Number of EPs allotted commercial plot Structured Schedule Compensation and assistance 9 Total area of agricultural land allotted Structured Schedule Rehabilitation 10 Total area of residential land allotted Structured Schedule Rehabilitation 11 Total area of commercial land allotted Structured Schedule Rehabilitation 12 Total area of community land transferred for the road and Structured Schedule Rehabilitation resettlement sites 13 Type & number of community infrastructure relocated Structured Schedule Rehabilitation 14 Number of EPs received Productive asset grant (agriculture) Structured Schedule Economic rehabilitation 15 Number of EPs received Productive asset grant (business) Structured Schedule Economic rehabilitation 16 Number of EPs received House construction grant Structured Schedule Shelter 17 Number of EPs received Tranistional allowance Structured Schedule Economic rehabilitation 18 Number of EPs received Economic rehabilitation grant Structured Schedule Economic rehabilitation 19 Number of EPs received shifting allowance Structured Schedule Economic rehabilitation 20 Number of EPs received rental allowance Structured Schedule Economic rehabilitation B Financial progress Methodology Output 1 Amount disbursed for land compensation Structured schedule Compensation 2 Amount disbursed for structure Compensation Structured schedule Compensation 3 Amount disbursed for acquisition of wells Structured schedule Compensation 4 Amount disbursed for acquisition of trees Structured schedule Compensation 5 Amount disbursed for Producive asset grant ( agriculture) Structured schedule Assistance 6 Amount disbursed for Productive asset grant ( business) Structured schedule Assistance 7 Amount disbursed for House construction grant Structured schedule Assistance 8 Amount disbursed for Transitional allowance Structured schedule Assistance 9 Amount disbursed for Economic rehabilitation grant Structured schedule Assistance 10 Amount disbursed for rent Structured schedule Assistance 11 Amount of shifting assistance Structured schedule Magnitude of displacement 12 Amount for Restoration of Common Property Resources Core rapid appraisal Magnitude of impact 13 Amounts disbursement for assistance to tenants Structured schedule Magnitude of tenants affected 14 Amounts disbursed for community Infrastructure Core rapid appraisal Community welfare 1 _ ~J_ 11-2 00ZA Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated ResetUlement Action Plan 15 Amounts disbursed for conservation of religious structures Structured schedule Community welfare 16 Amount required for extension of Programmes Structured schedule Income restoration 17 Amount paid towards training & capacity building Structured schedule Better implementation & Co ordination 18 Fee paid to M&E Agency Structured schedule Monitoring cost 19 Fee paid to NGO for public consultation Core rapid appraisal Community perception 20 Fee paid to NGO for implementation Core rapid appraisal Implementation cost C Social Development Methodology Output 1 Consumption pattern Structured schedule Economic well being 2 Occupational pattem Structured schedule Diversified opportunities available 3 Status of health Structured schedule Improved health 4 Number of EPs brought above the BPL Structured schedule Poverty alleviation 5 Literacy Structured schedule Access to education 6 Time-disposition of women Structured schedule Increased productivity 7 Decision making by women Structured schedule Improved status 8 Drinking water Structured schedule Basic needs met 9 Schools Structured schedule Increased facilities 10 Health centres Structured schedule Increased facilities 11 Community infrastructure Structured schedule Community development C Participation Methodology Output 1 Number of meetings for dissemination of information on R & Structured schedule Awareness about the project R 2 Number of meetings with each EP to finalise their option for Structured schedule Informed choice of selection R&R 3 Number of EPs approach the Grievance redress committee Structured schedule Participation 4 Number of EPs participated in District level committee Structured schedule Decision making by the EPs 5 Selection of resettlement sites Structured schedule Decision making by the EPs 6 Number of EPs self-relocated Structured schedule Decreased dependency on the project 7 Number of women Eps decide the relocation site Structured schedule Minimise impact on women 8 Number of women EPs gainfully employed. Structured schedule Increased opportunity for women 9 Number of EPs move the court Structured schedule Implementation of project within the time frame 10 Total area, number of structures and EPs saved from Structured schedule Minimising negative social impact negative impact during implementation 11.4 COMPONENTS OF EXTERNAL EVALUATION Process, Outcome and Impact Evaluation Indicators relate to overall project objectives as stated in the entitlement framework. An external agency would be appointed by the ESDU, NHAI to evaluate R&R programs annual, mid-term and end-term. Thus the external agency would undertake evaluation at least thrice during the project period, which would provide the necessary guidance and inputs for any changes to be made to the RAP. It would provide a comprehensive assessment, whether the project objectives are being achieved. The key objective of the project entails restoration and improvement of affected people's income and quality of life. a) Process indicators would include project inputs, expenditures, staff deployments, etc.; b) Output indicators would include results in terms of numbers of affected persons compensated and resettled, incomes restored, additional assistance provided etc; and c) Impact indicators would relate to the long-term effect of the project on people's living in the project- affected area. The impact indicators assist in measuring the qualitative impact of the project in terms of changes in the lives of the people qualitatively. Thus the impact indicators relate to the overall project objectives as per the entitlement framework. These indicators would be evaluated using qualitative and quantitative techniques. The effectiveness of the project would be evaluated with respect to the following broad categories of indicators, Indicators of physical achievement; _.J _W 11-3 , Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan * Indicators of financial achievement; * Indicators of social development; and, * Indicators of Participation. The overall evaluation of the R&R components would be carried out with the help of various indicators. These indicators would enable the Evaluation consultants to measure the progress, understand the problems and issues and find solutions. The tables below explain the method of measuring the indicators under different heads, facilitating output monitoring. Table 11.2 Evaluation Framework for Physical Achievement S. No. Indicator for Physical Achievement 1. Agricultural land acquisition details 2. Residential land acquisition Details 3. Commercial land acquisition Details 4. Total area of community land transferred for the bypass and resettlement site. 5. Number of PAFs whose land has been acquired 6. Number of PAFs where residential structures have been affected. 7. Number of PAFs where residential structures have been acquired & demolished. 8. Number of Commercial Structures acquired & demolished. 9. Number of PAFs allotted agricultural land 10. Number of PAFs allotted residential plots 11. Number of PAFs allotted commercial plots 12. Total area of agricultural land allotted 13. Total area of residential land allotted 14. Total area of Commercial land allotted 15 Type & number of community infrastructure relocated 16 Number of EPs who received productive asset grant (Agriculture) 17 Number of EPs who received productive asset grant (Business) 18 Number of EPs who received House construction grant 19 Number of EPs who received Transibonal Allowance 20 Number of EPs who received Economic Rehabilitation grant 21 Number of EPs who received shifting allowance 22 Number of EPs who received Rental Allowance Table 11.3 Evaluation Framework for Financial Achievements S. No. Indicator for Financial Achievement 1. Amount disbursed for payment of compensation (Commercial & Residential) 2. Amount disbursed for structure compensabon 3. Amount disbursed for acquisition of wells, irrigation units 4. Amount disbursed for trees 5. Amount disbursed for productive asset grant (business) 6. Amount disbursed for productive asset grant (agriculture) 7. Amount disbursed for House construction grant 8. Amount disbursed for Transitional Allowance 9. Amount disbursed for Economic Rehabilitation grant 10. Amount disbursed for Rent 11. Amount for Shifting Assistance 12. Amount for Restorabon of Common Property Resources 13. Amount disbursed for assistance to Share Croppers 14. Amount disbursed for community infrastructure 15. Amount disbursed for conservation of Temples 16. Amount required for extension of programs (IEC) 17. Amount paid for training & capacity building 18. Fee paid for Evaluation Agency 19. Fee paid to NGOs for RAP implementation I_ _'lw 11-4 1 Independent Review and Consolidaton of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 11.4 Evaluation Framework for Social Impact Assessment S. No. Indicator for Social Progress 1. Consumption Pattern 2. Occupational Pattem 3. Number of EPs brought above the poverty line 4. Literacy 5. Time availability of Women 6. Decision making by women 7. Drinking Water 8. Schools 9. Health centers 10. Internal Roads 11. Electricity Table 11.5 Evaluation Framework for Participation S.No. Indicator for Participation of stakeholders 1. Number of meetings for information dissemination on R&R 2. Number of meetings with each EP to finalize their options for R&R 3. Number of EPs approaching the Grievance Redressal Committee 4. Number of EPs participated at District Level Committee 5. Selection of Resettlement Sites 6. Number of EPs self relocated 7. Number of Women EPs who chose the relocation site 8. Number of women gainfully employed 9. Number of EPs moved to the court 10. Total areas, number of structures and EPs saved from negative impact during implementation. 11.5 EVALUATING THE PROJECT ACTIVITIES The project has to be evaluated against the objectives of the project, through (a) performance indicators, and (b) impact indicators. These indicators form important tools in assessing the progress targeted in the RAP and their achievements. External evaluation would provide a clearer insight into the progress, indicating, whether or not, the project objectives have been achieved. Given the objectives of the project, the R&R activities of the project have to be evaluated in the following terms. I Physical targets set and achievements made within the prescribed time frame: This would help in identifying the reason for delay in the implementation process. * Budgetary allocations made and actual expenditure made: This assessment would help in identifying issues related to financial management * Perception of EPs about the RAP: This would evaluate the perception of PAPs about the various aspects of RAP including the implementation procedure adopted. 11.6 MEASURING CHANGES IN THE QUALITY OF LIFE The rationale behind preparing a comprehensive RAP has been to restore/improve the standard of living of PAPs as compared to pre-project standard of living. The terms "standard of living" and "quality of life" have been often used interchangeably. However, the term 'quality of life' is somewhat more comprehensive in meaning than the word 'standard of living'. Quality of life is a more holistic way of looking at the well being of a person whereas standard of living has more to do with income level of a person. Considering that the ultimate aim of the RAP would be to improve the quality of life of the target groups, it's important that efforts should be made to assess the changes brought about by the project. I J" _ 11-5 , w Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Quality of life includes combination of both objective factors and subjective perception about those objective conditions. Objective conditions are the artifacts, which can be easily measured numerically. But the subjective perceptions, which are qualitative in nature, are difficult to measure. An approach of assigning weights (to different indicators) and scales (to different perceptions) may be adopted by the external evaluation agencies for subjective evaluation to arrive at the quality of life index. An illustrative list of indicators, which may be considered for assessing the objective as well as the subjective quality of life indices are given in Table 11.6. This does not undermine the other indicators of achievement. However, these are most important in the sense that the physical and financial progress does not necessarily show the effectiveness and the extent of participatory methods undertaken during the implementation of the RAP. Table 11.6 Indicators for Assessing Changes in the Quality of Life Objective Indicators Subjective Indicators % of families below poverty line Income % of SC households below poverty line Families income, personal income % of ST household below poverty line Availability of Income opportunity, Formal, and informal income, % WHF of household below poverty line Primary and Secondary income. % of families squatting Employment % of change in employment rate Present employment Security of employment % of families living in pucca houses House % of houses with separate kitchen Condition of house, size of house % of houses with water connection Location of house % of houses with power connection Food % of houses with toilet facility Quality of food, Nutrition intake Family assets ownership in % Clothing Television, Tape Recorder, Radio Share of income spent on clothing Cycle, Hand-cards, Animal-carts, Two wheelers, Three Satisfacion with which clothes worn wheelers Water Supply Cooking gas, Refrigerator Source of water supply Sanitary Condition in the Vicinity of House Sanitation Sanitary Condition in the area Sanitary condition in the Vicinity of House Fuel and Energy Fuel Availability, Expense on Fuel Availability of Regular Electric Supply Access to Market Accessibility to Market, condition after Project (Physical), Market condition after Project (business) Transportation Condition of Road Safety for pedestrian and other road users Environment Air Quality Dust Noise 11.7 REPORTING The external evaluation agency would submit one annual evaluation, one mid term report and one end of the project evaluation reports to the NHAI. The reports would contain all the data/information collected and their critical analysis. It is expected from the agency that it would make a comparative analysis of pre- project and post-project socio-economic conditions of the PAPs. If the external evaluation agency finds shortcoming or flaws in the existing plan of action, the agency should suggest specific recommendations. The Internal monitoring reports would be compiled within twenty days (20 days) and at the end of each month, it would be the responsibility of the NGO to ensure that each PAP, whether an individual, a household, or a community receives the entitlement due to them. I.," IOOW 11-6 -#1Z7Ar Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan ".' 11.8 INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM An external agency independent of the project or a local panel of experts with prior experience in rehabilitation/resettlement or other social development programme would be engaged to carry out the evaluation of the implementation of the RAP. This external agency / local panel of experts would carry out the evaluation at least thrice during the life of the project. The first evaluation would be an annual evaluation, and would take place after the PAFs have been displaced from the ROW. Any problems encountered would be assessed and necessary changes would be recommended to the NHAI headquarters for consideration. This would ensure that these issues do not linger throughout the life of the project. The other evaluation would include the mid term evaluation report and an end term evaluation report at the end of the project period. 11.9 THEMATIC AND OTHER RELATED STUDIES In the course of RAP implementation, it's likely that unexpected issues, obstacles and snags would be encountered. The M & E component would therefore have capacity to rapidly deploy problem solving action oriented research in support of corrective action by implementers. Provisions for specific research and studies would be included in the M & E budget. Among thematic topics that may be typically encountered in R & R programs include the following: * Road side natural resources management * Road Safety Issues * Gender and Child issues in adaptation to relocation and resettlement * Housing and settlement pattern * Causes and extent of indebtedness and resource lost * Participation of local community in minimising the negative impact during implementation and in the decision making process to make informed choice. * Impact of the development oriented R & R approach on the poor. ,J _ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~11-7 < !I I I I I I I I .I I II ,I f ~~~~~~~~~~~~CHAPTER 12 I II i11 I ~~~~~~~~~~HIGHWAY RELATED DISEASES ij I i I Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettement Action Plan 0 A 12 HIGHWAY RELATED DISEASES 12.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF ASSESSING HIV/AIDS HEALTH RISKS Highway often acts as means of spreading HIV/AIDS disease with commercial sex workers in red light areas along the highways and the truckers plying in that particular section. The findings of the demographic survey of truck drivers carried out in India revealed that 84 percent of the interviewees were suffering from sexually transmitted disease (STD), out of which 94 percent of the infected truck drivers had regularly visited sex workers during the previous year. (NACO, 2001) It has been estimated that road transport amounts to 70% of the total transportation in the country and the number of mobile persons engaged in road transportation comprises nearly 5 million truck drivers and their helpers/assistants. These people are often accused of spreading HIV/AIDS and STDS (Sexually Transmitted Diseases) and their sex partners in most cases the commercial sex workers (CSW) also act as key agents for spreading such diseases. Thus, the need to address the spread of highway diseases and taking necessary action in controlling the spread of such diseases involving the truckers and the CSWs requires a strategic action oriented programme in the project area. The present section provides an insight into the prevailing HIV health risks in the project area and potential hot spots for spread of this disease in the Lucknow-Ayodhya stretch NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass section. It also throws light on the various preventive measures for spread of this disease and suggests mechanisms for creating community awareness of the issues related to this disease. Further, to give a more practical approach a comprehensive action plan has also been prepared for the project area. (Table 11.3). 12.2 HIV /AIDS AND HEALTH RISKS IN THE PROJECT AREA The Lucknow-Ayodhya section forming a part of the NH-28 section has been envisaged as a major generator of economic development in the region. As this road section passes through the important districts of Lucknow, Barabanki and Faizabad in the state of Uttar Pradesh, the widening/strengthening of the highway would certainly change the panorama of economic activities in this region. The changes in the socio-economic activities of the near by settlements would generate a conducive environment for mixing population, which may lead to spread of HIV/AIDS and other communicable diseases among the rural community. The Gorakhpur Bypass alignment on the other hand traversing mainly through agricultural fields would be exposed to sudden high volume traffic movement and would require substantial studies and comprehensive baseline surveys to assess the exact level of the knowledge & magnitude of this disease along the project alignment. Viewing the complexity of the spread of HIV /AIDS and in absence of any models to predict the increase in propensity of HIV infection, it may be assumed that as the intensity of traffic on highway increases the disease may spread at a faster rate. In the process of carrying out the social studies, the consultant has also conducted surveys at several locations to assess the level of awareness about HIV/AIDs. These surveys were carried out at two levels i.e: * Location Specific level. * Rural Settlement level. 12-1 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Acion Plan The main target groups in the highway sector mainly include villagers, truckers and commercial sex workers and people directly impacted from the project. The social surveys were mainly conducted to assess the awareness level of the people about HIV/Aids. The basic objectives of these surveys are given below. 12.3 THE MAIN OBJECTIVES OF THE SURVEYS * To assess the level of awareness among the stakeholders. I To assess the nature of sexual practise prevailing among the target groups. * Information on sexual networking. * To identify different types of sex workers working in the area. I To examine the awareness levels on HIV/AIDS among the truckers. * Present availability of health services addressing STD diagnosis and treatment and their perceived accessibility and appropriateness. 12.4 THE PROCESS FOR ASSESSING HIV/AIDS DISEASE IN THE PROJECT AREA The present study has been carried out on a rapid assessment basis so as to assess the prevalence of existing pattern of HIV/AIDs in the project area. The study also endeavoured to assess the STD/HIV vulnerability of different population groups at specific locations of the project corridor. As the study has been carried out as rapid assessment, the study brings to light the emerging issues related to the spread of disease in different sections of the society and suggests mitigative measures that need to be adopted for addressing the target groups. This further helped the consultant in preparing a sustainable implementation schedule wherein highlighting the roles and responsibilities of the different agencies for better implementation. The methodology and key findings for the area specific and village surveys has been discussed below: 12.4.1 LOCATION SPECIFIC STUDY IN THE PROJECT AREA The purpose of area specific study for the Lucknow Ayodhya section-NH-28 has been carried out at three critical junctures, one being near the starting point of the project corridor (Chihat at Km 9.00), second being near the exit point at Mirzapur (Km 122). The other critical locations that have been specially selected comprise the Dhabas, eating joints and rest places which are identified as potential hot spots for the target groups like truckers and the commercial sex workers. Table 12.1 Location Specific Survey for assessing the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in NH-28 section Numbe of tucke No. f trukers No. Of group Date Survey points (route name) sumveyed in 24tcrs No. Of truckers discussion in the route October 2003 Chinhat Tiraha K.M.9.00 250 180 04 October 2003 Rasauli K.M.32.00, End of 180 155 06 I ~ ~~~~~~~~Barabanki bypass October 2003 Kotwa Sarak K.M.57.00 165 140 08 October 2003 Bhelsar K.M.86.00 170 153 05 October 2003 Mirzapur K.M.122.00, 102108 Near starting of Faizabad Bypass 140 121 Total 905 749 31 Source: Primary Survey, 2003 *a _ 12-2 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya secion on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan The area specific study mainly carried out at various points at Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 were: * Near the entry point of the project corridor Chinhat Tiraha Km.9.00 * Near starting of Faizabad Bypass - Mirzapur Km 122.00, I At Kotwa Sarak at Km 57.00, which is a very congested road stretch with hub of commercial activities, dhabas, eating joints, rest houses etc * At Bhelsar at Km 86.00 which is a very congested road stretch with hub of commercial activities, dhabas, eating joints, rest houses etc On the other hand the location specific survey for Gorakhpur Bypass was also carried out on the similar lines. The survey points taken were at the starting point of the Bypass at Kaleshwar and at all the critical road crossings where the bypass crosses the MDR 49, SH-1 bypass, Nh-28 and SHI bypass and at end point at Koni & Jadishpur where the new alignment meets the settlements at NH- 28. Table 12.2 Location Specific Survey for assessing the prevalence of HIV/AIDS in Gorakhpur-Bypass section Number of truckers No. of truckers No. Of group Date Survey points (route name) duses in truckers responded theuron e surveyed in 24hrs. responded the r-oute December 2003 Kaleswar 125 90 08 December 2003 Haraiya chungi 90 70 04 December 2003 Khanipur chauraha 110 85 06 December 2003 Khanipur chauraha 130 95 04 December 2003 Domindarh & lahasadi 140 109 06 January 2004 Ramgarh tal & siktaur 120 96 04 January 2004 Khorabarurfsuabazar 80 55 03 January 2004 Koni & Jagdishpur 140 115 05 Total 935 715 40 Source: Prirnary Survey, 2003 -04 The area specific study at Gorakhpur Bypass was mainly carried out at various points namely: * Kaleswar (starting point of new bypass) * Haraiya chungi (starting point of MDR.49 on existing NH.28) * Khanipur chauraha (crossing of new alignment with MDR.49) * Khanipur chauraha (crossing of new alignment with MDR.49) * Domindarh & lahasadi (villages coming on proposed bypass on both side of Ring dam road) * Ramgarh tal & siktaur (villages coming on crossing of new alignment and S.H.1 Bypass * Khorabar urf suabazar (Crossing of existing N.H.28 & S.H.1) * Koni & Jagdishpur (end point of proposed bypass & meeting settlement at existing NH.28) The two main methods adopted for assessing the HIV /AIDS impact in these locations were through questionnaires and discussions. However the surveys for location specific survey have been mainly limited to the truckers who form a considerable percentage in spreading this disease in the highway sector. The total percentage of respondent (truckers) was around 79.5 percent and the number of discussions held was around 71. The informal discussions were carried out in different places near the survey points with the truckers and their attendants. The aim of these discussions were to generate * 12-3 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan ! information pertaining to knowledge, sexual practice and preparation attitude about STD/HIV, health seeking behaviour, and access to health facilities Area specific findings During the survey it was found that 60 percent of the truckers were involved in sexual practices with the commercial sex workers, out of which 50% were aware of symptoms on STDs. Two types of sex workers were identified in the project area belonging to the fixed and flying category. However, flying sex workers mainly dominate the project stretch who board the trucks and travel along with the truckers and get dropped at nearby places/cities. * Prolonged absence from home was identified as the primary cause to seek commercial sex on highways. I Truckers informed that they were not aware of good/ accessible treatment facilities. * In Gorakhpur Bypass Stretch the poor girls from Indo-Nepal border indulged in such activities and were mainly flying sex workers. 12.4.2 Village Level Survey In addition to the studies conducted above, the discussions were conducted at village level with the men and women to assess their level of awareness on HIV/AIDS and solicit suggestions for prevention and spread of diseases. These discussions were carried out in different places near the survey points with the truckers and their attendants. The aim of the discussions was to generate information pertaining to knowledge, sexual practice and preparation attitude about STD/HIV, health seeking behaviour, and access to health facilities. It has been observed that in Lucknow-Ayodhya section there were no fixed red light area/pockets, only few points (Dhabas) on highway where some CSWs of nearby villages were involved. The village level survey in few important settlements revealed the following: Near Faizabad-Ayodhya: There were no CSWs in these settlements and the consultation with people revealed that these kinds of activities were looked down upon due to the proximity of the holy city of Ayodhya and its influence over the communities in this section. The truckers also opposed these types of activities in this particular area and found these activities unethical. Sarthara Village: (Starting settlement of new Barabanki Bypass, near Safedabad village on N.H.28). There were some Mujarawalis (Dancers) found and who were engaged in commercial sexual activities. Darapur Village: (Near Barabanki-Haidergar connecting Road) No fixed red light area was identified here, and majority of villagers were not aware HIV/AI!DS and other sexual transmitted diseases. The survey in Kashipur Village revealed (Starting point of Ramsanehighat bypass near Ramsanehighat/Bhitaria town), absence of CSWs activity in this village. Asraf Gangraila & Ranimau: There were some eating joints identified where CSWs activity was being carried out. It was revealed that maximum CSWs were flying types who were less aware of the HIV/AIDS and sexual transmitted diseases. The village level observations in the Gorakhpur bypass section revealed the following: Kaleshwar village: There were no fixed hot spot identified for conmmercial sex activities and were no cases of HIV/AIDS case registered earlier. The outcome of the surveys of the truckers near this section brought to light that there were some flying commercial sex workers on the highway section wherein the migrated girls from Nepal due to their financial crisis indulged in such activities. _ JI ~12-4 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated ResetUlement Action Plan 04 Ramgarh Tal & Siktaur (villages coming on crossing of new alignment and S.H.1 Bypass) The villages did not reflect any cases of HIV/AIDS though there are few cases of flying commercial sex workers reported here. Khorabar urf suabazar: (Crossing of existing N.H.28 & S.H.1) The survey revealed that due to financial burdens and unemployment, poor girls from Sonauli (Border of India & Nepal) indulged in commercial activities in this corridor though there have been no fixed spots identified for their activities. However the main purpose of these poor girls were to migrate to Gorakhpur city (red light are near the railway station) for earning higher income. Village level findings 1 Majority of the villagers were aware of the existence of red light areas but were not aware of sexually transmitted diseases. * Majority of villagers had not heard of the disease like AIDS, HIV etc. I The villagers felt the need of mass-scale awareness campaign on HIV/AIDS during the construction of the bypass. * People reported that there were no known cases of people suffering from HIV/AIDS only in one or two villages the youth had suffered and died from AJDs. * Two types of sex workers were identified: fixed sex workers & flying sex workers, wherein flying sex-workers accounted for higher share. 12.5 OBSERVATIONS AND DISCUSSIONS The interactions with the truckers revealed a very low awareness level related to HIV /AIDS, even though a considerable amount of them (70 percent) have been engaged in sexual practices. The truckers face professional and social degradation and are stigmatised for living a sexually promiscuous life style. They seem to prefer to have sexual relationship, irrespective of age and marital status. The female sex workers working around the NH-28 sector were generally mobile and came from roadside villages, indulging in this practice due to their poor socio-economic conditions. On the whole the apathy of poor socio-economic conditions of the rural masses, low literacy and awareness level, uncertainty factors and risks involved in highway section have been main contributors in spreading of the disease in the project area. Poor medical facilities, sub standard blood banks on the highway and apathy of the health providers compel them to seek improper treatment for STD. The other fatal disease was that of polluted drinking water, which was causing health hazard like Hepatitis and large number of persons suffering from intestinal and liver infections were also traced. 12.6 RECOMMENDATIONS AND MEASURES FOR AWARENESS GENERATION Since, the spread of highway disease has become one of the most growing concerns by policy makers, planners and bureaucrats, the government intervention in the entire process would play a very important role in controlling the spread of such fatal diseases. Some of the basic measures that may be adopted to mitigate such disease in the project area include: Health surveys: are important to make an inventory of the status of health of the migratory men (truckers and their assistants) and people along the project corridor. Settlements falling under the impact zone of the project corridor, especially those designated as resting areas should be surveyed to understand the nature and occurrence of diseases. Patients of STD/AIDS etc. should be re-surveyed to find out the cause of contamination. Analysing all these information, strategies could be developed to take further steps in controlling the spread of highway diseases. 3_ ~7~ W12-5 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan 0 ! KABP (Knowledge, Attitude, Behavior and Practice) survey: needs to be conducted as it provides an insight into various dimensions in which people look at the problem. It also helps in understanding the dos, don't and the taboos associated with a subject like STD/HIV/AIDS. This understanding helps in formulating behavior change communication materials. An effective strategy would be to incorporate various awareness generation programmes within the existing government programmes of mother and childcare through primary health care centers. Awareness Campaigns: The awareness generation should incorporate more of audiovisual mediums and local art and modes of entertainment for spreading the message. This is important, as most of the target audience may not be literate. Mediums like 'nautanki', the local theatre and 'puppet shows' in the local language are generally very popular among the villagers. Also messages on the radio through the local 'Akash Vani' center will reach out to a larger population. Special messages against alcoholism and against discrimination towards the girl child should also be featured in the 'nautanki' and 'puppet shows'. Apart from these, a very popular form of entertainment in the North, is the 'bioscope', or what is popularly known as 'video halls'. Screening of small films on HIV/AIDS at the beginning of each show could be effective as the young population generally gather around the video halls. Various festivals and fairs held during these times should also be targeted for dissemination of information. Other measures like Signage/Hoardings, Vehicle stickers and Condom vending machines are also few significant measures. Provisions of Health Facilities And Services: There should be provision of health facilities and services where the patients can avail of treatment and get cured. Strict measures should be taken to maintain the secrecy of the patients who are afraid of ex-communication, if exposed. * Early diagnosis and effective treatment of STDs should be considered as an important strategy, not only for controlling STDS, but also for preventing HIV/AIDS. * Vulnerable communities should be provided with free treatment facilities through the health centres and hospitals. * Ambulatory health units may be employed to treat patients along the corridor especially where health centres are not present in the vicinity. Moreover some may prefer to seek the help of mobile clinics/ health units for services related to STDs owing to the fear of being identified for such treatment at static locations, * Patients should be handled with care and comfort and they be assured about the confidentiality of the treatment they are undergoing. * Enlisting of commercial sex workers at resting areas along the project corridor is required to I be made to know the number of persons engaged in commercial sex. This is essential for monitoring the cases of occurrence of infection among them, cases of treatment undertaken and progress thereof, cases of HIV/AIDS among CSWS, etc. These CSWs should be provided with health care services and certified with their status of health after regular check-ups. Other measures: * Developing appropriate and sensitive behaviour change communication materials like posters, songs and plays for telecast over radio. * Organizing camps for awareness generation about the diseases and knowledge about controlling the spread of such diseases * Making available training program for the health workers of the villages on STD/ HIV/AIDS * Providing for better medical services at the grass root through either increased support to existing health centers or developing mobile health units, under government responsibility. * Conducting health surveys along the corridor to find out the nature of spread of these diseases. I , _ 12-6 Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan - 12.7 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT & CO-ORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Since HIV/AIDS has been attaining the epidemic proportion in the many countries across the world and India being one of the most vulnerable nations, the Government of India without wasting time initiated steps and started pilot screening of high risks population. At the National Level, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare constituted a National AIDS Committee comprising representatives from various sectors with a view to bring together various stakeholders at a common platform in addressing the issue of HIV/AIDS. At the State level, an empowered committee has been constituted by the States either under the chairmanship of chief secretary or additional chief secretary at par with the National AIDS control board at the centre level. This committee has been responsible for taking policy decisions for implementing HIV/AIDS control programme in respective states and approve administrative and financial actions. Infact viewing the complexities of the committees, the State AIDS control societies was later created with its members representing from various ministries and Non governmental organizations. The success stories of these societies in Tamil Nadu, led to the Government of India to advise other states to follow the similar pattern of implementation of the National AIDS Control programme. In line with the above, the State AIDS Control society in the project area would also play a pivotal role in determining the HIV/AIDS control and awareness programme. However an intersect oral collaboration needs to be initiated in the areas identified as Transport Health, Reproductive and Child Health Programmes and National AIDS control programme II (NACP) in the major World Bank funded projects. Once the initiative is mobilized at the Donor Agency level, the top down approach of percolation of initiatives and networking from the National, State, District to Block level in project area corridors will be lot more smoother. With the transport sector playing an important role in transmitting HIV/AIDS, Ministry of Road and Highways (MoRT&H) in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare must play an important role in implementing the guidelines laid down under the NACP-II as well as incorporating new focus areas related to control HIV/AIDS in the transport sector. The National Highways Authority of India at the State and PIU level in collaboration with the State AIDS control societies of Uttar Pradesh, Department of Health and Family Welfare, other stakeholders like NGOs and Contractors should work towards effective implementation of HIV /AIDS intervention programmes. The proposed action plan for conducting various activities related to awareness generation and control of HIV/AIDS has been provided in the ensuing tables. 12-7 - - - m m m m m m Independent Review and Consolidation of EIA, EMP & RAP for Lucknow-Ayodhya section on NH-28 and Gorakhpur Bypass Draft Final Consolidated Resettlement Action Plan Table 12.3 Plan for Awareness Campaign Prevention of STD 'AIDs in the Project Area Project Location Action Theme Target group Action Components Implementation Counterpart Overseeing Source of Funding Stage Responsibility Responsibility Responsibility Awareness Campaign Village community Signage/Hoardings Contractor/NGO - PIU/NGOs National & State Govemment / Donor Truckers agency / Contractor's Budget Commerdal sex workers Construction Camp Condom Vending machines - PlU/NGOs Natonal & State Govemment / Donor Medical Facilities Contractor/NGO - agency / Contractor's Budget Routine medical check-up Contractor/NGO PIU/NGOs Contractor's Budget Construction Prevention Period Project Site Awareness Campaign Village community Signagell-loardings Contractor/NGO NACO/DFID/NHAI PlU/NGOs Signage/Hoardings PIU/NGOs NACO/DFID/NHAI Counterpart Line agencies Budget co- Advertisements PIU/NGOs NACO/DFID/NHAI ordination BudgeUresources is built in the Immediate Awareness Campaign Medical facilities PIU/NGOs NACO/DFID/NHAI NGO/PIU Surrounding of the Project (villages) Truckers Signage/Hoardings Concessionaire PIU State AlDs Control With be buift in the concession Agreement Commercial sex workers organization / Men folk Vehicle Stickers NACOIDFID PIU NHAI Conidor Counterpart Line agencies Budget Rest Areas Awareness Campain Management UniVSHGs Condom vending machine With be built in the concession Agreement Prevention Medical facilities Concessionaire NACO/DIFC Awareness Campaign Truckers Vehicle stickers NHAI conidor NACO/DIFD NHAI Corporate Built in the establishment cost of the Toll Commercial sex workers Management Unit Booth Operabon Toll Booths Men folk and attendants Pamphlets NACO/DFID - NHAI Corporate Counterpart Line agencies Budget Period Truck Lay Byes Awareness Campaign Truckers Signage/Hoarding NACO/DFID - - Counterpart Line agencies Budget Commercial sex workers Men folk and attendants Village community Signage/Hoardings Counterpart Line agencies Budget Condom vending machines Coordination Budget/ resources will be buiit Immediate Awareness Campaign Advertisements NACO/DFID NHAI corridor in the NHAI Coridor Management Unit. Surrounding of the Medical facilities Management Unit OPjiect Mobile medical units (MMU) (Villages) Note (a) DFID is Department for International Development. British High Commission in India, New Delhi DFID is already involved in a number of HIVIAIDS awareness and prevention projects in the States of Uttar Pradesh & Bihar (b) NACO is the National AIDS Control Mission, Govemment of India. NACO is mandated to implement & co-ordinate HIVIAIDS awareness and prevention programmes and as such is already involved in similar programmes in the surroundings of the GTRIP project corridor, including projects on GT Road with targeted focus on highway truck drivers. ,. in joint venture with 12-8 - - m m m m m m m m m - - - - - - Action Plan for Combating the Spread of HIV/AIDS in the project area First year Second Year Third yet 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 gistic planning and mobilization rareneasGenerstionProgrammeIneprojectarwa * * * * * * * a * * B b B a B b B B W W b a tribtion of pamrphlet and posters handuts etc a a a i a a £ * a a Uf ,s ndedia od speakes and video showu *a a a I a a a W * I mtlfication of potential sites and the target groups -ro mapping of the target area and group saline study, field surveys Secondary dat fDechon of pi-ry and secondary data a a m a m a A aa I I 9 J * * * I I A 5 a tailed socro-econorrc prfile of target populatin & area I*****U G * G * E * a a b a Rtadedstudyoftheavailable &tatusofHealthfaclIea * fltr H 0 a *ada* a I an I a * I rd investgation/ Mteranchonsr th the community & emergmg issues * a W b aa ipwity Building /Training programmes amnmng Programmes r the Self Help Grups & Target population * bG b l pacty Building Tra-mng progrannes tor the project staff * ab n m a b B * B rategy Formulation for planned intervention lucating the cornrunty and the target groupos *' '4 Aa l * t stribunng health cwre k and identtying the servne providers -ondmnation wth the concerned stakeholders in introducng heath care mechanons Deralionalizng Instiltonalrmechanirrasa we an linkage to the NACO programme It ua u a I I a It a a II I I I I It I 11 I I I ANNEXURE 1.1 I1 I I Database of Titleholders -Land Owners Lucknow Ayodhya section NH-28 1 I I I I l1 l Annexure 1.1 S. No. District Village Name of Owner Sh.c Gat Area Area to be No. Of ~DIWHDsbeOcpto 14 Owned Acquired % Family SCBLWHDsbeOcpto I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(ha) (Ha) 1 Lucknow Uttar Ohauna Shyamn Lal 34 0.035 0.016 42.53 1 AO 2 Lucknow Uttar Dhiauna Krushna Kurmar Singh d1i 0.033 0.015 45.58 2 Ag 3 Lucknow Uttar Dhauna Tej Naranayan 210 0.479 0.014 2.91 2 AO 4 Lucknow UttarODhauna Ram Ratan 25l 0.114 0.029 25.12 2 Ag I ~ ~~~~~5 Lucknow Uttar Dhauna Bharat Prasad 1ll 0.939 0.098 10.48 2 Ag 6 Lucknow UttarODhauna Ram Sewak 250 0.531 0.088 16.51 5 Ag 7 Luckrnow Uttar Dhauna Ravender Kuniar is 0.190 0.014 7.58 2 8 Faizabad Kushahni Faqir 16 1.555 1.280 82.32 2 Ag 9 Faizabad Ashraf Gangrela Lt. Mewlai 4a2 4.974 0.243 4.89 2 BPL Ag 10 Faizabad Kushahn Rai Bahadur 24 0.215 0.141 65.64 2 Ag 11 Faizabad Ashraf Gangrela Absentee 490 1 12 Faizabad Kushahri Ram Narayan Sh.c 2 0.126 0.049 38.98 2 Bussiness 113 Faizabad Kushahn Hanishand 16 1.555 1.280 82.32 2 SC BPL Ag 14 Faizabad Kushahni Jagat Rani 15 2.004 0.884 44.11 2 Ag 15 Faizabad Kushahni Nazir Khan 1 0.101 0.038 35.96 2 Ag 16 Faizabad Kushahni Meku 1S 1.555 1.280 82.32 4 SC BPL Disable Ag 17 Faizabad Bhelsar Ahnr,ad Mustafa 0.087 0.082 94.71 2 Ag U ~ ~~~~18 Barabanki Pipar Taila Ram Prasad 0.118 0.029 24.41 5 BPL Ag 19 Barabanki Barail Suraj 1057 0.225 0.041 18.13 2 Ag 20 Barabanki Barail Shabihan Lai 1369 0.089 0.067 74.97 2 Ag 21 Barabanki Barail Smit. Kanrini Bajpai 1049 0.186 0.075 40.26 2 Ag 22 Barabanki Gharsania Rajjan 335 0.002 0.001 50.00 2 Ag 23 Barabanki MohanrvTldpur Srrt. Jahan 216 0.013 0.013 100.00 1 WHH Ag Chauki 24 Barabanki Gharsania Nanhe 39 0.087 0.082 94.71 2 Ag 25 Barabanki Gharsania Santram 115 0.104 0.101 97.08 2 Ag I 6 aabni hasni slu ~0.2 009 2.727 Barabanki Gharsania Purai 22) 0.390 0.004 1.05 2 SC BPI Ag 28 Barabanki Gharsania Sent. Sundara 406 0.005 0.005 100.00 2 Ag 29 Barabanki Gharsania AIun 407 0.002 0.002 100.00 3 Ag 30 Barabanki Gharsania Mangal 348 0.465 0.045 9.67 3 31 Barabanki Ghsrsania Ram Pal 374 0.316 0.014 4.56 2 Disable Ag 32 Barabanki Gharsania Chootulal 224 5.980 0.025 0.42 2 SC Labor 33 Barabanki Gharsania Sent. Pinrars 410 0.266 0.068 25.53 2 WHH Ag 34 Barabanld Gharsania Molhe 221 0.354 0.021 6.05 1 SC BPL Labor 35 Barabanki Gharsania Absentee 259 1 36 Barabanki Gharsania Shankar Badash 200 0.166 0.080 36.14 2 SC BPI Ag 37 Barabanki Gharsania Mats Prasad 199 0.465 0.045 9.67 2 SC BPL AG 38 Barabanki Gharsania Bhagwan Din 307 0.038 0.019 52.89 2 SC DPI Labor 39 Barabankl Gharsania Hannath ~ 101 0.045 0.007 16.00 2 GovtService 40 Barabanki Gharsania Chauhan 225 0.401 0.048 11.97 1 SC DPI 41 Barabanki Gharsanra Badhraj 317 0.488 0.071 14.52 1 Ag 42 Barabanki Safedabad Md. Ayub 35 0.363 0.086 23.80 2 Ag 43 Barabankd Mohanynedpur Srinath, Gupta 238 0.061 0.010 15.74 2 Ag Chauki 44 Barabanki Mohanmidpur Md. Atik 123 0.244 0.003 1.31 2 Ag U ~ ~~~~~~~Chauki 45 Barabanki Mohansnadpur Md. Ajhamudin 180 1.072 0.088 8.21 5 Ag Chauki 46 Barabanki Moharrwmdpur It. Chaudhary Mohiudin 101 0.281 0.080 28.47 2 WHH Ag I ~ ~~~~~~~Chauki 47 Barabanki Mohanwmadpur Anjum Fatnina 23B 0.401 0.048 11.97 2 WHH Ag Chauki 48 Lucknow Juggar Lata Khanna 1 0.392 0.040 10.20 2 Ag 49 Lucknow Semrra Brat La[ 58 0.187 0.024 12.61 2 Ag 50 Lucknow Serrra Umashankar 54 0.011 0.011 100.00 2 Ag 51 Lucknow Serrera Raff*helawan 171 0.062 0.024 38.45 1 Ag 52 Lucknow Senra Onmprakash 166 0.388 0.058 15.01 2 53 Lucknow Semraw Binod Bihan 195 0.455 0.013 2.92 2 Ag 54 Lucknow Semra Sandeep Agarwal 203 0.352 0.055 15.68 2 Ag 55 Lucknow Semraw Babu Lai 50 0.600 0.106 17.65 2 Ag 58 Lucknow Senra Mohan Lai 53 0.949 0.077 8.08 2 Ag 57 Luckncow Senra Rahul 18 4.254 0.306 7.19 2 Ag 58 Luckrnow Senrra Sant Singh 19 0.329 0.034 10.21 2 Ag 59 Luckrnow Semnra Chatrapal 21 0.139 0.064 45.81 2 Ag I 0 uknw cew RmNah24 0.8 00 2 2.461 Lucknow Serrira Juber 170 0.126 0.044 3.4.54 2 Ag 62 Luckn1ow Semra Sent. Shabran; 55 0.010 0.009 94.40 2 Ag 63 Luckncow Anaura Asharti 18 0.078 0.018 22.56 1 64 Lucknow Anaura Vidya Upadhyay 713 2.216 0.011 0.51 1 Ag I ~ ~~~~65 Lucknow Anaura Lt. Gurcharan 722 1.455 0.077 5.28 2 Ag 66 Lucknow Anaura Ram Bachan Yadav 723 0.439 0.042 9.48 2 AG 67 Lucknow Anaura Sernt. Madhukurrar 725 0.094 0.027 28.94 2 Ag 68 Luckenow Anaura Ram Sanehe 728 0.067 0.038 57.31 2 69 Lucknow Anaura Pyare Lai 741 0.548 0.002 0.41 5 BPL Labor 70 Lucknow Anaura Sunder Lal 330 0.752 0.070 9.34 2 71 Lucknow Anaura Lala 763 0.584 0.012 2.05 2 72 Lucknow Anaura Vijay Bahadur 763 1.170 0.042 3.59 6 Ag 73 Lucknow Aneaura Ramsewak 699 0.232 0.005 2.07 2 Ag Annexure 1.1 S. No. Ditrict Vilage Nameof Owner h.c Gata Area Area to be N.O S. No. Olatrict Village Name of Owner ~ ~~No Owned Acquired % N.ll of SC DPL WHH Disable Occupation Sh.c ~~~ (ha) (Ha) Fml 74 Lucknow Anaur8 Roopchandl 742 0.013 0.003 20.00 2 75 Lucknow Anaurs Jagadeep 744 0.626 0.003 0.51 5 76 Luckncyw Anaurs Babu Lai 7711 0.306 0.002 0.52 2 Ag 77 Lucknow Anaura Brahma 158 0.171 0.009 5.15 2 BPL Bussiness 78 LucknIOW Annura Ram Sanehi 35 0.067 0.038 57.31 3 GoviSarvice 79 Lucknow Anaurs Bishnu Agarwal 623 0.089 0.024 26.97 2 Ag 80 Lucknow Anaura Naresh Agarwal 695 0.660 0.074 11.15 2 AU 81 Lucknow Anaura Atok Kumar 633 0.170 0.114 67.20 2 82 Lucknow Anaurs Smtd. Prasad Yadav 6 0.202 0.013 6.57 3 I ~ ~~~~~83 Luckncyw Anaurs Smit. Raini 612 0.670 0.082 12.18 2 AG 84 Lucknow Anaura Ran, Singh 762 0.885 0.158 17.81 2 85 Lucknow Anaura Smit. Saroj 743 0.552 0.046 8.41 2 Ag 86 Lucknow Anaura Snrt. Kanta Devi 725 0.094 0.027 28.94 2 Ag I ~ ~~~~~87 Lucknow Anaura K(ishun 350 0.812 0.333 41.06 8 Lunw Aara At68 0.6 002 456 2 A 89 Lucknow Anaura Ram Shankar 228 0.164 0.024 14.63 2 AO 90 Lucknow Anaura Smrt. Poonam 226 0.164 0.024 14.63 2 Ag 91 Lucknow Anaura SfT1. Sarsai 624 0.410 0.018 4.29 2 Ag 92 Luckncyw Anaura Uttam Kumar 624 0.410 0.018 4.29 I Ag 93 Lucknow Anaura Ram Milan 621 0.190 0.027 14.32 1 Ag 94 Lucknow Anaura Bhuneswar 619 0.816 0.048 5.88 1 Ag 95 Luckniow Anaura KafinarAJi 620 0.13 0.022 16.47 2 Ag 96 Lucknow Anaura Raj Bakasha lsngh 355 0.496 0.005 0.97 2 Ag I ~ ~~~~~97 Lucknow Anaura Brajender 334 0.206 0.114 55.53 9 Lukw Aaunana 027 006 9.7 2 A 99 Lucknow Anaura Lanari Shnkar 357 3.319 0.037 1.11 5 Bussiniess 100 Lucknow Ansura Sn-t. Ratna 615 1.354 0.068 5.05 2 Ag 101 Lucknow Anaura Srmi. Raniwati 613 0.700 0.008 1.12 2 WHH Ag I 02 Lucaw Anum Mnewa 44 0.56 0.5 10.0103 Luckncow Anaura Ram Naresh, 455 0.739 0.003 0.43 2 Ag 104 Lucknow Anaura Manoj Kunar 898 0.232 0.005 2.07 I Ag 105 Lucknow Annuma Ram Adhar 664 1.105 0.001 0.10 2 106 Lucknow Anaura Ram Singh Yadav 698 0.068 0.038 58.47 2 Ag 107 Luckcnow Anaura Lt. Satya Narayan 552 1.242 0.083 6.70 2 BPL Ag 108 Lucknow Anauma Hari Singh 666 0.067 0.001 1.43 1 Ag 109 Lucknow Anaura Ram Datta 225 0.654 0.054 8.26 2 110 Lucknow Anauma Lt. Ram Chander 6 0.405 0.040 9.88 2 BPi Labor 111 Lucknow Anauma Snlt. Sabita Garg 348 1.270 0.117 9.20 2 Ag 112 Lucknow Anauma Snat. Nita Kuffur 346 0.105 0.014 13.71 2 Ag 113 Lucknow Anauma Sfft. Neelanm 348 1.225 0.085 6.92 2 Ag 114 Lucknow Annuma Radhey Lal 354 0.552 0.046 8.41 2 115 Lucknow Anauma Nekram 437 0.356 0.054 15.17 3 116 Lucknow Annuma Mahesh 445 0.116 0.031 26.34 2 SC Ag 117 Luckncow Annuma SmTi. Sina Devi 446 0.737 0.056 7.60 2 Ag 118 Lucknow Annuma Harbhajan 447 0.784 0.029 3.67 2 Ag 119 Lucknow Annuma Lt. Srr1. Dhan Dai 765 0.037 0.037 100.00 2 DPI. Labor 120 Bamabanki Gharsania Dhonde 99 0.100 0.091 90.88 1 BPI. Ag 121 Brambanki Gharsania Mangal 1.300 0.251 19.31 2 WHH Ag 122 Barabanki Gharsanin Desh Raj 318 . 0.365 0.004 1.05 2 WHH Ag 123 Barabanki Gharsania Radheshyam 198 0.186 0.065 34.92 2 SC GovtSerilce 124 Brambanki Ghnrsania AsharmmVernTu 126 0.629 0.145 23.12 2 8ussiness 125 Barabanki Gharsarnia Absentee 1 I ~ ~~~~~126 Barabanki Gharsania Bachmaj 317 0.488 0.071 14.52 2 Ag 127 Barabanki Gharsania Ram Kirpal 349 0.325 0.062 19.15 2 BusshWess 128 Barabankl Gharsania Khusiram 396 0.795 0.047 5.94 2 Bussiriess 129 Barabanki Gharsania Latbahadur, Sohanlal 181 0.459 0.152 33.19 2 SC BPL Ag 130 Barabanki Gharsania Ishwardeen 0.780 0.125 16.08 2 BPL Ag 131 Barabanki Gharsanta Siyaram 104 0.189 0.158 83.64 2 Bussiness 132 Barabanki Gharsania Absentee 133 Barabanki Gharsania Rann"l Veffa 374 0.316 0.014 4.56 2 .PvtService 134 Barabanki Gharsania Rarmavatar 188 0.152 0.129 84.95 2 SC 4D PL Ag 135 Barabanki Gharsannia Ganeshi 165 1.157 0.178 15.36 2 SC BPL Ag 136 Barabanki Gharsania Gyanendra (Biharn) 3.510 0.142 4.05 2 SC OPL Govt.Service 137 Baarbankl Gharsanra Absentee 138 Barabanki Gharsanin Absentee 1 139 Barabanki Gharsania Chhedalal 39B 2.086 0.964 46.24 2 A 140 Barabanki Gharsania Absentee 1 141 Barabanki Gharsania Kishornlal 403 0.280 0.107 38.17 2 DPI Ag 142 D3ambanki Gharsania Absentee 143 B3arabanki Gharsania Absentee 144 Barabanki Sarlhara Ram Pratap 1.690 0.025 1.49 1 SC GovtService 145 Barabanki Sarthara Radheshyam Lal 1.560 0.098 6.28 2 SC BPI Bussiress 146 B3arabanki Sarthara Majid Ansari 0.390 0.011 2.82 2 DPL Ag 147 Barabanki Sarthara Absentee 148 Barabanki Bhuhema Absentee 1 149 Barabanki Bhuhema Balakram 422 0.125 0.007 5.89 2 Ag I ~ ~~~~~150 Barabanki Bhuhera Absentee 151 Barabanki Bhuhera Balakram 425 1.068 0.514 48.13 2 Ag 152 Barabanki Bhuhera Siyaram 423 0.736 0.345 46.87 2 Ag 153 Barabank, Lachbar Bataha NourTmiaa 1706 0.431 0.046 10.77 2 Ag Annexure 1.1 S. No. Dlasilct Village Name of Owner Sh.c NaOa Owned Area o be Namily SC PL WHH Disable Occupsatin 3 1~~~~54 Barabanki Lachlbar Bajaha Udaya Narayan 1589 1.474 0.134 9.12 2 AO '155 Saratbarld Lachbar Bajaha Surender Chandra 1061 0.407 0.005 1.18 2 158 Barabanki Lactibar Dajaha Ganga R1am 1758 0.122 0.042 34.10 2 BPL AO I ~ ~~~~157 Barabanki Lachibar Dajaha Sureah Chand 1705 0.407 0.005 1.18 2 DPL AG 158 Barebanld Lachibar Bajaha Rakibool 1749 0.38 0.138 37.3 2 BPL WHH AD 159 Barabank, Ahmadpur Mehimood Hussain 24 0.210 0.032 15.24 2 ShDp 160 Barabanku Lachbar Bajaha Md. Hassm Ali 1586 0.224 0.125 51.1 2 BPL Ag 161 Barabanld Lachbar Bajaha Jagadish Prasad 1554 0.0 0.138 45.26 2 Ag 3 ~~~~~162 Barbankd Lachibar Bajaha Satyaneam 1762 0.797 0.002 0.22 2 AG 163 Barebanki Lachbar Bajaha Suresh 1596 0.251 0.025 10.12 2 BPL Ag 3 ~~~~~164 Barabank, Lachibar Bajaha Ram Jiyavan 1757 0.121 0.056 46.28 2 AO 165 Barebanki Lachbar Bajaha Arr3rrSingh 1750 0.284 0.106 37.18 2 BPL AG 166 Barabanld Jalalpur Sohan mLa 259 0.208 0.171 82.31 3 lsna 167 Barabankd Jalalpur Bahadur 213 0.566 0.040 7.07 5 SC AG 168 Barabankd Jalalpur Prabhu Oayal 216 0.008 0.008 100.00 2 WHH GovISenvice 169 Barabanki Jalalpur Babadin 222 0.540 0.037 6.81 2 WHIH suaanena 170 Barabankd Jalaipur Shatrughan Lal 218 0.320 0.038 12.00 2 AG 171 Barabanld Jalaipur V(inod 299 1.300 0.025 1.93 2 WHH AG 172 Barabanki Jalalpur Shanhruj Prasad 368 0.152 0.042 27.37 2 Diflams 173 Barabanki Jalaipur Ram Pratap 0.107 0.094 88.22 2 BPL AU 174 Barabanki Jalalpur S8ntram 296 0.076 0.070 92.63 i SC Ag 175 Barabanki Jalaipur Nathya 296 0.160 0.160 100.00 3 SC BPL AO 176 Barabanki Jalalpur Santbhu Prea"d 217 0.139 0.139 100.00 2 WHH fisns I . ~~~~177 Barabankl Dadra Abdul Pasi 979 0.794 0.072 9.07 2 Ag 178 Barabankl Dadra Ramdeen 1076 0.210 0.032 15.24 2 Ag 179 Barabankid Dadra S. Daha 1.040 0.057 5.48 2 WHHt 8aabkea 180 Barabanki Dadra Jay Prakash 1114 0.258 0.118 45.89 2 SC BPI Ag 181 Barabankl Dadra Rlyaz 1135 0.160 0.050 31.00 2 BPL WHH BuumaMs 182 Barabanki Dadra Pramod Kunfur 1094 0.310 0.051 16.52 2 AC 183 Barmbanld Cadra Milthana Musamat 1134 0.300 0.107 35.73 2 SC BPL WHH AC 184 Barabanki Dadra Ram Roop 991 0.810 0.224 27.65 2 busIesk" 185 Barebankd Cadra Shree Shankar Jeg 992 0.850 0.099 11.67 2 Disable Ag 166 Barab nki Cadre Raghunandan 1004 0.430 0.078 16.23 2 WHH Ag 187 Barrabanki Cadre Sherbahadur 1013 0.891 0.184 20.65 2 Ag 188 Barabanki Cadre Md. Islam Sh.c 1036 0.950 0.096 10.27 2 LAWr 189 Barabankd Cadra Siral Ahmad 1047 0.139 0.001 0.92 2 Shop 190 Barebankl Cadre Krushna Nand 1049 0.025 0.025 100.00 2 Ag 191 Barabanki Cadra Kanrtesh 1064 0.311 0.069 22.12 2 Ag 192 Barabankl Jalaipur Bhuneswar 296 0.056 0.046 82.86 1 AU 193 Barabanka Jalalpur - Smt.Gyanawari .---- 88 --0.299 -04.-47--- -49.23 -- 2 A4- 194 Barabanki Jalalpur Rom Sajeevan 0.502 0.008 1.50 2 195 Barabanki Udhauli Absentee 288 1 196 Barabanki Udhauli Babadal Sh.c 1589 0.164 0.021 12.68 2 WHH Ag 197 Barabankl Udhauli Ramgirlam 487 0.168 0.057 34.19 2 BPL caVale"r 196 Barebanki Udhauli \Adhya Prakashi 144 0.164 0.096 58.54 2 Ag 199 Barabankid Udhauli Gurudeen 1321 0.013 0.013 100.00 2 Ag 200 Barabankl Udhauli Bare; Lal 1318 0.409 0.067 16.43 2 DPI Cupw~e 201 Barebankl Udhauli Ganeshl 1319 0.099 0.029 29.09 2 BPL Ag 202 Barabanki Udhauli AwadeBsh Kumaur Sh.c 101 0.680 0.053 7.7 2 DIAg 206 Barebanki Udhauli Ram Adhar 120 0.190 0.086 45.4 2 Ag 207 Barebanki Udhauli All Hussain 1501 0.120 0.049 40.67 2 Ag 208 Barebanld Udhauli Absentee 132 1 209 Barebanki Udhauli Battadur 284 0.455 0.012 2.84 2 SC DPI Ag 210 Barabankd Udhauli Ranuihah 406 0.894 0.024 2.72 2 DPI Dwaineaa 211 Barabankl Udhauli Ram Shankar Sh.c 404 0.188 0.028 14.84 2 212 Barbnkid Udhauli Absentee 436 1 213 Barabankl Udhauli Phioolnull Sh.c 240 1.170 0.015 1.32 1 SC BPI. WHH Ag 214 Barebanki Udhauli Balrmkund 1508 0.434 0.090 20.85 2 Ag 215 Barebanki Udhauli Ranrnatah 126 1.398 0.168 12.02 2 Bluwsena 216 Barabanki Udhauli Harinaryan 1509 0.108 0.108 100.00 3 Ag 217 Barabanki Udhauli Gajadhar 101 0.680 0.053 7.76 2 &111411aa1 218 Barebanki Chiloki Rarrianuj 5.720 1.254 21.92 2 DPI AD 219 Barebanki Chiloki Shyarrtal 188 0.638 0.061 9.53 2 Ag 220 Barabanki Chiloki Raja Ram 0.177 0.060 33.99 2 AU 221 Barebanki Chiloki Shiv Bahadur 0.010 0.004 42.00 2 Ag 222 Barabanki Chilok, Bishram 0.126 0.034 26.92 2 Ag 3 ~~~~223 Barebanki Chiloki Rarrunatti 1.300 0.024 1.85 2 DPI AO Annexure 1.1 Gaa Area Area to be N.o S. No. District Village Name of Owner ShcOwned Acquired No.Faml SC BPL WHH Disable Occupation 224 Barabanki Chiloki Ram Lakhan 4.160 0.254 6.11 2 SC BPL Business 225 Barabanki Chhandwal Shyarrlal 1728 0.718 0.126 17.60 1 SC BPL WHH Bussirness 226 Barabanki Chhandwal Ram Dulhar 1729 0.104 0.050 47.69 6 SC BPL Busslaess 227 Barabanki Chhandwal Ujjagar 1674 2.860 0.562 19.65 2 SC BPL flsirmine I 28 BraaniChanwl arsev175 0.4 007 6.1229 Barabanki Chhandwal Ram Milan 1726 0.061 0.016 26.23 2 SC BPL WHH AU 230 Barabanki Chhandwal Raj Kumaer 1679 1.040 0.251 24.13 2 BPL AG 231 Barabankiu Chhandwal Umashankar 1769 0.484 0.101 20.83 2 SC BPL Govt.Service 232 Barabanki Chhandwal Mata Prasad 1623 0.572 0.125 21.85 2 Ag 233 Barabanki Chhandwal Lailti 1687 1.170 0.025 2.14 2 BPL Ag 234 Barabanki Chhandwal Mahiyad 1691 0.076 0.021 28.00 2 SC BPL Busmsiness 235 Barabanki Chhandwal Nourrnlal 1717 2.470 0.045 1.83 2 SC BPL Ag 238 Barabanki Chhandwal Gayadin 1689 3.120 0.033 1.04 2 BPL Ag 237 Barabanki Sursanda Shaprohan 2433 1.869 0.926 49.57 2 Ag 238 Barabanki Sursanda Pyasde9 2434 0.557 0.391 70.18 2 Bussiness 239 Barabanki Sursanda Indara 2439 0.445 0.252 56.56 2 BPL Ag 240 Barabanki Sursanda Mekulal 2442 0.097 0.079 81.65 2 SC BPL Ag 241 Barabank, Sursanda Smt. Janaka 2443 0.177 0.101 57.13 3 SC BPL Ag 242 Barabanki Sursanda Sanrpat 2446 0.152 0.110 72.53 2 BPL Ag 243 Barabanki Sursanda Sahadev 2450 0.060 0.060 100.00 2 SC BPL Ag 244 Barabanki Sursanda Bhagouti 2453 0.139 0.118 84.60 2 BPL Ag 245 B3arabanki Sursanda Ram Dayal 2454 0.177 0.100 56.68 1 SC BPL Ag 248 Barabanki Asain, Sant Ram 244 0.658 0.324 49.19 2 Ag 247 Barabanki Asaini Avtar. Ram Shankar 245 0.455 0.264 58.02 2 Ag I ~ ~~~~248 Barabanki Asaini Munshilal S/0 Mahaveer 239 0.420 0.145 34.63 2 PvtService 249 Barabanki Asaini Churama~ni 243 0.252 0.210 83.17 2 SC BPL Ag 250 Barabanki Asaini Kailtu S/0 Bhagwan Din 231 0.362 0.253 70.01 2 BPL Ag 251 Barabanki Asaini Babulal. Ram Swaroop 569 0.582 0.209 35.93 2 Disable Ag 252 Barabanki Asain, Snit. Ramawali WIO Paras Ram . 233 0.010 0.008 83.20 s BPL WHIH Ag 253 Barabanki Chhandwal Pumrrmsi 1906 0.130 0.072 55.38 2 SC BPL GovtService 254 Barabanki Chhandwal Santosh Kunsar 1898 0.406 0.048 11.82 2 BPL Ag 255 Barabanki Chhandwal Lt. Narayandin 1854 0.057 0.021 36.49 2 BPL Ag 256 Barabanki Chhandwal Ram Prasad 1771 0.019 0.019 100.00 1 SC BPL Ag I ~ ~~~~~257 Barabanki Ghhandwal Puntilal 1707 0.110 0.029 26.18 2 258 Barabanki Chhandwal Devik Nandan 1927 0.212 0.037 17.36 2 Ag 259 Barabanki Chhandwal Jagallal 1930 0.205 0.048 23.41 2 Ag 260 Beambankki Chhandwal Kamulakant 1929 0.246 0.048 19.51 2 Ag 261 Barabanki Chhandwal Shree Keshav 1920 0.280 0.050 17.71 2 SC BPL WHH Ag 262 Barabanki Chhandwal Manjanu 1924 0.195 0.026 13.13 2 SC BPL Ag 263 aarabanki Chhandwal Mohan 1925 0.365 0.042 11.40 2 SC BPL Ag 264 Barabanki Chhandwal Babulal 1931 0.855 0.118 13.85 3 SC BPI Ag 265 Barabanki Chhandwal Pooja Marshi 1922 0.144 0.022 15.56 2 SC BPL Ag 268 Barabanki Chhandwal Sonuit Lia 1928 0.221 0.032 14.48 2 Ag 267 Barabanki Chhandwal Garibe 1530 0.036 0.018 48.89 2 268 Barabanki Chhandwal Ram Charan 1719 0.012 0.012 100.00 I Ag 269 Barabanki Chhandwal Ram Jaan 1732 0.334 0.051 15.33 2 Ag 270 Barabanki Chhandwal Ram Narayan 1661 0.251 0.021 8.37 2 271 Barabanli Chhandwal Taj Mohrnad 1767 0.380 0.336 88.42 3 Ag 272 Barabanki Chhandwai Ayodhya Prasad 1767 0.380 0.338 86.42 2 Ag 273 Barabanki Chhandwal Sakil Ahrrmad 1790 1.031 0.054 5.28 2 Ag 274 Barabanki Chhandwal Surya Barabh Singh 1769 0.484 0.101 20.83 2 Ag 275 Barabanki Chhandwal Ram Karan Singh 1842 0.360 0.067 18.67 2 Ag 276 Barabanki Chhandwal Affnbika Prasad Singh 1900 1.262 0.138 10.90 2 Ag 277 Barabanki Chhandwal Vindeswar 1899 0.777 0.106 13.58 2 Ag 278 Barabanki Chhandwal Kuber Bahadur Singh 1901 0.083 0.056 67.47 2 Ag 279 Barabanki Chh:ndwal Hanstia Prasad Sh.c 1741 0.489 0.138 28.14 2 Ag 260 Barabanki Chhandwal Ram Sajeevan 1739 0.489 0.062 12.76 2 Ag I ~ ~~~~281 Barabanki Chhandwal Lai Ji 1542 0.212 0.014 6.79 2 282 Barabanki Chhandwal Chootelal 1611 0.523 0.025 4.78 2 283 Barabanki Chhandlwal Ram Karan Singh 1566 0.360 0.067 18.67 . 2 284 Barabanki Chhandwal Ghasrnuj 1690 0.164 0.096 58.54 2 I ~ ~~~~285 Barabanki Chhandwal Ra rks 63 024 019 5.326 arbniChnwl Dukhi Ram 1772 0.276 0.170 61.45 5 SC BPL Ag 287 Barabanki Chhandwal Bhagirath Singh 1565 0.284 0.025 8.94 2 288 Barabanki Chhandwal Shobha Ram 1685 0.086 0.042 48.37 2 289 Barabanki Chhandwal Sriram 1684 0.308 0.114 37.04 2 290 Barabanki Chhandwal Absentee 1683 1 291 Barabanki Chhandwal Raffesh Chand 1662 0.362 0.124 34.25 2 292 Barabanki Chhandwal Nepal 1564 0.201 0.032 15.92 2 293 Barabanki Palharn Jageswar 471 0.280 0.182 64.91 2 SC BPi Disable Ag 294 Barabanki Palhari Ram Udhar 473 0.189 0.056 29.80 2 SC BPL Ag .3 ~ ~~~~~295 Barabanki Palhan Ram Dev 514 0.202 0.037 18.22 2 Ag 296 Barabank, Paihan Md. Asnif 503 0.051 0.027 53.33 2 GovtSe,vice 297 Barabanki Palharn Tilak Ram 694 0.581 0.109 18.73 4 SC BPL Ag 298 Barabanki Palhan Onvrakash, 509 0.377 0.181 47.96 2 Ag 299 Barabanki Palhan Israt Ahmad 501 0.240 0.088 36.67 2 BPL Ag 300 Barabanki Palhan Ranmsaran 662 0.098 0.067 68 57 2 Ca-penter 301 Barabanki Paihani Abdul Ali 489 0.584 0.062 10863 2 Ag 302 Barabanki Palhan Naznua Khatun 687 0.187 0.187 100.00 2 BPL WHH Ag 3 ~~~~~303 Barabank, Palhan Abdul Ahib 677 0.683 0.176 25.77 2 Ag Annexure 1.1 Gat Area Area tobe No.O S. No. District Village Name of Owner Sh.c M Owned Acquired % Family SC BPL WHHi Disable Occupation (ha) (Ha) Fail 385 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Sunder Lai 90~5 0.150 0.058 38.40 2 SC BPL WHH AU 386 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Nageswar 906 2.510 0.310 12.37 2 Ag 387 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Kushmesh 921 0.456 0.106 23.16 2 Ag 388 Barabanli Lalpur Rajpur Ram Sarmuiha %2 0.223 0.051 22.96 2 Ag 389 Barabanki Laipur Rajpur Chandra Dev 951 0.284 0.006 2.25 2 BPL Ag 390 Barabanki Laipur Rajpur Abadh Ram 946 0.401 0.028 7.02 2 Ag 391 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Ram Surriran 941 0.411 0.035 8.56 2 Ag 392 Barabanki Lalpur Raipur Devi Prasad 955 0.645 0.069 10.67 2 Ag 393 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur rirath Ram 981 0.063 0.024 38.10 2 BPL Ag 1 ~ ~~~~394 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur AyLub 966 1.217 0.001 0.05 2 BPL Ag 395 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Satya Nam 962 0.017 0.012 70.59 2 396 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Abadhut Bhagawan 345 0.329 0.015 4.47 2 397 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Sunder La[ 35D 0.658 0.324 49.19 2 398 Barabanki Menduwa Lallu Singh 12l7 1.722 0.083 4.83 2 Bussiness I ~ ~~~~399 Barabanki Menduwa Ram Kishore 1215 0.235 0.021 8.85 2 Ag 400 Barabanki Menduwa Dewan 1216 0.063 0.050 78.73 2 BPL Ag 401 Barabanki Menduwa Vijay Pratap Singh 1220 0.262 0.054 20.76 2 WHH Ag 402 Barabanki Menduwa Akhilesh Pratap Singh 1224 0.089 0.014 16.18 2 Ag 403 Barabanki Menduwa Ram Lakhan 1231 0.516 0.077 14.83 2 SC BPL Ag 404 Barabanki Menduwa Ram Sagar 1258 1.580 0.025 11.60 2 Ag 405 Barabanki Menduwa Ram Chander 126 0.190 0.066 34.53 2 WHH Ag 406 Barabanki Menduwa Raffesh 1289 0.30.4 0.072 23.68 2 WHH- Ag 407 Barabanki Menduwa Rarreshwar 130 0.147 0.088 59.86 2 Ag I ~ ~~~~406 Barabanki Menduwa Babuali 135 0.110 0.001 1.11 2 BPL WHH Ag 409 Barabanki Menduwa Tulsi Ram 135 0.537 0.029 5.36 2 SC BPL Ag 410 Barabanki Menduwa Smit. Somadev, 1361 0.535 0.056 10.47 2 Ag 411 Barabanki Menduwa Rarrnakanta 1383 0.720 0.061 8.44 2 PytService 412 Barabanki Mohnymadpur Balak 268 1.054 0.123 11.64 2 SC BPL WHH Ag I ~~~~~~~~~~~Kirat 413 Barabanki Mohmmnadpur Shivraj 272 0A69 0.140 29.78 2 BPL Ag Kirat 414 Barabanki Mohrwmedpur Bhikhan 272 0.469 0.140 29.78 2 BPL Ag Kirat 415 Barabanki Mohnyredpur Sundar 267 0.A28 0.053 12.30 2 SC BPL Ag 416 Barabanki Mohn-nmdpur Chandrapal 272 0.A69 0.140 29.78 2 SC BPL Ag 3 ~~~~~417 Barabanki Mohrrnadpur Hansala 343 0.739 0.138 18.64 2 SC BPL Ag 418 Barabanki Mohrramdpur Nathu 261 0.679 0.082 12.04 2 Ag Virat 419 Barabanki MohnTnadpur Shivshankar 272 0.469 0.140 29.78 2 BPL Ag Kirat 420 Barabanki Mohnrnadpur Monyaram 272 0.469 0.140 29.78 2 BPL Ag 421 Barabanki MohrTsmdpur Ram Dev 263 0.156 0.035 22.50 1 SC BPL Ag Kirat 422 Barabanki Mohrrmndpur Puttan 356 0.142 0.106 76.39 3 BPL Ag I K~~~~~~~~~~~irat 423 Barabanki Mohnrnadpur Kashiram 266 i.054 0.123 1 1.64 2 Ag Kirat 424 Barabanki Mohrmradpur Ram Shankar 250 0.012 0.006 53.33 2 Ag I K~~~~~~~~~~~irat 425 Barabanki Mohnrnedpur Rajend Prasad 2U0 0.013 0.013 100.00 2 Ag Kirat 426 Barabanki Mohrwmadpur Sonu 341 0.031 0.007 22.19 2 Ag Virat 427 Barabanki Mohnmaodpur Ram Sankar 361 2.247 0.107 4.78 2 PvtService 428 Barabanki Mohnvnadpur Asarfi 381 0.200 0.123 61.52 2 8usainess Kirat 429 Barabanki Mohrrnadpur Prem Narayan 381 0.021 0.018 83.81 3 Ag I ~~~~~~~~~~~Kira( 430 Barabanki Mohnrnadpur Nand Kuneiar 359 0.400 0.13 33.84 2 Bussiress Kirat 431 Barabanki Mohnfmadpur Darshan Lal 370 0.162 0.096 59.06 2 Ag K(iral 432 Barabanki Mohnyiidpur Kailash 368 0.174 0.066 37.70 2 Ag 433 Barabanki MohffvTiadpur Badlu 262 0.088 0.047 53.64 2 Ag Kira( 434 Barabanki Mohrrnadpur Sahaijram 371 0.325 0.025 7.69 2 U K~~~~~~~~~~~irat 435 Barabanki Mohrrsrdpur Santram 268 1.054 0.123 11.64 1 SC BPL Ag Kirat 436 Barabanki Mohnnwmdpur Ramdulare 257 0.180 0.076 42.40 2 BPL ShDP I ~~~~~~~~~~~Kirat 437 Barabanki Mohmrnadpur Prerriwwati 355 1.712 0.080 4.64 2 Ag Kirat 438 Barabanki Mohnwn~adpur Ram Abhilash 354 0.589 0.087 14.70 2 Ag 3 ~~~~~~~~~~~Kirat Annexure 1.1 S. No. Distrlct Village Name of Owner ScGa O wned Acured to Familyo I ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(ha) (Ha) 385 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Sunder Lai 905 0.150 0.050 38.40 2 SC BPL WHH Ag 386 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Nageswar 906 2.510 0.310 12.37 2 Ag 387 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Kushrresh 921 0.456 0.106 23.16 2 Ag 388 Barabanki Lalpur Raipur Ram Sarriu;ha 922 0.223 0.051 22.96 2 Ag 389 Barabanki Lalpur R.ajpur Chandra Dev 951 0.284 0.006 2.25 2 BPL Ag 390 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Abadh Ram 946 0.401 0.028 7.02 2 Ag 391 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Ram Surraran 947 0.411 0.035 8.56 2 Ag 392 Barabanki Llipur Rajpur Devi Prasad 956 0.645 0.069 10.67 2 Ag 393 Barabanki Laipur Rajpur Tirath Ram 951 0.063 0.024 38.10 2 DPI Ag 394 Barabanki Laipur Rajpur Ayub 980 1.217 0.00`1 0.05 2 BPL AU 395 Barabanki Laipur Rajpur Satya Nam 962 0.017 0.012 70.59 2 396 Barabanki Laipur Rajpur Abadhut Bhagawan 345 0.329 0.015 4.47 2 397 Barabanki Lalpur Rajpur Sunder Lal 350 0.658 0.324 49.19 2 398 Barabanki Menduwa Lailu Singh 1217 1.722 0.083 4.83 2 Bussiness 399 Barabanki Menduwa Ram Kishore 1215 0.235 0.021 8.85 2 Ag 400 Barabanki Menduwa Dewan 1218 0.063 0.050 78.73 2 DPI Ag 401 Barabanki Menduwa V~ijay Pratap Singh 122 0.262 0.054 20.76 2 WHH Ag 402 Barabanki Menduwa Akhilesh Pratap Singh 1224 0.089 0.014 16.18 2 Ag 403 Barabanki Menduwa Ram Lakhan 1231 0.518 0.077 14.83 2 SC DPI Ag 404 Barabanki Mendiuwa Ram Sagar 1258 1.560 0.025 1.60 2 Ag 405 Barabanki Menduwa Ram Chander 1263 0.190 0.066 34.53 2 WHH Ag 406 Barabanki Menduwa Rameah 125 0.304 0.072 23.68 2 WHH Ag 407 Barabanki Menduwa Rameshwar 1308 0.147 0.088 59.86 2 Ag 408 Barabanki Menduwa Babulai 1352 0.110 0.001 1.11 2 DPI WHH Ag 409 Barabanki Meniduwa Tuisi Ram 1353 0.537 0.029 5.36 2 SC DPI Ag 410 Barabanki Menduwa Snmt. Somadevi 1361 0.535 0.056 10.47 2 Ag 411 Barabanki Menduwa Rarrikanta 1363 0.720 0.061 8.44 2 PvtService 412BDarabanki Mohnmmdpur Balak 260 1.054 0.123 11.64 2 SC BPI WHH Ag I K~~~~~~~~~~~irat 413 Barabanki Mohnwnadpur Shivraj 272 0.469 0.140 29.78 2 DPI Ag KOrat 414 Barabanki Mohnirmdpur Bhikharn 272 0.469 0.140 29.78 2 DPI Ag K(irat 415 Barabanki Mohniiudpur Sundar 26, 0.428 0.053 12.30 2 SC DPI Ag 416 Barabanki Mohmmadpur Chandrapal 272 0.469 0.140 29.78 2 SC DPI Ag 417 Barabanki Mohmmadpur Hansala 343 0.739 0.138 18.64 2 SC DPI Ag 418 Barabanki Mohmniawdpur Nathu 261 0.679 0.082 12.04 2 Ag 419 Barabanki Mohmrrvvadpur Shivshankar 272 0.469 0.140 29.78 2 DPI Ag Virat I ~ ~~~~420 Barabanki Mohmrudpur Monyaram 272 0.469 0.140 29.78 2 DPL Ag Kirat 421 Barabanki MohffaTmdpur Ram Dev 263 0.156 0.035 22.50 1 SC DPI Ag Kirai 422 Barabanki Mohymudpur Puttan 386 0.142 0.108 76.39 3 DPI Ag 423 Darabanki Mohmnradpur Kashiram 26B 1.054 0.123 11.64 2 Ag Kirat 424 Barabanki Mohrnumdpur Ram Shankar 259 0.012 0.006 53.33 2 Ag 1 K~~~~~~~~~~~~~lirat 425 Barabanki Mohmmadpur Rajend Prasad 260 0.013 0.013 100.00 2 Ag Kirat 426 Barabanki Mohmniadpur Sonu 341 0.031 0.007 22.19 2 Ag Virat 427 Barabanki Mohmffnadpur Ram Sankar 361 2.247 0.107 4.78 2 Pvt.Service 428 DarabanKirMhnTat pr Aaf 8 .0 .2 15 usns Kirat 429 Barabanki Mohmrnvadpur Prem Narayan 387 0.021 0.018 83.81 3 Ag I ~~~~~~~~~~~Kirat 430 Barabanki Mohrmiadpur Nand Kunar 359 0.400 0.135 33.84 2 Bussirness Kirat 431 Barabanki Mohmnuodpur Darshan Lai 370 0.162 0.096 59.06 2 Ag Virat I ~ ~~~~432 Barabanki Mohmmuadpur Kaflash 360 0.174 0.066 37.70 2 Ag Virai 433 Barabanki Mohmrrnadpur Badlu 262 0.088 0.047 53.64 2 Ag Kirat I ~ ~~~~434 Barabanki Mohmmrvadpur Sahaijram 371 0.325 0.025 7.69 2 Kirat 435 Barabanki MohnfvTdpur Santram 26B 1.054 0.123 11.64 1 SC DPI Ag Kirat 436 Barabanki Mohnvr"dpur Ranmdulare 257 0.180 0.076 42.40 2 DPI Shop I ~~~~~~~~~~~Kirat 437 Barabanki MohnTnadpur Premawati 366 1.712 0.080 4.64 2 Ag Kirat 438 Barabanki Moimrrrnadpur Ram Abhilash 354 0.589 0.087 14.70 2 Ag Kirat Annexure 1.1 S. No Disrict illae Nana ofOwner Sh.cGata Area Areato be No.Of S. No. District Village Name of Owner Sh N.c Owned Acquired % Faiy SC BPL WHH Disable Occupation 508 BarabankiPalhari Hanscand SIB 0.447 0.256 57.31 2BPL Ag U ~ ~ ~~~1 aaak ahr Vdaei57 021 013 8.7 2BPL WHtH Ag 512 Brabaki Pahari Sahaijram 4D .1 .04 43 PL GovtSnervc 513 Barabanka Paihani Chhedana 534 0.266 0.004 1.58 2 DPI AU 54 Barabanki Palharn Rajaram 752 0.184 0.165 89.57 2 BPL Ag S 5Barabanki Palhari Pumamasi 753 0.344 0.108 31.49 2 56Barabanki Palhari Ganga Ram 755 0.203 0.076 37.67 2 SC BPL Ag 517 Barabanki Palhan Ashakilal 759 0.246 0.030 12.10 1 BPL Ag 518 Barabanki Palhari Ram Surat 760 0.278 0.169 60.68 2 BPL Ag 519 Barabanki Palhari Deshraj 771 0.465 0.144 30.93 1 BPL Ag 520 Barabanki Paihani Khame 778 0.647 0.230 35.59 2 BPL Ag 521 Barabanki Palhan Md.Isshad 78.9 0.257 0.085 33.06 2 BPI Ag 622 Barabanki Paihan Rajesh Kunar 791 0.130 0.014 10.85 2 SC BPI Shop 523 Barabank, Paihari Banshi Lal 722 0.030 0.002 5.33 2 Ag 524 Barabanki Palhari Sitaram 436 0.062 0.000 0.52 2 Ag 525 Barabanki Chandwara Sahyaz Hussain 773 0.608 0.211 34.74 2 BPL Ag 526 Barabanki Chandwara Ravi Kunar 763 0.064 0.064 100.00 3 Ag 527 Barabanki Chandwar-a Mewalal 792 0.160 0.154 96.00 2 SC BPL Ag 626 B3arabanki Chandwara Buttan 796 0.128 0.078 61.25 2 SC BPL Bussiress 629 Barabanki Dilauna Ram Sanjeevan 707 0.319 0.014 4.36 2 530 Barabanki Dilauna Bhikari Le] 706 0.207 0.127 61.53 2 Ag 531 Barabanki Dilauna Ram Achal 696 0.768 0.048 6.36 2 BPL Ag 532 Barabanki Dilauna Smi. NifnalIa 22 2.275 0.251 11.03 2 WHH Busainesa 533 Barabanki Dilauna Ramdhan 698 0.025 0.017 67.20 1 BPL GovtService 534 Barabanki Dilauna Om Prakash 654 0.735 0.026 3.36 1 Ag 535 Barabanki Dilauna Sakhan . 653 0.215 0.141 66.64 2 536 Darabanki Dilauna Santram 677 0.745 0.057 7.65 2 537 Barabanki Dilauna Bansars 695 0.146 0.105 71.67 2 Ag 538 Barabanki Dilauna Ram Sanehi 659 0.222 0.013 5.98 2 Ag 539 Barabanki Dilauna Ram Singh 658 0.101 0.013 13.15 2 SC Ag 540 Barabanki Dilauna Shiv Kailash 706 0.087 0.052 60.32 2 Ag 541 Barabanki Dilauna Raneanand 710 0.183 0.141 77.11 1 WHH Ag 542 Barabanki Dilauna Rajender Prasad 702 0.074 0.052 70.27 4 Ag 543 Darabanki Dilauna Kedar Nath 699 0.066 0.040 69.79 2 Ag 544 Darabanki Dilauna Abadhesh Kuffur 701 0.045 0.030 66.13 2 Ag 545 Barabanki Dilauna Omkiar Narayan 704 0.078 0.048 61.54 3 Ag 56Barabanki Dilauna Pawan Kunar 693 0.267 0.022 8.33 2 Shop I~ ~ ~~~~4 aaak Bhendua Ram biahin.43 002 5 P Ag 549 Barabanki Bhendua Ramndhiash 21 0.227 0.065 2.8.6 24P Ag Brahmanan 549 Barabanki Bhendua GindraPraa 217 1.668 0.057 34.73 2 BPL Ag I ~ ~~~~~~~~Brahrrenan D5 arabanki Bhendua nram Prlasa 29 0.168 0.579 345.473 5PLA Brahmaunan 652 Barabanki Bhendua RamDuharan 129 0.696 0.1861 23.15 2 Brahnoanan I ~ ~~~~563 Barabanki Bhendua Deshideen 4 0.325 0.253 77.93 1 Brahffunan .554 Barabanki Bhendua Bhikharn 24 1.406 0.823 58.50 2 BPL Ag Brahnianan 555 Barabanki Baghaura It. Chootei 148 0.228 0.069 30.18 2 SC DPL Ag I ~ ~~~~556 Barabanki Baghaura Ramicharan 794 2.730 0.254 9.30 2 SC 557 Barabanki Baghaura Parayr 80 0.130 0.103 78.85 2 SC BPL Ag 568 Barabanki Baghaura Bihari 87 0.520 0.042 8.10 2 SC DPI Ag 559 Barabanki Baghaura Shahanavaj 546 0.630 0.006 0.97 . S 50Barabanki Baghaura Rarrroop 247 3.900 0.251 6.44 2 *BPL Bussirness 561 Barabanki Baghaura Medhilal 231 0.104 0.054 51.92 2 SC DPL. Ag 562 B3arabanki Baghaura Ramuj 247 0.780 0.032 4.10 4 SC DPI A 563 Barabanki Baghaura Ayodhya Prasad 236 0.780 0.042 5.40 2 SC BPL Disable Ag 564 Barabanki Baghaura Ratan 87 0.076 0.064 64.21 2 SC BPI Ag 565 Barabanki Baghaura Ramsaamuj 668 0.520 0.025 4.81 2 SC DPI Ag 566 8arabanki Baghaura Ram Sankar 26 0.255 0.024 9.41 2 SC BPL Ag 567 Barabanki Baghaura Ratan 87 0.485 0.322 66.31 2 SC BPL Ag 568 Barabanki Baghaura It. Shrn Keshan Sh.c 968 2.340 0.021 0.91 2 Ag 569 Barabanki Baghaura Rameshvar 598 0.334 0.051 15.33 2 SC Ag 570 Barabanki Baghaura Tulsiram 706 1.339 0.025 1.87 3 SC Ag 571 Barabanki Baghaura Dukhaharan 715 0.780 0.045 5.77 1 SC BPL Ag 572 Barabanki Daghaura Santiram 550 0.780 0.025 3.21 1 SC BPL Ag 573 Barabanki Baghaura Chaffela 592 1.040 0.025 2.40 1 SC BPI Ag 574 Darabanki Baghaura Rajaram 709 1.170 0.026 2.17 2 SC DPLIA 575 Darabanki Baghaura Munawra 703 0.489 0.086 17.67 2 SC BPL Ag 576 Barabanki Baghaura Bhabhuti 555 0.285 0.018 6.48 2 SC Ag 577 Barabanki Baghaura Puttilat 116 1.300 0.056 4.31 2 SC DPL Dussiness 578 Barabanki Baghaura Ram Gulam 652 0.334 0.051 15.33 3 SC OPtL Ag 579 Barabanki Baghaura Asharam 663 1.560 0.253 16.22 2 SC BPL Ag Annexure 1.1 S. No Distict VllageNameof Owner ShC Gata Area Area to be No.iof S. No. District Village name Sh. ~~~No. Ond Acquired % Fno.l SC Sc PL WHH Disable Occupation (ha) (Ha) 507 Barabanki Palharn Hanaschand 518 0.447 0.256 57.3 2 BPL Ag 509 Sarbanki alhari Srat. 438U51 04108 0.313 76.75 2 SCAg 51i Barabanki Palhan Vidyadevl 527 0.231 0.193 83.67 2 BPL WHH AC I ~ ~~~~~51 Barabanki Palhari Madhu Jaiswal52 094 000 063 1A 512 Barabanki Palharn Sahaijram 482 0.319 0.014 4.38 2 BPL GovtService 513 Darabanki Paihari Chhedana 534 0.266 0.004 1.56 2 DPL AU 514 Barabanki Palhari Rajaram 752 0.184 0.165 89.57 2 BPL Ag 515 Barabanki Palhari Puman,asi 753 0.344 0.108 31.49 2 3 ~~~~~~516 Darabank' Paihari Ganga Ram 755 0.203 0.076 37.67 2 SC BPI Ag 517 Barabanki Paihari Ashakilal 759 0.246 0.030 12.10 1 BPL Ag 518 Barabanku Palhan Ram Surat 760 0.278 0.1169 60.66 2 BPI Ag 519 Darabanki Palharn Deshraj 771 0.465 0.144 30.93 1 DPL Ag 520 Barabanki Palhan Khame 778 0.647 0.230 35.59 2 BPI A 521 Barabanki Palharn Md.lsshad 7819 0.257 0.085 33.06 2 OPL Ag 522 Barabanki Palhari Rajesh Kurrar 791 0.130 0.014 10.85 2 SC DPI Shop 523 Barabanki Palhan BanshiLIa! 722 0.030 0.002 5.33 2 Ag 524 Barabanki Palharn Sitaram 435 0.062 0.000 0.52 2 Ag 525 Barabanki Chandwara Sahyaz Hussain 773 0.608 0.211 34.74 2 DPL Ag 526 Barabanki Chandwara Ravi Kuffwa 763 0.064 0.064 100.00 3 Ag 527 Barabanki Chandwara Mewalal 792 0.160 0.154 96.00 2 SC DPL Ag 528 Barabanki rChandwara Buttan 798 0.128 0.078 61.25 2 SC DPI Bussirness 529 Barabanki Di:auna Ram Sanjeevan 707 0.319 0.014 4.36 2 530 Barabanki Dilauna Bhikar, Lai 706 0.207 0.127 61.53 2 Ag 531 Barabanki Dilauna Ram Achal 696 0.758 0.048 6.35 2 DPI Ag 532 Barabanki Dilauna Smit. Nirnula 22 2.275 0.251 11.03 2 WHH Bussarness 533 Barabanki Dilauna Raffdhan 698 0.025 0.017 67.20 1 DPI Govt.Service 534 Barabanki Dilauna Om Prakash 654 0.735 0.025 3.35 1 A 535 Barabanki Dilauna Sakhan 653 0.215 0.141 65.64 2 I ~ ~~~~~536 Barabanki Dilauna Santram 677 0.745 0.057 7.65 2 537 Barabanki Dilauna Bansraj 695 0.146 0.105 71.67 2 Ag 538 Barabanki Dnlauna Ram Sanehi 659 0.222 0.013 5.98 2 Ag 539 Barabanki Dilauna Ram Singh 658 0.101 0.013 13.15 2 SC Ag 540 Barabanki Dilauna Shiv Kailash 705 0.087 0.052 60.32 2 Ag I 6~~~~~41 Darabanki Dilauna Ramanand 710 0.183 0.141 77.11 1 WHH Ag 542 Barabanki Dilauna Rajender Prasad 702 0.074 0.052 70.27 4 Ag 543 Barabanki Dilauna Kedar Nath 699 0.058 0.040 69.79 2 Ag 544 Barabanki Dilauna Abadhesh Kuffur 701 0.045 0.030 66.13 2 Ag 545 Barabanki Dilauna Omk*ar Narayan 704 0.078 0.048 61.54 3 Ag 546 Barabanki Dilauna Pawan Kumar 693 0.267 0.022 8.33 2 Shop 547 Barabanki Bhendua Ram Abhilash l8 0.043 0.002 5.68 2 DPI Ag Brahmanan 548 Barabanki Bhendua Ram Abhilash 18 0.D43 0.002 5.58 4 Ag I D~~~~~~~~rahmanan21 027 005 2.9 2DIA 549 Barabanki Bhendua Giridhani2 .2 .65 2.9 2BLA Brahnianan 550 Barabanki Bhendua Indra Prasad 17 1.668 0.579 34.73 2 DPI Ag Brahffunan 551 Barabanl, Bhendua Ram Dulhari 29 0.190 0.086 45.47 5 552 DaraBan a hendanan aan 8 .66 011 31 552 Barbank rahrendan Rdaai12 069 .6 31 553 Barabanki Bhendua Deshideen 4 0.325 0.253 77.93 1 I D~~~~~~~~rahnuanan 554 Barabanki Bhendua Bhikharn 24 1.406 0.823 58.50 2 DPI Ag Brahnuanan 555 Darabanki Baghaura It. Chootel 148 0.228 0.069 30.18 2 SC DPI Ag 5.56 Barabanki Baghaura Rafficharan 794 2.730 0.254 9.30 2 SC I ~ ~~~~557 Barabanki Baghaura Parayi 80 0.130 0.103 78.85 2 SC DPI Ag 558 Barabanki Daghaura Bihari 87 0.520 0.042 8.10 2 SC DPI Ag 559 Barabanki Baghaura Shahanavaj 546 0.630 0.006 0.97 5 S 560 Barabanki Baghaura Rarwroop 247 3.900 0.251 6.44 2 DPI Bussiness 561 Barabanki Baghaura Medhilal 231 0.104 0.054 51.92 2 SC DPI Ag 562 Barabanki Baghaura Ranum 247 0.780 0.032 4.10 4 SC DPI Ag 563 Barabanki Baghaura Ayodhya Prasad 236 0.780 0.042 5.40 2 SC DPI Disable Ag 564 Barabanki Baghaura Ratan 87 0.076 0.064 64.21 2 SC DPI Ag 565 Barabanki Baghaura Rarurmisnj 668 0.520 0.025 4.61 2 SC DPI Ag 566 Barabanki Baghaura Ram Sankar 26 0.255 0.024 9.41 2 SC DPI Ag 567 Barabanki Baghaura Ratan 87 0.485 0.322 66.31 2 SC DPI Ag 568 Barabanki Baghaura It. Shri Keshan Sh.c 968 2.340 0.021 0.91 2 Ag 589 Darabanki Baghaura Rarreshvar 596 0.334 0.051 15.33 2 SC Ag 570 Barabanki Baghaura Tulsiram 706 1.339 0.025 1.87 3 SC Ag 571 Barabanki Baghaura Dukhaharan 715 0.780 0.045 5.77 1 SC DPI Ag 572 aarabanki Baghaura Santiram 550 0.780 0.025 3.21 I SC DPI Ag 573 Darabanki Baghaura Chamela 592 1.040 0.025 2.40 1 SC DPI Ag 574 Barabanki Baghaura Rajaram 709 1.170 0.025 2.17 2 SC DPI Ag 55 Darabanki Baghaura Munawra 703 0.489 0.086 17.67 2 SC BPI Ag 3 ~~~~~576 Darabanki Baghaura Dhabhutr 555 0.285 0.018 6.46 2 SC Ag 577 Barabanki Baghaura Puttilal 116 1.300 0.056 4.31 2 SC DPI Dussmess 578 Barabank, Baghaura Ram Gulam 652 0.334 0.051 15.33 3 SC DPI Ag 579 Barabanki Bghaura Asharam663 1.560 0.253 16.22 2 SC DPI Ag Annexure 1.1 S. No. istric Villae Narmof Ownr Sh.cGata Area Area to be No. of S. No. District Village Name o Owner Sh~ N.c Owned Acquired % Faiy SC BPL WNH Disable Occupation I No.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(a (Hia) Fm 580 Barabanki Baghaura Munnulal 705 0.362 0.075 20.83 2 SC BPL Ag 581 Barabanki Baghaura Salikram 699 0.182 0.051 28.13 6 SC BPL Ag 582 Barabanki Baghaura Shiv Prasad am 1.1540 0.025 2.44 2 SC BPL Ag 583 Barabanki Baghaura Li Sukai 944 0.780 0.002 0.31 2 SC BPL Bussiness I ~ ~~~~~584 Barabanki Baghaura Meherbasa 546 0.254 0.214 84.25 58 aaak ahus Sr eha .2 .0 s C SIA 588 Barabanki Baghaura Ajimulia 263 0.379 0.075 19.67 3 Ag 587 Barabanki Baghaura Ram Charan 706 0.066 0.027 41.21 2 SC BPL Ag 588 Barabanki Baghaura Snit. Bikko Khatun 100 0.089 0.010 10.79 2 WHH Ag 590 Barabanki Baghaura Kesavram 247 0.780 0.231 29.62 2 SC BPL Ag 5891 Barabanki Baghaura Pumitrlal 233 10.22 0.014 6.37 32 S BPL Ag 53Barabanki Baghaura Nanhaku 664 1.031 0.054 5.28 2 SC Ag 594 Barabanki Baghaura Babulal 152 0.390 0.095 24.36 2 SC BPL Ag 595 Barabanki Baghaura Choti 253 0.723 0.122 16.82 3 SC BPL Buassiess 596 Barabanki Baghaura Asarfee 21 0.260 0.008 3.08 2 SC BPL Ag 597 Barabanki Baghaura Barsati 87 0.182 0.002 1.15 2 SC BPL Bussirness 598 Barabanki Baghaura Snit. Bindeswan Devi 1116 0.325 0.054 16.65 2 BPL WHHt Ag 599 Barabanki Pratapganj Suki Ram 212 0.177 0.134 75.93 2 BPI. Ag 600 Barabanki Pratapganj Shahid Musir 378 0.089 0.050 55.73 2 Ag 601 Barabanki Pratapganj Laiiu 238 0.089 0.0548 53.93 2 SC BPL PYtService 602 Barabanki Pratapganj Puma Masi 237 1.300 0.243 18.69 4 BPL Barber 603 Barabanki Pratapganj LaxrTun 268 0.063 0.0500 0.76 2 SC BPL Ag 604 Barabanki Pratapganj Li Raghura Devi 166 0.049 0.018 36.24 2 605 Barabanki Pratapganj Hansraj 232 0.044 0.044 100.00 2 Ag 606 Barabanki Pratapganj Satya Narayan 248 1.430 0.580 40.56 2 BPL Bussiness 607 Barabanki Prataipganj Ram Sevak 241 0.455 0.011 2.46 2 SC BPL Barber 608 Barabanki Pratapganj Surendra Singh . 376 0.397 0.158 39.90 2 Bussir~ess 609 Barabanki Pratapganj Asharam 375 0.177 0.134 75.93 2 Busirsess 610 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Maikulal 762 0.164 0.102 62.05 2 BPL Ag 611 Barabanki Hathoundha Ram Kuffur 961 0.367 0.135 36.80 6 Ag 612 Barabanki Hathoundha Santosh 978 0.060 0.060 100.00 2 BPL Ag 613 Barabanki Hathoundha Lt. Shivrani 963 0.275 0.042 15.13 2 BPL WHH Ag 614 Barabanki Hathoundha Ram Kumar 976 0.028 0.028 100.00 3 BPL GovtService 615 Barabanki Hathoundha Uffashankar 953 0.114 0.016 13.61 2 BPL Ag 616 Barabanki Hathoundha Shivraj 975 0.039 0.039 100.00 3 Ag 61 7 Barabanki Hathoundha Suresh 973 0.046 0.046 100.00 3 BPL Ag 618 Barabanki Haihoundha Chootelal 979 0.053 0.053 100.00 2 BPL Ag 619 Barabanki Hathoundha Chandra Prakash 964 0.114 0.005 4.49 2 BPL PvtService 620 Barabanki Hathoundha Raj Kishor 972 0.044 0.037 84.00 2 BPL Ag 621 Barabanki Hathoundha SI. Shital 980 0.017 0.017 100.00 3 Ag 622 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Ram Kaia 721 1.479 0.108 7.30 2 BPL WHH Ag 623 Barabanki Bhawanoyapur Rajiteram 720 0.325 0.027 8.27 2 SC BPL Ag 624 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Prasad 756 0.048 0.044 92.33 2 625 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Rarra Vati 718 0.806 0.254 31.51 2 SC BPL WHH Ag 626 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Bhagawat Prasad 718 0.068 0.004 5.18 2 627 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Ram Deen 788 0.076 0.064 83.58 2 SC Ag 628 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Shakoona 749 0.546 0.069 12.60 2 BPL. WHH Ag 629 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Phoolwasi 760 0.202 0.002 0.87 2 SC BPL WHH Ag 630 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur it Siyaram 741 0.165 0.039 23.37 3 Ag 631 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur it LaIu 761 0.146 0.043 29.48 2 SC BPL Ag I 3 Brbak Baanypu hada rkah73 .66 0.3 1.4633 Barabanki Bhawaniyapur Kalawati 742 0.237 0.042 17.55 2 BPL WHH Ag 634 Barabanki Barail Ram Chander 778 0.061 0.072 89.28 2 Ag 635 Barabanki Barail Bipati 77 0.066 0.009 13.82 2 Ag 636 Barabanki Barail Santosh 788 0.472 0.008 1.59 3 SC BPL WHH Disable Ag 637 Barabank: Barail Guru Prasad 792 1.040 0.037 3.51 2 BPL Ag 638 Barabanki Barail Ganga Ram 1431 0.341 0.001 0.19 2 SC BPi Poultry 639 Barabanki Barail Shyam 779 0.166 0.056 34.02 5 Disable Ag 840 Barabanki Barail Suraj 784 0.078 0.015 19.49 - 2 BPL WHH Ag 641 Barabanki Barail Medilal 785 0.078 0.015 19.49 2 SC BPL Ag 842 Barabanki Barail Sharrtal 1371 0.478 0.108 22.59 2 BPL Ag 643 Barabanki Barail Ayasha Khatun 1338 0.200 0.123 61.52 2 644 Barabankl Barail Sukai 1431 0.341 0.001 0.19 2 Ag 645 Barabanki Barsail Bidyawati 1062 0.308 0.114 37.04 2 Ag 646 Barabanki Barail Absentee 1060 I 648 Barabanki Bara Ra HiregLa 10364 0.096 0.1021 28.00 2 A 684 Barabanki Barail Hre al ig 10394 0.295 0.010 35.25 A 649 Brabaki Brati Shiv Shankar